组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:56 题号:4256558
In 1996, John Tierney suggested in the New York Times Magazine article that “recycling is garbage.” He wrote, “The money spent on recycling programs should have been spent on real social and environmental problems. Recycling programs not only increase energy use and pollution, but also cost more money than the disposal (处理) of plain old garbage. Recycling may be the most wasteful activity in modern America.”
Environmental groups were quick to express their disagreement. They wrote reports on how recycling programs in cities can reduce pollution and cost less than regular garbage pickup and disposal. Michael Shapiro, an official of the US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), said that “recycling can be good value for money, although there’s still room for improvements.”
But in 2002, New York City, a pioneer of recycling, found that its recycling program was losing money, so it stopped glass and plastic recycling. Other major cities watched closely to see how New York was dealing with its remaining program (the city never stopped paper recycling). But then it closed its last landfill (垃圾填埋地), and private companies out of New York raised prices due to the increased workload of carrying away and disposing New York’s garbage. As a result, glass and plastic recycling became profitable for the city again, and New York brought the program back. According to Cecil Adams of The Chicago Reader, the lessons learned by New York are relevant everywhere. He believes that, if managed correctly, recycling programs should cost cities less than garbage disposal.
Even though the benefits of recycling over disposal are many, keep in mind that it better serves the environment to “reduce and reuse” before recycling is even considered as a choice.
1. Why did John Tierney think “recycling is garbage”?
A.Because he considered recycling a wasteful activity.
B.Because he didn’t think recycling was a new idea.
C.Because he found few people would like to recycle.
D.Because he didn’t like the environmental groups.
2. Which argument was put forward by the environmental groups?
A.Recycling technologies are mature.
B.Recycling programs save money.
C.Recycling programs cause pollution.
D.Recycling technologies are valueless.
3. Why did other cities watch closely to see how New York was doing?
A.Because New York was doing extremely well.
B.Because they didn’t want to have a recycling program
C.Because they felt worried about the waste of money.
D.Because New York was running a new recycling program.
4. Which of the following would the author most probably recommend?
A.Always bring your own shopping bag when you go shopping.
B.Always put your shopping bag into the dustbin after use.
C.Never go shopping where shopping bags are offered for free.
D.Never use a shopping bag which is not recycled.
【知识点】 环境保护 说明文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了世界超过五分之一的爬行动物物种面临灭绝的风险,我们应该采取行动保护这些爬行动物,以维持自然生态的平衡。

【推荐1】Reptiles, like snakes, lizards, and crocodiles are egg-laying animals. The species are cold-blooded, which means their bodies have the same temperature as the area around them. A recent report says that more than one-fifth of the world’s reptiles are at risk of going extinct.

The study, written by 52 scientists, is the first worldwide measurement of how threatened different species of reptiles are. For 15 years, between 2004 and 2019, researchers collected information on over 10,000 different kinds of reptiles. They gathered details from over 900 reptile experts around the world.

The report has revealed some unhappy news — 21% of all reptile species are in danger of extinction. That’s over 1,800 species in all. The study reported that at least 31 species of reptiles have already gone extinct. The main reason these reptiles are faced with extinction is that humans are taking over more and more of their natural habitats. More land continues to be cleared to make room for cities and towns. Large areas of land are also being cleared so that they can be used as farmland. Logging is another big threat to reptile habitats.

But even if reptiles aren’t considered lovely, they play a very important part in nature’s food chains. One service performed by reptiles humans should appreciate is that they are natural enemies to certain pests, like insects and rats, and therefore helping control their numbers.

Scientists say the good news is that we know what must be done to protect reptiles. Bruce Young, one of the leaders of the research, says, “We have all the tools we need. Protecting natural areas, especially rainforests, is at the top of the list. Studies show that saving natural areas doesn’t just protect mammals or birds, but all kinds of animals, including reptiles.”

1. What can we know about reptiles from the report?
A.There are over 10,000 different kinds of reptiles worldwide.
B.Reptiles are cold-blooded egg-laying animals.
C.Over 20% of reptile species are at risk of dying out.
D.Temperature rising poses the greatest threat to reptiles.
2. What mainly caused the extinction of at least 31 reptile species?
A.Loss of habitats.B.Human hunting.
C.More natural enemies.D.Environmental pollution.
3. What does the author think of reptiles?
A.Attractive.B.Intelligent.
C.Beneficial.D.Dangerous.
4. What does Bruce think is the most important in reptile protection?
A.Improving breeding methods.B.Developing new rainforests.
C.Strengthening cooperation.D.Saving their natural habitats.
2023-05-26更新 | 136次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是篇说明文。文章主要介绍了一家公司声称其产品是环保的,但实际上它是一点也不环保的漂绿行为,并分析了它的危害性及背后的原因。

【推荐2】Whether you’re a citizen, consumer or investor, it is fast becoming a key life skill to make out greenwashing, a word meaning a company claims that its products are environmentally friendly but actually not green at all. Misleading, or not proved claims about benefits to climate can make it harder for people to make informed decisions. They can also weaken real efforts by companies to clean up their act and deal with the climate crisis.

The basic problem is a lack of clarity. Indeed, when it comes to spottıng greenwashing, it can actually be more helpful to focus on the color grey—because it is the many grey areas that have helped make greenwashing appear in particular places. These grey areas might be around measurements, definitions, best practice, standards or regulations. Even the language we use is very imprecıse, leaving lots of room for vagueness, confusion or complete cheating. For instance, what do words such as “green”, “sustainable” and “eco” even mean? You have no standards, measurements or definitions to judge by.

These problems are increasingly important when it comes to the greenwashing of investment products, such as pensions and investment funds. In recent years, there has been a sharp rise in consumer demand for funds that invest according to environmental, social and governance (管理) criteria, often referred to as ESG funds. According to the financial data provider Morningstar, the value of assets (资产) held in UK funds grew from £29bn at the beginning of 2017 to £71bn by the end of 2020.

With that much money at risk for high profits, misleading claims can effectively hamper the flow of money and resources into really green new plans and businesses, preventing global efforts from dealing with the climate emergency. “I describe it as the ‘teenage years’ of responsible investing, with a lot of experimentation, and a lot of people trying out new things.” says Ashley Hamilton Claxton.

1. Which of the following can be called greenwashing?
A.A product that is claimed to benefit the climate.
B.A product that is claimed to be green while not the case.
C.A product that can be washed in a green way.
D.A product that is absolutely environmentally friendly.
2. What’s the major cause of the problem of greenwashing?
A.There are no such words as “sustainable”.B.The language isn’t grammatically right.
C.The product’s description is not clear.D.The company doesn’t say it’s “green” and “eco”.
3. What does the underlined word “hamper” probably mean?
A.Stop.B.Clarify.C.Put.D.Divide.
4. What can you learn from the last paragraph?
A.Much money enables high profits.
B.Responsible investing is still at its early stage.
C.More money is invested in real green businesses.
D.A lot of people are unwilling to try out new things.
2023-11-24更新 | 19次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】Avoiding the worst effects of climate change will require action. But it’s hard to take action when you don’t even know there’s a problem. Around the world, only half of adults understand that humans are causing climate change through activities that produce greenhouse gases. But the picture is different for kids. Previous work has shown that children are more engaged and more knowledgeable than adults are about climate change. The question is, can we harness this to make a difference?

“We had come across this idea that kids are capable of influencing their parents. And when we say influence, we really mean just teaching them.” said Daniella Lawson, a social scientist at NC State University. “That’s what we set out to really investigate: can we design things in such a way that kids are able to teach their parents about climate change. A parent is willing and able to listen to their children speaking to them instead of just an adult on the street or a different climate communicator. ”

To test the idea, Lawson set up a wildlife-based climate course for kids. This approach was based on previous courses, but the team added a twist: involving the parents. First, parents were invited to come along to an event that formed a part of the course. And that’s not all. “So we also had students interview their parents. And this interview never mentioned climate change specifically. But it had questions like: how have you seen the weather change over the last five to ten years? Do you believe the sea level is rising? How do you think that could impact our communities?”

The study showed that the course did indeed increase concern about climate change: not just among the kids, but their parents too. And there were some surprising findings in the results. These findings come at a time when more kids are becoming climate activists. And Lawson says that her study shows just how persuasive young people’s voices can be.

1. What does the underlined word “harness” in paragraph one refer to?
A.Adopt.B.Accumulate.
C.Review.D.Control.
2. What can be learned from the first paragraph?
A.Effective actions have been taken to deal with climate change.
B.Most adults have realized the climate damages caused by themselves.
C.Children better adults in the area of climate change and its effects.
D.Adults and children will cooperate to deal with climate change.
3. About climate change teaching, which one will Daniella Lawson most probably agree with?
A.Kids can be taught by adults.
B.Adults can learn from the kids.
C.Climate communicators are more professional.
D.Parents are more likely to consult street adults.
4. What can be learned about the course?
A.The course involved is completely new.
B.Interviews and questionnaires are necessary in the course.
C.Adults and kids study separately during the course.
D.The course is relatively effective in climate education.
2019-12-23更新 | 104次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般