组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:102 题号:13937124

Microsoft plans to erase its entire carbon footprint since its foundation in 1975. Microsoft aims to accomplish "carbon negative" by 2030, meaning that it will erase more carbon from the environment than it emits(排放). The company will minimize carbon emissions across its entire supply chain to zero. And the following step is to clean up all the carbon emissions it has produced since 1975, when it was founded. What the company further proposed was that it would try to push for policies to price carbon and help clean energy technology develop faster. It is among the companies that approve of carbon tax.

More attention has been drawn to removing carbon from the atmosphere. There are a variety of methods toward that, including nature-based ones, like planting trees, and technological ones, like capturing carbon directly from the air.

“Microsoft will initially focus on nature-based methods like restoring degraded forests and planting new trees, ”said Lucas Joppa, the company's Chief Environmental Officer. An investment of one billion dollars will also be provided for the development of carbon removal and reduction technology. Microsoft's decision of counting its supply chain's emissions is an extension of its previous commitment to run data centers mainly on the renewable energy.

The company's intention to promote low-carbon policies was highly recognized by environmentalist. “A company's most powerful tool for fighting climate change is its political influence, and we're eager to see Microsoft use it, ”Elizabeth Sturcken, Managing Director of EDF+Business said.

Other industries are also encouraged to follow Microsoft's example. But none of them has such a commitment, according to Gary Cook, senior analyst of Greenpeace. Nevertheless, Cook, together with some other environmentalists, criticized Microsoft for continuously cooperating with oil and gas companies. Amazon's AWS service has faced the same criticism for working with fossil fuel clients.“There's a real disconnection between what they're doing within their own company and their empowering of dirty energy, ” Cook said.

1. What do we know about Microsoft In its “carbon negative” commitment?
A.It will reduce its carbon emissions to almost zero.
B.It will remove all the carbon from the environment.
C.It plans to clean up its previously released carbon.
D.It plans to include its clients in its future campaign.
2. Which of the following approaches will Microsoft apply to reduce its carbon emissions?
A.Collecting carbon taxB.Capturing carbon from the air
C.Exploring renewable resourcesD.Funding carbon reduction technology
3. What do environmentalists think of Microsoft?
A.They criticize it for its unrealistic promise.
B.They think highly of it for its political influence.
C.They praise it for its push for low-carbon policies
D.They speak ill of it for its partnership with Amazon.
4. In which section of a newspaper may this text appear?
A.Health.B.PoliticsC.Technology.D.Environment.
【知识点】 环境保护 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约310词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐1】You can see a sea turtle named Herman, an octopus (章鱼) called Octavia, and a seal named Lidia at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo in Washington, D.C. Rather than real animals, they are actually artworks made out of plastic trash from the ocean.

These artworks are part of a traveling exhibit called “Washed Ashore: Art to Save the Sea”. The Washed Ashore project, led by the artist called Pozzi, works to raise awareness about plastic pollution in Earth’s oceans.

More than 315 billion pounds of plastic litter the world’s oceans today. Most of the plastic is garbage from towns and cities, as well as trash that people leave on beaches. Rainwater, winds, and high tides bring the trash into the ocean or into rivers that lead to the ocean. Once it is under the waves, the plastic begins to break up into smaller and smaller pieces.

Thousands of sea animals die each year from eating plastic bags and other things. Each year, millions more pounds of plastic end up in the ocean. A recent study found that if that continues, by 2050 the total weight of plastic will be more than that of all the fish in the ocean.

The Washed Ashore project is working to stop that from happening. Since 2010, Washed Ashore volunteers have collected 38,000 pounds of plastic trash from more than 300 miles of beaches. They helped Pozzi create more than 60 artworks of sea creatures harmed by plastic pollution.

“These artworks are a powerful reminder of our personal role and global responsibility in preserving biodiversity (生物多样性) on land and in the sea,” says Dennis Kelly, director of the National Zoo.

1. What is the purpose of the artworks shown at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo?
A.To let people know about animals in the ocean.
B.To introduce one way of recycling plastic trash.
C.To warn people of plastic pollution in the ocean.
D.To show Pozzi’s great gift for creating artworks.
2. According to the passage, what is the source of plastic pollution in the ocean?
A.Garbage from towns and cities.B.Trash left on beaches by people.
C.Plastic bags broken up by waves.D.Litter created by human activities.
3. The data in Paragraph 5 is given to prove that ______.
A.plastic pollution will be more serious in the ocean.
B.more and more artworks of sea creatures will be made.
C.the Washed Ashore project has made great achievements.
D.volunteers can solve the ocean pollution successfully by 2050.
4. What’s Dennis Kelly’s attitude towards the artworks?
A.worried.B.supportive.
C.doubtful.D.unconcerned.
2018-11-14更新 | 196次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约600词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】Smog in Europe and North America could be more than 25 times more deadly than the average air pollution found in Chinese cities, a new study suggests. In the largest ever study of its kind in the developing world, researchers tested the effects of air pollution on the health of people in 272 cities in China.

They found average annual exposure to fine particles, known as PM2.5, in those cities was more than five times higher than the level recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), according to a paper in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

However they also discovered that it was much less likely to increase the death rate than PM2.5 in Europe and North America.

The researchers, led by Dr Maigeng Zhou, of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, suggested this was because China is affected by large amounts of natural dust blown by the wind from arid areas, while most pollution in the West comes from industry.

They found that for every increase of 10 micrograms of air pollution in a cubic meter of air, the mortality rate increased by 0.22 percent, discounting deaths from accidents.

Professor Frank Kelly, an expert in environmental health at King’s College London, who was not involved in the study but has studied air pollution in China, told The Independent: “Those relative risks are considerably less than those seen in Europe and the US. For mortality(死亡率) in Europe we are working on a six percent increase per 10 micrograms.” That suggests air pollution in Europe is about 27 times more toxic than average air pollution in China.

However, Professor Kelly said cities like Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong were likely to suffer from Western-style air pollution. "The natural dust component there is not of the magnitude that it would dwarf the coal, biomass and fossil fuel signals,” he said, “That may be true in certain cities whose pollution is not dominated by local power generation or major traffic congestion.”

Natural dust particles can cause physical damage to the lungs and trigger an asthma attack. Particles of carbon produced when fossil fuels are burned can lead to similar problems but they are also coated with toxic heavy metals, chemicals and volatile organic compounds. These are able to pass from the lungs into the blood stream where it is thought they cause further damage to the body.

Areeba Hamid, an air pollution campaigner with environmental group Greenpeace, said: “Poisonous air causes damage to people’s health wherever in the world they live. We now know fumes from diesel(柴油机) vehicles are a lot more poisonous than car companies claimed and this is a big cause of air pollution in Europe and North America. These companies have a lot to answer for, but so far they’ve managed to avoid any real accountability.”

The study of cities in China found the average annual expose to PM2.5 was 56 micrograms per cubic meter, compared to the WHO guideline limit for safe air quality of 10 micrograms.

People who were older than 75, had less education or who lived in hotter places were more likely to die. It is thought people in warmer cities were more likely to spend time outside or leave their windows open, thereby breathing more polluted air, the researchers said. They also speculated that less well educated people might have poorer access to health care or experience poorer environmental health conditions.

1. Why PM2.5 in China is less deadly than that in Europe and North America?
A.China is free from any pollution about PM2.5.
B.Pollutants affecting China mainly come from arid areas.
C.Fewer people died from PM 2.5 in China than those in Europe and North America.
D.Europe and North America are polluted by natural dust.
2. What does the underlined part in Para 7 refer to?
A.The average mortality rate.B.The higher mortality rate.
C.The lower mortality rate.D.The normal mortality rate.
3. What’s the real cause of air pollution in Europe and North America according to Areeba Hamid?
A.Fumes from diesel vehicles are much more poisonous.
B.The environmental agencies can’t take on responsibilities.
C.The technology doesn’t meet the standards.
D.Car companies can’t evaluate the results.
4. The author’s purpose of writing the passage is to ________.
A.appeal to people to lay an emphasis on environmental protection
B.illustrate smog in Europe and North America is quite serious
C.demonstrate China is safest place in the world to live in
D.provide some good ways to address the smog
2017-09-27更新 | 135次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】We’re often reminded of the importance of preserving the planet as we see it for future generationsand children at St Oswald’s Primary School in Chester certainly agree.

Nine-year-old Isobel Kelleher from the school’s Hummingbirds class thinks adults need to take note.Sometimes they can be busy and I dont think they think they can make a differencebut if everyone does a little bit it all adds up,”she tells HuffPost UK.We started looking at plastic pollution in our oceans and the things like plastic bags and broken down pieces of plastic that are polluting them.she says.Fish can eat the plastic and they can dieor we might even eat the fish ourselves.

Mr TimmsIsobels teacherhas been spearheading a new project at the school which lets children loose creatively to raise awareness of the need to be more environmentally friendly.The entire Hummingbirds classwhich is made up of 9 and 10-year-old pupilshas been busy writing poems and creating online video adverts to warn adults about the serious situation of our oceans and wildlife.

Mr Timms thinks children have an important role to play in teaching us how to take care of the things around us.We sometimes overlook how much we can really learn from children.he says.It has been really hard to believe having parents come in saying that their children have been asking them to stop using plasticand to recycle moreand even stopping them using plastic straws.

Mr Timms is proud of his Hummingbirds class.The message that they would like to send to the world is simple:stopping this isnt someone elses joband it wont be OK if we just leave it.

1. What can we infer about adults according to Isobel Kelleher?
A.They just pretend to be busy.
B.They havent done their part well.
C.They can do nothing to stop pollution.
D.They have started to care about oceans.
2. What is the purpose of the school project?
A.To help adults to learn more about their kids.
B.To remind adults to be friendly to environment.
C.To persuade students to stop using plastic bags.
D.To teach students how to write poems creatively.
3. Why does Mr Timms mentionparentsin Paragraph 4?
A.To prove kids are creative in teaching.
B.To attract people to support his work.
C.To have adults care about education.
D.To show the effects of the project.
4. What is the text mainly about?
A.An inspiring school project.
B.An appeal to stop plastic bags.
C.Serious situations of our planet.
D.Adultsignorance of environment.
2019-02-21更新 | 179次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般