Art and science may seem like opposite things. One means the creative flow of ideas, and the other means cold, hard data-some people believe. In fact, the two have much in common. Now, a study finds art can help students remember better what they have learned in the science class.
Mariale Hardiman, an education specialist at Johns Hopkins University, noticed that students who used art in the classroom listened more carefully. They might ask more questions. They might volunteer more ideas. What’s more, students seemed to remember more of what they had been taught when their science lessons had involved(涉及) art. To prove that, Hardiman teamed up with some researchers and six local schools.
In the experiment, the researchers worked with teachers in 16 fifth-grade classrooms. They provided traditional science lessons and art-focused ones. In a traditional science class, for example, students might read aloud from a book. In the art-focused one, they might sing the information instead.
The team randomly assigned(随机分配) each of the 350 students to either a traditional science classroom or an art-focused one. Students then learned science using that way for the whole unit-about three weeks. When they changed to a new topic, they also changed to the other type of class. This way, each student had both an art-focused class and a traditional one. Every unit was taught in both ways, to different groups of students. This enabled the researchers to see how students did in both types of classes.
The team found that students who started off in a traditional class performed better after they moved into an art-focused class. But those who started off in an art-focused class did well even when they went back to a traditional science class. These students appeared to use some of the art techniques(技巧) after going back to a traditional class. Classroom teachers reported that many students continued to sing the songs that they learned after finishing the unit. “The more we hear something, the more we retain it,” Hardiman says. “It suggests that the arts may help students apply creative ways of learning on their own.”
1. Why did Mariale Hardiman do the study?A.To prove the importance of art at school. |
B.To see if art might improve science learning |
C.To find a way to help her students learn better. |
D.To know how to encourage students to ask questions. |
A.Take two types of classes. | B.Learn three units in total. |
C.Learn two topics for three weeks. | D.Choose what they’d like to learn. |
A.Finish. | B.Express. | C.Improve. | D.Memorize. |
A.Art helps students develop creativity. |
B.Art-focused classes interest students a lot. |
C.Art can make science easier to remember. |
D.Art has something in common with science. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Two years ago, I decided to study at the University of St. Edwards in the city of Austin, Texas. When I was on my research to find the perfect place to study in, I considered many aspects: a safe place, a city where there were companies devoted to marketing or technology, a place where speaking Spanish and English was an advantage and a school where I could learn about digital strategies (数字策略). After comparing and evaluating many cities and universities. I finally decided on Austin.
Since I arrived in Austin, Texas. I had been living inside the university where I had a private room and shared common areas with more students. University life was not very different from the life in Mexico and classes were semblable and the way of socializing too. However, in the United States, the classes were more practical and teachers encouraged you to be self-responsible and complete your tasks.
The classes that I was taking were related to social media, digital marketing and advertising. I was very excited to be able to study technology-related courses.
What I liked most about the experience was being able to live with students from many places, which allowed me to learn from other cultures and to share mine with other students. Also, international student services usually organized events and tours that helped me to get to know the city and the school.
I certainly think that studying abroad is a beneficial experience. It makes us capable of understanding cultural differences and accepting diversity. Personally, I would suggest that you first determine what your goals are by going abroad, research the opportunities and lifestyle, evaluate your universities, and finally decide on the one where you feel more comfortable, connecting with your values and way of seeing life.
1. Which of the following can best describe the author according to paragraph 1?A.Casual. | B.Cautious. | C.Changeable. | D.Adventurous. |
A.Worthwhile. | B.Practical. | C.Same. | D.Similar. |
A.Speaking Spanish and English in Austin, Texas. |
B.Working as a designer in a technology company. |
C.Having a chance to learn about different cultures. |
D.Organizing many events and tours independently. |
A.Be careful to choose the university to study in. |
B.Set no limits on their academic performances. |
C.Study where they're familiar with everything. |
D.Adjust personal lifestyles for the university. |
【推荐2】A typical school day in the UK starts around 8:30 am. This is often even earlier elsewhere in the world, with students siting down to their first lesson at 7:30 am in the US. The average teenager ideally needs eight to nine hours’ sleep each night, but in reality a lot of teenagers struggle to get this much. A lot of the problems happen because our sleep patterns are not fixed, and they change as we grow.
So a later school start time(推迟到校时间)could help to solve this problem, by ensuring to get their eight plus hours of sleep and react properly to their body's natural rhythms(规律). There has been a general change over the past 25 years to shorten the school day, This is not at the cost of teaching time (which has remained constant) but at the cost of natural breaks, which has led to reduced lunch time and lesson breaks.
Later start times could help teens’ grades and health. This is mainly because it makes the management of children easier. Managing hundreds of children “playing” requires effective staffing(人员配备). And there is always the fear that behavior worsens during breaks. So the theory goes that having them in class and strictly managed must be better.
But this means that students barely have enough time to absorb what they were doing in maths before suddenly they are forced to study ancient history. And teaching staff also move through from one class to another, with hardly a rest or time to refocus.
Clearly rethinking the school day could benefit everyone included. Anyway, it could also lead to better achievement in teenagers and less of a struggle for parents in the mornings. For teachers, it could also mean a less stressful day all around and what could be better than that?
1. At what time do the students start their first lesson in the US?A.7:00 | B.7:30 |
C.8:00 | D.8:30 |
A.They reduce children’s lunch time and lesson breaks. |
B.They reduce the teaching time. |
C.They properly adjust children’ natural rhythms. |
D.They increase more holidays. |
A.To manage children more easily. |
B.To make children quickly take in what they learned. |
C.To reduce children’s excitement. |
D.To make children behave better in class. |
A.It will add to the teacher’s pressure. |
B.It has always been there for 25 years. |
C.Parents may support it. |
D.It benefits the students only. |
A.The benefits of a less stressful day. |
B.The benefits of later school start time. |
C.How to solve teenagers’ sleep problem. |
D.The reasons why teenagers sleep differently. |
【推荐3】Think back to when you were in a classroom, and the teacher set a difficult problem. Which of the two following answers is closer to the way you reacted?
A: Oh no, this is too hard for me. I’m not even going to seriously try.
B: Ah, this is quite difficult but I like to push myself. Even if I don’t get the answer right, maybe I’ll learn something in the attempt.
The psychologist Carol Dweck of Stanford University gave a group of children problems that were slightly too hard. One group reacted positively, said they loved challenge and understood that their abilities could be developed. She says they had a “growth mindset”. But another group felt that their intelligence was being judged and they had failed. They had a “fixed mindset” and were unable to imagine improving.
Professor Dweck believes that, for years, children have been praised for their intelligence or talent, but this makes them sensitive to failure. They want to please by getting high grades, without interest in learning. The solution is to praise the process that children are engaged in: making an effort, using learning methods and improving. This way they will become better and achieve more.
Psychologists have been testing these theories. Students were taught that if they left their comfort zone and learned something new and difficult, they will be more intelligent. These students made faster progress than a control group. In another study, unsuccessful school children were using growth mindset techniques for a year. The results were astonishing. They came top in a regional test, beating children from much more advanced background. These children had previously felt that making an effort was a sign of being stupid, but they came to see it as the key to learning.
So, back to our original question. If you answered B, well done — you already have a growth mindset. If A, don’t worry; everyone is capable of becoming better with a little effort and self-awareness.
1. What makes the students with fixed mindset fail?A.Lacking imagination. | B.Negative attitudes. |
C.Poor judgment. | D.Low intelligence. |
A.Making an effort. | B.The regional test. |
C.The background. | D.The comfort zone. |
A.To give an example. | B.To teach how to react. |
C.To draw a conclusion. | D.To introduce the topic. |
A.Talent. | B.High grades. | C.Hard-working. | D.Achievement. |
【推荐1】There’s no single known cause for autism (自闭症), but researchers now point the finger at higher lithium (锂) levels in drinking water. Their new study found that pregnant women in Denmark whose household tap water had higher levels of lithium were more likely to have kids with autism, compared to pregnant women living in areas where tap water had lower levels of this element.
“Maternal prenatal (妊娠期) exposure to lithium from naturally occurring drinking water sources in Denmark was associated with an increased autism spectrum disorder risk in the offspring,” said study author Dr. Beate Ritz, a professor of neurology. “This suggests a potential fetal neurotoxicity (神经毒性) of lithium exposure from drinking water that needs to be further investigated.”
For this latest study, researchers analyzed lithium levels from about half of the country’s water supply. When the investigators compared children with autism to those without this developmental disorder, they found that when lithium levels increased, so did the risk of autism.
Kids born to moms who lived in areas with the highest lithium levels in the water were 46% more likely to be diagnosed with autism than those born in areas with the lowest amount of lithium in drinking water, the study showed. Lithium levels increased the risk for all types of autism in this study.
Lithium leaches into drinking water from soil and rocks, but these levels could rise in the future from waste in lithium batteries. While more research is needed to confirm this association, Ritz suggested using filtered water and testing it for lithium levels while pregnant. Bottled water isn’t necessarily the answer. “A lot of bottled water is not tested either,” she said. “Some bottled water is just filled up from regular drinking water sources.”
Dr. Max Wiznitzer, director of the Rainbow Autism Center, urged caution before jumping to conclusions, though. “It’s an interesting association, but causation is definitely not proven,” Wiznitzer told CNN. “We have to see if there’s a workable and biologically plausible (似乎合理的) mechanism by which a small amount of lithium in the water supply can somehow do this, yet pharmacologic (药理学) dosing of lithium in women with bipolar disorder has not been reported to be causing increased risk of ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder).”
1. What might cause women in Denmark to have kids with autism?A.Lower levels of lithium in tap water. | B.Higher lithium levels in drinking water. |
C.Maternal prenatal exposure to neurotoxicity. | D.Naturally occurring drinking water sources. |
A.The risk of autism declined with lithium levels increasing. |
B.Lithium in drinking water mainly came from lithium batteries. |
C.Kids were 46% more likely to be diagnosed with autism than moms. |
D.Bottled water could not be always safely used for its lack of filtering and testing. |
A.Favourable. | B.Shocked. | C.Cautious. | D.Indifferent. |
A.Lithium in Water Supply Linked to Uptick in Autism Risk |
B.Lithium in Drinking Water Did Harm to Mental Health |
C.Lithium in Drinking Water Decreased the Risk of ASD |
D.Lithium in Water Supply Linked to the Chance of Pregnancy |
【推荐2】All living things need energy to move and grow. Energy can come in many different forms.
Where do plants get their energy? They get their energy from the sun. Plants absorb sunlight with their leaves.
Plants are called producers because they produce their own food. Producers form the base of every food chain in an ecosystem. Plants are eaten by animals, which are eaten by larger animals. For example, a plant takes in energy from the sun and turns it into plant food.
The food humans eat provides us with energy. When we chew and digest food, a chemical reaction takes place.
A.The energy produced from this reaction fuels our bodies. |
B.Eater, that plant might be eaten by a rabbit, giving the rabbit energy. |
C.Notice how you feel when you eat whole foods like vegetables and fruits. |
D.Through this process, energy from the sun is moved from one living thing to another. |
E.They use the sun’s energy to change water and carbon dioxide into plant food and oxygen. |
F.The amount of energy we get from food depends on which nutrients are in the food we eat. |
G.For example, light energy, heat energy, and chemical energy are all different forms of energy. |
【推荐3】A study has found that when people burn extra calories by working out, the body starts to compensate by reducing the amount of energy spent on functions to stay alive, such as sleeping or digestion. About a quarter of the calories burnt during a workout are then budgeted for later on, meaning that overall the total number of calories burnt is less than expected. For overweight people, it is estimated that about half of calories burnt during periods of higher activity were later compensated for.
Researchers at the University of Roehampton found that the calories the body burns to keep ticking over decrease by 28 per cent during periods when daily exercise levels are consistently high. This means the more we exercise over the long-term, the less calories our bodies bum for the most rudimentary activities. The results show that only 54 per cent of the calories used by exercise or activity among people who have the highest body mass actually translated into calories burnt at the end of the day, due to their bodies reducing the energy spent on the most basic of functions. In contrast,70 percent of calories burnt during activity by those with the lowest body mass translated into more calories burnt at the end of the day.
Professor Lewis Halsey, of the department of life sciences, said: “Around the world, national guidelines tend to recommend a 500—600 calorie deficit through exercising and dieting to lose weight. However, they do not take into account the reduction of calories being burnt in the most basic of human functions as the body compensates for the calories burnt on the exercise as shown in our research, and the variation in this compensation between people with different levels of body fat.”
In this study they found no differences between men and women in the energy lost during activity. But since the research shows overweight people who exercise burn significantly fewer calories on day-to-day functions, there is a need for greater personalisation of exercise plans depending upon body mass.
1. Why are calories burnt by exercise less than expected according to the study?A.Time spent on exercise is limited. | B.Exercise levels are not high enough. |
C.People tend to overeat after exercise. | D.They are compensated for by the body. |
A.By analyzing causes. | B.By raising examples. |
C.By providing statistics. | D.By explaining concepts. |
A.They are worth recommending. | B.They are supposed to be revised. |
C.They neglect gender differences. | D.They take body mass into account. |
A.Overweight Exercisers Burn Fewer Calories | B.Ways to Keep Fit by Exercising and Dieting |
C.Sleeping and Digestion Function to Stay Alive | D.Personalized Exercise Plans on Losing Weight |
【推荐1】As you’re drafting your New Year’s resolutions, you may think that it takes 21 days of repeating an action for that action to become a habit. So, you set out to go to the gym for 21 days, thinking that by day 22 heading to the gym will feel automatic — maybe even fun.
However, that 21-day estimate isn’t true. A habit expert Wendy Wood found that this falsehood came from a self-help book in the 1960s and actually described how long it takes to get used to your new appearance after plastic surgery. It’s important to note that getting used to something is not the same thing as forming a habit, and perhaps the two concepts got confused along the way, giving rise to the term today.
To figure out how long it actually takes to form a habit, Phillippa Lally, and her team did a series of research.
They recruited 96 people and asked each person to choose one new habit and report each day on whether or not they did the behavior and how automatic the behavior felt. Some people chose simple habits like “drinking a bottle of water with lunch.” Others chose more difficult tasks like “running for 15 minutes before dinner.” At the end of 12 weeks, the researchers analyzed the data to determine how long it took each person to go from starting a new behavior to automatically doing it.
The study found that it takes more than 2 months before a new behavior becomes automatic — 66 days to be exact. And if you want to set your expectations appropriately, the truth is that it will probably take you anywhere from two months to eight months to build a new behavior into your life. Interestingly, the researchers also found that “missing one opportunity to perform the behavior did not affect the habit formation process.” That is to say, it doesn’t matter if you mess up every now and then. Building better habits is not an all-or-nothing process.
So, for those who wish to form certain habits, persistence is king. To form a good habit, we need to pay more energy and effort.
1. What does “21days” actually mean according to Wendy Wood?A.The time one drafts a book. |
B.The time one develops a new habit. |
C.The time one gets used to something. |
D.The time one recovers from a surgery. |
A.By doing questionnaires. | B.By tracking people’s behaviors. |
C.By making predictions. | D.By analyzing data of previous studies. |
A.Habits cannot be noticed easily. |
B.The amount of time a habit takes varies. |
C.One should perform a behavior constantly. |
D.It takes exactly 66 days to form a new habit. |
A.Habit — good or not? | B.Better habit, better life? |
C.21days to form a habit? | D.Hit or miss with habits? |
【推荐2】People like to celebrate when they move into a new home. Maybe it’ s the first flat someone has owned, a couple’ s first home since getting married or maybe a growing family has moved to a bigger house. For whatever reason, the home is new. It represents a change and an exciting new beginning, with walls to paint, rooms to decorate and neighbors to meet. And what better way to meet people than to throw a party?
Parties to celebrate moving into a new home are called “house-warming” or “flat-warming” parties. If you think about it, they are appropriate names because an empty house with no people or furniture in it is a cold shell of a place. A house full of people, on the other hand, often requires some open windows or air conditioning to keep from getting too hot.
So what are house-warming parties like? Usually, the hosts invite their new neighbors as well as their friends. They usually provide some food and drinks and guests usually bring house-warming gifts. The gift might be something for the house,like a plant, or something for the guests to share, like a bottle of wine. There may be a dress code or theme. For example, if it is a “Hat Party”, people will wear unusual or funny hats. This helps break the ice by making people laugh. This makes it easier to meet new people and creates a fun and cheerful atmosphere.
There’ s an old saying that home is where the heart is. When people throw a house-warming party,they’ re opening their hearts as well as their homes to the people around them. So if you’ re ever invited by new neighbors to a house-warming, go! Then invite them to your home another time. Your home might already be warm, but new friends are the surest way to warm your heart.
1. People hold a house-warming party to celebrate ______.A.finding a new job | B.having a new baby |
C.getting married | D.moving into a new home |
A.It’s the opposite of a house-cooling party. |
B.A house or flat with people in it seems to be lively. |
C.When people drink wine at these parties they get very warm. |
D.At these parties there is always a fire that people sit around to warm themselves. |
A.It means to get conversation flowing(流畅). |
B.It means to make a hole in the ice through which to fish. |
C.It means conversation is very difficult because people don’ t know each other. |
D.It means the atmosphere at a house-warming party is very cold and unfriendly. |
A.It can show your politeness to your neighbors. |
B.Everyone should have a house-warming. |
C.Making new friends will make you happy. |
D.Inviting them will warm up your cold house. |
【推荐3】Young trees don’t just grow; they develop a personality and learn more about their environment and how they should best behave in it. They also help each other out whenever there’s trouble.
Personality, just as among people, varies among trees. Some are anxious, some bold. On the author’s land, there are three oak trees growing close together. One of the oak trees always starts to shed its leaves two weeks earlier than the others. Since they all experience the same temperature, the same soil and the same length of day, such variables can’t be the explanation. So what’s happening?Well, this tree is simply more careful than the others. Whoever holds on to their leaves longer can do more photosynthesis(光合作用) and store more nutrients.However, the longer a tree keeps its leaves, the higher the risk of injury.
Not only do trees make their own decisions, they also learn from their mistakes. A tree, for example, keeping its leaves too long during one year will never make this mistake again. This leads to several other conclusions: trees must notice the temperature and the length of the day and be able to save their experiences somewhere. Obviously, trees don’t have brains,but it is thought that in the sensitive tips of their roots they keep track of information and experiences.
But trees aren’t only clever when it comes to caring for themselves. They also support each other whenever there’s trouble by giving warnings and even taking care of sick and weak conspecifics with nutrients. For example, one time the author found a very old tree stump. Its insides had rotted a long time ago to topsoil. But the wood on the outside of the stump was still living. How was this possible?Well, the stump was nourished by its neighbors with nutrients from the root system, and had been for at least 400 years!
Why do trees do such a thing? It’s simple: it’s better together. Trees need the forest; it protects them from storms, provides the right microclimate and warns them of attacks.
1. According to the text, which of the following best describes general features of trees?A.Anxious and bold. |
B.Smart and adventurous. |
C.Helpful and well-behaved. |
D.Adaptable and supportive. |
A.Give warnings. |
B.Offer assistance. |
C.Depend on others. |
D.Provide nutrients. |
A.A public lecture. |
B.A science book. |
C.An experiment report. |
D.A travel journal. |