The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported recently that diseases from mosquito, flea and tick bites tripled in the US between 2004 and 2016, with more than 640,000 cases seen during that period of time. Maine alone saw a 20-fold increase in cases of the tick-borne (蜱传播的) illness Lyme disease. The danger showed no sign of abating this year, with ticks crawling into Mainers’ lives as early as May.
Their early arrival was largely a product of warmer temperatures in the region. It is perhaps for this reason that Lyme disease-once a regional problem largely confined to New England-has now been discovered in all 50 states. Warm weather-loving ticks and Lyme disease are just the examples of how our rapidly-heating planet is destroying our health.
Climate change’s most visible symptoms are the natural disasters we’ve seen so often in recent years. When a disaster strikes, the most immediate threat to health is, of course, the danger posed by the event itself. During the 2017 wildfires in California and Oregon, for example, many living near the smoke reported respiratory distress (呼吸窘迫) and other problems because of breathing in the dangerous smoke. But this initial damage is often just a prologue (序幕) to the damage these disasters can have on our health-damage that unfolds over the course of weeks, months or even years.
Take standing flood water for example. It’s a ripe breeding ground for mosquitoes and bacteria and can pose a serious threat in the period following a major storm. Climate change’s impact is combined with the destruction of the basic construction-like power grids and drinking water delivery systems-and the loss of core services-like health care and waste disposal. It can both create new health challenges and complicate the treatment of existing ones.
Climate change can lead to storms and fires, fever and smoke, and the mental and physical health challenges that characterize the long aftermath of disasters. It is through these damages that climate change has gotten under our skin, into our lungs and weighed on our minds to the hurt of our well-being.
1. What does the underlined word “abating” in the first paragraph mean?A.Decreasing. | B.Distinguishing. | C.Disobeying. | D.Developing. |
A.Because of the movement of population. |
B.Because of the wide spread of mosquitoes. |
C.Because of more natural disasters in the country. |
D.Because of warmer temperatures all over the country. |
A.Natural disasters are becoming more common. |
B.We should take measures to prevent climate change. |
C.Climate change is becoming more and more noticeable. |
D.Climate change increases the chance of people getting sick. |
A.following time order | B.giving examples |
C.making comparisons | D.presenting research findings |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Just a year ago, the colors were bright under the waves. Now it’s gray — the Maldivian reef is dead. The coral is killed by the pressure of rising temperatures.
Coral reefs are areas underwater where small creatures live. The coral is hard material formed on the bottom of the sea by the skeletons of those creatures. But the world has lost about half its coral reefs in the last 30 years. Scientists are working to prevent their destruction. Due to global warming, over 90 percent of corals are expected to die by 2050. “To lose coral reefs is to fundamentally undermine the health of a very large proportion of the human race,” said Ruth Gates, director of the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology.
Why are coral reefs important? Coral reefs support a fourth of all marine species, as well as half a billion people worldwide. They serve as barriers to protect coastlines from the storms. They provide billions of dollars from tourism, fishing and other trade. They are also used in medical research for cures for diseases. “Everyone should be concerned,” said biologist Ove Guldberg at Australia’s University of Queensland. “This is not just some distant dive destination. This is the basic structure of the ecosystem we depend on.”
The ocean is getting warmer. A rising temperature of just one to two degree Celsius can force coral to expel the algae (驱逐海藻) that live there. This leaves their white skeletons uncovered. It is a process called “bleaching”. Sixteen percent of the world’s corals died of bleaching in 1998. The problem has become much worse in recent years.
“We’ve lost 50 percent of the reefs, but that means we still have 50 percent left,” said Ruth Gates, who is working in Hawaii to breed corals that can better withstand increasing temperatures. She is also trying to “train” corals to survive rising temperatures. Gates says it is time to start “thinking outside the box”— find creative ways to help them.
1. The underlined word “undermine” in paragraph 2 means ___________.A.weaken | B.regain | C.promote | D.overlook |
A.People won’t find a dive destination in the future. |
B.The effort to save corals will turn out to be fruitless. |
C.The destruction of coral reefs will affect the earth ecosystem. |
D.The bright sea has lost its charm because of those dead corals. |
A.the harm of algae | B.the process of “bleaching” |
C.the importance of coral reefs | D.the change of ocean temperature |
A.proud | B.cautious | C.optimistic | D.casual |
【推荐2】A group of scientists are warning that weather extremes in the future and growing demand could lead to a drop in power supplied from renewable energy. Many scientists have partly blamed human activities for an increase in extreme weather events.
The study predicts the world’s power systems are expected to face pressure. One of the biggest expected pressures to face power systems will be an increase in the use of air conditioning systems because of rising temperatures. Why? The UN has estimated that 68 percent of people will live in cities by 2050. That compares to about 55 percent who live in cities currently.
Dasun Perera, a lead writer of the study, said in a statement , “We observed that current energy systems are designed in a way that makes them highly susceptible to extreme weather events such as storms and heat waves.”
The researchers found that extreme weather will make it difficult to balance the demand for power with production. “This will make it difficult to match the energy demand and renewable power generation,” Perera said. “Dealing with the effects of climate change is going to prove harder than we previously thought.”
Perera told the French Press Agency AFP that extreme weather events could reduce the reliability of power supplies by up to 16 percent. This, he said, could easily lead to “blackouts resulting in huge economic losses.” Perera said that energy experts do not consider the effects of extreme climate events when planning and designing energy systems.
In a separate article published in Nature Energy, U.S. and European researchers noted that traditional energy models often fail to consider extreme weather.
The researchers called on world governments to consider the short-term risks of extreme heat and cold when planning and building energy systems. World governments should require “new thinking, new experiments, and, quite possibly, new combinations of tools.” The researchers added:“This is a tall order to be sure, but there is no risk in trying.”
1. Why does the world’s power systems face pressure?A.Because more and more people will choose to live in cities. |
B.Because the use of air conditioning systems is welcomed. |
C.Because human activities have led to global warming. |
D.Because the burning of fossil fuels caused extreme weather. |
A.Suitable. | B.Systematic. | C.Sensitive. | D.Subjective. |
A.Ignore the risks of extreme weather. | B.Take creative ideas into account. |
C.Carry out the strict rules. | D.Think twice before they do. |
A.Peace and development are two major issues in the world. |
B.There is no link between extreme weather and power systems. |
C.Extreme weather may put pressure on power systems. |
D.There is a very great demand for renewable energy. |
【推荐3】Climate change will bring greater extremes in weather, the Government’s chief scientific adviser warned as he called for action to deal with global warming. Professor Sir John Beddington says the effects of climate change on the weather are already being felt in the UK.
“In a sense we have moved from the idea of global warming to the idea of climate change, and that is rather important. Temperatures are increasing and there are more changes in our weather, ” he said.
Even if effective action is taken now on global warming, he says there will be great climate change over the next 20 to 25 years as a result of past global problems.
“We have serious problems in the world — in 12 years there will be another billion people on the planet and we have big issues of food security, water security and energy security, and many people will start to be living in cities, ” he said. “ These are serious problems; climate change is just going to make it worse.”
He said there were some “ uncertainties ” in the analysis of climate and climate change. “ But those uncertainties are completely unimportant in comparison with a great deal of evidence that shows it is happening in the sort of ways climate models would expect, ” he said. “ For example, the Arctic is heating up faster than other parts of the world — this is exactly what the climate scientists are predicting. ”
Sir John said those words as Britain experienced freezing cold weather and snow, with thousands of homes across the UK without power. England and Wales experienced 10 separate flooding events between April and December last year after widespread drought gave way to the wettest summer in a century, with unusually high rainfall totals and river levels around the country.
1. Which of the following is NOT one of the things that Sir John says?A.We need more action to deal with global warming. |
B.Climate change will make some big problems worse. |
C.Climate change will cause greater extremes in weather. |
D.England will experience more extremes in weather than Wales. |
A.25 years. | B.20 years. | C.12 years. | D.10 years. |
A.Puzzled. | B.Trusting. | C.Uncertain. | D.Unconcerned. |
A.To call for effective action on climate change. |
B.To introduce Professor Sir John and his opinions. |
C.To prove that the UK has experienced a series of disasters. |
D.To show how correct the climate scientists’ predictions are. |
【推荐1】Two and a half months before the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season officially begins, forecasters have already predicted and warned that warm sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic and the development of a La Niña in the Pacific may create a “perfect storm” of the conditions needed for major hurricanes.
Key to the formation of any tropical cyclone (气旋) is the combination of warm ocean temperatures and the absence of what is known as wind shear (风切变). Alex DaSilva, a forecaster, explains that wind shear occurs when wind changes direction and speed at different heights in the atmosphere. When there’s much wind shear, it essentially knocks down those clouds and prevents tropical systems from really intensifying. Besides, hurricanes also need surface water to be at a temperature of 26 degrees Celsius or higher. That warm water, and the warm air just above it, provides fuel for the storm. The record data for February are 1.2 degrees Celsius above normal.
Over periods ranging from three to seven years, the waters of the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean alternately (交替地) warm and cool as a result of a repeatedly occurring climate pattern called the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). During an El Niño, sea surface temperatures in the eastern Pacific increase, and those warmer temperatures affect the path of the Pacific jet stream, which in turn brings drier, warmer weather to the northern United States and Canada, and wetter conditions to the Gulf Coast of Mexico and southeast. El Niño reduces the possibility of Atlantic hurricane formation because it lowers hurricane activity and increases wind shear. La Niña has just the opposite effect of El Niño. During the 2023 season, ENSO was in an El Niño phase. By the time the 2024 season starts, it is likely to have shifted fully into a La Niña.
“If a tropical storm system comes into this area, it could rapidly intensify, potentially close to land,” DaSilva cautions. “And that’s why people need to be on alert and have their hurricane plans ready. Because any system with these kinds of conditions can explode very quickly. That’s what we’re concerned about.”
1. Where can you probably read this article?A.https://www.thecut.com/culture/ |
B.https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/sports |
C.https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/ |
D.https://www.smithsonianmag.com/category/innovation/ |
A.Dying down. | B.Falling away. | C.Breaking down. | D.Becoming stronger. |
A.Generate less wind shear. | B.Bring more rainfall to the Gulf Coast. |
C.Block the path of the Pacific jet stream. | D.Cause higher temperature in Canada. |
A.To remind people to get prepared. | B.To report the Atlantic hurricanes. |
C.To compare El Niño and La Niña. | D.To introduce some geographic knowledge. |
【推荐2】Last year, wildfire spread through Boulder, Colorado. It wasn’t a hot summer day. It wasn’t a forested neighborhood. It was winter in the suburbs (郊区). More than 1,000 homes and buildings burned.
Large parts of the country that don’t have wildfires are now at risk. They include nearly 80 million homes and buildings. That’s what new data shows. Over the next 30 years, the risk will only grow. The group First Street Foundation created a program called Fire Factor. People can go to a website to learn what their wildfire risk is in 2022 and in 2052. Right now, about 16% of Americans live in risky places. By 2052, that will go up to 21%.
California will likely suffer a lot from wildfire. That’s partly because it is so big and partly because of its weather. So California will be on the top of the at-risk list. But nearly half of all at-risk Americans in 2052 will live in the southern half of the U.S. The South will be home to the largest number of people at high risk: 32 million. States like Texas, Florida, Oklahoma, and North and South Carolina will be “in the line of fire,” so to speak, and so will southwestern states like Arizona and New Mexico.
People are doing many things to make fire risk worse. They are moving to places where wildfire is a natural yearly event. They are building homes right next to plants and trees that can burn. Climate change has increased heat and dryness. That means any spark (火花) at any time can cause a big fire.
As with many climate threats, wildfires put minorities (少数群体) at the greatest risk. By 2052, about 44% of all Native Americans will live in places at major risk from wildfire. Nearly 1 in 4 Hispanics will. People who don’t speak English or own cars will have a harder time learning about and getting away from a fast-moving fire.
1. What problem did Boulder have last year?A.Strange weather. | B.Huge loss of forests. |
C.Widespread wildfires. | D.A rapid drop in populations. |
A.About 16% of Americans are safe now. |
B.The risky areas of wildfire are increasing. |
C.The risk of wildfire will be lowered in 2052. |
D.Nearly 80 million homes are burnt down by wildfire. |
A.Florida. | B.South Carolina. |
C.California. | D.New Mexico. |
A.Reasons why wildfire risk is worse. | B.Dangers humans may face in the future. |
C.Actions taken by humans to prevent fire. | D.Suggestions for self-protection in wildfire. |
A.About 16%. | B.About 21%. |
C.About 25%. | D.About 44%. |
【推荐3】Entire towns in western Germany were destroyed last week by “the flood of the century”, said Susanne Scholz in Express, and the whole country is in shock. The images on TV news looked like they were coming from a tropical monsoon zone (热带季风区), not our first-world nation. Never did we think we would see our own citizens “trapped in houses on the edge of crash, in danger of being swept away by masses of water”.
Days of severe rain got rivers to burst their banks in the states of Rhineland-Palatinate and North Rhine-Westphalia, and in neighboring Belgium and the Netherlands. In the small town of Sinzig, the River Ahr reached its highest level at about 23 feet, flooding a nursing home and drowning 12 disabled residents who could not flee.
Authorities have so far confirmed some 200 deaths across Germany, but hundreds more people remain missing. While authorities say it’s too early to put a price tag on the damage, the images of flooded homes and electrical stations, damaged bridges, and cars crumpled (变皱) by fallen trees tell a tale of vast material loss. “The German language hardly knows any words for the damage that has been brought about,” said Chancellor Angela Merkel. She praised the thousands of volunteers who came to pump out water, load sandbags, and search for survivors.
“Disaster control clearly failed,” said Peter Tiede in Bild. State and local authorities responsible for evacuation (疏散) warnings relied on smartphone apps that many Germans don’t have — and service was out anyway because the storms had downed the cell towers. Only old-fashioned alarms work in such emergencies, yet our few loudspeaker vans never left the stations. Public radio, meanwhile, “was playing pop music while hundreds of people were being washed away, houses collapsing, villages torn down to the ground.” It’s simply unforgivable. “How bad will it get when such a flood hits a major city like Cologne or Hamburg instead of villages and small towns?”
1. How did the whole country react to the flood?A.They were indifferent. | B.They were quite surprised. |
C.They were in high spirits. | D.They were well-prepared. |
A.Days of heavy rain. | B.Failure in disaster control. |
C.Old-fashioned alarms. | D.Delayed Evacuation warnings. |
A.The German language is limited. | B.Volunteers are needed badly. |
C.The damage is beyond description. | D.New vocabulary should be added. |
A.Authorities Should Be to Blame | B.Major Cities Are Ready for Emergency |
C.Harmful Floods Raise Concerns in Germany | D.Deaths Are Confirmed in Terrible Floods |
【推荐1】If you have heart disease, your doctor might tell you, eat more vegetables, a strategy that has limited success.
“Getting people to change their diets is actually pretty hard. These are lessons I would give over and over again. And I would think, ‘Why is this so hard to do?’” Jennifer L. Smith is a nurse researcher at the University of Kentucky who now has a preliminary answer about why change is so hard: it might depend on your genes. Specifically, whether or not you’re genetically tended to perceive(感知)bitterness—and therefore bitter vegetables. So broccoli(西兰花)is definitely one of them. They tend to be cruciferous(十字花科的)vegetables, like cabbage. If you ever took that test in science class where you put a piece of paper on your tongue to see if it tastes bitter, you might already know your bitter status.
Smith took saliva(唾液)samples from 175 adults known to be at risk of heart disease. She then did a genetic test to determine whether they had a copy of a bitter-taste gene variant. She also had them fill in a questionnaire about their eating habits. After controlling for factors like age, gender, income, and so on, Smith found that people with a copy of the bitter-sensitive gene variant were just 40 percent as likely to report eating a lot of vegetables as were the folks without the gene variant. She’s presenting the results this week at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions in Philadelphia. “If these findings hold up to more testing,” Smith says, “perhaps doctors could advise patients with this gene variant to avoid the most offensively bitter vegetables but to try the others.” “Or perhaps certain herbs and spices might reduce the bitterness,” she says. Of course, chefs already figured this out with cheesy broccoli. But for heart patients, the better flavor might not be a favor.
1. What mainly decides people’s eating habits?A.Income and health. | B.Age and gender. |
C.Bitter status. | D.Genes. |
A.Cheesy broccoli. | B.Cruciferous vegetables. |
C.Broccoli and cabbage. | D.Vegetables without bitterness. |
A.People with the gene variant eat a lot of vegetables. |
B.Doctors can take advantage of Smith’s test results. |
C.Smith’s findings need to be further tested. |
D.Smith’s test results have been proved. |
A.An experiment guide. | B.A history book. |
C.A science magazine. | D.A science fiction. |
【推荐2】If you see someone collapse(晕倒), perhaps as a result of a heart attack, what can you do while you wait for an ambulance? Chen Wenqiaochu set a good example when he was 14. He performed CPR on a cleaner at his school, saving the man's life in 2013. Chen showed that knowing how to perform CPR can be beneficial.
According to medical experts, there is a "golden period", the first four minutes of a heart attack, when CPR is most effective in saving the person's life. On Aug. 24, a joint guideline was issued by the Ministry of Education and Red Cross Society of China. It asks all public schools nationwide to provide first-aid courses, including CPR training, as part of health education. CPR is not hard to grasp. All that one needs to learn is how to observe and decide if a person is unconscious, where to press on the patient's chest, and how to blow air through the mouth and into the lungs.
Unfortunately, less than 1 percent of Chinese adults have mastered the skill of CPR, while many have never heard of it. A 2019 survey from the Development Research Center (DRC) of the State Council noted that although 64.6 percent of schools have opened health education courses, the teaching results are not satisfactory, according to China Youth Daily.
Zhao Shengyu, 18, a graduate from a Shandong high school, recalled her first time to be taught CPR in the class. "No model, video or practice was included. I realized the acts I had been taught orally had lots of errors after I was trained another time in a medical school," she said. Based on her own experience, Zhao said more qualified first-aid courses in schools are necessary. Ding Banghan, a doctor from Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, is a strong supporter for bringing first-aid knowledge into the classroom. "The first-aid course in schools is key for its popularization," said Ding.
Apart from China, many countries have attached importance to the popularization of first-aid training, including CPR.
1. How did Chen Wenqiaochu save a man's life?A.By calling an ambulance. |
B.By waiting for an ambulance. |
C.By asking doctors for help. |
D.By performing CPR. |
A.CPR is the most effective way in saving the person's life. |
B.The first-aid course has already been provided in all public schools. |
C.Chinese public schools will provide first-aid courses in the near future. |
D.There is no need to learn how to perform CPR for us ordinary people. |
A.Supportive. | B.Indifferent. |
C.Disapproving. | D.Neutral. |
A.Chen Wenqiaochu sets a good example for all the Chinese. |
B.It's urgent and necessary to bring first-aid knowledge including CPR into the classroom. |
C.What is CPR. |
D.How to perform CPR correctly. |
【推荐3】It sounds like a math problem. How do you make one of the world’s most famous ancient sites bigger? You can’t build more of it.
So with ever more tourists pouring into the site, the team behind the Archaeological(考古的)Park of Pompeii have found a plan B—dividing visitors around ancient sites that are farther, with all-in-one tickets and buses laid on between the sites.
The ancient city of Pompeii will be a scattered archaeological park, including the archaeological areas of Pompeii itself, as well as famous old houses in nearby villages or towns. The sites have already become part of the Archaeological Park of Pompeii, but until now, they have been selling their own tickets. They are also far away from each other—the park’s sites cross around 8 miles—with little public transport to some of them.
The inaccessibility(难达到)to the old houses means that visitor numbers are low. While nearly four million people visited Pompeii itself in 2019, only 55,000 made it to see House A, which is thought to have been owned by the emperor Nero and his second wife. Only 52,000 went as far as the two houses at Stabiae, House Arianna and House San Marco. But visitor numbers to Pompeii rose from under 2.7 million in 2014 to over 3.9 million by 2019. In July 2023, a record 21, 141 people visited the park in a single day.
A bus service around the sites—the Pompeii Artebus—was started in 2021. Tickets for the connected sites will be acceptable for three days, with free buses connecting all the sites.
1. How is the Archaeological Park of Pompeii made bigger?A.By building more of it. | B.By improving the service. |
C.By connecting nearby sites. | D.By attracting more tourists. |
A.Narrow. | B.Private. | C.Impressive. | D.Spread-out. |
A.It has lost its attraction. | B.It was rebuilt in 2019. |
C.It is free for visitors all the time. | D.It is overcrowded with visitors. |
A.The Archaeological Park of Pompeii getting bigger. |
B.The ancient Pompeii bringing in modern transport. |
C.The Archaeological Park of Pompeii getting more popular. |
D.The ancient houses in Pompeii changing their tickets. |