Along the streets of Malabon in the Philippines, Marilene Capentes pushes a cart every morning except Sundays. The city of Malabon is just north of the capital, Manila.
Capentes is a waste picker. She collects bags of separated garbage, placing food waste in one container. This material will be turned into compost (堆肥) at the local recycling center. The rest of the waste goes into separate containers. The recyclable materials are later sold.
Capentes said the heavy rubbish used to be all mixed together. Then a few years ago, a local environmental nonprofit (非盈利机构) started asking people to separate their rubbish.
The Mother Earth Foundation in the Philippines is a member of the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, called GAIA. The organization wants to avert food waste from going to landfills. Food waste gives off biogas (沼气) as it breaks down. Biogas is a powerful greenhouse gas.
At a material recycling center in Malabon, organic (有机的) waste collected from households is turned into compost. This material then goes into a community garden to grow vegetables. Some of the food waste is broken down into biogas. This biogas is then used to cook vegetables for waste workers to eat.
There are challenges in establishing these systems in new places. It costs money to set up a facility for composting. People, including local officials, have to be educated on the importance of separating waste. Containers have to be provided to families that cannot buy more than one.
And sometimes separating organic waste is not thought to be important. Also, unlike recyclables and metals, there is not a large market for organic materials. Therefore, waste workers must be paid for the system to work. But these problems can be solved. More people are making the connection between reducing biogas and fighting climate change.
1. Why is food waste separated from other waste?A.To sell it for money. | B.To cook vegetables. |
C.To feed it to animals. | D.To turn it into plant food. |
A.Remove. | B.Prevent. | C.Select. | D.Protect. |
A.Difficulties to build the new systems. | B.Importance of building the new systems. |
C.Conditions required for the new systems. | D.Arguments over building the new systems. |
A.Critical. | B.Grateful. | C.Optimistic. | D.Doubtful. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Going green seems to be fad(时尚)for a lot of people these days. Whether that is good or bad, we can’t really say, but for the two of us, going green is not a fad but a lifestyle.
On April 22, 2011, we decided to go green every single day for an entire year. This meant doing 365 different green things, and it also meant challenging ourselves to go green beyond easy things. Rather than recycle and reduce our energy, we had to think of 365 different green things to do and this was no easy task.
With the idea of going green every single day for a year, Our Green Year started. My life and I decided to educate people about how they could go green in their lives and hoped we could show people all the green things that could be done to help the environment. We wanted to push the message that every little bit helps.
Over the course of Our Green Year, we completely changed our lifestyle. We now shop at organic stores. We consume less meat, choosing green food. We have greatly reduced our buying we don’t need. We have given away half of what we owned through websites. Our home is kept clean by vinegar and lemon juice, with no chemical cleaners. We make our own butter, enjoying the smell of home-made fresh bread. In our home office anyone caught doing something ungreen might be punished.
Our minds have been changed by Our Green Year. We are grateful for the chance to have been able to go green and educate others. We believe that we do have the power to change things and help our planet.
1. It was difficult for the couple to live a green life for the whole year because_________.A.they were expected to follow the green fad | B.they didn’t know how to educate other people |
C.they were unwilling to reduce their energy | D.they needed to perform unusual green tasks |
A.They tried to get out of their ungreen habits. | B.They ignored others’ ungreen behavior. |
C.They chose better chemical cleaners. | D.They sold their home-made food. |
A.The government will give support to the green people. |
B.The couple may continue their project in the future. |
C.Some people disagree with the couple’s green ideas. |
D.Our Green Year is becoming a national campaign. |
A.They never bought meat. |
B.They cleaned their home by using chemical cleaners. |
C.They tried to make some food for themselves. |
D.They sold the things they don’t need on the Internet. |
【推荐2】General Motors (GM) is one of the world’s major automakers (汽车制造商). In January, the company set a goal: It will stop selling gas-powered cars by 2035. It means the company will make more battery-powered vehicles.
This is a big moment for the auto industry. Scientists say it’s important to move away from gas powered vehicles. Doing so will fight climate change. Transportation causes about 25% of global carbon emissions (排放物). Three-quarters of that is from road travel. Countries are taking action. In China, most new vehicles sold must be electric by 2035. The United Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands will not allow sales of new gas-powered cars in 2030.
Venkat Viswanathan is a professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He told TIME for Kids, “It is now very clear that going electric is the future.”
Electric cars run on lithium-ion (锂离子) batteries, which power our mobile devices. Making these batteries has an environmental cost. Lithium is taken from the earth, like the oil used to make gas. But the long-term cost is much smaller. “When you use up a battery, you can recycle the material,” says Jessika Trancik, a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Electric cars have another environmental effect. They need energy to recharge. They get the energy from power plants. These places burn oils. But countries can turn to cleaner energy sources, such as wind and solar power. If they do, electric vehicles will get cleaner too. Even now, they’re cleaner than cars that run on gas.
1. What will GM do in 2035?A.Stop producing all vehicles. | B.Produce just electric cars. |
C.Sell more gas-powered cars. | D.Find more energy sources. |
A.To bring convenience to road travel. | B.To deal with climate change. |
C.To promote sales of electric cars. | D.To set up more power plants. |
A.They are cleaner than solar power. | B.They have no environmental cost. |
C.Their materials are recyclable. | D.They are cheaper than oil. |
A.The Sales of Gas-powered Cars | B.How to Sell More Electric Cars |
C.Carmakers’ Plan of Going Electric | D.Electric Cars Are the Future |
【推荐3】Heritage on the Edge
In an effort to preserve some of the world’s most famous landmarks,Google has announced a new project to transform a few of the most endangered by climate change into interactive 3D models,just in case one or all is irreparably(不能恢复地)damaged in the coming decades.
Edinburgh Castle
Edinburgh Castle comprises 27 buildings on top of an extinct volcano. It was home to many kings and queens. But old roofs and rainwater management systems will become insufficient as they will be unable to deal with the level of storm water associated with extreme weather events. Besides,if temperatures continue to rise,the rate of decay(腐烂)will increase further.
Kilwa Kisiwani
Kilwa Kisiwani was a regional center of the medieval trading civilization along the East African Coast. Its permanent architecture included ports,Muslim buildings,and the unique“stone houses”. However,the drier weather and subsequently heavy rainfall is threatening the stability of the ruins,causing the worsening of this exposed heritage site.
Mosque City of Bagherat
The Mosque City of Bagherat was once a lost city. It has many Muslim buildings,bridges,roads and palaces. A recent report stressed the increasing impacts of sea level rise and changes in salinity(盐度)on this community. Increased salinity not only makes much of the water undrinkable but damages structures.
Chan Chan
Chan Chan was the capital city of Chimu empire,stretching for nearly a thousand kilometers along the coastline. The city planning reflects a strict political and social strategy. But site managers today face challenges in rainfall and droughts due to El Nino events and climate change that threaten to gradually wash the ancient city away.
1. What do we know about Edinburgh Castle?A.It was built along the coast. | B.It is the largest castle in the world. |
C.It is in danger of being washed away. | D.It used to be the home of royal families. |
A.Water pollution. | B.Water’s becoming salty. |
C.Water shortage. | D.Water’s being overused. |
A.Temperature rises. | B.Volcanic eruptions. |
C.Sea water. | D.Environmental damage. |
【推荐1】A recent New York Times opinion piece by Daniel Willingham addressed the question of whether listening to a book is the same as reading it. Willingham begins the piece with a frequently asked question—Is it cheating if I listen to an audiobook for my book club?
Willingham argues that they’re both worthwhile but is careful to note that doesn’t mean they have the same value. In line with his points in the article, I listen to audiobooks when I wouldn’t otherwise be engaged in a book—say, at the gym or while walking. That’s certainly an advantage of listening over reading. But I was surprised to find that Willingham didn’t mention what I consider to be the biggest difference between the two: Engagement.
The critical difference, for me, between reading and listening is that reading is something you do, while listening is something that happens to you. Reading is an act of engagement. The words on the page aren’t going to read themselves, which is something they literally do in an audiobook. If you’re not actively taking in written information, then you’re not going to make progress on the book. Audiobooks, on the other hand, make progress with or without your participation.
Willingham refers to this point by saying that harder books—“difficult texts” as he calls them—require more engagement, which is thus better suited to reading. Yet it’s not necessarily true. For example, I’ve recently been listening to David Graeber’s excellent Debt: The First5000 Years, a tough read with lots of information and arguments. While I haven’t grasped every piece of information that he’s presented, I have spent a lot more time thinking about an important topic than I otherwise would. This fill-in-the-cracks nature of audiobooks is a critical advantage.
Ultimately, it’s fair to consider audiobooks and written texts as fundamentally different media. They are different forms based on the same work. Your option depends on what you are willing to give to it(time, above all) and what you hope to get out of it.
1. What is an advantage of audiobooks according to Willingham?A.Cutting down one’s reading time. | B.Increasing absorption of knowledge. |
C.Providing more flexible access to information. | D.Encouraging further thinking on serious topics. |
A.It helps the general idea to stand out. | B.It suits people working on difficult texts. |
C.It speeds up readers’ progress on the book. | D.It requires more participation from readers. |
A.To demonstrate what makes a tough read. | B.To show why audiobooks attract listeners. |
C.To prove audiobooks also suit hard texts. | D.To stress reading can also take huge effort. |
A.They involve similar efforts. | B.They prove equally demanding. |
C.They have distinct user groups. | D.They serve different purposes. |
【推荐2】Assigning children some chores once they reach a certain age has been an important part of responsible parenting for centuries. Easy tasks like taking out the garbage or cleaning their room are intended to teach children the basics of taking care of themselves and self-control. On the surface, it would seem that this age old practice has stood the test of time. However, a new study finds that childhood chores may not help kids develop self-control after all.
To come to this conclusion, researchers from the University of Houston analyzed data originally collected as part of a 10-year study on Mexican youths at various ages (10, 12, 14, 16 and 19). These children self-reported how much self-control they believed they had, and parents were also surveyed. Besides, the 10-year study also gathered data on various aspects of the children’s lives, including their day-to-day home life and any chores they were typically asked to do.
The research team analyzed all of this data. They were surprised by what they found. “We found no evidence of co-developmental associations between chores and self-control, with four out of four of our assumptions receiving no support. The result was dumbfounding given the strong theoretical basis for our predictions,” says study author Rodica Damian. However, that doesn’t mean parents should give up childhood chores altogether. “Maybe chores don’t matter for personality development, but they still predict future chore behavior,” Damian says. “It is a stable habit and having a tidy home is not something to ignore.”
Damian and her team also looked into another self-control matter unrelated to chores: whether self-control levels between the ages of 10-16 predicted better career outcomes in young adulthood. They found that children who had higher self-control at age 10 had less job stress and better job fit nine years later. Additionally, children whose self-control showed positive changes from age 10 to 16 had higher job satisfaction years later. “The results suggest that improving one’s level of self-control, regardless of where you start, will help you later in life,” Damian concludes.
1. What can we say about Damian’s finding?A.It would stand the test of time. | B.It challenged a popular belief. |
C.It changed her research goals. | D.It confirmed her assumptions. |
A.By analyzing data from a previous study. |
B.By observing children for 10 years. |
C.By accessing a university database. |
D.By interviewing children in person. |
A.Practical. | B.Encouraging. |
C.Astonishing. | D.Unreliable. |
A.Self-control increased with age. |
B.Success at work needed great self-control. |
C.Doing chores would improve children’s self-control. |
D.Self-control was positively related to job satisfaction. |
【推荐3】STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education is future-oriented (面向未来的). The demands for jobs that need routine skills have decreased, while those requiring more technical (技术的) skills have increased. We should encourage students to choose STEM fields after school.
Improve the image of science.
Many people view science as something tough and boring. Much of this can be blamed on those movies and books that describe scientists as nerdy (书呆子).
If a student sees that a teacher is knowledgeable and passionate about science, then they will try to follow in their footsteps. So, try to act as their role model.
Make it fun.
You should get students involved in science at an early stage and try to make it fun and interesting. You can use hands-on experiments to develop their interest in science.
Connect it to everyday life.
You should show students how science is used in everyday life. We have cellphones, video games, computers, etc. because of science.
Give them opportunities.
You can create competitions and ask the students to use science to come up with new ideas, designs, etc.
A.Bring it to life. |
B.Be a positive role model. |
C.Teachers can play a big role in changing this view. |
D.You should tell them how these things are making our life better. |
E.For example, you can ask them to develop an app for everyday use. |
F.Here are some ways to inspire students to choose science for their future. |
G.You should encourage students to watch different programs related to science. |