组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:29 题号:12592122

Wang Ling, a middle school girl, felt angry with her parents after getting a boy’s phone call. “A classmate called me to discuss homework. We talked for just a few minutes before my parents got mad,” said the girl. “They asked whether I liked the boy. I’m sad I didn’t, but they wouldn’t believe me.”   

Wang’s trouble is not strange at all because puppy love becomes a big headache for both parents and schools. They worry that puppy love will be bad for their study. Her school makes it a rule not to allow any talk or any physical contact between one boy and one girl alone.   

Many students say they understand why parents and teachers are so nervous about puppy love. But some think they are going too far. “We have our own thoughts and we know what to do with it.” said Wang Ling.   

Another girl, Jiang Ting, liked making friends with boys. “Boys and girls can learn from each other,” she said. “My mother asks me to study hard. However, she never stops me from making friends with boys.” Once Jiang Ting told her mother she might fall in love with a boy. Her mother let Jiang make her own decision. Soon Jiang found that she didn’t like him any more because the boy was not as good as what she had thought before. And she did worse and worse in her subjects because she spent much on it. At last she understood the worry from school and most parents about puppy love.

1. What’s the right meaning of the underlined word “physical contact” in the second paragraph?
A.物理联系B.相互接触C.身体接触D.独自相处
2. What can we learn from the article?
A.Wang Ling told her mother she might fall in love with a boy.
B.Jiang’s mother doesn’t care about her at all.
C.Puppy love will be bad for student’s study.
D.Puppy love becomes a problem for all students.
3. From the last paragraph, we know ________.
A.Jiang doesn’t like making friends with students.
B.Jiang can’t make a decision for herself
C.Jiang worked hard and she did not bad in her subjects.
D.Jiang understood her parents’worry at last

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】You are being stalked ( 跟踪)everywhere you go. In your car. On your morning walk. Even in your own home - by your own TV.

TVs have joined the ranks of websites, apps, and credit cards in the profitable business of sharing your information. Americans spend an average of three and a half hours in front of a TV each day, according to eMarketer. But that history is a window to your interests, joys, and embarrassments. And marketers are collecting it because, legally speaking, we gave our permission when we set up our Internet-connected smart TVs.

The TV makers sell this information to data brokers (中间人),who in turn sell it to advertisers and media companies, who are now able to link up what you watch with what you do on your phone, tablet, and laptop — even with what you buy in stores. Marketers can then retarget ads you see on TV to your computer and phone. They can measure how many people bought their product after seeing their ads.

I ran an experiment on my own Samsung TV as well as new models from Samsung, TCL Roku TV,   Vizio, and LG. I set up each as most people do: by tapping “OK” with the remote control to each on-screen prompt (提示).Then, using special software from Princeton University, 1 watched how each model sent data. What I found is that some TVs record and send out everything on your screen. It's not always "you" they're after, but your behaviors help create aggregated (整体统计的)statistical models of people who act or watch TV the way you do. Still, you might find it upsetting. When 1 set up my TV, I didn't realize I could say no to any of this. You can change your settings after the fact, if you're prepared to hunt around in out-of-the-way menus, such as “Terms and Policies.”   But it may be worth the hunt.

1. How do the TV makers collect customers' information?
A.By recording watching history.
B.By linking up their phone with TV.
C.By setting up the Internet-connected TV.
D.By monitoring their sensitive financial data.
2. Who will most likely be the buyer of personal information?
A.Banks.B.Websites.C.Media companies.D.Data brokers.
3. What can be inferred from the author's experiment?
A.We can choose a different menu to set up TV.
B.TV makers record and give away our way of life.
C.We can change the settings to protect our information.
D.We should agree with the TV settings without hesitation.
4. Which of the following is the best title for the text?
A.Is Your TV Safe Enough to Watch?
B.Legal but Disturbing Deals
C.How to Keep Our Information Secret?
D.Information War between Companies
2021-05-21更新 | 41次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇新闻报道。文章介绍了为了避免感染病毒的风险,中国政府和传染病专家呼吁人们使用公筷。

【推荐2】Most Chinese diners pick up food from communal platters (公盘) with the same pair of chopsticks that they then use to eat, or serve others. Double dipping is the norm. But the government hopes to change habits by urging people to use a second pair of chopsticks—just for serving.

State news agencies are calling it a “dining table revolution.” Dr. Zhong Nanshan and Dr. Zhang Wenhong, outspoken infectious disease experts who have become celebrities since the outbreak of the COVID-19,have voiced their support. The authorities across the country are running advertisements with slogans like: “The distance between you and civilized dining is just one pair of serving chopsticks.”

Some restaurants and diners have followed the call. They are offering discounts to diners who use serving chopsticks. In the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou, more than 100 outstanding restaurants have formed a “Serving Chopsticks Alliance.”

Still, resistance is strong. Many see sharing food with one’s own chopsticks as among the most genuine expressions of China’s communal culture and emphasis on family, no less essential than hugging is to Americans or the cheek kiss is to the French. Serving chopsticks are typically associated with formal settings, like feasts and meals with strangers.

By contrast, wheat-eating northerners, and particularly the men, take pride in what Chinese call “eating big and drinking big,” without caring about such small concerns as germs and bacteria. Never mind a small, recent experiment by government experts who found that the level of bacteria in dishes for which serving chopsticks were used was as little as 0.4 percent the level of dishes shared in the regular fashion.

1. What does the underlined sentence “Double dipping is the norm.” mean in paragraph 1?
A.Normally, people use reusable chopsticks in a meal.
B.It’s common to use two pairs of chopsticks in a meal.
C.It’s a common practice to share food with one’s own chopsticks.
D.People will dip their chopsticks in soup twice before serving others.
2. The author mentioned Dr. Zhong Nanshan and Dr. Zhang Wenhong in paragraph 2 to     .
A.introduce the topicB.show their popularity
C.draw readers’ attentionD.strengthen the persuasion of the call
3. Which of the following statements is NOT true according to the passage?
A.People should use serving chopsticks whenever dining.
B.It’s civilized to use serving chopsticks when dining out.
C.Northern men especially mind using serving chopsticks.
D.Some restaurants encourage diners to use serving chopsticks with discounts.
2024-01-07更新 | 17次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,主要讲述了消费者倾向于购买环保产品,但很多公司往往进行虚假的环保宣传,尤其是时尚行业,这种“漂绿”行为容易误导消费者,所以消费者需要重新思考自己的购物行为,政府也开始采取措施保护消费者。

【推荐3】Going green is good for business. Consumers are often willing to pay more for eco-friendly products than other comparable products on the market, according to market research. But not all environmental claims are created equally. “Greenwashing” is a form of misinformation often used to fascinate an enthusiastic green consumer. Companies promising to be sustainable, or biodegradable sometimes fail to meet the promises they make to consumers.

Greenwashing is particularly common in the fashion industry, says Maxine Bédat, director of The New Standard Institute, a think tank(智库) focused on improving the industry’s environmental standards. Being sustainable is the latest trend and a way for the industry to attract consumers. “I think we’re at the top of green washing in the industry,” she says.”

Retailers(零售商) will mislead consumers by distracting them from a company’s larger issues. For example, a large retailer might roll out a new line of products, such as jeans, that uses less water and therefore theoretically has less of an environmental impact than the other clothes the company sells. “You think ‘Oh that sounds great,’” Bédat says. But that same company might ignore water usage in the rest of their products lines, while doing nothing to address the other ways that their production might be harming the environment.

When it comes to fashion, Bérdat says to rethink shopping habits. After all, buying a new sweater labeled “carbon neutral(碳中和)” still produces more carbon than wearing a sweater already in your closet. She notes, “The most sustainable thing you can do as a consumer is wear the things you have more.”

As more companies look to cash in on sustainable marketing, governments are beginning to take more action to safeguard consumers. In New York, The Fashion Act would require fashion companies operating in the state to obey the Paris Climate Agreement. A new law brought forth by members of the European Union would more strictly regulate environmental claims and sustainability labels slapped on products sold in Europe.

1. What is the purpose of greenwashing?
A.To advocate proper use of water.
B.To introduce green ways to wash clothes.
C.To reduce the impact on environment.
D.To appeal to those eco-friendly customers.
2. What does the example in paragraph 3 present?
A.A new trend in fashion.B.A new kind of product.
C.A trick of greenwashing.D.A large issue of a company.
3. What is Bérdat’s attitude towards greenwashing?
A.Doubtful.B.Indifferent.C.Disapproving.D.Tolerant.
4. Why did European Union put forward a new law?
A.To enhance the quality of products.
B.To shelter customers from greenwashing.
C.To raise people’s awareness of going green.
D.To encourage carbon-neutral product lines.
2023-11-12更新 | 88次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般