组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境污染
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:198 题号:14428807

With the outbreak of the COVID-19, multiple kinds of protective medical equipment, such as disposable(一次性的)masks, have been consumed. Market research indicates a sharp increase rate of 53% in the mask market alone. People often use these types of protective equipment and then throw them without thinking of the consequences, both on the ecosystem and human beings.

Disposable surgical masks are severely affecting the ecosystem. When improperly-handled masks enter the water system, they break up into smaller pieces. Complete masks can trap marine animals, resulting in their impaired mobility and even death. Meanwhile, the poisonous plastic particles will cause marine animals to be poisoned to death or weakness when they consume plastic. Furthermore, these harmful pollutants can severely affect reproduction, growth, and the development of the young. Just like their effects on marine animals, these pollutants can also contribute to severe harm in human bodies, especially in the neuron system. Exposure to micro plastics may cause particle poisoning, cellular damage and neuro-degenerative (神经退化的) diseases like Alzheimer’s disease(阿尔茨海默症).

Despite the potential harm to the ocean system and human neuron system, improperly-handled disposable masks will likely become a dangerous public health threat under the environment of a global pandemic. Instead of helping us fight against the COVID-19, to some extent, micro plastic pollution also causes the potential risk of speeding up the spread of the virus. Micro plastic particles in the ocean can be mixed up with water vapour to form aerosols in the atmosphere because they are small enough to enter the water cycle, where they are transferred from the marine system to the atmosphere in vast amounts and become a source for the disease COVID-19. thus causing the virus to speed up the spread of the global pandemic.

Humans will eventually suffer from the wrongdoing in the ocean systems because humans are nothing but temporary residents of the planet. Just like what the famous English anthropologist, Jane Goodall, has said, “Every individual matters. Every individual makes a difference.”

1. The underlined word “impaired” in paragraph 2 probably means“_________”.
A.strengthenedB.damaged
C.completedD.influenced
2. The improperly-handled masks lead to following outcomes EXCEPT_________.
A.the impact on marine lives’ reproduction, growth and weakness
B.the destruction to human’s neuron system, cellular system
C.the huge economic loss for people living near the sea
D.the great burden of micro plastic particles on ecosystem
3. The main idea of paragraph 3 is_________.
A.to describe the negative effects of disposed masks on nature and human beings.
B.to advise readers to deal with the improperly-handled masks.
C.how the improperly-handled masks help spread the virus.
D.how to deal with the virus.
4. What is the purpose of this article?
A.To explain a serious phenomenon caused by the virus.
B.To advocate a proper solution to solving the disposable masks.
C.To compare the sufferings between marine animals and human beings.
D.To analyze the harmful results of the improperly-handled masks.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】Ship tourism to Antarctica is on the rise: More than 35,000 tourists are expected to visit Antarctic this summer. In 1992-1993, 6,750 visited Antarctica, according to the Antarctica Treaty. All of this tourism, however, is putting both tourists and the environment in great danger.

Among the tourist ships that visit the continent, the Explorer, a Canadian ship, was one of the first. Put to use in 1969, it was built to carry tourists to Antarctica. Last week, however, it became the first commercial passenger ship to sink beneath the waters. Fortunately, all of the passengers and crew members were rescued from the ship. However, the sunken ship endangered the Antarctic’s fragile(脆弱的) environment. The ship was estimated to be holding 48,000 gallons of fuel.

The accident was not unexpected. Both the US and UK had warned a conference of the Antarctic Treaty member countries in May that the tourism situation in this area was a potential disaster. The US said in a paper, people “should take a hard look at tourism issues now, especially those related to ship safety.” Although the Antarctic seas are relatively calm, floating ice causes a potential threat to ships. The owner of the Explorer blamed the sinking on a fist-like hole in the ship created by ice.

Many of the other large ships now visiting Antarctica are not designed especially against thick ice. Such ships generally can only come to the continent in summer. But the tourist rush is pushing ships into dangerous situations. “The increasing number of ships operating in Antarctic means that the ship are under great pressure to get there in time for the key visiting sites,” the British government wrote in a paper at the meeting of member countries.

As a natural frontier, Antarctica is in a messy legal situation. There are no obvious answers as to who is responsible for dealing with the threat that tourist may cause to human life and the environment.

There is no coast guard for Antarctica. Do we want it to become Disneyland, or do we need some controls?

1. Which of the following is true according to this passage?
A.Antarctica tourism has a history of about 17 years.
B.The number of tourists to the Antarctic is over 5 times as large as that of 17 years ago.
C.The tourism boom has caused holes in the floating ice in the Antarctic.
D.The Antarctica Treaty is responsible for the environmental problems.
2. The sinking of the Explorer____________.
A.led to a conference about the tourism situation in the Antarctic.
B.was caused by the rough seas
C.had been predicted
D.did harm to the Antarctic.
3. In this passage, the writer suggests that___________.
A.people had better not make a tour of the Antarctic
B.ships to the Antarctic should be built strong enough
C.there should be legal controls over tourism in the Antarctic
D.the Antarctic’s environment is fragile to be protected
2019-12-27更新 | 147次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约500词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐2】Politicians and officials across the world — at local, regional (区域性的) and national level — have been coming up with new ideas to reduce air pollution. More recently, some have pointed the finger at countryside “contributions” to air pollution in the developing world, especially in India and China. During Diwali celebrations at the end of October last year, New Delhi’s pollution level was off the charts, cementing (巩固) the Indian capital’s status as the world’s most polluted large city and causing a nationwide debate on India’s killing smog (雾霾).

Official data from the Delhi Pollution Control Committee showed dangerous levels of smog, with concentrations (浓度) of both PM2.5 and PM10 hitting levels more than 30 times the World Health Organization’s recommended 24 hour average limit. Over the last few years India has held many conferences and workshops to find a solution to the smog. A regional approach is the most common suggestion to have appeared from these conferences, but the situation on the ground has not changed. In fact, it is getting worse with each passing year.

India has more than 100 coal-based power factories with old technology, with burning of crop remains adding to the emissions (排放物). And New Delhi’s grievous pollution is the result of a harmful mixture of emissions from vehicles and coal-fired power factories, fumes (烟) from cooking stoves and crop-burning in neighboring provinces. In Beijing, where air pollution is being treated as a health emergency, the government can order cars off the road and shut down schools and industries if particulates (微粒) threaten to rise to the highest WHO level — New Delhi’s level of pollution is unimaginable in Beijing.

North China, which battles smog in the winter, also has the problem of crop burning. Some local governments in China are punishing farmers who burn their crop remains and thus contributes to the air pollution in nearby cities. The problem is, farmers often burn crop remains as it is the only way to treat remains, and they have to burn coals to keep warm during the freezing winter in North China because they lack other means of heating.

Some will say this reflects elements of unbalanced economic development and the unfairness between countryside and urban areas is at the heart of the issue. Many people ask what options farmers have to keep themselves warm in the winter except by burning crop remains. Ideally, they should be provided with alternative energy sources, solar power or natural gas for example, to keep their homes warm in the freezing winter.

This can be achieved by China without much difficulty, because the country leads the world in investment in renewable energy. The plan, however, needs to be targeted at countryside farmers if we want them to stop adding to the air pollution of cities. Such a development is something I look forward to during my visits to China.

1. What can we know about Indian measures to reduce pollution?
A.The Indian regional approach has great effect on smog.
B.Indians tried their best to reduce pollution effectively.
C.India did nothing to find a solution to the smog.
D.The Indian regional approach has no effect on smog.
2. Which of the following statements about India is Not true?
A.It has many coal-based power factories with old technology.
B.A harmful mixture of emissions leads to New Delhi’s serious pollution.
C.Burning is one way for coal-based power factories to deal with crop remains.
D.The government can order cars off the road if particulates threaten to rise too high.
3. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.New Delhi’s celebrations caused Indian discussion on pollution.
B.New Delhi’s pollution level has made Indians know its damage.
C.Pollution created by crop burning is not a problem unique to India.
D.Farmers can burn crop remains to keep warm around the world.
4. What advice does the author give to the government?
A.The government should develop urban areas firstly.
B.The government should force farmers to use solar power.
C.The government should permit farmers to burn crop remains.
D.The government should do more for countryside development.
2019-07-13更新 | 101次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】The loud continuous noise of the cars or the sound of a plane can force its way into the deepest forest, yet it’s not only humans that are bothered by the noise.

Bioacoustician Bernie Krause has been studying the effect of noise pollution on wildlife, and has come across some interesting behaviors, especially among animals that communicate by vocalization(发声), like humans. Birds use sound to communicate, but in noisy places, these animals have to shout over the natural noise to be heard.

Krause mentions a study of nightingales to clarify what he means. The birds responded to traffic noise by singing louder and louder until they actually went beyond noise pollution standards in the city. To belt out (sing loudly) their songs, they increased their lung pressure fivefold, but scientists state that this is not dangerous for the birds themselves.

Studies show that sudden noise can cause certain birds to leave their nests, exposing the young to their enemies. One study also showed that songbirds that nested close to busy motorways were much less productive than those that nested farther away. Mammals(哺乳动物)too are affected. A recent study showed that nursing caribou responded to plane noise by not producing enough milk to feed their young.

In some cases noise pollution can actually help some animals while harming others. Toads(蟾蜍)and frogs are known to vocalize in synchrony(同步;同步方式)so that no predator (their enemies) can zero in on them. Krause found that when planes flew overhead and disturbed the toad’s song, they lost their synchronicity, and it took them 45 minutes to get it back again. That gave their natural enemies plenty of time to find and catch individual toads by sound.

According to Kruse, “Not only will noise pollution bother wildlife, but it won’t help our lives either.”

1. How do young caribou suffer from aircraft noise?
A.They receive less food.B.They can’t sleep at night.
C.They are often displaced.D.They can’t hear their mothers.
2. What would happen if toads and frogs failed to sing in union?
A.They might become defenseless.
B.They would stop communicating.
C.They would soon regain their rhythm.
D.They might ne unable to hunt in groups.
3. What is the text mainly about?
A.The effects of noise pollution on wildlife.
B.The causes of noise pollution.
C.Animals’ reaction to noises.
D.The ways animals communicate with each other.
2018-08-16更新 | 73次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般