组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 科普与现代技术 > 科普知识
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:136 题号:4052442
As the population of the planet increases, so does the number of homes, businesses, parking lots, schools, airports and roadways. All these structures use electricity and need to be lighted. Humans demand these lights. They want their homes more comfortable and they want their streets safe. The problem is that researchers are finding that all the light is having a negative effect on humans and wildlife as well.
Less than 10 years ago I drove to a thinly populated section of my town, lay down in the middle of the road and watched an attractive meteor shower (流星雨). The area was short of homes, street lights and traffic. If I did that today, I wouldn't be able to see the meteor shower as well. Due to the increase in street lights, I would surely be run over by a car.
Nowadays scientists are finding light pollution can be almost as bad as carbon dioxide pollution. If you've ever taken a flight at night, the view is beautiful, but you must remember that all the light you see wastes electricity. The crew of the space shuttles see an even bigger picture of how extensive the wasted electricity is worldwide.
One of the saddest parts of light pollution is that most of it is unnecessary and most of the outdoor light that we use is wasted. One only needs to look at a row of street lights to see how much of the light shines upwards and lights the sky; a total waste of electricity.
Additionally, somewhere electricity needs to be produced, and the production of electricity creates pollution by releasing greenhouse gases. This affects the air we breathe and our quality of life.
Scientists are also studying the effects of light pollution on wildlife. Thousands of birds die each year when they crash into highly lighted buildings, as they become puzzled by the light. It has been long known that tiny baby sea turtles become lost and follow lights on the shore instead of heading towards the sea.
Fortunately, light pollution is one of the easiest sources of pollution that can be corrected without a negative effect. Following some guidelines and a little searching on Google can give you many ideas on how to reduce your contribution to light pollution.
1. It is implied in Paragraph 3 that the best way to deal with light pollution is ________.
A.reducing the output of the lights
B.avoiding the use of unnecessary lighting
C.educating people about light pollution
D.inventing environmentally- friendly lights
2. Which of the following is the effect of light pollution?
A.Many animals species have died out.
B.More traffic accidents happen every day.
C.The air we breathe may be polluted.
D.It is much easier for us to watch meteor showers.
3. What can be inferred from the text?
A.We are almost at a loss how to deal with light pollution.
B.Global warming results in light pollution in some way.
C.Astronauts can’t see clearly in space nowadays.
D.Some animals use natural light to direct their movements.
4. What will probably be provided following the last paragraph?
A.Helpful tips for surfing the Internet.
B.approaches to decreasing light pollution.
C.Benefits of searching on Google.
D.More bad effects of light pollution.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约290词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。本文主要介绍了一项新的研究发现,大脑更大的鸟类能更好地应对气候变化。

【推荐1】Many birds have shrunk in size as the temperatures have increased during the past 40 years. And the reduction in body size is so common that scientists have suggested it may be a universal response to warming conditions.

However, a new study, published in Ecology Letters, indicates that not all birds are equally affected when it comes to reductions in body size. Birds with bigger brains relative to body size have not shrunk as much as those with smaller brains.

Study lead author Justin Baldwin said, “As temperatures warm, body sizes are shrinking. But larger-brained species are shrinking less strongly than small-brained species.”

The researchers analyzed information on some 70,000 birds that died when they collided (碰撞) with buildings in Chicago between 1978 and 2016. They found that birds with very big brains relative to body size have shown only about one-third of the reduction in body size.

“Relative brain size is related to increased learning ability, increased memory, longer lifespans and more stable population dynamics,” said Baldwin. “In this case, a bigger-brained species of bird might be able to reduce the influence of climate change by seeking out habitats with cooler temperatures, for example.”

“One of the first things that jump out to me from these findings is that we can already see that climate change is having a much stronger effect on species that have poorer ability to deal with environmental change through their behavior.” said Professor Botero at Washington University.

North America has lost nearly one-third of its birdlife in the last half-century. The findings of this recent study, therefore, are very important to bird management and protection.

1. What does the underlined word “shrunk” mean in Paragraph 1?
A.Increased.B.Indicated.C.Decreased.D.Affected.
2. Which statement does Justin Baldwin agree with?
A.Climate change has the same effect on birds in different brain sizes.
B.All birds are not equally affected when it comes to reductions in body size.
C.Birds with small brains are shrinking less strongly than ones with large ones.
D.Relative brain size is only connected with enhanced learned ability and memory.
3. What are the findings of the recent study vital for?
A.Finding cooler habitats.
B.Conserving and saving birds.
C.Reducing the impact of climate change.
D.Ensuring more stable population dynamics.
4. What is the passage mainly about?
A.Climate change makes birds fewer.
B.Brain size increases make lifespans longer.
C.Humans can protect birds better in the future.
D.Big brains help birds cope with climate change better.
2022-07-08更新 | 56次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要讲述研究表明真正的快乐在于有回报的关系,而不是物质财富。

【推荐2】True happiness lies in rewarding relationships, not material wealth, according to new research. Scientists have said that a close circle of friends and family is most important for happiness, and that owning things such as iPhones, computers, being wealthy and owning a sports car do not provide the same level of satisfaction.

The study was done by psychologists at the Sahlgrenska Academy and Lund University, in Sweden. The experts analyzed articles in Swedish newspapers published in 2016 and recorded which words most often occurred in the same articles as the Swedish word for happiness. In this way, they could know our common happiness.

Co-author Dr Danilo Garcia, a researcher at the Sahlgrenska Academy’s Center for Ethics, Law and Mental Health, said, “It’s relationships that are most important, not material things that we possess, and this is in line with other findings in happiness research.”

The study, which contained more than 1.5 million words, showed that terms such as “grandmother” and personal pronouns such as “you”, “me”, “us” and “them” often emerge in the same article as the Swedish word for happiness. Researchers found that words such as “iPhone”, “millions” and “Google” almost never appear with the word “happiness”.

The study is a part of a larger research project on how people describe both positive and negative events in their lives. The researchers believe that the word analysis reflects a common perception among the members of our society as to what should make us happy.

Dr Danilo Garcia said, “Just as the Beatles sang, most people understand that money can’t buy you happiness or love. But even if we can understand the importance of close and warm relationships at a social level, it isn’t certain that everyone is aware that such relationships are actually necessary for our own personal happiness.”

1. New research mainly shows that ________.
A.various things can lead to happiness in people
B.having some close friends is very important to us
C.owning expensive things can actually make us happy
D.rewarding relationships make us happy instead of material wealth
2. How did the experts arrive at their findings?
A.By doing surveys.
B.By doing experiments.
C.By analyzing printed articles.
D.By referring to previous studies.
3. What Dr Danilo Garcia in Paragraph 3 shows that the new findings ________.
A.explain something new
B.are unbelievable to many people
C.prove material things are unimportant
D.confirm previous findings in happiness research
4. What does the underlined word “emerge” in Paragraph 4 mean?
A.Appear.B.Spread.C.Start.D.Unite.
5. Dr Danilo Garcia doubts whether ________.
A.money really buys us happiness or love
B.rewarding relationships really lead to personal happiness
C.close and warm relationships are important at a social level
D.all people know rewarding relationships lead to personal happiness
2022-04-22更新 | 159次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】Scientists say we are all born with a knack for mathematics. Every time we scan the cafeteria for a table that will fit all of our friends, we’re exercising the ancient estimation center in our brain.

Stanislas Dehaene was the first researcher to show that this part of the brain exists. In 1989, he met Mr. N who had suffered a serious brain injury. Mr. N couldn’t recognize the number 5, or add 2 and 2. But he still knew that there are “about 50 minutes” in an hour. Dehaene drew an important conclusion from his case: there must be two separate mathematical areas in our brains. One area is responsible for the math we learn in school, and the other judges approximate amounts.

So what does the brain’s estimation center do for us? Harvard University researcher Elizabeth Spelke has spent a lot of time posing math problems to preschoolers. When he asks 5-year-olds to solve a problem like 21+30, they can’t do it. But he has also asked them questions such as, “Sarah has 21 candles and gets 30 more. John has 34 candles. Who has more candles?” It turns out preschoolers are great at solving questions like that. Before they’ve learned how to do math with numerals and symbols, their brains’ approximation centers are already hard at work.

After we learn symbolic math, do we still have any use for our inborn math sense? Justin Halberda at Johns Hopkins University gave us an answer in his study. He challenged a group of 14-year-olds with an approximation test: The kids stared at a computer screen and saw groups of yellow and blue dots flash by, too quickly to count. Then they had to say whether there had been more blue dots or yellow dots. The researchers found that most were able to answer correctly when there were 25 yellow dots and 10 blue ones. When the groups were closer in size, 11 yellow dots and 10 blue ones, fewer kids answered correctly.

The big surprise in this study came when the researcher compared the kids’ approximation test scores to their scores on standardized math tests. He found that kids who did better on the flashing dot test had better standardized test scores, and vice versa (反之亦然). It seems that, far from being irrelevant, your math sense might predict your ability at formal math.

1. From the first two studies, we can learn that estimation center ________.
A.is divided into two separate mathematical areas
B.can help figure out numerals and symbols problems
C.functions independently in both kids’ and adults’ brains
D.works better when symbolic parts are injured or undergrown
2. What most surprised Justin in the study of 14-year-olds?
A.The variety of math abilities in different students.
B.The link between technology skills and estimation skills.
C.The difficulty of the task as the number of dots increased.
D.The connection between estimation skills and formal math ability.
3. What could be the best title for the passage?
A.Born with a Sense of Math
B.Go beyond What You Can Learn
C.Symbolic Math and Estimation Math
D.Our Brain一a Born Mathematician
2018-05-27更新 | 355次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般