The essence (本质) of fast fashion is to make clothes inexpensively and quickly, to get new trends and styles into stores and online as soon as possible, and it comes at a high social and environmental cost. Keeping production costs low means they can make their clothes cheap, using cheap labour in unsafe working conditions, and in countries with bad environmental regulations.
Throw-away culture is deeply rooted in our society; three in five of our clothing pieces are thrown out within a year. Fast fashion brands keep the consumers hungry and feeling like they need more by attracting them with newness and convincing the consumers that they need what they’re selling. This only results in increasing textile (纺织品) waste as people no longer want but throw it away.
Criticisms of the fast fashion industry include its negative environmental impact: water pollution, the use of toxic (有毒的) chemicals and increasing levels of textile waste. Textile dyeing is the second largest polluter of clean water globally, after agriculture. Fast fashion companies rely on their products being made cheaply and quickly, so they avoid talking when it comes to being aware of their impact on the environment. Greenpeace’s recent Detox Campaign showed that many brands use toxic and dangerous chemicals in their supply chains, and many of the chemicals are either banned or strictly controlled in lots of countries.
In conclusion, the fast fashion industry has a bad effect on our environment through fast fashion brands’ ecological practices and only continues to make the problem last for a long time in the future through extreme consumerist culture. In order for change to happen, the common people need to open their eyes and take measures to prevent the fast fashion from growing.
1. What’s one of the characteristics of fast fashion?A.Producing clothes quickly. | B.Making people buy old clothes. |
C.Causing a lot of anxiety. | D.Selling most clothes through stores. |
A.They are mainly sold online. | B.They are made by cheap labour. |
C.They save the cost of advertising. | D.They are made in unsafe countries. |
A.Positive. | B.Surprising. | C.Natural. | D.Puzzling. |
A.Changing fast fashion brands’ working conditions. |
B.Changing clothes stores ‘sales model. |
C.Introducing stricter laws for factories. |
D.Raising public awareness of preventing fast fashion. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Plastic, once seen as a revolutionary material for its wide application and convenience, has become a global environmental crisis because it is non-biodegradable. The ubiquity (无处不在) of plastic in our daily lives has led to an increasing amount of plastic waste, causing great harm.
One of the most alarming examples of this crisis is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a floating mass of plastic waste in the North Pacific Ocean. It is estimated to be twice the size of Texas and consists of everything from microplastics to abandoned fishing nets. Marine life often mistakes plastic particles for food, leading to ingestion and death. Additionally, the chemicals used in plastic production can pollute water and soil, and finally threaten marine ecosystems.
Plastic waste is not limited to the oceans; it also impacts the land. Landfills overflow with plastic waste, emitting (排放) harmful greenhouse gases as plastics break down slowly over time. The production of plastics is highly energy-intensive and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate change. Furthermore, plastic litter is evident in urban and rural landscapes, destroying the natural beauty of our planet.
Beyond its environmental impact, plastic poses serious health risks to humans. Many plastics contain harmful chemicals, which can be found in food and drinks when plastic containers are used for storage and heating. These chemicals have been linked to a range of health problems, including developmental issues and cancer.
In conclusion, the problem of plastic pollution demands urgent action. A comprehensive strategy for cutting down on plastic is essential to tackle these challenges and safeguard the well-being of our planet and its inhabitants.
While reducing the consumption of plastic may seem challenging, it is achievable through a combination of policy measures, technological innovations and changes in consumer behavior. Governments must issue laws to ban or heavily regulate single-use plastics and promote alternatives. Businesses should adopt sustainable packaging practices, and individuals can reduce plastic consumption by making conscious choices.
1. What does the example of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch show?A.Animals rely on plastic waste to survive. |
B.Plastic is too widespread to remove. |
C.Plastic waste is harming the oceans. |
D.Plastic poses health risks to humans. |
A.Worsening. | B.Controlling. | C.Recording. | D.Evaluating. |
A.Ways to cut plastic consumption. |
B.Problems of handling plastic. |
C.Alternatives for plastic products. |
D.Some benefits of banning plastic. |
A.Plastic Packaging Is Everywhere |
B.Plastic Consumption Should Be Reduced |
C.How Should Plastic Be Used |
D.How Plastic Products Affect People |
【推荐2】What is ecofashion? Eco-fashion is about making clothes that take into account the environment, the health of consumers and the working conditions of people in the fashion industry.
There is some concern that eco-friendly fashions are just a trend that we will eventually grow tired of but in fact, more and more people are concerning about this and we can make sure that doesn’t happen.
A.Then, how to solve the problems? |
B.They relate directly to our personal health. |
C.Because choosing ecofashion can also contribute to our personal health, though it is mostly done by way of keeping the health of the planet. |
D.In addition to this, there is a lot of waste produced in the process, especially in the form of polluted water. |
E.The fashion industry has developed quickly. |
F.On the other hand, as consumers we can all make contributions by selecting environmentally friendly clothing and reducing clothing consumption. |
G.A closer look at the fashion industry points out many problems. |
【推荐3】The microplastics(微型塑料) problem in the oceans has made its way to sea turtles in a big way. A new study has found microplastics in the stomach of every single turtle they tested—a total of 102 sea turtles.
The researchers tested more than 100 sea turtles from all seven kinds and three different oceans, and they were looking for man-made things less than 5 mm long. The most thing the team found were fibers (纤维), which most likely came from clothing and fishing equipment.
“The influence of these particles (颗粒) on turtles is unknown,” said Emily Duncan. “Their small size means they can pass through the stomach without causing a problem, as is frequently reported with larger plastic pieces.”
The researchers found more than 800 man-made particles in the turtles, but since they only tested part of the stomach, they believe the total number of particles could be 20 times higher. They don't know how the turtles take in the particles, but they think they are from polluted seawater and polluted plants.
Professor Brendan Godley said that eating microplastics isn't the biggest problem to sea turtles at the moment, but it is a clear sign that we need to do a better job watching global waste.
This turtle study shows that we need to reduce the amount of plastic waste, so we can keep clean and healthy oceans for future people.
1. The underlined part in paragraph 1 probably means “_________” .A.has gone into | B.has made great effect on |
C.has been walking to | D.has tried to escape from |
A.By giving examples |
B.By comparing sea life |
C.By studying different sea animals |
D.By testing turtles from different oceans. |
A.stop killing sea animals | B.find out more plastic waste |
C.control pollution to oceans | D.carry out further researches |
【推荐1】Soon after you have your first child, the question of having a second one is raised by friends and family. However, as the pattern of having two children in a family is challenged by modern family units, there are a few reasons why it is not selfish to want only one child.
Today, the role of women has changed a lot. But nowadays, a wife has to help her husband earn the bread and butter as well as well as looking after her family. In demanding times like these, a woman has to put in more physical and emotional effort than any other member of the family.
Raising a child comes at a cost that remains only heard of, until you find yourself paying it. The good reality of double income with no kids suddenly comes crashing down when there is a child involved in the picture. When one parent (the mother) needs to take some time off to look after the newborn, only one person becomes the earning member. Of course, the expenses went up rapidly. According to Susan Newman, PhD, a social psychologist, the average cost of raising a child is $227,000 from birth to college.
Most young mothers also think that having one child would mean that there is more income for the child, and thus, better facilities can be provided. It is much easier to educate a single child at a good school, and give him/her better life with more resources at hand.
With several children in the house, it becomes increasingly difficult to find ways to spend time with all of them. Dividing your time with just one child means that you can devote a little more time to doing the things you want to. In a single child unit, there are less comparison and more chances for positive motivation to learn new things. A happy child, who deserves the rightful attention, love, care, and time from both the parents, always gets a meaningful childhood, for both the parents and the child.
1. What does the writer mainly want to tell us in the passage?A.It is not selfish to have only one child in a family. |
B.Raising a child costs a lot nowadays. |
C.It is more difficult to raise several children in a family. |
D.Women are playing a more important role in the family than before. |
A.A family with several children can give parents a meaningful life. |
B.The only child in a family can more easily get a wonderful childhood. |
C.A family with only one child is surely better than a family with several children. |
D.You can be more relaxed with several children. |
A.better education. | B.meaningful childhood. |
C.less generation gap. | D.better care. |
A. | B. |
C. | D. |
【推荐2】David Rees runs a very distinctive business. He charges customers $15 to sharpen their pencils to perfection, using a variety of tools.
I know what you’re thinking—is this a joke? The 39-year-old gets asked that question a lot. To clarify everything, he even created a special section on his website telling everyone he’s actually providing a real service.
You can supply your own pencil or you can have Rees sharpen one of his own favorite 2B pencils. After that, he mails it to you in a display tube with the shavings in a separate bag, and an authentic certificate which just happens to mention the pencil is so sharp as to be a dangerous object.
To achieve the desired result, the master sharpener uses all kinds of tools, including general sandpaper, pocket knives and even a special $ 450 sharpening machine. “It depends on what the customer wants to use his/her pencil for,” he says. That determines the most appropriate pencil-sharpening technique. Some customers buy pencils as inspirational symbols while others buy them because of their special memories of classic 2B pencils.
$15 to have a pencil sharpened is a bit expensive though, right? You’re not the only one who feels that way, and David’s unique business has really angered lots of people, who talk of inequality in America, saying it is so insane for the wealthy to pay $15 to sharpen a pencil. But others will say, “This is just our urge to put an end to the welfare state because new ideas arise along with the business.”
David admits his trade is sort of unusual. But there are those who actually value his service, as is proven by the over 500 orders he has gotten.
1. How could David make money by sharpening pencils?A.He invented new tools for the job. |
B.He provided quality service for his customers. |
C.He promoted his skill on his website. |
D.He saved lots of time for other people. |
A.He provides personalized services. |
B.He knows all kinds of pencil users. |
C.He values ideas behind the pencils. |
D.He always writes in pencil. |
A.Deliberate. | B.Rewarding. | C.Unreasonable. | D.Irresponsible. |
A.It’s a waste of time and money. | B.It needs further improvement. |
C.It’s awfully expensive. | D.It’s a fancy service. |
【推荐3】Modern museums are trying everything they can to shore up declining attendance. Somehow, there always seems to be some crisis that they are struggling against — a severe funding cut, for example. What’s worse, the unappreciative public is going farther and farther away. So museums do what they can to attract people, and the results are occasionally wonderful and occasionally laughable.
The worst of such results occurs when some curator, someone who is in charge of a museum, decides that the reason the audience isn’t pouring through the doors is that the content is over their heads — the history presented is too complex and political, the art too abstract, or the scientific explanations too in-depth. What occurs then is a uniform simplifying of the exhibits. Text is minimized, and historically significant pieces are passed over in favor of those more pretty and pleasing. The museum becomes a place where people go to look at pretty things instead of a place for learning, understanding and appreciating different cultures, art, and science.
All these efforts have given rise to the concept of “edutainment”— a mixture in which learning is supposed to be accomplished without any effort at all on the part of the visitor. Displays are constructed with an eye toward their entertainment value, with relevant facts slipped secretly in, as though learning were a bitter pill that must be sugarcoated before the average museum visitors can be induced (劝诱) to swallow it. But true education is an active pursuit, not something one receives like a piece of candy. The museum’s job should be to inspire visitors to look deeper, not to force-feed them predigested facts.
If a museum becomes indistinguishable from a theme park, it has failed. Nonprofit institutions exist because, if they did not, no for-profit institutions would serve their function. If active scholarship is missing, then by all means, supply it, instead of shaping the museum to resemble successful entertainment enterprises.
1. What can we learn from paragraph 1?A.Modern museums succeed in raising funds. |
B.Modern museums have been quite appreciated. |
C.Modern museums are facing many challenges. |
D.Modern museums are often far away from city centers. |
A.simple and pleasing | B.badly expressed |
C.educational and important | D.too difficult to understand |
A.Learning is supposed to be interesting. |
B.Entertainment shouldn’t be practiced in museums. |
C.Museums should help visitors enjoy learning. |
D.Museums shouldn’t provide complex content. |
A.To point out a problem of modern museums. |
B.To encourage readers to visit museums. |
C.To advise readers to acquire knowledge actively. |
D.To show some good changes in modern museums. |
【推荐1】The Chinese fashion icon, qipao, was born a century ago in Shanghai. However, the dress made its way through history from the hands of old craftsmen and is deep-rooted in Chinese culture.
“Qipao used to be so popular,” Leung Long-kong, 89, a well-known qipao craftsman, says, adding that the dress was an everyday outfit among women, from the less well-off to women at the highest levels of society. “Now, nobody is wearing them except on grand and happy occasions.”
To carry on the tradition, fashion designer Mary Yu, 41, who has been attending classes teaching knot button-making techniques, is trying to renew the design of qipao by taking symbols from Chinese history and literature.
“I feel I should look into Chinese culture and learn more about the past. People should have an in-depth understanding of their culture in order to move on,” Yu says. “Fashion design requires a profound knowledge of one’s culture before visualizing it.”
“After a period of wearing foreign brands all the time, there will be a day when one looks back to traditional Chinese culture. It is about finding the stuff that exists in your genes and suits you best.”
Yu set up her own qipao brand in 2016. Most of the clothes were made by tailors based in Shenzhen and Hangzhou, for their lower cost and more traditional work.
In the constantly evolving fashion industry, qipao is catching up with the times. Zippers, digital print patterns and new materials such as lace and denim have been introduced to a new generation. More daring ideas like 3D printed qipao have also become a reality. Yu believed that with the help of these new technologies, qipao will find its way back to the daily life of Chinese people in the near future.
1. Which of the following best describes Mary Yu?A.Creative. | B.Conservative. | C.Cautious. | D.Considerate |
A.To call on Chinese women to wear qipao in everyday life. |
B.To introduce the development of qipao in China. |
C.To emphasize the importance of qipao in China nowadays. |
D.To show that qipao is no longer as popular as it was. |
A.She devoted herself to using new technologies to make qipao. |
B.She borrowed some symbolic designs from foreign brands. |
C.She added some elements from Chinese culture to the design. |
D.She learned the tailor techniques in Shenzhen and Hangzhou. |
A.Qipao is an iconic sign in the fashion industry. |
B.Qipao is on its way back to the daily life of Chinese. |
C.Qipao enjoys a good reputation in the world. |
D.Qipao is seen as a symbol of wealth in modern China. |
【推荐2】A new research, presented on Monday, suggests that parents who go down slides with their kids are actually making slides even riskier for their little ones.
Led by Dr. Charles Jennissen, a professor at the University of Iowa, the research found that placing children (especially infants and toddlers蹒跚学步的小孩) on adult laps increases the risk of injury to their lower legs, including broken bones.
"I've seen a lot of these injuries all through my career, and I hadn't seen anybody talk about this problem," says Jennissen.
So Jennissen and his colleagues found that about 350,000 children under the age of six were injured on slides in the U.S. from 2002 to 2015. Injuries were most common among kids from 12-23 months of age, and the most common injury was lower leg fractures (骨折).
The researchers found that 94 percent of 600 cases include lower leg injuries. This is important, because that's not how a kid falling off a slide alone would usually get hurt. The fact that so many kids are getting lower leg injuries—and that those injuries seem to get less common as kids get older—suggests something else is at play.
Jennissen thinks that when children are sliding alone, they aren’t going fast enough or carrying enough body weight to hurt themselves. When they’re sitting on an adult’s lap and their foot gets caught, they have the added momentum of an adult body.
"We think a lot of these lower extremity injuries are because they're on the lap," says Jennissen. "We don't know that for sure, because no parents say that. But from my experience, and the data that suggests it, we think almost all of these are kids are on the lap."
Jennissen isn’t arguing that you should never go down the slide with your kid—he agrees that it’s fun and that he’s done it with his own kids—but he thinks adults should realize the risks.
1. What can we learn about the research from the passage?A.Many parents are hurt when going down slides with their kids. |
B.More and more adult laps are found hurt in the accidents. |
C.The research issue has not yet concerned many people. |
D.Many people have discussed the possible reasons for the injuries. |
A.paying attention | B.taking effect | C.solving problems | D.making efforts |
A.He supports it. | B.He is against it. |
C.He doesn’t care about it. | D.He is careful about it. |
【推荐3】Mountain regions are not just playgrounds for the richer citizens on the planet, however. The disappearing snows of Mount Kilimanjaro are a worrying sign that nowhere is safe from the adverse effects of human actions. The United Nations has identified three main areas that need to be addressed to ensure the future safety of the world’s mountains. These are: the protection of mountain ecosystems, the encouragement of peace and stability in mountain regions, and assistance for mountain people to maintain their ways of life.
From the busy cities of India to the farmlands of California, more than half the world’s population is dependent on mountains for their fresh water supply. Global warming, deforestation, mining and heavy farming seriously damage breakable mountain ecosystems and put vital fresh water sources at risk.
Mountain regions host a large proportion of the world’s wars. From Afghanistan to the Balkans and the Andes to many parts of Africa, territorial(领土的) and drug related conflicts have damaging effects on the local environment and the lives of the local people. Fighting makes essential tasks such as farming impossible. Land mines make large areas of potential farming ground unusable. Also schools, roads, bridges and other important infrastructure(基础设施) are left in ruins.
Mountain people are among the poorest, least represented groups on the earth. They face many hardships and each day can be, “a test of survival”. Damage to mountain ecosystems worsens their situation and leaves them even more unprotected to disease and ‘natural’ disasters such as floods and landslides. It’s been recommended that forest profit should be reinvested in mountain communities and the people living there should be given a stronger political voice. Their fate is in many ways directly connected with that of people living at sea level.
There is an old motto for visitors to the countryside which advises them to leave nothing but footprints. It is still as relevant today as it always was. Unfortunately, the size of our footprints seems to be getting larger.
1. What the writer discussed in the previous sections is most probably about .A.mountain ecosystems | B.mountain regions |
C.mountain people | D.mountain sports |
A.direct | B.harmful |
C.positive | D.powerful |
A.inadequate supply of fresh water | B.impossible farming |
C.mountain people’s poor living condition | D.ruined infrastructure |
A.Mountain people have enough political voice to protect themselves. |
B.More money should be raised to establish mountain communities. |
C.Worsened ecosystems put mountain people’s lives under threat. |
D.Visitors to mountains have left nothing but large footprints. |