组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自我 > 方法/策略
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:47 题号:19232480

You watch a sad film and get caught up in your emotions. You cry your eyes out at the dramatic plot —you feel sad for the characters if they suffer, or happy for them when they are successful. It is only when the movie is over that you realize that what you were watching is not real.

But why couldn’t you accept that when you were so absorbed in the movie? It was reported in Science Daily this week that scientists at Case Western Reserve University, US, discovered that people simply cannot think emotionally and logically at the same time.

It has long been known that something different goes on in our brain when we use logic, rather than responding to something emotionally. Thinking logically is a step-by-step process, in which people make decisions through reasoning and find answers rationally. When we think emotionally or empathize (有同感) we look at things from someone else’s point of view and try to feel their pain.

Now scientists have found that thinking logically and emotionally are like the two ends of a seesaw (跷跷板)— when we’re busy empathizing, the part of the brain used for cold-hard analysis is suppressed (抑制). And it’s also true the other way round.

To come to this conclusion, scientists gathered 45 people — men and women — to take brain scans as they solved different kinds of puzzles. Some of the puzzles were tough and involved math and physics and others were social problems that required participants to put themselves in other people’s shoes.

Scientists found that when participants were doing a math problem, the region in their brain that is associated with logical thinking lit up, and when asked to make emotional decisions, the region for emotional thinking lit up. But the most interesting part is that when asked to solve problems that required both logical and emotional responses, the participants always used one of the regions at a time while the other one went dark.

“Empathetic and analytic thinking are... mutually (相互之间地) exclusive (排斥的)in the brain,” said Anthony Jack, leader of the study. “You don’t have to favor one, but cycle efficiently between them, and employ the right network at the right time.”

However, people sometimes ended up using the wrong one. This explains why some people are good at solving complex math problems but have poor social skills. And why even the smartest people get taken in by fake but touching stories.

1. Why does the author mention watching movies at the beginning of the article?
A.To show that we are easily moved by things that are not real.
B.To show that sometimes we only use emotional thinking.
C.To prove that emotional thinking is powerful.
D.To introduce the research based on this kind of experiences.
2. Scientists at Case Western Reserve University proved through their recent tests that ______.
A.logical thinking works differently from emotional thinking
B.logical thinking and emotional thinking take turns to function independently
C.logical thinking is much more efficient than emotional thinking
D.logical thinking and emotional thinking could work together
3. We can conclude from the last two paragraphs that ______.
A.people have to frequently switch between different types of thinking
B.adopting the wrong thinking mode could have bad results
C.people could only either have excellent logical thinking or emotional thinking
D.people who think logically could easily be controlled
【知识点】 方法/策略 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约500词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章讲述了成功的秘密。

【推荐1】The secret of success

The recipe for succeeding in any given field is hardly a mystery: good ideas, hard work, discipline, imagination, perseverance and maybe a little luck. Oh, and let’s not forget failure which Dashun Wang and his colleagues at Northwestern University call “the essential prerequisite (先决条件) for success” in a new paper.

But not every failure leads to success, he adds. And what eventually separates the winners from the losers, the research shows, certainly is not persistence. One of the more interesting findings in the paper, published last October in Nature, is that the people who eventually succeeded and the people who eventually failed tried basically the same number of times to achieve their goals.

It turns out that trying again and again only works if you learn from your previous failures. The idea is to work smart, not hard. “You have to figure out what worked and what didn’t, and then focus on what needs to be improved instead of struggling around and changing everything,” says Wang. “The people who failed didn’t necessarily work less than those who succeeded. They could actually have worked more: it’s just that they made more unnecessary changes.”

As they explored “the mechanisms governing the dynamics of failure” and built their model. Wang’s team identified what they describe as previously unknown statistical signatures that separate successful groups from unsuccessful groups, making it possible to predict their final outcomes.

One such key indicator (besides keeping the stuff that works and focusing on what doesn’t) is the time between consecutive (连续的) failed attempts, which should decrease steadily. In other words, the faster you fail, the better your chances of success, and the more time between attempts, the more likely you are to fail again. “If someone has applied for a grant and they are three failures in,” Wang says, “if we just look at the timing between the failures, we will be able to predict whether they will eventually succeed or not.”

Working with such large-scale data, Wang and his colleagues were able to identify a critical point that was common to each of the hundreds of thousands of undertakings they had analyzed, a fork in the road where one path leads to a development region and one leads to a stagnation region.

“This diverging pattern of performance increases with each new attempt,” says Wang. Although in some cases it is apparent which region a person is in as early as the second attempt.

Wang points out that the existence of the tipping point cuts against the traditional explanations for failure or success, such as luck or a person’s work habits. “What we’re showing here is that even in the absence of such differences, you can still have very different outcomes,” he says. What matters is how people fail, how they respond to failure and where those failures lead.

1. It can be learned from Paragraph 2 that ________.
A.winners are more persistent than losers
B.failure is not important for success at all
C.more trying doesn’t necessarily breed success
D.winners and losers differ in how many times they tried
2. Wang and his colleagues believe that ________.
A.no one can obtain success without failure
B.the performance pattern is hard to identify
C.failure can sometimes help predict success
D.the critical point had been discovered by chance
3. The underlined phrase “a stagnation region” in Paragraph 6 refers to a region ________.
A.in its elementary stageB.without progress
C.unknown to outsidersD.beyond recognition
4. What is the conclusion of Wang’s research?
A.Winners try less than losers but gain more.
B.Perseverance is the utmost secret to success.
C.Working smart can turn failures into future successes.
D.Luck and work habits make little difference to the result.
2022-04-29更新 | 211次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐2】Stage fright or performance anxiety is the anxiety, or fear which may occur in an individual by the requirement to perform in front of an audience. It is most commonly seen in school situations, like stand-up projects and class speeches. It has numerous forms: heart beating fast, trembling hands and legs, sweaty hands, dry mouth etc.

In fact, most of the fear occurs before you step on stage. Once you’re up there, it usually goes away. Thus, it is a phenomenon that you must learn to control. Try to think of stage fright in a positive way. It heightens your energy, adds color to your cheeks. With these good side effects you will actually look healthier and more physically attractive.

Many of the top performers in the world get stage fright so you are in good company. Stage fright may come and go or decrease, but it usually does not disappear permanently (永久地) . You must concentrate on getting the feeling out and present what you have prepared calmly.

Remember “Nobody” ever died from stage fright. But, according to surveys, many people would rather die than give a speech. If that applies to you, and you are an unlucky guy who is with stage fright the whole time, try out some of the strategies

(策略) as follows to help get yourself under control. Realize that you may never overcome stage fright, but you can learn to control it, and use it to your advantage.

Strategies are as follows when the program begins:

1) If legs are trembling, lean on table or shift legs or move.

2) Don’t hold notes. The audience can see them shake. Use three-by-five cards instead.

3) Use eye contact. Look at the friendliest faces in the audience.

Remember nervousness doesn’t show one-tenth as much as it feels. Before each presentation, make a short list of the items you think will make you feel better. Don’t be afraid to experiment with different combinations. You never know which ones will work best until you try. Use these steps to control stage fright so it doesn’t control you. Once you are used to stage fright, you will find you on the road to a great speech-maker.

1. Someone may be most likely to suffer from stage fright when he/she is ______.
A.attending an English class
B.standing in a classroom
C.watching a performance
D.talking in front of people
2. Which of the following is true?
A.Top performers usually suffer from stage fright.
B.Stage fright may stay with a person for a life time.
C.Nobody would rather die than give a speech.
D.No one can overcome or control stage fright.
3. The author advises people with stage fright to ______.
A.show one-tenth of their nervousness
B.experiment with different kinds of stage fright
C.refer to the strategies whenever they feel the need
D.use one of the strategies each time
4. The passage mainly talks about ______.
A.how to deal with stage frightB.what stage fright is like
C.when stage fright occursD.why people have stage fright
2019-12-19更新 | 77次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约210词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。我们大多数人错误地认为创造性只是属于发明家而不是自己,但事实上我们每个人天生都有创造的潜力。本文讲述了3条培养我们的创造力的建议。

【推荐3】Most of us mistakenly think that creativity is a quality belonging only to inventors rather to ourselves.     1     The following tips are a great beginning for developing our creativity.

1. Get out of your comfort zone

Break out of your usual patterns and welcome creativity into your life. The human brain was designed to recognize patterns. We continue to create patterns and routines for almost everything we do.     2     As we become more efficient at using patterns, we rely less on creativity to find new paths. We should force ourselves out of our comfort zones and open up new possibilities.

2.     3    

If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got. We are creatures of habits and routines, but creativity hates routines. Interrupt your routine and try something new. Undoubtedly, new things are often creative.

3.Take action

    4     You must work to make it a reality. Have you ever seen a new product and realized that you thought of the same thing long ago? Yet someone else is making money with “your” idea.     5     The difference between a dreamer and a doer is action. If you can put your ideas into practice, you are well on your way to improving your creativity. You can become a true inventor in your own life somehow!

A.Having a great idea is not enough.
B.Seek several options.
C.We may attempt to think from the other person’s point.
D.Try different things.
E.However, the truth is that we are all born with the potential to be creative.
F.In fact, our comfort zone is only a collection of patterns.
G.We all have great ideas sometimes, but only a few people turn their ideas into reality.
2017-08-24更新 | 149次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般