Climate emergencies are a bit like buses. You wait an age for one and then three come along at once. Parliaments in the UK and Ireland passed motions declaring a climate emergency in May. Last Monday, Canada followed suit.
It isn’t just parliament sounding the alarm. “This is a climate emergency,” said U.N. climate chief Patricia Espinosa for the first time last Tuesday. Hours earlier, James Bevan of England’s Environment Agency and Vince Cable, the leader of the U.K.’s Liberal Democrats, also used the phrase.
They join a cast of high-profile public figures already on the bus, from UK opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn to UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres. But how did the language of climate change campaigners jump to the lips of the establishment, and should we welcome its seemingly unstoppable adoption?
Does this language make a difference? A day after Canada’s climate emergency motion, it approved a £4.4 billion oil pipeline. Bristol City Council in the UK also declared a climate emergency, yet the city’s mayor subsequently backed expansion of the local airport. Nothing changed on UK streets after parliament declared a climate emergency, notes former Labour Party leader Ed MIliband. “This silent response to an alarm that we ourselves have sounded symbolizes the challenge we face,” he wrote. _______?_______
Mike Hulme at the University of Cambridge argues against the phrase because it implies “time-limited radical(激进的)” action could end the emergency, when climate change is actually a “new condition of human existence.” Some, HUlme included, also fear the language may cause counterproductive responses.
Bur Roz Pidcock of communication organization Climate Outreach says a climate emergency “suggests a response that is very radical in scale and ambition, but not incautious or knee-jerk(本能的),” and certainly not a license for extreme measure like geoengineering the climate.
Despite the risk of phrase being devalued, Rebecca Willis at Lancaster University in the U.K. tells me it is still useful ---and that’s because it is true. As Spratt says, “You cannot solve a problem unless you name it for exactly what it is.” Getting politicians to adopt the language will also be crucial to holding them to tough policy decisions later, says Doug Parr of Greenpeace.
The phrase’s widespread adoption isn’t a problem. The lack of action equivalent to such language is. And that action is going to include a lot of silently gliding electric buses.
1. Which of the following sentences may best end Paragraph 4?A.We should strive to stimulate people’s initiative. |
B.The use of “climate emergency” highlights the challenge. |
C.Such a mismatch risks making the term meaningless. |
D.There are many people against the use of the phrase. |
A.climate change call for deliberate consideration before action is taken |
B.immediate action should be taken to put climate emergency to an end |
C.the phrase “climate emergency” may lead to the opposite consequences |
D.people all over the world have been accustomed to climate change |
A.Extreme measures will be taken to address the issue of climate change |
B.The use of the phrase may contribute to substantial policymaking. |
C.The phrase will make no sense unless practical solutions are found. |
D.Less attention is paid to the phrase though it reflects a true story. |
A.Negative | B.Optimistic |
C.Indifferent | D.Objective |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】As a kid,I wanted to be a naturalist. When I got to college, I chose what I thought was a more practical path, studying physics along with public policy. That combination led me to atmospheric sciences. Now I'm studying low clouds.
But I didn't really notice low clouds until I started my study at the University of Washington, in Seattle. That city had a lot of low clouds. I suddenly realized how important their reflection of heat back into space was for Earth's climate. I continued studying how clouds at the University of Colorado in Boulder. There I earned my PhD.
Seattle's skies may be home to plenty of low clouds, but there are even better places to spot these little clouds. The greatest gatherings tend to occur off the coasts of places like Namibia, in Africa, and northern Chile. These places are home to some of Earth's driest deserts. And I like visiting such places.
The more I learned about these little clouds, the more fascinating I found them. I'm really interested in the various ways these low clouds respond to their environment. Because there are so many low clouds and they help keep Earth cool by reflecting(反射) heat, anything that affects them can also affect overall climate. It feeds back to the whole energy balance of the planet.
Lately I've been exploring how smoke that drifts(漂浮 )over clouds might change the way that these clouds absorb or reflect sunlight. Such smoke -from burning trees and grasses-can drift thousands of kilometers. If that smoke affects clouds, it might also affect climate. Last year, I spent a month on distant Ascension Island in the South Atlantic Ocean setting up instruments to track the interaction(相互作用) between low clouds there and smoke from southern Africa.
I appreciate the diversity in my work. Besides the occasional trip to distant islands, I also teach and work with other scientists to better understand Earth's climate system. Along the way, I'm helping bring one type of low clouds to the attention it deserves.
1. What do we know about the author?A.She learned three majors at the same time in college. |
B.She wanted to study low clouds when she was a kid |
C.She knew the importance of low clouds when in university |
D.She was always worried about climate change in the world |
A.Because she enjoys views of deserts. |
B.Because she loves visiting beautiful coasts. |
C.Because she has got tired of Seattle's skies. |
D.Because they're great places for observing low clouds. |
A.To study smoke' s effect on low clouds |
B.To find the real causes of climate change. |
C.To set up instruments for other scientists |
D.To study the influence of low clouds on climate. |
A.The fact of being very special | B.The fact of working by oneself |
C.The fact of being respected by others | D.The fact of including some different things. |
【推荐2】The human body can't handle overheating. The processes that keep us alive work best within a certain temperature between about 36° C and 37° C, depending on the person.
If someone's body temperature goes higher, the body's primary response to heat is to try and get rid of it. To get rid of the overheat, blood vessels(血管) expand. At the same time, the heart begins beating faster. That pushes blood flow to the skin. There, the blood can release heat to cool down. Meanwhile, sweating kicks in to cool the skin.
But there is a limit to how much the body can adjust. That limit depends on an individual's health, as well as the temperature and humidity(湿度) outside. If the outside temps are hotter than the body, blood at the skin won't release heat. And where humidity is high, sweating won't cool the skin. That's because the sweat can't evaporate(蒸发). In 2008, two scientists suggested that humans can't cool off if they spend extended time at a temperature over 35° C.
No one is resistant to heat. But it hits some groups harder than others. The elderly are considered the weakest. One reason: They have fewer sweat glands(汗腺). But their bodies also respond more slowly to rising temperatures. Children, too, are at risk because they haven't fully developed the ability to regulate heat. People with certain diseases such as diabetes and heart disease also can have trouble cooling their bodies. And people living in poverty often lack air conditioning and other resources to help them beat the heat.
Many people see heat as more of an annoyance than a threat. But climate change, extreme heat and human health are all connected. As Earth's temperatures climb, extreme heat waves will probably become more common, endangering more people.
1. What pushes blood flow to the skin according to Paragraph 2?A.Blood vessels expand. | B.Blood releases the heat. |
C.The heart beats faster. | D.Sweating cools the skin. |
A.The hidden dangers of extreme heat. | B.The findings of a study in 2008. |
C.The influences of heat on the body. | D.The limits of the body's adjustments. |
A.The old. | B.The young. | C.The sick. | D.The poor. |
A.People haven't realized the danger of overheat. |
B.The rising temperatures have claimed many lives. |
C.Improper human activities cause climate change. |
D.The Earth is unsuitable to live on in the future. |
【推荐3】Humans are not the only ones adapting to (适应) the effects of global climate change. Animals are also adapting to the environmental changes—some warm-blooded animals are beginning to “shapeshift (变身)” in response to shifts in climate, according to a recent study carried out by a team of researchers. The leader of the team is Sara Ryding, a researcher at Deakin University in Australia.
In the study, researchers have found new evidence that supports the theory that some warm-blooded animals are experiencing changes to their bodies due to the rising temperatures, resulting in larger legs, ears and beaks (喙) in some cases. The researchers have noted that warm-blooded animals living in colder climates have smaller legs, ears and beaks than animals of the same species living in warmer climates.
“When climate change is discussed in mainstream media, people are asking ‘Can humans overcome this?’ or ‘What technology can solve this?’” Ryding says.
She says that just like humans, animals also have to adapt to climate change, as shapeshifting for some of the warm-blooded animals is occurring over a far shorter time period.
“The climate change that we have created is putting much pressure on them, and while some species will adapt, others will not,” Ryding says.
Researchers have found body change in birds in Australia and North America. Certain species of Australian parrots have shown about 4%~10% increase in the size of their beaks since 1871, the reason for which is rising temperatures. In North America, the dark-eyed junco (灯芯草雀) also has seen an increase in beak size.
“Larger beaks help birds dissipate (驱散) extra body heat more effectively, which is useful as global temperatures rise. However, shapeshifting does not mean that animals are able to deal with climate change easily and that all is ‘fine’,” Ryding says. “It just means that they are struggling to adjust themselves to surviving it.”
1. What happens to some warm-blooded animals in warmer climates?A.Some parts of their bodies are missing. |
B.Their bodies become colder and colder. |
C.Their bodies change into smaller ones. |
D.Some of their body parts become larger. |
A.To warn about the decrease of animal species. |
B.To speak highly of animals’ ability to survive. |
C.To explain why animals change the body shape. |
D.To show the evidence of animals’ shapeshifting. |
A.Climate change does little harm to bird species. |
B.Climate change is still a big challenge for birds. |
C.Birds can easily deal with global climate change. |
D.Birds fail to adjust themselves to climate change. |
A.All Animals Have to Adapt to Global Climate Change |
B.Rising Temperatures Are Destroying Animals’ Bodies |
C.Climate Change Is Making Some Animals Shapeshift |
D.Warm-blooded Animals Inform Us of Global Warming |
【推荐1】Way back in Victorian times, around 1872,Christina Rossetti wrote a collection of nursery rhymes entitled Sing-Song: A Nursery Rhyme Book, and in it she composed (创作) all sorts of neat little poems that were favorably received. British author Lewis Carroll, a friend of the Rossetti family, lauded the poems, and the public was particularly pleased by the illustrations.
Some of the poems improve children’s mind and character;some are memory aids for learning about numbers, time and colors; others deal with nature, including wind, rain, growth, and death. Rossetti’s delightful poems have a kind of simplicity and effortlessness that audiences today still appreciate. They refresh our memories of being a kid.
Why is the sky blue? Will my head explode if I think too much? You used to ask such fun questions when you were a little one, right? Hey, we all did. And that’s kind of what makes being a kid so cool. In fact, kids often try their hardest to come up with the silliest questions that will inspire a little laughter from others. It’s kind of their duty as kids.
“Who has seen the wind?” It is a silly question, isn’t it? But Rossetti can break nature down for us in a way that not only makes sense but sounds nice, too. The poem reopens our days of innocent imagination.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither I nor you.
But when the leaves hang trembling,
The wind is passing through.
Who has seen the wind?
Neither you nor I.
But when the trees bow down their heads,
The wind is passing by.
The poem opens with the title that asks, “Who has seen the wind?” The speaker informs us that neither she nor anyone else has ever seen it. But we do see the leaves “trembling,” which informs us that the wind is passing through. The speaker then repeats the same question. The answer remains the same, but when the trees “bow down their heads,” we again realize that the wind is passing by.
1. What does the underlined word “lauded” in Paragraph 1 probably mean?A.Discovered. | B.Praised. |
C.Wrote. | D.Hid. |
A.In Paragraph 1. | B.In Paragraph 2. |
C.In Paragraph 3. | D.In Paragraph 4. |
A.It is natural for kids to ask them. |
B.There is no need to answer them. |
C.They are harmful to kids’ growth. |
D.They often annoy others. |
A.By learning from adults. |
B.By feeling the moving air. |
C.By watching the movements of trees. |
D.By listening to the sounds of the wind. |
【推荐2】The other day a friend,a sociable man,told me he had found himself alone in New York for an hour or two between appointments.He went to the Whitney and spent the"empty"time looking at things.He then felt unexpectedly happy.Suddenly alone,he discovered there was a new self to meet.
"One alone is never lonely."There is great difference between being alone and lonely.Loneliness is most strongly felt with other people,for with others,even with a lover sometimes,we suffer from our differences of tastes,personalities and moods.The fear of hurting or being hurt in a social situation brings us loneliness.Alone,we can afford to be wholly whatever we are,and to feel whatever we feel absolutely. That is a great luxury(奢侈)!
I have been alone for the last twenty years and it becomes increasingly rewarding.When I can wake up and watch the sun rise over the ocean,as I do most days,and I know that I have an entire day ahead, uninterrupted,in which to write a few pages,take a walk with my dog,lie down in the afternoon for a long think,read and listen to music,I am flooded with happiness.
I'm lonely only when I am overtired,when I have worked too long without a break,when from the time being I feel empty and need filling up.And I am lonely sometimes when I come back home after a lecture trip,when I have seen a lot of people and talked a lot,and am full to brimful(满满的)experience that needs to be sorted out.Then I need to be alone to find where my self is hiding.
It takes a while, but the moment comes when the world falls away,and the self comes out again from the unconscious,bringing back all I have recently experienced to be explored and slowly understood.
1. Why does the writer mention his friend in Paragraph 1?A.To introduce the topic over being alone. |
B.To prove that loneliness can bring happiness. |
C.To describe the state of being lonely and alone. |
D.To express acceptance of his friend's sociability. |
A.Loneliness never occurs when others are around. |
B.Loneliness brings the fear of hurting and being hurt. |
C.Being alone offers one more private time and space. |
D.Being alone makes one interested in reading and music. |
A.take a long lecture trip | B.meet and talk to people |
C.stay alone to be refreshed | D.be confused with life troubles |
【推荐3】Two managers in the same organization were coming into conflict when having disagreements in their work. After thinking about a particularly troubling issue throughout the night, the first manager wrote a letter to the other one, outlining his thoughts as reasonably as possible. He gave it to the other person and asked him to read it later and suggested that after working through their anger, they discuss it again.
The following day the first manager stopped by the office of the other and asked how it would go. The second one admitted that he was very upset at first, but after thinking it over he realized that most of their disagreements were for a lack of understanding. He stated that he felt if they could discuss it without losing their tempers, they could work things out. That is exactly what they did later and got the issue settled with flying colors (成功地).
American president Abraham Lincoln was known for writing two letters when he needed to communicate with someone else who had made him angry. He first wrote a letter that severely conveyed just what he thought. Then he tore up that letter and wrote a second one that was appropriate and reasonable, and sent the letter out.
Effective communication is the key to any relationship. When we allow ourselves to become emotional and react immediately to what we feel without thinking, emotions overwhelm (压倒) the situation and prevent true communication. Step back, think evaluate what happened or what was said, and ask to clarify questions if it is needed. Then, you can respond appropriately.
Don’t let overwhelming emotion control your life. Instead, choose to think and process internally whatever comes your way before externally responding. That is when you can communicate with others effectively and you will be able to keep good relationships with them.
1. What did the first manager do in his letter?A.He expressed his general ideas reasonably. |
B.He explained why the issue was troubling. |
C.He apologized to the second manager sincerely. |
D.He invited the second manager to discuss the issue. |
A.Any great man can get angry. |
B.Making plan B is necessary in work. |
C.Writing letters was very popular in the past. |
D.We should deal with matters after calming down. |
A.A bad first impression. | B.Ineffective communication. |
C.The high chance of failure. | D.The breakdown of a relationship. |
A.Learn to answer questions indirectly. | B.Avoid anger to keep good relationships. |
C.Never be overwhelmed by your emotions. | D.Think reasonably before making a decision. |
Make sure you know the type of ground you are standing on. For example, in a crowd of moving people wet ground can be dangerous, causing you to fall. You should know the general atmosphere of the event, as panic situations can often be predicted. When in danger, a few seconds can make all the difference, giving you the possibility of taking advantage of your escape route. Always stay closer to the escape route
If you find yourself in the middle of a moving crowd, do not fight against the pressure, do not stand still or sit down, because you could easily get injured or even be killed by being stepped on by other people. Instead, move in the same direction of the crowd; take advantage of any space that may open up to move sideways to the crowd movement where the flow is weaker. Keep your hands up by your chest, which will protect your chest during the movement.
If you fall, get up quickly. If you can’t get up because you are injured, get someone to pull you back up. If you fall and can not get up, keep moving by crawling(爬行)in the same direction of the crowd. Do not lie on your stomach or back, as this is dangerous for your body.
The worst situation is to be pushed by the crowd against an immovable object. Try to shun
High walls, as the crowd pressure can build up rapidly. After you’re pushed forward, the way you move is on a diagonal(斜线). There’s always space between people. You work your way out that way till you get out of the crowd.
1. When you are in a crowd the first thing you do is ____.
A.fight against the pressure |
B.stay closer to an immovable object |
C.move in the same direction of the crowd |
D.be familiar with the surroundings |
A.you must go to the exit quickly |
B.you must not stand still or sit down |
C.you’d better stop moving forward |
D.you should push your way out |
A.leave for | B.keep off |
C.jump on | D.break down |
A.How to survive the rush crowd |
B.How to enjoy yourself in a crowd |
C.How to protect yourself outside |
D.How to run away from people |
There are other ways to keep burglars away from your house.
•Keep lights on around your house in the evenings. Light is a natural fright for burglars.
•Invest in a security alarm, particularly if your house is located at a remote spot. Security systems can often bring down the cost of your homeowner’s premium (保险费).
•Make sure that all windows and doors are locked and the security alarm turned on before you sleep at night or go out of the house. Avoid keeping house keys in obvious places, such as under the lamp or on top of the doorframe.
•Adding an additional lock will provide extra security when you are home. The deadlock, sometimes called an “exit only deadbolt”is a deadbolt that does not have an external (外部的) key. It is clearly visible on the door from the outside, but cannot be broken into without destroying the door, frame or lock itself. While this security won’t help directly when you aren’t home, the visibility may discourage an
•Your door itself should be made of strong materials, such as oneinch thick solid hardwood or heavy metal.
1. The advice given by the writer in the passage focuses on ________.
A.how to make your house safe from burglars |
B.what to do when your house is broken into |
C.how to improve social security in the United States |
D.how to run a home business |
A.to enjoy convenience outside their home |
B.for the safety of their property |
C.not to let others know about their business |
D.in order to avoid being seen by burglars |
A.buy a security alarm and turn it on in the evening |
B.fix an extra lock on the door from inside |
C.have the doors made of solid hardwood or heavy metal |
D.keep lights on in all rooms to threaten burglars |
A.Someone who is invited for a visit. |
B.Someone who illegally enters the home. |
C.Someone who pays regular visits to the home. |
D.Someone who tries to destroy the lock. |
【推荐3】Never Talk to Strangers?
“Never talk to strangers.” Many children are taught this simple rule as a precaution against abduction (诱拐). In June, 2005, an 11-year-old boy was lost in the Utah wilderness for four days. During that time, he stayed on the path. He saw people searching for him but deliberately hid from them, afraid someone might “steal” him. Eventually, the unfortunate game of hide-and-seek ended and he was found. According to the Canada Safety Council, this alarming incident shows how unwise it is to instill (灌输) a fear of strangers in children. The “stranger danger” message can prevent children from developing the social skills and judgment needed to deal effectively with real-life situations. In a difficult situation, a stranger could be their lifeline to safety.
To have a child go missing is a parent’s worst nightmare. The threat of abduction by a stranger is minimal when compared with other possible reasons for a disappearance. In 2004, there were 67,266 missing-children cases in Canada. Only 31 involved abduction; in most of those cases the abductor was a relative, friend, or person known to the family. There were 671 cases of children wandering off, and 332 cases of abductions by a parent. Almost 80 percent of all cases were runaways. These statistics cast doubt on the idea that children should never talk to strangers. Wandering off is more common—but a lost child may have to call upon a stranger for help, and must develop the ability to judge what kind of people to approach. The “never talk to strangers” rule does not protect children in the situations they are most likely to face. On top of this, it can be confusing. Adults do not model the behavior; they often talk to strangers. A child may not know how to tell who is a stranger, and who is not.
For young children, nothing replaces close supervision (监管). Pre-schoolers do not understand risk and tend to act without thinking. Children need to develop habits and attitudes that will protect them from the real threats and dangers they may face. The Canada Safety Council encourages parents to give their children age-appropriate positive messages about safety, bearing in mind how youngsters may understand their world.
1. Which of the following statements is NOT true about the 11-year-old boy?A.He practiced the “never talk to strangers” rule. |
B.He hid from the rescuers to avoid possible abduction. |
C.He eventually showed up when his hide-and seek game ended. |
D.He stayed where he was, expecting the coming of familiar people. |
A.Being abducted by a parent. | B.Running away. |
C.Being abducted by strangers. | D.Wandering off. |
A.a friendly and attractive person may be dangerous |
B.adults do not act upon the rule and strangers are hard to tell |
C.the rule does not protect children in the situation of abducting |
D.a lost child may have difficulty in communicating with a stranger |
A.It is not well recognized by parents. |
B.It is practical as a safety tip in daily life. |
C.It is easy enough for children to follow. |
D.It is not effective in keeping kids safe. |