组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:62 题号:14224867

Which kind of diamond is better for the environment and the world we live in: a diamond from a traditional mine or one made in a laboratory? It seems that everyone would think that man-made diamonds would be better. But wait a minute. Don’t draw your conclusion so quickly.

Some recent reports suggest the answer may not be so clear. At the very least, these reports provide evidence of tensions between two different sectors of the diamond industry. Lab-grown diamond companies say they are more moral and cause less harm to the Earth’s environment as they don’t have to dig deep into the earth for diamonds.

The traditional diamond sector notes that its businesses help the communities where they operate mines. It says they provide jobs, help build roads and other infrastructure and make investments in conservation. Some companies, such as De Beers, work on both sides. De Beers sells natural and man-made diamonds.

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission(FTC)investigates reports of deceptive, or misleading, advertising. In April, the commission sent warning letters to eight lab-grown diamond companies. One of the FTC’s concerns was the use of the word "eco-friendly", and similar terms, to describe diamonds made in a laboratory. The lab-grown process requires very high temperatures and uses a lot of energy.

Trucost is a company that estimates the costs of using natural resources. Asked by the Diamond Producers Association to study the issue, Trucost found the carbon intensity of natural diamonds was lower than lab-grown diamonds. The Trucost report did note that diamond miners should reduce their effect on the environment by using more wind power and sunlight.

The Reuters news agency reported that the International Grown Diamond Association did not immediately respond to requests for comments about the story.

1. What’s the opinion of traditional diamond companies about their business?
A.They refuse lab-grown diamonds.
B.They bring benefits to local people.
C.They cause less harm to the Earth’s environment.
D.They are more moral than lab-grown diamond companies.
2. Why were lab-grown diamond companies warned by FTC?
A.They sold false diamonds.B.They teased customers.
C.They took unfair competition.D.They made false advertisements.
3. What did Trucost advise diamond miners to do?
A.Use renewable energy.B.Give up mining diamonds.
C.Change mining equipment.D.Develop lab-grown diamonds.
4. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.Is Natural Diamond Mining Coming to an End?
B.Do Diamond Miners Really Protect the Environment?
C.Which Kind of Diamond Is Better for the Environment?
D.Why Are Lab-grown Diamonds Environmentally Friendly?
【知识点】 环境保护 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】The second little pig was unlucky. He built his house from sticks, which was blown away by a wolf. His brother, by contrast, built a wolf-proof house from bricks. The fairy tale could have been written by an agent for the construction industry, strongly favoring brick, concrete and steel. However, in the real world it would help reduce pollution and slow global warming if more builders copied the wood-loving second pig.

No other building material has environmental credentials (认证信息) as exciting and overlooked as wood. The energy required to produce a laminated wooden beam (层压木梁) is one-sixth of that required for a steel one of comparable strength. As trees take carbon out of the atmosphere when growing, wooden buildings contribute to negative emissions by storing the stuff. And for refitting older buildings to be more energy efficient, wood is a good insulator (绝缘体). A softwood window frame provides nearly 400 times as much insulation as a plain steel one of the same thickness and over a thousand times as much as an aluminium (铝) equivalent.

But such bigger stories are still uncommon. Governments can help push the industry to use more wood, particularly in the public sector — the construction industry’s biggest client. That would help wood-building specialists achieve greater scale and lower costs. Zero-carbon building regulations should be altered to take account of the emissions that are presented in materials.

Construction codes could be regulated to make building with wood easier. Here the direction of travel is wrong. Britain, for instance, is banning the use of timber on the outside of tall buildings after 72 people died in a tower fire in London in 2017. That is a nonsense. Grenfell Tower was covered in aluminium and plastic, not wood. Modern cross-laminated timber (交叉层叠木板) panels perform better in fire tests than steel ones do.

Carpentry alone will not bring the environmental cost of the world’s buildings into line. But using wood can do much more than is appreciated. The second little pig was not wrong, just before his time.

1. The purpose of the writer telling the story in the first paragraph is to _______.
A.attract the readers’ attentionB.make the argument more convincing
C.criticize the author of the taleD.lead in the topic of the text
2. Paragraph 2 is intended to inform us _______.
A.wood is a good insulator
B.such skyscrapers with wood are uncommon currently
C.the unique advantages of wood material being friendly environmental
D.how wood reduces the emission of carbon dioxide
3. Which of the following does NOT belong to the governments’ measures to help the scheme?
A.To encourage the construction industry’s biggest client to use more wood.
B.To transform Zero-carbon building regulations.
C.To arouse the public’s awareness of protecting the woods.
D.To regulate the Construction codes.
4. The author may imply that _______.
A.the second pig in the tale was unlucky
B.the outside of tall buildings Grenfell Tower could have been constructed in wood
C.we haven’t appreciated the characteristics of using wood at all
D.wood-building specialists will achieve greater profits
2020-06-26更新 | 97次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐2】The traditional tent cities at festivals such as Glastonbury may never be the same again. In a victory of green business that is certain to appeal to environmentally-aware music-lovers, a design student is to receive financial support to produce eco-friendly tents made of cardboard that can be recycled after the bands and the crowds have gone home.

Major festivals such as Glastonbury throw away some 10,000 abandoned tents at the end of events each year. For his final year project at the University of the West of England, James Dunlop came up with a material that can be recycled. And to cope with the British summer, the cardboard has been made waterproof.

Taking inspiration from a Japanese architect, who has used cardboard to make big buildings including churches, Mr. Dunlop used cardboard material for his tents, which he called Myhabs.

The design won an award at the annual New Designers Exhibition after Mr. Dunlop graduated from his product design degree and he decided to try to turn it into a business.

To raise money for the idea, he toured the City’s private companies which fund new businesses and found a supporter in the finance group Mint. He introduced his idea to four of Mint’s directors and won their support. Mint has committed around £500,000 to MyHab and taken a share of 30 per cent in Mr. Dunlop’s business. The first Myhabs should be tested at festivals this summer, before being marketed fully next year.

Mr. Dunlop said that the design, which accommodates two people, could have other uses, such as for disaster relief and housing for the London Olympics.

For music events, the cardboard houses will be ordered online and put up at the sites by the Myhab team before the festival-goers arrive and removed by the company afterwards. They can be personalized and the company will offer reductions on the expense if people agree to sell exterior(外部的) advertising space.

The biggest festivals attract tens of thousands of participants, with Glastonhury having some 150,000 each year. Altogether there are around 100 annual music festivals where people camp in the UK. The events are becoming increasingly environmentally conscious.

1. “Eco-friendly tents” in paragraph 1 refer to tents              .
A.economically desirable
B.favorable to the environment
C.for holding music performances
D.designed for disaster relief
2. Mr. Dunlop established his business              .
A.independently with an interest-free loan from Mint
B.with the approval of the City’s administration
C.in partnership with a finance group
D.with the help of a Japanese architect
3. It is implied in the passage that               .
A.the weather in the UK. is changeable in summer
B.most performances at British festivals are given in the open air
C.the cardboard tents produced by Mr. Dunlop can be user-tailored
D.cardboard tents can be easily put up and removed by users
4. The passage is mainly concerned with              .
A.an attempt at developing recyclable tents
B.some efforts at making full use of cardboards
C.an unusual success of a graduation project
D.the effects of using cardboard tents on music festivals
2019-10-10更新 | 352次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】A 90-year-old may not be typical for a show's narrator(解说员),but without the voice of English broadcaster Sir David Attenborough,one of the most successful new shows on television just wouldn't be the same.

BBC's Planet Earthis getting good ratings in the United Kingdom.And Sir David,the man behind the show's voice,describes it as "greatly pleasing".The naturalist is the father of nature documentaries(纪录片),with a television career that started in 1950.Since then,the London-born broadcaster has traveled the world intent on sharing his discoveries through the television in new ways.

Ever since his first wildlife documentary series,1954's Zoo Quest,Sir David's voice has become synonymous(同义)with environmental protection.Concerned with how humans are harming the planet,he attempts to educate viewers on the threats and dangers that are present today.He's used his profile to raise important issues like global warming,deforestation,climate change and overpopulation.

"We can't go on increasing at the rate human beings are increasing forever,because the Earth is finite(有限)and you can't put infinity into something that is finite,"he told The Independent two years ago."So if we don't do something about it then the world will do something about it."

And after almost 30 years of nature-based programming,Sir David's efforts to protect wildlife and the environment have not gone unnoticed.His work has been significant in reconnecting an increasingly disconnected human population with the environment of the planet that we not only come from but also rely on.

1. What can we learn about Planet Earth?
A.It was made in 1950.
B.It is now very popular.
C.It is broadcast all over the world.
D.It was filmed in the United Kingdom.
2. When did Sir David's job begin to be widely recognized?
A.In 1950.
B.In 1954.
C.When he is 90 years old.
D.After 30 years of hard work.
3. What does Sir David intend to tell in Paragraph 4?
A.We will lose control of the worsening of the Earth.
B.He will help to deal with some important issues.
C.Measures should be taken to protect the Earth.
D.Human population should stop increasing.
4. Which of the following best describes Sir David according to the text?
A.Optimistic.B.Ambitious.
C.Generous.D.Devoted.
2017-10-03更新 | 147次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般