组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境污染
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:31 题号:22403107

Sea life near Turkey is being harmed by a layer of brown foam (泡沫) on the ocean’s surface. The foam, which many people are calling “sea snot”, is natural, but it’s caused by pollution and global warming.

The actual name for the foam is mucilage (粘液). Scientists first noticed and described mucilage in 2007, when it was found near Turkey. Then, it was also found in other parts of the Aegean Sea, near Greece. Mucilage covers the ocean’s surface with a thick, slimy layer that gives it the nickname of sea snot.

This year’s appearance of mucilage is the worst ever recorded. It’s been developing for seven months and is now covering large parts of the Sea of Marmara. The Sea of Marmara is an inland sea, surrounded by land belonging to Turkey, and connected to the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea.

There are many different kinds of algae (海藻), and it’s natural and normal for algae to grow in the ocean or in other bodies of water. But when there is lots of food for the algae, and other conditions are just right, algae would boom, which results in algae growing quickly and in huge numbers. And in very bad situations, mucilage is the result.

There are two main causes of the present appearance of mucilage. One is the heavy pollution — waste water and chemicals — flowing into the Sea of Marmara. The second cause is higher water temperatures because of climate change.

By covering the ocean’s surface, mucilage stops sunlight from reaching all the sea life below. “This mucilage is now covering the sea surface like a tent,” says Muharrem Balci, who teaches biology at Istanbul University. Because there is so much algae, it takes up lots of oxygen from the seawater. That means that there’s very little oxygen left for the other sea life that depends on it. The BBC reports that divers in the area are seeing large numbers of dying fish. After a while, the mucilage falls to the bottom of the ocean, where it covers the sea floor, poisoning sea life that lives there. The mucilage has already been found as deep as 30 meters below the surface.

Mahsum Daga, a local fisherman, told the reporter, “Do you know what it does to shellfish? When they open up, it prevents them from closing up again because it gets in the way. All the seasnails here are dead.”

1. What do we know about mucilage?
A.It generally doesn’t last long.B.It was first noticed near Turkey.
C.It is the result of algae poisoning.D.It is mainly formed in inland seas.
2. What does the underlined word “boom” in paragraph 4 probably mean?
A.Shoot up.B.Stand out.C.Break down.D.Take off.
3. What is the last but one paragraph mainly about?
A.The reason for the formation of mucilage is difficult to explain.
B.Mucilage is doing much more harm than good.
C.The present situation of mucilage needs attention.
D.Mucilage puts sea life in danger in different ways.
4. What is the main idea of the text?
A.Sea life in Turkey is in great danger of extinction.
B.A new kind of poisonous algae is found in Turkey.
C.Turkey’s coastal waters are covered with mucilage.
D.Mucilage is likely to cause great damage to Turkey.
【知识点】 环境污染 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Japan says it will start releasing radioactive(放射性的) water from the destroyed Fukushima nuclear center into the sea beginning in two years. The polluted water is to be treated before it is released into the Pacific Ocean. The government announced the plan Tuesday and said it had been approved by cabinet ministers. The decision had long been expected, but faced delays linked to safety concerns and public opposition.

Japan has said the water release is necessary to move forward with cleanup efforts at the Fukushima nuclear center. Three reactors(反应堆) there suffered meltdowns after the 2011 earthquake and huge ocean wave destroyed the plant5s cooling systems. The disaster forced 160,000 people to flee polluted areas around the plant. Tokyo Electric Power Company, or TEPCO, operates the nuclear center. It is carrying out the cleanup. TEPCO said Fukushima will run out of all its storage space for radioactive water by late 2022.

Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga said the government had decided the ocean release was the most realistic way to solve the water storage problem. Other methods considered included injecting the water into the ground or converting it to steam or hydrogen and then releasing it into the atmosphere.

The government describes the water to be released as “treated” and not “radioactive”. But experts say that 100 percent of radioactive materials cannot be removed. Government officials say tritium(氚) is the only substance that cannot be removed from the water. They say tritium is not considered harmful in small amounts.

The officials say all other radioactive materials in the water can be reduced to releasable levels. The exact amount of radioactive material that would remain in the water is not known. Some scientists say the long-term effects on ocean life from large amounts of such treated water also remains unknown. Fishermen and many people living in the area strongly oppose the plan. They have said releasing the water into the ocean could cause widespread damage to Fukushima5s fishing and agriculture industries.

1. What is the reason for Japan's water release?
A.Previous disasters damaged its storage space.
B.Too much nuclear energy is needed.
C.The storage space for radioactive water won't be enough.
D.TEPCO didn't deal with it properly.
2. What can we infer from the passage?
A.The ocean release was the only way to solve the water storage problem.
B.Only the fishing and agriculture industries will be affected.
C.Tritium won't do harm to humans if taken in in small amounts.
D.It’s possible that the radioactive water is still harmful after being treated.
3. What is the main idea of the text?
A.Japan5s plan to release radioactive water faces delays.
B.Japan announces to release radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean.
C.Japan will treat the radioactive water before it is released into the Pacific Ocean.
D.Japan’s efforts to deal with radioactive water.
4. What is the author's attitude to the water release?
A.Neutral.B.Supportive.
C.Opposed.D.Unconcerned.
2021-06-26更新 | 92次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是说明文。文章讲述一项新的研究发现,在新鲜的水果、蔬菜中首次检测到微塑料颗粒污染的问题。

【推荐2】Just when you thought you were taking care of your health by eating enough fruit and vegetables every day, new research has come out revealing that you might be swallowing microplastic particles (颗粒) along with all those vitamins, minerals, and fibre. A groundbreaking study published in the journal Environmental Research has found that fruits and vegetables absorb microplastic particles from the soil and move them through vegetal tissues, where they remain until eaten by hungry diners, thus getting transferred to human bodies.

The researchers, who are from the University of Catania in Italy, as well as Sousse and Monastir universities in Tunisia, analyzed a variety of common fruits and vegetables — carrots, lettuce, broccoli, potatoes, apples, and pears. These were chosen for the fact that they are frequently consumed, usually one per day, which allowed the researchers to better assess the dietary intakes of MPs (microplastic particles) and NPs (nano-plastics). The samples were purchased from different sources in the city of Catania, including a small fruit vendor and a supermarket.

The researchers found that apples, followed by pears, were the most polluted fruit samples, and carrots were the most polluted vegetable. In the study’s discussion section, the authors wrote, “We can assume that the fruits contain more MPs not only because of the very high vascularization(血管化) of the fruit pulp(果肉) but also due to the greater size and complexity of the root system and age of the tree (several years) compared to the vegetables (60–75 days for the carrot). ”

This study is important because it’s the first to detect microplastics in fruits and vegetables.

They have been found in other sources before, such as sea salt, beer, water (bottled, in particular), shellfish, sugar, soil, and even air, but never inside fresh produce. It’s an alarming discovery that raises yet another red flag about microplastic pollution in the natural environment.

It’s an area that will likely see a lot more attention in coming years, with the study authors calling for further research into the question of microplastic and whether it harms the health of both plants and humans.

1. What is the study about?
A.The main cause of soil pollution.
B.The great changes in people’s diets.
C.The benefits of eating fruits and vegetables.
D.The microplastic pollution in fruits and vegetables.
2. Why did researchers choose frequently eaten fruits and vegetables?
A.To lower the cost of the study.
B.To gain widespread acceptance.
C.To improve the accuracy of the study.
D.To reduce the time for preparing the samples.
3. What may cause fruits to contain more MPs according to the authors?
A.The deep spreading roots.
B.The long growth period of fruit trees.
C.The complex preservation method.
D.The large amounts of the fruit pulp.
4. What do the study authors think of the research on microplastic?
A.It needs to be further studied.
B.It wasted them quite a lot of time.
C.It has raised people’s awareness of health.
D.It has attracted people’s attention to diets.
2022-09-24更新 | 112次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】There is an "environmental silver lining" as a result of the coronavirus (冠状病毒) —carbon emissions have been reduced by more than 4%, many wildlife markets around the world have been shuttered and air quality in some places has slightly improved, Dave Ford, founder of the environmental literacy organization SoulBuffalo, says.

But thanks to an increase in pandemic-related, non-recyclable materials such as take-out plastic containers and masks, 30% more waste has entered our oceans, he notes. "There's 129 billion facemasks being made every month—enough that you could cover the entire country of Switzerland with facemasks at the end of this year if trends continue," he says. "And a lot of these masks are ending up in the water." The masks look like jellyfish—in other words, food—to turtles and other wildlife creatures, thus, attractive to those animals and then endangering them, he says.

Very little of the plastic we use is actually recyclable. Sharon Lerner of The Intercept told Here & Now last year that "the vast majority of plastic that has ever been produced—79%—has actually ended up in landfills or burned, but not refashioned into new products." Even if the plastics we have can be reused, Ford says recycling programs across the globe are facing drastic budget cuts.

"We're starting to see recycling programs shuttered, waste picking communities operating at 50% or actually shutting down. They are the last line of defense between plastic and the environment," he says.

Last year, Unilever planned to cut its use of non-recycled plastics in half by 2025. In an interview with Here & Now, Richard Slater, Unilever's chief research and development officer, drew on the industry argument that plastic packaging is lighter, which means less shipping and therefore fewer dangerous emissions that cause climate change.

Yes, plastics are lightweight and can cut down on fuel spending. But on the other hand, plastic waste is being found in every facet of life—even in the deepest ocean.

1. What does "environmental silver lining" in Papagraph 1 refer to?
A.An environmental organization.
B.The closure of some wildlife markets.
C.The decrease of carbon dioxide emissions.
D.Benefits on environment from the coronavirus.
2. Why are facemasks appealing to some sea creatures?
A.They resemble the sea creatures' food.
B.They contain certain unique chemicals.
C.Many sea creatures like to chase plastic by nature.
D.There is a continuous shortage of food in the ocean.
3. What can we learn about the plastic waste?
A.Most of it is recycled into new products.
B.The majority of it is buried or burned.
C.129 billion facemasks end up in the ocean.
D.There is enough budget for plastic recycling.
4. Which of the following might be the best title for the text?
A.Plastic can cut down fuel spending
B.Recycling programs are shutting down
C.The coronavirus has caused more ocean plastic
D.Solutions to ocean plastic pollution are being explored
2021-03-10更新 | 232次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般