广东省惠州市实验中学2023-2024学年高二下学期5月期中英语试题
广东
高二
期中
2024-05-16
29次
整体难度:
适中
考查范围:
主题、语篇范围
一、阅读理解 添加题型下试题
With such a strong artistic heritage, it’s no surprise that England knocks it out of the park when it comes to world-class art galleries. These are the galleries you need to add to your must-visit list.
Royal Academy of Arts (RA), London
Not your standard gallery, the Royal Academy of Arts is led by artists to promote not just the appreciation of art, but its practice. It is world-famous for hosting some exhibitions that get everyone talking. Besides, what sets the RA apart is its engagement with the public through participatory experiences, allowing visitors to not only view art but become part of it in innovative ways.
Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts, Norwich
Sitting on the edge of the University of East Anglia’s campus, the Sainsbury Centre holds a collection of remarkable works of art spanning over 2,000 years. Inside the seminal Norman Foster building, you’ll find artworks from around the world, including some stunning pieces of European modern art by Degas, Francis Bacon, and Alberto Giacometti.
Yorkshire Sculpture Park, West Yorkshire
Tearing up the rulebook when it comes to how we traditionally view art, the Yorkshire Sculpture Park strives to break down barriers by showing works from British and international artists in the open air. Set in hundreds of acres of West Yorkshire parkland, you’ll see sculptures by some of the leading artists of the 20th century.
Whitworth, Manchester
After a sky-high £15 million development, the Whitworth is becoming one of the premier galleries in the north of England. Making full use of its picturesque park setting, the gallery has a beautiful art garden and a sculpture terrace (露台), all waiting to be explored. Inside the gallery, you can view an exciting programme of ever-changing exhibitions.
1. What is special about the Royal Academy of Arts?A.It offers interactive experiences. |
B.It displays works by senior artists. |
C.It occupies a vast space in the museum. |
D.It stages exhibitions in a traditional way. |
A.They are small in scale. | B.They offer outdoor settings. |
C.They feature long-standing works. | D.They host exhibitions on an annual basis. |
A.An art textbook. | B.An art student’s paper. |
C.A personal travel blog. | D.A travel guidebook. |
Josefa Marin went to New York from Mexico in 1987, supporting her daughter back home with the $140 a week she earned at a sweater factory. With that small income, she had to collect recyclables, trading in cans for five cents each.
When the clothing factory closed down in the late 2000s, she became a full-time recycler, picking up cans and bottles to make ends meet.
Marin’s story is not unique. Millions around the world make a living from picking through waste and reselling it — a vital role that keeps waste manageable. In New York City, the administrative department collects only about 28 percent of the cans that could be recycled. Rubbish collectors, however, keep millions of additional recyclables out of landfills every year.
Yet collectors are ruled out by government policies. The United States Supreme Court in 1988 stated that household garbage is public property once it’s on the street. That enables police to search rubbish for evidence, but that protection hasn’t always been extended to recyclers. And in places like New York City, which is testing city-owned locked containers to hide garbage from rats, containers are made clearly inaccessible for collectors.
“There’s value in the waste, and we feel that value should belong to the people, not the city or the corporations”, says Ryan Castalia, director of a nonprofit recycling and community center in Brooklyn.
Recognized or not, waste pickers have long been treated with disrespect. Marin recalls an occasion when someone living next to a building where she was collecting cans threw water at her. “Because I recycle doesn’t mean I am less of a person than anyone else,” she says. It’s a pity to see that the government doesn’t stand by the garbage collector’s side, either.
Fortunately, some governments are starting to realize that protecting the environment and humanity go hand in hand. Brazil classified waste picking as an official occupation in 2001. In 2009, Colombia’s government granted the right to collect valuable garbage. The U.S. is slowly catching on too. After all, to the government, the garbage is garbage, but to the collectors, it’s something they make a living on.
4. What is the author’s purpose of telling about Marin?A.To highlight waste collectors’ role. |
B.To reflect the unemployed’s hardship. |
C.To praise her devotion to her daughter. |
D.To show the seriousness of unemployment. |
A.By citing reference. | B.By contrasting. |
C.By giving definitions. | D.By cause-effect analysis. |
A.No job is noble or humble. | B.Business is business. |
C.The early birds catches worms. | D.One good turn deserves another. |
A.Who owns our garbage? | B.How can we end poverty? |
C.Who takes blame for waste? | D.How should we recycle rubbish? |
Eating insects is one of those ideas that never quite seem to catch on. The United Nations spread the idea a decade ago, but, in the West at least, insects remain mostly absent from supermarket shelves. Faced with an unsatisfied public, scientists have been exploring other options. One is to feed the insects instead to farm animals, which are not so picky.
Of course, the insects need to eat, too. To date, they have mostly reared (饲养) on leftover chicken feed. But the supply of that is limited, and if insect-reared meat is to take off, new sources will be needed. Niels Eriksen, a biochemist at Aalborg University, suggests feeding them on the waste products of the beer industry.
The world knocks back around 185bn litres of beer every year. Each litre produces between three and ten litres of wastewater full of thrown-away grains. The mix is rich in protein but lacking in carbohydrates (碳水化合物), especially compared with chicken feed.
Most insects grown for feed depend, in the wild, on the carbohydrates found in bad fruit. Whether insects would actually consider beer waste a square meal was, therefore, unclear.
The researchers used the baby insects of the black soldier fly. The young insects were divided into three groups, which were offered beer waste, chicken feed or a mixture of both. The researchers monitored both their weight gain and the amount of CO, they produced. They found the baby insects happily consumed both beer waste and chicken feed, and grew equally well on either food source. Dr Eriksen found few differences in how nutritious the insects would be to farm animals.
The experiment may have implications beyond the beer business, too. Bone meal from farms, and waste from other food industries are all likewise plentiful and protein-rich.
All now look to be reasonable targets for nutrient recycling by insects. Whether consumers will be willing to eat insect-reared beef, though, remains to be seen.
8. What is the purpose of Niels Eriksen’s research?A.To find alternatives to chicken feed. |
B.To recycle the wastewater in beer industry. |
C.To change public’s attitude toward insects. |
D.To reduce the consumption of waste products. |
A.The future application of the research. | B.The importance of protein in the cycle. |
C.The extended influence of the research. | D.The contribution of the beer industry. |
A.chickens-insects-cows-humans | B.humans-beer waste-insects-cows |
C.beer waste-insects-cows-humans | D.cows-chickens-insects-beer waste |
A.Waste recycling will be taking off soon |
B.Eating insects is the new option for people |
C.Insects could help turn beer waste into beef |
D.Insects could gain popularity in supermarket |
Forests absorb huge amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) from Earth’s atmosphere, which makes them a key part of easing climate change. But humans may have already made the world’s largest rainforest useless in—and perhaps even detrimental to—the battle against greenhouse gases, a new study finds.
According to the study, the carbon balance of the Amazon rainforest is damaged largely due to large-scale (大规模的) human disturbance to the Amazon ecosystem, with wildfires—many deliberately set to clear land for agriculture and industry—responsible for most of the CO2 emissions (排放量) from the region and the hotter dry seasons.
“The first very bad news is that forest burning produces around three times more CO2 than the forest absorbs,” lead author of the study Luciana Gatti said. “The second bad news is that the places where deforestation is 30 percent or more show carbon emissions 10 times higher than the places where less than 20 percent of forest is destroyed.”
In the new study, the researchers analyzed nearly 600 measurements of CO2 and CO concentration at four spots in the Brazilian Amazon collected from 2010 to 2018. The team found that, on average, fires poured about 1.6 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year, while healthy trees absorbed only about half a billion tons. The team also found that, while the Eastern Amazon, which has seen historically greater amounts of deforestation over the past 40 years, has become a place where carbon emissions are from, the Western Amazon, which has seen much less deforestation, is neither a carbon “producer” nor a carbon sink. There, CO2 absorption by healthy forests balances the emissions from fires.
The Amazon Basin contains about 2.8 million square miles of jungle, representing more than half of the tropical (热带的) rainforest area remaining on Earth. “Limiting deforestation, and especially wildfires, is key to changing this dangerous trend in the Amazon. Imagine if we could keep the Amazon from fires, the forest could be a carbon sink,” Gatti said. “But we are doing the opposite—we are accelerating climate change.”
12. What does the underlined word “detrimental” mean in paragraph 1?A.Harmful. | B.Sensitive. |
C.Responsible. | D.Ineffective. |
A.Climate change. | B.Industrial development. |
C.Human activity. | D.Natural wildfires. |
A.The Eastern Amazon is relatively better-preserved. |
B.The Amazon witnessed more fires from 2010 to 2018. |
C.The majority of forest fires resulted from deforestation. |
D.The Amazon rainforest creates more CO2 than it absorbs. |
A.More forests should have been protected. |
B.The Amazon rainforest is shrinking rapidly. |
C.People should greatly reduce their carbon footprint. |
D.Preventing fires helps improve the Amazon’s condition. |