Levels of an ozone-destroying chemical are mysteriously rising, despite international efforts to crack down on the problem. The uptick in the airborne chemical HCFC-141b comes even though reported production has declined steadily since 2012, leaving scientists stumped about the source. “All I can really say is these emissions are up,” says Luke Western, an atmospheric scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Global Monitoring Laboratory, who helped lead the new research.
The discovery underscores the challenge of getting rid of these once widely used chemicals, which can linger in appliances for decades. It also shows how continent-size gaps in a network of sensors make it hard to pinpoint sources of the problem.The chemical, used chiefly to make foam insulation for appliances such as refrigerators, is part of a family of fluorocarbon molecules blamed for eating away at a layer of stratospheric ozone, roughly 20 kilometers above the ground, that filters out harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. The world began to wean itself off these chemicals under the 1987 Montreal Protocol, widely considered the most successful international environmental treaty. Overall, ozone-damaging chemicals have declined steadily since the early 2000s, and the ozone “holes” above the poles have begun to heal.
In 2018, however, researchers reported that levels of the banned chemical CFC-11 had been rising since 2012. An international panel concluded that surge was likely due to illicit production, much of it in eastern China, perhaps because HCFC-141b, then used as a substitute for CFC-11 because it is less destructive to ozone, was in scarce supply. Releases of CFC-11 started to fall once again in 2019. By now production of HCFC-141b should also be declining. Its phase-out began in 2013, with a complete ban scheduled for 2030. It is already being replaced by a group of chemicals that doesn’t damage the ozone layer.
But scientists say atmospheric levels of HCFC-141b are actually rising. Emissions have climbed each year between 2017 and 2021, an increase totaling 3000 tons from 2017 to 2020, the researchers estimate. The findings, based on a combination of measurements from air sensors and computer models of how the gases move through the atmosphere, were posted online on 27 April by Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, although the paper hasn’t been peer reviewed yet. The rise of the newer chemical doesn’t appear to be a repeat of the CFC-11 incident, says Stephen Montzka, an atmospheric scientist who heads NOAA’s monitoring lab and led the work that uncovered the CFC-11 emissions. “I think in the instance of 141b the situation is much murkier,” he says. Results from air sensors in South Korea suggest the problem isn’t originating from eastern China. It does seem to be coming from somewhere in the Northern Hemisphere, because levels have risen faster there than in the south.
One possibility is that unreported HCFC-141b is being manufactured somewhere in the world, Montzka says. But the blip could also be temporary, triggered as aging appliances are thrown out and the foam breaks down, releasing the gas. “Taking a close look, we realized there are possible explanations that don’t require somebody doing something that they weren’t supposed to do,” Montzka says.The monitoring work in papers like this is “critical,” says Helen Walter-Terrinoni, a member of the Montreal Protocol’s technical panel and a chemical engineer with the Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, which represents major manufacturers. The panel reports every 4 years on the state of ozone-depleting gases and the science surrounding them. Its new report, slated for 2023, “could help shed more light on what’s going on” with the rising emissions, Walter-Terrinoni says.
For now, gaps in the air sensor network have made answers elusive. The sensors are concentrated in North America and Europe, with only a handful in East Asia and at isolated sites elsewhere. Scientists are blind to what’s happening in much of India, Russia, and the Middle East, and most of Africa and South America. “If there were emissions in those regions,” Montzka says, “we wouldn’t be able to tell you very accurately where they are coming from.”
The picture could improve in the coming years. In the wake of the CFC-11 incident, an EU-funded initiative is underway to install more sensors and close some of those gaps. For now, Montzka isn’t alarmed about the added dose of chemicals. It amounts to a “small perturbation” in the ozone layer, he says, just a fraction of 1% of the ozone-damaging power of gases now in the atmosphere.
1. Which type of writing does this passage belong to?A.Descriptive writing. | B.Expository writing. | C.Persuasive writing. | D.Narrative writing. |
A.Valid. | B.Licensed. | C.Constitutional. | D.Illegal. |
A.Ground filters out harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. |
B.The world began to wean itself off these chemicals. |
C.Unreported HCFC-141b is being manufactured somewhere in the world. |
D.Ozone-damaging chemicals haven’t declined steadily. |
A.Atmospheric Levels of HCFC-141b Are Actually Rising |
B.Bad Picture Could Improve in The Coming Years |
C.Ozone-destroying Chemical Is on The Rise Despite Crackdown |
D.Continent-size Gaps in Sensors Make It Hard to Pinpoint Sources of The Problem |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Blue Planet Ⅱ’s latest episode (情节) is about how plastic is having a terrible effect on the ocean and slowly poisoning our sea creatures. Researchers have also found that sea creatures living in the deepest place on Earth, Mariana Trench, have plastic in their stomachs. Indeed, oceans are drowning in plastic.
Though it seems that the world couldn’t possibly function without plastic, plastic is a very recent invention. The first plastic bags were introduced in the 1950s, the same decade (十年) that plastic packaging began gaining popularity in the United States. This growth has happened so fast that science is still catching up with the change. Plastic pollution research, for example, is still a very early science.
We put all the plastic into the environment, but we still don’t really know what the outcomes are going to be. What we do know, though, is disturbing. Ocean plastic is expected to kill millions of sea animals every year. Hundreds of species, including endangered ones, are known to have been affected by it. One in three leatherback turtles, which often mistake plastic bags for jellyfish, have been found with plastic in their stomach. Ninety percent of seabirds are now eating plastic regularly. By 2050, that figure is expected to rise to 100 percent.
And it’s not just wildlife that is threatened by the plastic in our seas. Humans are consuming plastic through the seafood we eat. I could understand why some people see ocean plastic as a disaster, worth mentioning in the same breath as climate change. But ocean plastic is not as complicated (复杂的) as climate change. There are no ocean waste deniers (否认者), at least so far. To do something about it, we don’t have to remake our planet energy system.
This is not a problem where we don’t know what the solution is. We know how to pick up garbage. Anyone can do it. We know how to deal with it. We know how to recycle. We can all start by thinking twice before we use single-use plastic products. Things that may seem ordinary, like using a reusable bottle or a reusable bag — when taken collectively, these choices really do make a difference.
1. Why is plastic pollution research still a very early science?A.The plastic pollution research is too difficult. |
B.Plastic has produced less pollution than coal. |
C.Plastic has gained popularity too fast for science to catch up. |
D.The world couldn’t possibly function without plastic. |
A.By presenting reliable data. |
B.By citing quotes from leading experts. |
C.By making a comparison and contrast. |
D.By listing examples from his own experiences. |
A.We reap what we sow. |
B.The shortest answer is doing. |
C.All things are difficult before they are easy. |
D.Actions speak louder than words. |
A.The oceans become choked with plastic. |
B.Ocean plastic is a global problem. |
C.Blue Planet Ⅱ has left viewers heartbroken. |
D.Plastic gains in popularity all over the world. |
【推荐2】Food production does great harm to our environment. There are many procedures involved in the manufacture of food that result in greenhouse gases and other pollutants. Some procedures require the consumption of large amounts of fossil fuels, such as the transportation and storage of food products. Other factors that cause great damage to our environment include the overuse of fresh water.
The production of beef is more damaging to the environment than that of any other food we consume. Raising large numbers of cattle requires the production of large amounts of food for the animals. it's estimated that producing one pound of beef requires seven pounds of feed.
Land use is also a problem. If the cattle are free-range cattle, large areas of land are required for them to live on. This has led to disastrous forest cutting and the loss of rare plants and animal species, particularly in tropical rain forests in Central and South America.
Another problem specific to beef production is methane emissions (甲烷排放). Although many people are aware of the damaging effects of carbon dioxide, they don't realize methane's global warming potential is 25 times worse, making it a more dire problem.
Unfortunately, beef consumption is growing rapidly. This is the result of simple supply and demand factors. Specifically, there are two main causes of demand that are encouraging the production of more supply. First, the increase in the world population means there are more people to consume meat. The second factor is socioeconomic advancement. As citizens in developing nations become financially stable, they can afford to buy more meat.
Therefore, one way to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions is for people around the world to significantly cut down on the amount of beef they eat.
1. Which of the following is TRUE?A.Raising free-range cattle is eco-friendly. |
B.People cut down trees for animal habitats. |
C.Producing beef can damage the environment. |
D.Carbon dioxide causes far more harm than methane. |
A.common |
B.urgent |
C.beneficial |
D.avoidable |
A.more people are in demand of beef |
B.developing countries raise more cattle |
C.more land is available to raise cattle |
D.the cost of raising cattle is relatively low |
A.describe the booming of the beef production |
B.emphasize the advantages of beef production |
C.criticize the cutting of the rain forest |
D.argue for a decrease in beef consumption |
【推荐3】Somewhere between 40,000 and 110,000 tons of plastic waste produced by Americans ends up in the ocean, according to a study published in the journal Science.
It's difficult to point out where all that waste comes from, and researchers think that much or most of it probably comes from the nation's seriously-populated coasts. But there's also evidence that the nation's inland waterways serve as a passage for plastic to travel thousands of miles into the oceans.
While researchers have documented plastic and human trash floating in the world's oceans, there has been relatively little attention paid to plastics in rivers, streams and lakes. "To my knowledge, no one has studied particular routes, with the exception of places like L.A, and Baltimore Harbor where there are measures in place to prevent trash in rivers from entering the ocean." said Kara Lavender Law, an oceanographer.
The few studies that exist, however, suggest that it may be a huge problem. A 2011 study of two southern California urban rivers---including Santa Ana River---found that every square meter of water contained from 125 to 819 pieces larger than 4.75 millimeters. Another survey of the Meuse River, which flows 575 miles through France, Belgium and the Netherlands to the North Sea, found that it contained 70,000 pieces of plastics per square meter of water, about 500 of which were roughly an inch or bigger in size.
If there's anything positive in this, it's you that can do something, at least on a personal level, to reduce the amount of plastic that goes into the oceans. "Put trash where it goes." said Jenna Jambeck, an associate professor of environmental engineering at the University of Georgia. "Use reusable items---bags, cups and bottles---to reduce waste."
Finally, Jambeck urges people to pick up litter along waterways, and record it with a phone app called the Marine Debris Tracker. The data you provide can help scientists to get a better handle on the trash problem.
1. According to the text, the least polluted place might be __________.A.Santa Ana River | B.Meuse River |
C.Baltimore Harbor | D.The North Sea |
A.By referring to experts' views. | B.By listing statistics. |
C.By making comparisons. | D.By following time order. |
A.Make use of plastic items. | B.Reduce the size of waste we throw away. |
C.Stay positive about the oceans' future. | D.Start from small things to deal with waste. |
【推荐1】In an attempt to fight with the nation’s food wastage problem, Denmark has opened the world’s first supermarket that sells expired(过期的) or damaged products. Ever since the grand opening in Copenhagen last Monday, people have been lining up outside WeFood for a chance to purchase discounted items that would otherwise have ended up in the trash because of damaged packaging or very short use---by dates. Food, cosmetics, and other household items at WeFood are priced at least 30 to 50 percent lower than at regular stores.
“WeFood is the first supermarket of its kind in Denmark and perhaps the world, as it is not just aimed at low-income shoppers but anyone who is concerned about the amount of food wastage produced in the country,” said project head Per Bjerre. “Many people see this as a positive and correct way to approach the issue.”
While Denmark alone is estimated to waste about 700,000 tons of food every year, the United Nations has stated that globally, food waste amounts to 1.3 billion tons. About 795 million people in the world are undernourished. Denmark, however, has adopted several measures to clean up its act, wasting 25% less food than it did five years ago.
The WeFood project is a collaboration between The Food Bank and charity DanCurch Aid. Together they raised nearly $150.000 over the past year through crowdfunding. They also had to face many obstacles while convincing the government to permit the sale of expired food. They were finally allowed to carry out the project, and the store is now run only by volunteers. Profits are used to fund DanChurch Aid’s other projects in developing nations like South Sudan and Bangladesh.
Provided WeFood’s remains popular in the long term and if it is able to maintain its food deliveries, DanChurch Aid plans to open multiple branches across Denmark.
1. Since WeFood was opened last Monday,_______.A.people have started to doubt |
B.people have been strongly against it |
C.it has been well received |
D.discounted items have been on sale online |
A.Amazing. | B.Doubtful. | C.Less. | D.Unclear. |
A.The WeFood project has got enough funds. |
B.Cooperation plays a key role in raising money. |
C.Denmark is eager to import more expired food. |
D.Denmark is trying to do business with South Sudan. |
A.Waste food and the safety of food |
B.Food wastage problem and Hunger |
C.Expired food supermarket in Denmark and its future |
D.World’s first expired food supermarket opens in Denmark |
【推荐2】If you’ve been in public in the past year or so, chances are you’ve noticed someone breaking dining etiquette(礼仪) that would seem second-nature to any adult. Why does our dining etiquette seem to be at an all-time low right now.
“Overall, there is much less feeling about the common good, which means caring about your neighbor---whether at home or in a restaurant,” said Steven, who writes articles for USA Today.
Take the use of cellphone at the table for example. While a 2015 survey by the Pew Research Center found that 38 percent of those surveyed thought it was acceptable to use their phones while dining out, the increasing number of cellphone bans in restaurant shows that restaurants aren’t putting up with it.
However, some look on the growing use of cellphones as a sign that manners change alongside our society.
“Manners change,” said the writer behind a food site The Takeout. “What we consider improper isn’t set in stone.” She points out the other “rules” that have since become outdated nowadays, like saying “Sir” and “Ma’am,” as proof of this change.
Yes, traditional manners are yet another thing being redefined by youth. “Younger people are growing up in a world with more flexible rules, and this spreads to the dining table,” said Daniel Levine, director of global trends consultancy The Avant-Guide Institute.
Whether you prefer high-end restaurants or a fast-casual meal, the biggest reason behind the decline of manners may just be a numbers game.
“I believe it is more likely for people to break dining ‘rules’ because they go out and eat more often,” said Diane Gottsman, owner of The Protocol School of Texas. “Years ago, people stayed home and sat around the family table. Today, there are more people in the workforce, which makes it more affordable for socializing and eating out. With new chance comes the possibility for more dining problems.”
1. What did the 2015 survey find?A.Many people accepted using phones at the table. |
B.Cellphones were banned in more and more restaurants. |
C.Most of the surveyed people used phones while eating out. |
D.Few restaurants took positions on using phones while eating. |
A.To show modern people are becoming impolite. |
B.To explain dining rules in high-end restaurants. |
C.To prove dining etiquette changes through time. |
D.To argue young people are making dining rules today. |
A.they think they are unimportant. |
B.they grew up with flexible rules. |
C.they have more chances to eat out. |
D.they must hurry meals to get back to work. |
A.To introduce changes in dining manners. |
B.To encourage people to have dining manners. |
C.To report survey findings on dining manners. |
D.To discuss the reasons for poor dining manners. |
【推荐3】“Some of the worst human tragedies happening in the world today go on because we don’t really see them. We rarely make eye communication with people who are suffering, so we act sometimes as if the people don’t exist.”
The speaker is Bill Gates, the world’s richest man. At a gathering in Seattle, he is talking not as the Microsoft chairman but as a partner in a strong personal duty. For Gates and his wife, Melinda, making less inequality in global health and domestic education has become a life’s goal.
Having set up their foundation with close to $29 billion, the Gates are on track to become history’s greatest philanthropists (慈善家). But they do more than just give money out. Experts praise the couple for their wisdom and their ability to gather others: “Even with this great contribution,” says Susan Schwab, president and CEO of the University System of Maryland Foundation, “they know they can’t solve these problems alone.”
Their devotion came from different sources. For Melinda, it was a vacation to Zaire, where she was struck by meeting women in being extremely poor. For Bill, it was reading that millions of children die every year from preventable diseases. “Melinda and I had assumed that if there were medicines and treatments that could save lives, government would be doing everything they could to get them to…people,” Bill said at the World Health Assembly in Geneva. “We couldn’t escape the cruel conclusion that…some lives are seen as worth saving and others are not.”
From shock came action. They focused on the simple message that one life is worth no more or less than another. Frances Hesselbein, chairman of the non-profit Leader to Leader Institute, says: “Sometimes people give in a very fair way, but there is something about what they are doing…that is the opposite of that. It is very difficult to understand and very personal.”
Both Gateses read scientific books and travel extensively in developing countries. So far, the Gateses have developed $9 billion to global health. They share a sense of urgency. “We’re not doing enough in developing countries to give out the treatments and practices we know are effective in fighting diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis and HIV,” the couple told U.S. News.
1. Which of the following does Bill Gates think is not correct?A.We act sometimes as if the people suffering don’t exist. |
B.They can’t solve these problems alone. |
C.Some lives are worth saving and others are not. |
D.Government would be doing everything to help people. |
A.hit | B.impressed | C.attacked | D.hurt |
A.They have had great influence on global health. |
B.They are limited to the area in Africa. |
C.They only focus on medical treatment. |
D.They are carried out without government’s support. |
A.praise Bill and Melinda Gates for their kindness | B.raise more money for the foundation |
C.explain to people how the projects work | D.convince more people of helping others |
【推荐1】Would you wear a dress that tells people that they’re standing too close to you? Or how about a shirt that changes color when it senses a change in your feeling? Those are actual creations Dutch designer Anouk Wipprecht has been working on for 20 years.
When she was 14 years old, Anouk Wipprecht started making women’s clothing. By 17, while in a design school, she decided to create something she’d never seen. One of her most notable designs is named “Spider Dress”. On the shoulders of the dress, there are long spider-like tentacles(触手)that move with the help of sensors and micro robots. It measures the intimate(亲密的)space(less than 20cm), the personal space(35cm), the social space(50cm)and the public space(more than 100cm)of the wearer. Whenever somebody unfamiliar comes into the personal space, it starts warning. That 3D printed design has been tried by models and shown around in the US and the world, including China, Russia and Holland.
When COVID-19 hit, Wipprecht created her “Proximity Dress”, which she called a very fashionable(时尚的)way to use sensors to keep social distance. This white dress looks unassuming so nobody can see anything special about it. But it balloons out when someone gets too close.
Right now, she’s working on the “Moody Wearable” that shows the wearers’ feelings like anxiety and sadness. “We live in a time when a lot of people start getting into anxious mode. But they might not want to speak about it. So, my designs might create a situation that these things become more discussable and help them feel less stressed. ” Wipprecht explains.
1. A stranger should stand at least ______ away from the “Spider Dress” wearer.A.20cm | B.35cm |
C.50cm | D.100cm |
A.Pretty. | B.Expensive. |
C.Funny. | D.Ordinary. |
A.To protect the wearers. | B.To test her new technology. |
C.To keep social distance. | D.To serve as a conversation starter. |
A.Health. | B.Fashion. |
C.Environment. | D.Photography. |
【推荐2】Keeping a travel journal (日志) is one of the best ways to keep the memory(记忆) of a trip alive. There’s nothing like going back and reading your own words describing a day in a foreign country to realize how easy it is to forget little details. For people who do not write often, keeping a travel journal doesn’t have to be hard. It doesn’t require much work. I usually set aside 15-20 minutes at night before going to bed.
I like to use a notebook and pen because it feels different from typing on a computer, which makes journaling more special. Besides, I believe that handwritten journals will last longer than digital documents(数字文档) and won’t become dated. I recently came across a bag of old travel journals from my grandmother’s home, describing a year of camping around Europe and the Middle East in the 1970s as well as her life on the island of Crete for three years. They’re still readable and I love seeing her handwriting once again.
While I recommend paper journals for daily writing, it doesn’t hurt to have a multi-media approach(多媒体方法).For example, on a bus in Sri Lanka, it was too bumpy (颠簸的) to write by hand, so I used my phone to take notes whenever thoughts came to me. This turned out to be a rich store of information that might have been meaningless to anyone else, but made perfect sense to me.
When keeping a travel journal, I also suggest focusing on the most important or memorable part of each day, rather than doing an hour-by-hour description. Ask yourself what made you smile, laugh, or cry, what you ate or smelled in the air, and what the locals were doing. Keeping a travel journal should be fun, but it is important to make it a daily habit.
1. What does the author think of keeping a travel journal?A.It helps improve our language skills. | B.It makes our trips seem planned. |
C.It is less difficult than we think. | D.It should be a bedtime habit. |
A.How he organized his journals. | B.How long he has kept journals. |
C.Who he learned journaling from. | D.Why he likes handwritten journals. |
A.He read a local paper. | B.He wrote on his phone. |
C.He reviewed his daily journals. | D.He thought about the meaning of writing. |
A.Doing it every day. | B.Including more details. |
C.Focusing on local history. | D.Sharing less personal feelings. |
【推荐3】One of the many interesting features of American society is the prestige granted to business institutions. Their status is arguably greater than that of any other kind of organization including, or perhaps especially, the government. What exactly is it about Americans that makes them place business on such a high social level and admire the successful business person so openly?
One possible explanation could be that Americans view business as being more firmly based on the concept of competition than other institutions in their society. Fair and open competition is an ideal long cherished, one could even say deep rooted in American political and economic life. It is seen as the source of progress, prosperity and opportunity. In fact, in the American psyche, the importance of free competition goes even deeper than that; free competition is the means by which other defining values such as democracy and individual liberty are achieved and ensured.
In American eyes, competition protects the freedom of the individual by ensuring that there is no monopoly of power, either economic or political. As in politics, where the government is divided into branches, each with powers that offset those of the others, businesses compete against each other for profits. The idea being that if one business tries to take unfair advantage of its customers, it will lose to competitors who treat their customers more fairly. In theory, where many businesses compete for the customers' dollars,the interests of the consumer will be paramount.
Competition in business is also believed to strengthen the American ideal of equality of opportunity. It is seen as an open and beneficial contest where success goes to the fittest; to those most deserving of it. Competitive success is commonly seen as the American alternative to social rank based on inherited status. In America, accomplishment in business and the accumulation of wealth and power thereby is viewed in the same light as an aristocratic ancestry once was in the Old World.
1. According to the passage, business achievement in America __________.A.is losing the respect of the society |
B.has always been highly regarded |
C.is second only to public service in social status |
D.has been viewed differently over the years |
A.The wealthy. | B.The government. |
C.The dishonest businessman. | D.The society as a whole. |
A.Both are considered untrustworthy. | B.Both primarily benefit the wealthy. |
C.Both are based on competition. | D.Both have a monopoly on power. |
A.Competition is generally fair. |
B.Competition should be limited to business. |
C.Competition should be regulated by the government. |
D.Competition does not benefit the poor. |