组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.85 引用次数:59 题号:15853491

In an area that’s surrounded by Scotland’s coal mining past and its industrial present, there’s a transformation happening beneath our feet. Just three years ago this area was re-engineered to bring the coastal wetland back to its natural state.

Allison Leonard, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, “We tear down the coastal defenses and let the water back in. But within a year or two we were seeing saltmarsh plants reappear. And we’re now three years down the line and you know, it’s all saltmarsh. And at that point we kind of just stepped back and let nature do its thing, and we’re really seeing the wildlife respond. So birds are using it at high tide and we see lots of deer, hares in the spring.”

As well as a diverse wetland habitat, this marsh has become a natural tool in our fight to reduce emissions of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere. Marshland plants absorb one of those key planet-warming gases, carbon dioxide, which then becomes buried in the mud. Lucy Miller, Research technician, University of St Andrews, said “This is some of the most organic-rich soils we find in the UK, compared to agricultural land, forest, forestry land. So we’ll wrap this up in cling film and then just to keep it, hold its shape and then we take it back to the University of St Andrews. We have a laboratory there. We will just perform a couple of experiments using a couple of different machines to measure the different layers, different levels of carbon within the layers of the core here.”

Allowing the sea to reclaim this stretch of land has provided a glimpse of how we can help nature to help us deal with the climate crisis.

1. What do the underlined words “a transformation” refer to?
A.The reappearance of saltmarsh.B.The recovery of the coastal wetland.
C.The bigger emissions of greenhouse gas.D.The fiercer climate crisis.
2. What can we infer from Paragraph 3?
A.Marshland plants take in harmful gases.B.Researchers have handled water pollution.
C.The air quality will be improved.D.The marsh makes a pollution-free environment.
3. Why will Lucy Miller take away some of the soils?
A.To measure levels of carbon in each layer.B.To get the data of different levels of soils.
C.To check the quality of different soils.D.To compare different soils.
4. What does the text mainly talk about?
A.The industrial transformation.B.The solution to the climate crisis.
C.The coastal wetland back to its natural state.D.The fight to reduce emissions of greenhouse gas.
【知识点】 环境保护 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 较易 (0.85)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。介绍了在格陵兰岛东南部发现了另外一种北极熊,在没有海冰的情况下,依靠冰川掉落的冰而觅食。

【推荐1】Researchers have discovered a unique group of polar bears who’ve survived in the absence of sea ice: by hunting from the ice that breaks off glaciers (冰川). The bears live in southeast Greenland and are a genetically(基因地) distinct subpopulation, which suggests they’ve been separated from other polar bears for around 200 years, according to a paper published this week in Science.

“The findings show us how some polar bears might survive under climate change. but I don’t think glacier habitat is going to support huge numbers of polar bears,” said Kristin Laidre, a polar research scientist at the University of Washington. “There’s just not enough of it. We still expect to see large declines in polar bears across the Arctic under climate change.”

When temporary ice sheets form on the ocean during each fall’s freeze, the bears walk across it in search of food, often by sitting next to gaps in the ice and waiting for seals to come up for air. When the ice melts (融化) in spring, polar bears typically survive between 100 and 180 days without food until the ice forms again. As temperatures rise, however, that period is becoming longer, which is harming the bears and pushing them toward starvation. The bears living in southeast Greenland go even longer without sea ice—around 250 days. But they’ve been able to continue bunting during that period by using large pieces of ice that break off from glaciers into the water.

There are roughly 26, 000 polar bears remaining across the globe. Though the southeast Greenland bears have adapted to surviving in their surroundings, rising temperatures may ultimately cause their glacial ice to shrink, too. As Steve Armstrup, a scientist with Polar Bears International says, the study “is not some kind of effective rescue for polar bears”. While the southeast Greenland bears are able to hunt through glacial ice today, he says, “In the future, that will change unless we arrest the rise of global greenhouse gases.”

1. What do we know about the newly- found polar bears?
A.They exist in large numbers.B.They have genetically changed.
C.They do better in hunting seals.D.They survive longer without food.
2. What is Steve Armstrup’s advice?
A.Keeping global warming under control.
B.Moving many polar bears south.
C.Preventing glacial ice breaking.
D.Finding new habitats for polar bears.
3. What is the best title of the text?
A.Polar Bears Find New Opportunities
B.Polar Bears Suffer From Lack of Ice
C.Polar Bears Survive in Iceless Regions
D.Polar Bears Decline With Climate Change
4. In which section of a website can you read this text?
A.Lifestyle.B.Health.C.Travel.D.Environment.
2023-01-12更新 | 127次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 较易 (0.85)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。一项研究表明,由于PFAS的含量偏高,地球上所有的雨水都不能安全饮用。减少PFAS含量,确保雨水的安全性迫在眉睫。

【推荐2】A study by Stockholm University and ETH Zurich scientists found that all rainwater on Earth is unsafe to drink due to the levels of PFAS (全氟烷基物质), or poisonous chemicals. These PFAS or poisonous chemicals are becoming a part of a future reality that humans must, unfortunately, learn to live with. PFAS were first found in shampoo, packaging, and even makeup but have begun to spread into our Earth. A professor at Stockholm University and lead author of the study, Ian Cousins noted, “There is nowhere on Earth where-the rain would be safer to drink, according to the measurements that we have taken.”

Using their study’s data, Cousins and his team illustrated that chemical levels in rainwater from remote areas are unsafe and above the US Environmental Protection. Agency’s (EPA) drinking water guidelines. Within this study, they took rainwater samples, from extremely remote areas like Antarctica or the Tibetan plateau. Although these areas are originally known as being remote and untouched, their PFAS levels are around 14 times higher than the US EPA guidelines.

PFAS have been associated with a range of serious health problems including cancer, childhood behavioral and learning problems, immune system disorders, and high cholesterol (胆固醇): Cousins continued by saying, “Based on the latest US guidelines for PFOA (全氟辛酸) in drinking water, rainwater everywhere would be judged unsafe to drink. Although in the industrial world we don’t often drink rainwater, many people around the world expect it to be safe to drink and it supplies many of our drinking water sources.”

Managing Director of the Food Packaging Forum, Dr Jane Muncke, said, “The vast amounts that it will cost to reduce PFAS in drinking water to levels that are safe based on current scientific understanding need to be paid by the industries producing and using these chemicals. The time to act is now.”

1. Which of the following is true about PFAS?
A.They were initially found in rainwater.
B.Their levels affect the security of rainwater.
C.They are mainly present in makeup products.
D.They will be completely removed in the future.
2. Why did researchers take rainwater samples from areas like Antarctica?
A.To reveal rainwater is rare in these areas.
B.To cut down the spending on rainwater study.
C.To confirm the widespread presence of PFAS.
D.To measure the quality of rainwater in these areas.
3. What does the author want to convey in the third paragraph?
A.It’s time to stop people from drinking rainwater.
B.It’s necessary to improve the safety of rainwater.
C.It’s promising to expand. Drinking water sources.
D.I’s tough to address PFAS-related health issues.
4. Which statement will Dr Jane Muncke probably agree with?
A.Scientists should be devoted to reducing PFAS.
B.Public efforts are required to obtain safe drinking water.
C.Some industries should bear the costs of reducing PFAS.
D.The chemical industry is responsible for the unsafety of PFAS.
2023-04-04更新 | 114次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 较易 (0.85)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了动物因各种原因而濒临灭绝,每一种的背后都有人类的因素。文章以渡渡鸟的灭绝为例讲述了人类是如何导致其它物种灭绝的。

【推荐3】What do the following animals have in common? Pandas, rhinoceros, Mexican burrowing snakes, pink pigeons and small tooth sawfish.

They are all endangered animals! Animals become endangered for a variety of reasons. Sadly, humans are behind every one of them!

For centuries, humans have hunted elephants for their tusks, and killed tigers for their beautiful fur, caught fish for food. While we still have elephants, tigers, and fish in the wild, we cannot say the same about many others that have simply died out!

Year 1505 was a dreadful turning point in the natural history of the island of Mauritius — European sailors discovered this beautiful island in the Indian Ocean and brought dogs, pigs, monkeys with them. The arrival of humans and those introduced animal species were bad news for dodo birds. About 50 pounds and flightless, dodo birds did not have any natural enemies until then. They picked fruit fallen from trees and built their nests on the ground. Shortly after humans set foot on Mauritius, however, dodo birds realized that they were in big trouble — men killed them for their meat, and those introduced animal species destroyed their nests and ate their eggs. The effects of excessive hunting and foreign species drove dodo birds to first become much fewer and then die out. The last dodo bird was killed in 1681.

Humans and animals have always competed for land and other natural resources. We clear an area of a forest for farming. We cut down trees and use wood to build beautiful houses. We build reservoirs to make sure that we have enough water to use. At the same time that we are trying to make our life comfortable, we destroy the habitats of wild animals.

More than once we have seen on television that rescue workers are trying their best to save seabirds in spilled oil. More than once we have heard about how emissions of carbon dioxide (二氧化碳的排放) and other gases have raised the earth's temperature and caused global warming. Pollution has a serious and long lasting effect. If we choose to do nothing and continue to pollute our planet Earth, our next generations will have to face an Earth without birds singing and beasts roaring.

1. Which of the following are NOT endangered animals?
A.Pandas.B.Rhinoceros.C.Pink pigeons.D.Dodo birds.
2. What does the underlined word “dreadful” (in Paragraph 4) mean?
A.Surprising.B.Exciting.C.Awful.D.Quick.
3. Paragraph 5 mainly talks about _______.
A.how excessive hunting led to endangerment of animals
B.when foreign species entered the island of Mauritius
C.the human activities caused the loss of habitats of animals
D.pollution played a main role in the worsening of the environment
4. What is the best title for the passage?
A.What makes the animals in dangerB.How to save the endangered animals
C.Pollution and animalsD.Don't hunt for animals
2023-03-19更新 | 214次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般