组卷网 > 试卷详情页

山西省晋中市介休市第一中学校2022-2023学年高二下学期期中考试英语试题
山西 高二 期中 2023-05-19 73次 整体难度: 适中 考查范围: 语篇范围、主题

一、阅读理解 添加题型下试题

阅读理解-阅读单选(约270词) | 适中(0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍的是四位著名诗人的相关情况。

Without poetry, we lose our way. Poets are special existence in our world. Learn a little about some of famous poets by reading our short biographies.

Patrick Kavanagh

One of the most popular modern poets of Ireland, Kavanagh was born into a rural farming family, and he never forgot his roots. His work was a straightforward representation of Irish rural life. His epic poem and perhaps his greatest offering, The Great Hunger, was published in 1942. The piece presented the poverty of country life.

Oscar Wilde

Born in Dublin, into a family of intellectuals, Wilde developed his writing style over the course of many years. By the early 1890s he was one of the most widely celebrated playwrights in London. Apart from his poems and plays, he is perhaps best known for his clever satirical (讽刺的) statements as well as his classic novel The Picture of Dorian Gray.

Shel Silverstein

An accomplished cartoonist, playwright and song writer, Silverstein is best known for his several series of poetry books. Works such as A Missing Piece, A Light in the Attic, and Where the Sidewalk Ends, are now main collections of the children’s literary genre.

John Keats

Born in London in 1795, John Keats poetry played a leading role in the second generation of the Romantic Movement, Ode to a Nightingale was one of his great poems. Keats as a poet was not highly regarded during his own lifetime, despite the fact that John Keats figured so prominently (重要地) in British poetry. He was not well accepted by polite society at that time.

1. Who may write many poems on farmers’ life?
A.John Keats.B.Oscar Wilde.
C.Shel Silverstein.D.Patrick Kavanagh.
2. Which of the following is more suitable for children?
A.A Light in the Attic.B.The Great Hunger.
C.Ode to a Nightingale.D.The Picture of Dorian Gray.
3. Why was Keats not well respected during his lifetime?
A.He only wrote several poems.B.He led the Romantic Movement.
C.He wasn’t welcomed by upper classes.D.He was born in a rural farming family.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇记叙文。文章介绍了杰西卡·鲁斯纳克从小立志成为一名运动员,却成了著名体育新闻记者的故事。

Growing up, Jessica Rusnak, tried out for every athletics team possible, though she had little success. Rather than give up, she focused her efforts on building a career as a sports journalist. The difficulty Rusnak faced as a hopeful athlete also prepared her for the perseverance and patience she would require as a sports journalist.

“It’s something I’ve always loved, but I’m not athletic at all,” explains Rusnak, who works for CBC Montreal’s Daybreak, a weekday morning radio show. “I was interested in journalism and, as I got older and started to think about my career, I decided that I wanted to go into sports journalism.”

Rusnak began interning (实习) at T990 while studying at Concordia. “I was trying to get my feet wet on the morning show where I started at 5:30 a. m.,” she says. “I’d leave after the show at 10 a. m. and have a class at 11 a. m. Through that I gained precious experience.”

She transferred into communication studies at Concordia after pursuing journalism elsewhere for a year. “Concordia was a really great experience,” she says. “The class sizes were much smaller and you pretty much knew everyone in your year, so there was always someone you could ask for help.” After her internship, Rusnak was hired by TSN where she worked as a reporter for five years covering sports teams such as the Montreal Canadiens, Montreal Alouettes and Montreal Impact.

Following a brief move to Toronto in 2015 where she worked as a sports editor at Sportsnet 590 The Fan, Rusnak returned to Montreal to work for Daybreak.

Being a woman in a field still largely dominated by men added to Rusnak’s challenge—and it wasn’t something she was prepared for. Despite the challenges, Rusnak persevered (坚持) and is now well-paid, and proud to see fellow alumni (校友) working at her side. There are a few people I studied with in communications who now work in the industry.

4. What was Rusnak’ s original dream?
A.To be an editor.B.To be an athlete.
C.To be a journalist.D.To be a radio host.
5. What does the underlined phrase “get my feet wet” probably mean?
A.Form the habit of early rising.B.Get my shoes or feet wet.
C.Gain some practical experience.D.Show my hard-working attitude.
6. Where was Rusnak working before she returned to work for Daybreak?
A.TSN.B.Concordia.
C.Sportsnet 590 The Fan.D.Montreal Canadiens.
7. How does she feel about the job?
A.Easy and high-paying.B.Challenging but worthwhile.
C.Interesting but tiring.D.Uncomfortable but rewarding.
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 较难(0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。虽然制定有利的法律和政策可以大幅减少温室气体排放,但是根据最近的一项研究表明一个有效的措施是少吃肉。

The major drivers of climate change are collective enterprises such as power grids (电力公司), industry, large-scale agriculture and transportation systems. About half of all greenhouse gas emissions comes from electricity generation and industrial fossil-fuel use. Substantial (大量的) emissions reductions in these settings most likely will not come from personal actions; they will come from laws and policies such as carbon-pricing systems, revised building codes and supports for green investment. But one effective act is to consume less meat.

Cutting meat consumption is a powerful and personal thing most Americans can do to tackle (解决)the climate crisis, and they can do it immediately. About 40 percent of greenhouse gases come from agriculture, deforestation and other land-use changes. Meat-particularly beef-drives climate change in two ways: first, through cows’ emission of methane(甲烷), a strong greenhouse gas, and second, by destroying forests as they are changed into grass land.Despite the economic slowdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (流行病), atmospheric greenhouse gas levels continued to rise in 2020, in large part because of an emissions increase in the Amazon as rain forests were changed into land for cattle to satisfy the global demand for beef. By eating less beef, we can start to decrease that demand.

You do not have to become a vegan (素食主义者) to do this. According to one recent study, if every person in the U.S. cut their meat consumption by 25 percent, it would reduce annual greenhouse gas emissions by 1 percent. That might not sound like a lot, but it would help protect the rain forest, so the positive effects-including reduced water and fertilizer use, improved biodiversity and safeguarded rights of local peoples-would be amplified (放大).

Perhaps, social action is kind of infectious (有感染力的) in a good way. If lots of us begin to eat less meat and if we talk about it constructively, we will likely influence others. Pretty soon the 1 percent reduction becomes 2 percent or more. Reduced demand for meat could motivate my local supermarket to carry better produce, making it easier for me and my neighbours to prepare a few more satisfying meat-free meals. Ultimately changes in demand will influence industry. Forty years ago few mainstream supermarkets carried organic (有机的) products; now nearly all do. Consumer demand did that.

Above all, cutting back on red meat also has the added benefit of being good for your health.

8. What may substantially reduce greenhouse gas emission?
A.Encouraging personal efforts.
B.Making favourable laws and policies.
C.Reducing various power plants.
D.Investing large transportation systems.
9. What caused greenhouse gas level still to rise in 2020?
A.The effects of COVID-19 pandemic.
B.The slow pace of economy.
C.The destruction of forests for cattle.
D.The quick development of agriculture.
10. “Organic products” was mentioned in paragraph 4 to ______.
A.remind people to buy organic food
B.prove one’s action can influence others
C.call on supermarkets to sell organic products
D.show demand has impact on production
11. Which can be a proper title for the text?
A.Less Beef, Much Healthier
B.To Eat Less Meat for Climate
C.Small Personal Actions Have a Big Impact
D.Cattle Are Partly Responsible for Climate Crisis
2022-05-26更新 | 165次组卷 | 5卷引用:辽宁省辽西联合校2021-2022学年高二下学期期中考试英语试题
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中(0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇议论文。文章谈论了电子游戏对儿童的影响。

Fears about what video games are doing to young minds have been growing for years- not least because now 97% of teenagers play them. Most parents believe they reduce children’ s socializing with real friends, damage psychological adjustment and that the violence presented in many games may be harmful.

On the other hand, some studies have suggested benefits like improved thinking skills, hand- eye co-ordination, perhaps even greater attention and creativity.

What should parents- and society at large- make of all this conflicting talk? Now a study, conducted by Oxford University psychologist Dr Andrew Przybylski, of almost 5, 000 young people in the UK has looked at both the positive and negative effects of video games together. The results, published in the journal Pediatrics, are cautiously positive about video games, but still support the old saying: Everything in moderation(适度).

Across the children, who were between 10- and 15-year-old, the results showed that the best adjusted children did play video games, but usually for less than one hour a day. These children were most likely to report: Being more sociable. Being more satisfied with their lives. Doing worse on these measures were teens that didn’t play any video games and those who spent at least half of their daily free time on video games (over 3 hours). For moderate players of video games - those who played for somewhere between 1 and 3 hours a day- there were no positive or negative effects on their psychological adjustment.

However, even the negative effects of playing video games too much were relatively insignificant compared to the effects of material deprivation(匮乏), family conflict or death of an important friend.

Actually, there was little evidence that playing video games was doing children that much good. Przybylski continued, “Some of the positive effects identified in past gaming research were mirrored in these data but the effects were quite small, suggesting that any benefits may be limited to a narrow range of action games.”

12. What is most parents’ attitude to children’s playing video games?
A.Critical.B.Cautious.
C.Supportive.D.Uninterested.
13. Which person may psychologically benefit from playing video games?
A.Peter, 15-year-old, plays 2 hours’ video games every day.
B.Lisa, 13- year-old, plays 4 hours’ video games every day.
C.Cathy, 9-year -old, plays 10 minutes’ video games every week.
D.Tom, 14-year-old, plays 30 minutes’ video games every day.
14. What is less harmful to a child in the author’s mind?
A.Suffering poverty.B.Quarreling with parents.
C.Being addicted to games.D.Loss of one’s best friend.
15. What is the conclusion of Przybylski’s research?
A.The positive effects of video games on children are not significant.
B.Video games are beneficial to children’s social ability.
C.Playing video games benefits children’ s thinking ability.
D.Too much video games may harm children’ s physical heath.
共计 平均难度:一般