组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 天气与气候 > 气候
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:94 题号:15748073

Climate change will bring and has already brought a wide variety of threatening destruction to human existence. Some of these are well-known and already operative, like the wildfires racing along California’s freeways or the permanent droughts that have been upsetting Mediterranean farmers. But are these all terrible disasters we can come up with that are brought about by climate change?

Absolutely not. None of the challenges posed by our warming climate has appeared larger in the popular imagination than sea-level rise, as global populations and wealth are heavily concentrated in low-lying coastal cities. The best available models suggest that 37 million people currently live in places that will be below high tide by 2050-in an optimistic low-carbon-emissions scenario (设想).

Or rather, that’s what such models suggested before this week. On Tuesday, a new study revealed that those alarming statistics were wildly inaccurate. The actual impacts of sea-level rise are going to be much, much worse.

Previous estimates of the impact that rising tides would have on coastal cities relied on essentially a three-dimensional map of Earth obtained from satellite readings. But those readings were fundamentally unreliable because they often measured the planet’s upper surfaces — such as treetops and tall buildings — rather than its ground level. These mistakes led scientists to overestimate the elevation (海拔) of many regions of Earth.

In a new study published by the journal Nature Communications, scientists from Princeton, University detail this methodological problem, then use artificial intelligence to determine the previous literature’s error rate. Their research yields some amazing updates to our conventional understanding of what the next century has in store for our coastlines.

In its optimistic scenario, the Princeton study projects that lands currently occupied by 150 million people will lie below high tide in 2050. But as warming destroys many of the world’s agricultural regions, climate change could accelerate migration from rural areas to coastal cities.

The new study does include one piece of slightly encouraging news. While previous models suggested that 28 million humans currently live in places that already lie below high tide, the actual number is closer to 110 million — which means seawalls and other barriers have proven sufficient to keep many cities dry even as sea levels have risen around them. Still, the scale of barrier construction necessary to save low-lying cities from collapse is now, apparently, far greater than previously understood when the task already looked terribly expensive, particularly for developing countries.

If the Princeton researchers’ projections are correct, avoiding mass death and suffering in the coming decades will require not only rapidly reducing carbon emissions and strengthening construction of seawalls but also furthering mass migrations away from low-lying cities and islands and toward higher ground.

1. The first paragraph is mainly intended to ________.
A.lay emphasis on the seriousness of climate changeB.show various disasters caused by climate change
C.call on people to fix attention on climate changeD.introduce the topic of this passage
2. All the following statements are true EXCEPT ________.
A.the three-dimensional map produced by satellite is not accurate
B.the Princeton study reveals an optimistic picture of sea rising
C.some measures are mentioned by the writer to deal with sea rising
D.more people are likely to live in coastal cities in the coming years
3. We can see something encouraging from the Princeton study that ________.
A.it’s cheap to construct seawalls as well as other barriers
B.the scale of barrier construction is much greater than before
C.seawalls do have the function to prevent coastal cities being drowned
D.developed countries have less trouble in dealing with rising sea levels
4. What is the warning that the passage is sending out?
A.How to protect cities from rising seas.B.Climate change is endangering human existence.
C.Rising seas are going to drown more cities.D.Less emission of carbon, fewer fires and droughts.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 较难 (0.4)
真题 名校

【推荐1】By the end of the century, if not sooner, the world’s oceans will be bluer and greener thanks to a warming climate, according to a new study.

At the heart of the phenomenon lie tiny marine microorganisms(海洋微生物) called phytoplankton. Because of the way light reflects off the organisms, these phytoplankton create colourful patterns at the ocean surface. Ocean colour varies from green to blue, depending on the type and concentration of phytoplankton. Climate change will fuel the growth of phytoplankton in some areas, while reducing it in other spots, leading to changes in the ocean’s appearance.

Phytoplankton live at the ocean surface, where they pull carbon dioxide(二氧化碳) into the ocean while giving off oxygen. When these organisms die, they bury carbon in the deep ocean, an important process that helps to regulate the global climate. But phytoplankton are vulnerable to the ocean’s warming trend. Warming changes key characteristics of the ocean and can affect phytoplankton growth, since they need not only sunlight and carbon dioxide to grow, but also nutrients.

Stephanie Dutkiewicz, a scientist in MIT’s Center for Global Change Science, built a climate model that projects changes to the oceans throughout the century. In a world that warms up by 3℃, it found that multiple changes to the colour of the oceans would occur. The model projects that currently blue areas with little phytoplankton could become even bluer. But in some waters, such as those of the Arctic, a warming will make conditions riper for phytoplankton, and these areas will turn greener. “Not only are the quantities of phytoplankton in the ocean changing. ” she said, “but the type of phytoplankton is changing.”

And why does that matter? Phytoplankton are the base of the food web. If certain kinds begin to disappear from the ocean, Dutkiewicz said, “it will change the type of fish that will be able to survive.” Those kinds of changes could affect the food chain.

Whatever colour changes the ocean experiences in the coming decades will probably be too gradual and unnoticeable, but they could mean significant changes. “It’ll be a while before we can statistically show that the changes are happening because of climate change,” Dutkiewicz said, “but the change in the colour of the ocean will be one of the early warning signals that we really have changed our planet.”

1. What are the first two paragraphs mainly about?
A.The various patterns at the ocean surface.
B.The cause of the changes in ocean colour.
C.The way light reflects off marine organisms.
D.The efforts to fuel the growth of phytoplankton.
2. What does the underlined word “vulnerable” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Sensitive.B.Beneficial.C.Significant.D.Unnoticeable.
3. What can we learn from the passage?
A.Phytoplankton play a declining role in the marine ecosystem.
B.Dutkiewicz’s model aims to project phytoplankton changes.
C.Phytoplankton have been used to control global climate.
D.Oceans with more phytoplankton may appear greener.
4. What is the main purpose of the passage?
A.To assess the consequences of ocean colour changes.
B.To analyse the composition of the ocean food chain.
C.To explain the effects of climate change on oceans.
D.To introduce a new method to study phytoplankton.
2019-06-10更新 | 3639次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐2】Industrial emissions (排放) of carbon dioxide and other planet-warming greenhouse gases have raised the global average temperature by about 0.8°C since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. But studies have disagreed about what impact the rise is having on the world’s species, says Mark Urban, an ecologist at the University of Connecticut, Storrs. Some have estimated that as many as 54% of species could eventually become extinct as a result of the climate change, but others have suggested no significant impact.①

Such disparate result might originate from the limited nature of some individual studies, possibly because they focused only on a few species or a relatively small geographical region, says Urban.② To address these limits, Urban used statistical methods to help blend the results of previous studies into an apples-to-apples comparison that estimates the risk of extinction of species worldwide.

③He chose to analyze only the results of studies that had assessed extinction risks of more than one species. Then he researched into the details, such as the regions in which species considered, whether those species were limited to one small region or were widely spread, and whether the species were free to move as climate changed or were blocked by barriers such as mountain ranges or urban development.④

Effects of climate change aren’t always immediate, Urban says, and the risks of extinction he’s estimated are the long-term results of species not being able to find a suitable habitat. Maybe the habitat will merely shrink to a size that can’t support the species, or maybe it will disappear entirely. In some cases, he notes, a species might not be able to outpace the shift in its range, dying out before it can reach a new homeland. For over the generations that rapid warming might kill them off before they can spread to a suitable new habitat.

1. What is the passage aimed to tell us?
A.It is the Industrial Revolution that raised the global average temperature.
B.Mark Urban is an ecologist at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
C.The climate change contributes to almost all the species dying out.
D.Global warming is not a main factor accounting for species extinction.
2. The sentence “And different teams have often used different methods to come up with their predictions.” can be placed in ________.
A.①B.②C.③D.④
3. According to Mark Urban in Paragraph 4, some species died out mainly because of ________.
A.the rising temperaturesB.human activities
C.their low birth ratesD.the loss of their habitats
2018-07-16更新 | 103次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】Scientists say seagrasses can be a valuable tool in fighting climate change. But many of these plants are being harmed as mining and fishing pollute the seawater.

In March, scientists went on an expedition (考察) to an area in the Indian Ocean thought to contain the largest field of underwater seagrass in the world. The team collected data to learn more about what affects the health of seagrasses.

Studies have shown that a big benefit seagrasses bring is that it can store up to two times the amount of carbon that forests do. If seagrasses can stay heathy and grow, they can remove carbon dioxide, or CO2, from the environment. CO2 is one kind of greenhouse gas that scientists have linked to rising temperatures in Earth’s atmosphere.

The Indian Ocean expedition, led by environmental group Greenpeace, traveled to Saya de Malha near the island nation of Seychelles. The field of seagrass at Saya de Malha is about the size of the European nation of Switzerland. Because the area is far from coastlines, it has stayed well protected from pollution and digging activities that can harm sea life. The seagrasses are also closer to the surface, meaning they take in more sunlight. This environment provides shelter and rich feeding grounds for thousands of different living things in the ocean.

Among those taking part in the expedition were scientists from Britain’s Exeter University. They say they were able to collect some of the firsthand field data on the area’s wildlife, including its little-studied seagrass beds. The team gathered up pieces of grass floating in the water to examine later in the laboratory. It isn’t yet known how much carbon is being stored in Saya de Malha. But experts estimate that worldwide, the root systems of seagrasses trap more than 10 percent of the carbon buried in oceans sediment (沉积物) per year. Therefore, the carbon-storing abilities of seagrass have massive implications (影响) for worldwide efforts to limit climate change.

This year, Seychelles began looking at its coastal seagrass carbon supply for the first time. And at least 10 countries have said seagrasses would play a part in their climate action plans.

1. The harm to seagrasses is mainly done by ________.
A.frequent harvestingB.global climate change
C.over-crowded living spaceD.pollution linked to human activities
2. Seagrasses have an advantage over forests in ________.
A.carbon storageB.rainfall increase
C.oxygen productionD.temperature reduction
3. What can we know about the seagrasses at Saya de Malha?
A.They stay quite close to coastlines.B.They are in danger of being polluted.
C.They cover an area as large as Europe.D.They benefit local sea creatures greatly.
4. What’s the best title for the text?
A.Caution: It Is Really Urgent to Preserve Seagrasses
B.A New Tool to Fight Climate Change Has Been Found
C.Scientists Study How Ocean Seagrasses Can Fight Climate Change
D.Scientists Find What Is to Blame for the Declining Health of Seagrasses
2021-06-25更新 | 97次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般