组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:55 题号:19436168

As the carbon countdown clock ticks on, cities must be more imaginative and cooperative, a lively round table hosted in Newham by a non-profit organization Friends of the Earth said.

“Net zero is around the corner,” said Mike Wake, Director of Friends of the Earth. “The UK has cut greenhouse gas emission (排放) by 40% to date mostly through the growth of large renewable generation on the grid (输电网), but further cuts will be needed as London tries to find new ways of using energy.

“While Newham has lower greenhouse gas emission per head than the UK, it has high levels of fuel poverty, poor air quality and leaky homes. Vastly improved energy efficiency, especially on older and leakier homes, along with more efficient forms of heating and an expansion of low carbon heat networks, will help,” said Wake.

“But the future requires a shift to a more communal solution,” the representatives said. District heating, which pipes hot water from a central source to connected homes or businesses, is often a cheaper and lower-carbon method of heating highly populated areas. “It’s the lowest cost and low carbon solution for the future,” Wake added.

“There are new technologies to use wasted heat,” Wake said. “We worked with businesses to decarbonise (使环保) energy supply. Rather than wasting, spare heat generated by manufacturing and other activities can be captured and used to heat nearby properties. Friends of the Earth has already helped save Newham thousands of tonnes of emissions through district heating plans, solar PV and more energy efficient measures in the homes.”

But the challenges are substantial. Newham has London’s second-highest rate of fuel poverty. “Anyway, I’m confident and hopeful about the collective challenge,” said Wake. “But for Newham to be at the forefront of a green economy, to solve fuel poverty and deal with structural equalities, we must spare no effort.”

1. What does Wake think of cutting greenhouse gas emission in the UK?
A.It doesn’t work at all.B.It ended a short time ago.
C.It is very difficult to continue.D.It still needs to be improved.
2. What does the underlined word “communal” in paragraph 4 mean?
A.Expensive.B.Peaceful.C.Public.D.Complex.
3. How did Friends of the Earth help protect the environment?
A.By releasing wasted heat.
B.By starting up many businesses.
C.By making national heating plans.
D.By solving the issues about energy.
4. What is Wake’s attitude to the challenges of Newham?
A.Worried.B.Positive.C.Uncaring.D.Critical.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】UW’s Jason Shogren and Linda Thunstrom, along with Jonas Nordstrom of the Lund University School of Economics and Management, have documented that two-adult households with children emit over 25 percent more carbon dioxide than two-adult households without children.

The study involved an analysis of expenditures on goods and services by households in Sweden. The researchers found that parents with children at home consume goods and services that emit CO2 in the areas of food, such as meat, and transportation, such as gasoline, at higher rates than childless households.

The economists note that time constraints (约束) become more demanding, and convenience may become more important, when people have children.

“Parents may need to be in more places in one day,” resulting in people driving themselves instead of using public transportation or bicycling, the researchers wrote. “They also need to feed more people. Eating more pre-prepared, red meat carbon-intensive meals may add convenience and save time.”

The distinction in the carbon footprints of Swedish households with and without children is particularly striking, as concerns about climate change are more pronounced in Sweden than most other developed counties. Most Swedes believe climate change is real and have accepted sizable CO2 taxes, and households with children are given financial aid, which helps to alleviate some of the time shortage for parents to a certain extent.

“If we’re finding these results in Sweden, it’s pretty safe to assume that the distinction in carbon footprints between parents and nonparents is even bigger in most other Western countries,” Thunstrom says.

“Becoming a parent can transform a person, he or she thinks more about the future and worries about future risks imposed on their children and of spring,” Shogren says. “But, while having children might be transformational, our results suggest that parents’ concerns about climate change do not cause them to be ‘greener’ than non-parent adults.”

1. According to the study, compared with the households without children, the households with children __________.
A.emit more carbon dioxide
B.consume more goods and services
C.attach more importance to the quality of goods and services
D.are less concerned about carbon footprints
2. Why do two-adult households with children have higher carbon footprints?
A.They prefer to eat red meat prepared in advance.
B.They aren’t concerned about climate change.
C.They drive cars more as a consequence of time pressure.
D.They need to purchase more goods and services.
3. The underlined word “alleviate” in paragraph 5 refers to __________.
A.solveB.heightenC.worsenD.ease
4. What is the main idea of the passage?
A.Being a parent will cause a person to be more concerned about carbon emission.
B.Carbon footprints grow with parenthood because of increased time constraints and the need for convenience.
C.The increasing expenditures on goods and services by households help raise the awareness of carbon footprints.
D.The difference in carbon footprints between parents and nonparents is much severer in other western countries than in Sweden.
2020-06-16更新 | 151次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约270词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】The health and welfare of every person in America will be affected by global warming, especially children, the elderly and the poor, according to a new White House science report.

The report said every region (地区) of the country will suffer worse health from heat waves and drought. All but a handful of states would have worse air quality and flooding. It predicts an increase in diseases spread by tainted (腐烂的) food, bad water and bugs (臭虫).

The report concludes that climate change causes real risk to human health and human system that supports the way of life in the United States.

Man-made global warming is caused by greenhouse gases from the burning of fossil fuels. At current emission (放射) levels, global temperatures are likely to rise by about 2 degrees by midcentury and about 7.5 degrees by the end of the century.

The most vulnerable (脆弱的) Americans — the poor, elderly, sick, very young and immigrants — will suffer more. That’s at least 10 percent of the country’s population, probably more. It will be tougher for these people to get enough health care for climate-related illnesses, to cool down in heat waves, to escape extreme events such as Hurricane Katrina, and even to get enough food.

While every region of America is vulnerable to global warming’s health and welfare effects, more people are moving to coastal regions, which are most vulnerable to climate change because of drought and hurricanes.

1. According to the report, we learn all of the following will risk human’s health EXCEPT ______.
A.increase in the number of bugs
B.reduction in carbon dioxide emissions
C.global warming and climate change
D.heat waves and drought
2. What does the underlined sentence in Paragraph 2 mean?
A.All of states would suffer flooding.
B.About half of all states would have clear air.
C.Flooding would occur in almost all the states.
D.Air quality in few states is not high.
3. Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage?
A.Global temperatures are increasing year by year because of carbon dioxide.
B.Global warming is caused by human beings.
C.It is wise for the Americans to move into coastal regions.
D.At least one tenth of Americans are more likely to suffer climate-related illnesses.
4. he writer wrote this passage to ______.
A.explain how the phenomenon of global warming forms
B.provide evidence that global warming and climate change risk human’s health
C.warn every American of the danger of global warming to their health
D.protect the vulnerable Americans from suffering from diseases
2019-09-10更新 | 12次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文为一篇说明文。从墨西哥下加利福尼亚半岛到阿拉斯加的太平洋海岸线上的向日葵海星大量锐减,其原因之一可能是气候变化,同时也因此会加剧气候变化,华盛顿大学的科学家们希望培养新一代的向日葵海星,希望最终恢复目前受到威胁的海草等生态系统的健康。

【推荐3】The population of a sea creature known as the sunflower sea star, which was once plentiful along the Pacific coastline from Mexico’s Baja California peninsula to Alaska, has been reduced sharply these years. Approximately 90% of them have disappeared since 2013 due to a mysterious sea star wasting syndrome (海星消瘦综合症).

One of the factors likely to have led to the death of sea stars is rising ocean temperatures caused by climate change, according to some scientists. The ocean absorbs most of the excess atmospheric heat caused by greenhouse gas emissions, which has the effect of increasing the temperature of the water. Many sea creatures can only tolerate very small changes to their environment.

Sunflower sea stars feed on sea urchins. Sea urchins feed on seagrass. Without the presence of sunflower sea stars, their key predator in the food chain, sea urchin populations have boomed. That has led to the death of many seagrasses — which in turn contributes to the climate crisis, as seagrass is a valuable tool to store carbon dioxide.

Scientists at the University of Washington have been working on that. They have been raising a new generation of sunflower sea stars that can be used to repopulate coastal waters. Jason Hodin, a research scientist at the University of Washington’s Friday Harbor Labs, said that they’re hoping the program can help recover the sunflower sea star and, ultimately, recover the health of ecosystems like seagrass that is under threat right now.

To test the sea stars’ ability to tolerate warming seas, scientists have these tiny creatures subjected to fluctuations (波动) in water temperatures in the lab. Some of the young adult sea stars are being raised in water that is slightly warmer than normal, and are showing signs of being able to adjust to the added warmth. “These are not typical ocean temperatures around here, but the success indicates that they at least have the ability to endure the warmer water,” said Hodin.

1. Which could be a possible reason for the death of sunflower sea stars?
A.Habitat loss.B.Climate change.
C.Food shortage.D.Ocean pollution.
2. What does paragraph 3 mainly talk about?
A.The living habits of sunflower sea stars.
B.The importance of seagrass to the environment.
C.The key role of sunflower sea stars in the food chain.
D.The consequences of the increasing sea urchin populations.
3. How do scientists help increase the population of sunflower sea stars?
A.By developing devices to cool sea water.
B.By improving the environment of coastal waters.
C.By growing plentiful seagrass to absorb carbon dioxide.
D.By experimenting on raising a new generation of the creature.
4. What does Jason Hodin think of the program?
A.It is meaningful.B.It is complicated.
C.It is bizarre.D.It is disappointing
2023-05-21更新 | 60次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般