There are a lot of chemicals that can cause indoor air pollution. A recent project conducted has found over 900 different substances in our home are related to it. Many researchers have already examined the causes of indoor air pollution.
It has been proved that different kinds of chemicals can be released by building materials and new furniture. Everything from painting and decorating products, bathroom cleaners and beauty products can contain these chemicals.
As a research from Denmark has highlighted, cooking, particularly roasting can damage our body. Roast dinners contain many potentially harmful pollutants.
As far as cooking emissions are concerned, no one is suggesting switching to takeaways.
A.In the long run, these changes lead to cancer. |
B.They might also arise from cooking at home. |
C.A wide range of sources are under investigation. |
D.Therefore, what results from indoor air pollution? |
E.However, most of us have ignored their bad effects. |
F.So, what are the main contributors to poor air quality? |
G.But we can change how we cook to deal with the emissions. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Exam anxiety is something that almost every person experiences during his or her student life.
In this competitive world,exams cause a tot of nervousness to students. For some, exam anxiety encourages them to work harder,while for others it may be the root for poor performance, leading to failure in exams and lack of confidence.
One of the most important methods of avoiding exam anxiety is
A.In fact,some students are anxious by nature. |
B.to communicate with others. |
C.Little anxiety helps one concentrate |
D.To sleep and eat well is equally important. |
E.to prepare well in advance . |
F.Fairing to handle it may result in poor academic performance. |
G.Parents also avoid putting pressure on their kids to do well. |
【推荐2】Some people are confident and full of wisdom while remaining true to their beliefs, which comes from self-awareness. Now we’ll share how to develop self-awareness so you can practice mindful living.
Self-awareness is a continuous process that involves constant changes. Those with a growth mindset may be more likely to experience change more frequently. So, make it your goal to often pause and think about who you are and where you are and build toward where you’re going.
Be more of a listener
The most common mistake that a lot of us make is that we always want to be heard. But how can we better understand ourselves if we don’t take the time to listen and accept feedback from others?
Take a 3rd-person point of view of self- awareness
When someone has made mean remarks about you, you likely feel hurt. But have you tried taking the perspective of a 3rd-party?
Treat yourself
A.Spend time with yourself |
B.Keep checking within yourself |
C.Life can be pretty challenging |
D.Self-awareness typically comes in periods of calm |
E.The journey of self-awareness requires self-examination |
F.This way, you will be able to avoid being over-critical of yourself |
G.Be ready to take in all perspectives that different individuals have about you |
【推荐3】A new study, led by Huijeong Jeong and Vijay Namboodiri of the University of California, San Francisco, has turned the world of neuroscience (神经科学) on its head.
It proposes a model of associative learning which suggests that researchers have got things backwards. Their suggestion, moreover, is supported by a series of experiments. The old model looks forward, associating cause with effect. The new one does the opposite. It associates effect with cause. They think that when an animal receives a reward (or punishment), it looks back through its memory to work out what might have caused this event. Looking at things this way deals with two things that have always made the old model hard to understand. Making predictions based on every single possible cue (暗示) would be somewhere between difficult and impossible. It is far simpler, when a meaningful event happens, to look backwards through other potentially meaningful events for a cause.
In practice, however, it is hard to distinguish experimentally between the two models. And that is especially true if you do not even bother to look—which, until now, people have not.
Dr. Jeong and Dr. Namboodiri have done so. They conducted 11 experiments that were designed specifically for the purpose. During these they measured, in real time, the amount of dopamine (多巴胺) being released by the nucleus accumbens, a region of the brain in which dopamine is involved in learning and addiction. All of the experiments came down in favor of the new model.
“The study is thought-inspiring and represents a stimulating new direction,” says Ilana Witten, a neuroscientist at Princeton University uninvolved with the paper.
More experiments will be needed to confirm the new findings. But if confirmation comes, it will have influences beyond neuroscience. Dr. Namboodiri thinks so, and is exploring the possibilities. Evolution has had hundreds of millions of years to better the process of learning.
So learning from nature is rarely a bad idea.
1. What is the main idea of Paragraph 2?A.The differences between the two learning models. |
B.The disadvantages of the old learning model. |
C.The difficulty in conducting the experiments. |
D.The daily learning behavior of animals. |
A.It looks backwards for a cause. |
B.It associates effect with cause. |
C.It ruins the old learning model. |
D.It makes predictions based on cues. |
A.To argue against the new findings. |
B.To confirm their new model of learning. |
C.To test the efficiency of the two models. |
D.To highlight the importance of dopamine. |
A.Negative. |
B.Carefree. |
C.Favorable. |
D.Doubtful. |
【推荐1】According to the World Economic Forum(WEF), eight million tons of plastic waste is being poured out into the oceans every year. That's the equivalent (相等物)of an entire garbage truck being dumped every three minutes, and the source of the problem—the world's cities. In Amsterdam, a simple solution has been found that could stop up to 86 percent of plastic waste ever reaching the oceans—a barrier made of bubbles (气泡).
The way the bubble barrier system works is basically that it is a tube placed diagonally (沿对角线地)on the bottom of the waterway. "The tube has a lot of tiny holes," according to Phillip Ehrhorn, Chief Technology Officer in The Great Bubble Barrier, "We pump air through it, and the air bubbles will rise towards the surface. The plastics are brought to the surface with the air bubbles and then, with the natural flow of the river, towards one side of the river." Then the other part of the bubble barrier system collects and removes the waste.
"Ship traffic is a key economic driver;we won't be able to stop that. So, we would have to find a solution which would not affect all the other existing activities and the ecosystem," Phillip added. The bubble barrier does exactly that. While it provides no block to water traffic and sea life can pass through freely, it also catches plastic waste of all sizes.
The Great Bubble Barrier is trying to work together with Amsterdam and local Non-governmental Organizations(NGOs)to evaluate what the bubble barrier system is catching so as to carry out new policies and additional measures on land. In this way, plastics entering the water could be reduced in the first place. "Our next step is a bubble barrier within Europe and we, of course, want to move to Asia because we think we can make a lot of influence there." said Francis Zoet, the founder of The Great Bubble Barrier.
1. What contributes to the invention of the bubble barrier?A.Suggestions from the WEF. | B.Large amounts of sea waste. |
C.Construction of the waterway. | D.Requests from the government. |
A.Creating tiny holes on the tube. | B.Removing the waste in the water. |
C.Sending plastics to the surface. | D.Changing the speed of the river flow. |
A.The waste | B.Ship traffic. | C.Sea life. | D.The bubble. |
A.Plastics entering the water will increase. | B.The city will evaluate the bubble barrier. |
C.The NGOs will move to Europe and Asia | D.The bubble barrier will benefit more places. |
【推荐2】We're often told the importance of protecting the earth for future generations and children at St Oswald's CE Primary School certainly agree.
Nine-year old Isobel Kelleher from the school's Hummingbirds class thinks adults need to pay attention. “Sometimes they can be busy and I don't think they believe they can make a difference, but if everyone does a little bit, it all adds up.” she tells HuffPost UK. “We started looking at plastic pollution in our oceans and the things like plastic bags that are polluting them,” she says. “Fish can eat the plastic and they can die, or we might even eat the fish ourselves.”
Mr. Timms, Isobel's teacher, has been leading a new project at the school which encourages children to creatively raise the awareness of the need to be more environmentally-friendly. The entire Hummingbirds class, which is made up of nine-year-old and ten-year-old pupils, has been busy writing poems and creating online videos to warn adults about the serious situation of our oceans and wildlife.
Mr. Timms thinks children play an important role in teaching us how to take care of the things around us. "We sometimes don't know how much we can really learn from children." he says. "It is really a pleasant surprise to see parents come in and say that their children have been asking them to stop using plastic and to recycle more, and even stopping them from using plastic straws.”
Mr. Timms is proud of his Hummingbirds class. “The message that they would like to send to the world is simple: stopping this isn't someone else's job, and it won't be OK if we just leave it.”
1. What does Isobel Kelleher mean in paragraph 2?A.People shouldn't eat fish any more. |
B.Adults have done their part pretty well. |
C.Everyone can do something to stop pollution. |
D.Plastic pollution is already too serious to be solved. |
A.By preventing people using plastic bags. |
B.By picking up waste plastic in oceans in person. |
C.By teaching students to write poems creatively. |
D.By warning adults about the pollution with poems and videos. |
A.The project has already proved effective. | B.Some parents are angry with the project. |
C.Children are good at looking after parents. | D.Adults ought to learn a little from their kids. |
A.Positive. | B.Negative. | C.Dissatisfied. | D.Unclear. |
A.Using plastic straws | B.Plastic pollution | C.Protecting the earth | D.The Hummingbirds class |
【推荐3】Air pollution remains a critical health risk in the European Union, claiming over 500,000 lives in 2021, with findings suggesting nearly half of these could have been prevented if pollution were reduced to levels recommended by health experts. Data from the European Environment Agency (EEA) show that of these deaths, 253,000 were linked to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) going beyond the World Health Organization’s (WHO) guideline limit of 5 micrograms per cubic meter. These particles are especially dangerous as they can pass into the bloodstream and affect various organs. Nitrogen dioxide and ozone also contributed to the mortality (死亡频率) statistics, associated with 52,000 and 22,000 deaths respectively. The EU’s environment commissioner, Virginijus Sinkevicius, underlined that air pollution poses the top environmental health risk in the EU. Nevertheless, there is evidence of improvement, with deaths from PM2.5 decreasing by 41% between 2005 and 2021, and the EU targets a reduction of 55% by 2030.
In response to these concerns, the WHO, which updated its air quality guidelines in 2021, warns that no level of air pollution can be considered safe but has set upper limits for certain pollutants. The European Parliament vote to bring the EU’s air quality standards in line with the WHO but decided to delay doing so until 2035.
Sinkevicius said that air quality is indeed improving due to effective clean air policies. Beyond death counts, the EEA also assessed air pollution’s broader impact on diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes, stressing not only mortality but the quality of life impacts. EEA researcher Alberto Gonzalez Ortiz pointed to severe disability states caused by these conditions, worsened by air pollution.
The EEA’s comprehensive approach shows that while the fight against air pollution has seen progress, immediate action is still critical to reduce pollution and reduce its widespread effects on public health.
1. Why does the author mention specific figures in Paragraph 1?A.To stress the risk of PM2.5 in the EU. | B.To illustrate the impact of air pollution. |
C.To prove the improvement in air pollution. | D.To show the guidelines of EEA lose control. |
A.It adjusted air quality standards accordingly. |
B.It didn’t perform the new limits until 2035. |
C.It claimed current pollution levels were relatively safe. |
D.It decided to change the guidelines completely. |
A.Concerned about its policies. | B.Indifferent due to its level. |
C.Uncertain about its impact. | D.Optimistic about its progress. |
A.The impact of wise decisions on air pollution in the EU. |
B.The specific health conditions worsened by air pollution. |
C.The progress and challenges in dealing with air pollution. |
D.The role of the WHO in establishing global health policies. |