Regardless of how far we’d like to believe gender(性别)equality in the workplace has come, there’s still a yawning gap between male and female leaders in the professional world. A 2018 statistic shows that women nowadays hold just 5.8 percent of CEOs positions at S&P 500 companies, according to Catalyst.
While it’s not a huge shock that women are somewhat underrepresented in leadership positions, what is surprising though, is the fact that females may actually be better suited to lead in almost every area, at least according to new findings from the BI Norwegian Business School.
In their research, Professor Oyvind L. Martinsen and Professor Lars Glas surveyed (调查) 2,900 managers with a special focus on personality types. The results were clear: Women scored higher than men in four of the five major leadership-centric categories.
While some people believe that men inherently make better leaders — probably because they picture a leader with a commanding voice, which is more typical of men than women — this piece of research suggests that women are better at methodical management and goal-setting, openness, sociability and supportiveness, as well as ability to communicate clearly.
There was one area in which men scored higher than women, though, and that was on emotional stability and ability to face job-related pressure and stress. The results suggest that women are more sensitive to the effects of high-pressure or highly emotional situations.
Obviously, it’s important to consider individual (个人的) differences. Anyone, regardless of gender, may be an inspiring leader and a competent boss. But next time you’re hiring for a management position, you just might want to give the resumes (简历) from female candidates a harder look.
1. What makes us shocked much at leadership positions?A.Women are worse than men. |
B.Men take almost all high positions. |
C.There is a huge gap between genders. |
D.Women might behave better in nearly every field. |
A.properly | B.potentially |
C.naturally | D.normally |
A.How We Can Figure Out The Boss |
B.Why Women Are Better Than Men |
C.Why Women Make The Best Bosses |
D.How We Can Tell Gender Difference |
A.Job hunters. |
B.Employers. |
C.Employees. |
D.Male bosses. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】People on the Move
Technology
Edgar Vargas, TransPerfect
Edgar Vargas brings nearly ten-year experience supporting large-scale business to TransPerfect as the new president of Business Department. With both buy-side and sell-side knowledge, Vargas brings various skills set to the TransPerfect team.
Advertising
Roy Massey, Version 2
Version 2, a leader in advertising technology, names Roy Massey Vice President, Head of Media Development. Roy considers participation and profitability(盈利能力)important. Previous leadership roles include Dentsu, AudienceX, PMI 5 Media Inc. and RCM Group.
Law
Jennifer Lieser, Kaplan Marino
White Collar Crinunal Defense Firm Kaplan Marino set up partnership with Jennifer Lieser. Jennifer practices white collar(白领)and complex criminal suits(诉讼), defending against various forms of Internet crimes. Jennifer brings unique point of view to each case and deals with matters with great skills as an experienced lawyer.
Public Relations
Kellie Hawkins, KEA
Kellie Hawkins has become a worker at KEA. She will run the company’s Health. Social Services and Education practice. Kellie served as COO for National Health Foundation before and managed the health and human services practice for the Hawkins Company. She holds degrees from Howard University and the University of Southern California.
1. What can we know about Edgar?A.He is a beginner in large-scale business. |
B.He is a COO for National Health Foundation. |
C.He masters the skills of sales and purchasing. |
D.He thinks highly of the willingness to make profit. |
A.Edgar Vargas. | B.Roy Massey. |
C.Jennifer Lieser. | D.Kellie Hawkins. |
A.They all become leaders m new jobs. |
B.They all do well in their working field. |
C.They all have less working experience. |
D.They all have a good knowledge of laws. |
【推荐2】If you are a recent social science graduate who has had to listen to jokes about unemployment from your computer major classmates, you may have had the last laugh. There are many advantages for the social science major because this high-tech "Information Age" demands people who are flexible (灵活) and who have good communication skills.
There are many social science majors in large companies who fill important positions. For example, a number of research studies found that social science majors had achieved greater managerial success than those who had technical training or pre-professional courses. Studies show that social science majors are most suited for change, which is the leading feature (特点) of the kind of high-speed, high-pressure, high-tech world we now live in.
Social science majors are not only experiencing success in their long term company jobs, but they are also finding jobs more easily. A study showed that many companies had filled a large percentage of their entry level positions with social science graduates. The study also showed that the most sought-after quality in a person who was looking for a job was communication skills, noted as "very important" by 92 percent of the companies. Social science majors have these skills, often without knowing how important they are. It is probably due to these skills that they have been offered a wide variety of positions.
Finally, although some social science majors may still find it more difficult than their technically trained classmates to land the first job, recent graduates report that they don't regret their choice of study.
1. By saying that "you may have had the last laugh" in the first paragraph, the author means that you may have ________.A.shared the jokes with computer majors |
B.earned as much as computer majors |
C.found jobs more easily than computer majors |
D.stopped joking about computer majors |
A.are ready to change when situations change |
B.are better able to deal with difficulties |
C.are equally good at computer skills |
D.are likely to give others pressure |
A.keep for some time |
B.successfully get |
C.immediately start |
D.lose regretfully |
A.Willingness to take low-paid jobs. |
B.Readiness to gain high-tech knowledge. |
C.Skills in expressing themselves. |
D.Part-time work experience. |
【推荐3】Hiring processes can be thought of as a battle between integrity and dishonesty. You might imagine this is a simple fight between truth-seeking firms and self-promoting candidates, and to a certain extent it is. But companies themselves tend to bend reality out of shape in ways that are self-defeating.
Start with the obvious wrongdoers: job applicants. When it comes to writing the resume (简历) , they tend to massage reality into the most appealing shape possible. Everyone beyond a certain level of experience is a transformational leader personally responsible for generating millions income; the world economy would be about 15 times bigger than it actually is if all such claims were true. The average British spends four and a half hours a day watching TV and online videos. But each average job candidate is an enthusiast for public welfare, using their spare time only for worthy purposes, like volunteering in soup kitchens.
But the tendency to stretch the truth infects companies as well as applicants. The typical firm will write a job description that invariably describes the work environment as fast-paced and innovative, and then lays out a set of improbable requirements for the “ideal candidate”, someone who almost by definition does not exist. Sometimes, the requirements include an ability to go back and change the course of history.
Too few firms offer an accurate account of what a position actually involves in their job previews, which are supposed to give prospective employees a genuine sense of the negatives and positives of the job, as well as a clear idea of the company’s corporate culture. One effective strategy is to lay out in text or video, what a typical day in the role would look like.
Such honesty can be its own reward. Research has long suggested that realistic job previews lead to lower turnover and higher employee satisfaction. A paper in 2011 by David Eamest of Towson University and his co-authors concluded that favourable perceptions of the organization’s honesty are the best explanation for why. So a process designed to uncover the truth about job applicants would run a lot more smoothly if firms were also honest about themselves.
1. Why are “leader” and “enthusiast” mentioned in paragraph 2?A.To present a rule. | B.To clarify a fact. |
C.To make a comparison. | D.To explain a phenomenon. |
A.Overstate. | B.Overturn. | C.Overlook. | D.Overestimate. |
A.They show a position as it is. | B.They are made either in text or video. |
C.They are favorable for bigger firms. | D.They mainly contain negatives of a job. |
A.Pains and gains of employees and employers |
B.How to get the lying out of hiring. |
C.How to be more appealing in hiring. |
D.A wrestle between applicants and companies. |
【推荐1】A robotic game of cat and mouse playing out in a lab provides a peek at future possibilities of robots carrying out search-and-rescue missions or wildlife surveys without much human guidance.
The Tianjicat robot developed by researchers at Tsihgftua University in China uses a brain-inspired computing chip called TianjicX. The so-called neuromorphic(神经形态的) chip can run multiple artificial intelligence techniques at once in an energy-efficient manner. It is one example of experiments with neuromorphic systems that could allow small robots to make decisions using limited computing resources and power.
The researchers challenged the Tianjicat robot to chase another robot that was set to move randomly in a room filled with obstacles. This required Tianjicat to track the mouse robot by using both visual recognition and sound detection, and to figure out the best path to chase down its pretend prey without crashing anything. The team says that the TianjicX chip reduced the amount of power required for the robot cat to make decisions during the chase by about half compared with an NVIDIA chip designed for AI computing.
Performing a cat-and-mouse chase would be a step up in difficulty for most commercialised robots, which usually follow very predictable routines in warehouses or factories. Many robots that interact with more complex and unpredictable environments rely on remote control by human operators, or else must maintain wireless connections with distant data centres that have the computing power necessary for more intensive decision-making.
Neuromorphic systems haven’t yet been commercialised in a big way, but their relatively low size, weight and power requirements could provide practical advantages.
“For robotics, this is very important because it allows the system to operate for longer durations in hard-to-reach environments with greater autonomy.” says Jeffrey Krichmar at the University of California, Irvine.
1. Why did researchers do the experiment in a room with obstacles?A.To apply visual recognition to Tianjicat. |
B.To explore the best path for Tianjicat. |
C.To test the integrated performance of Tianjicat chip. |
D.To reduce the amount of power for Tianjicat. |
A.It follows predictable routines. |
B.It can operate without humans involved. |
C.It has access to distant data centers. |
D.It is used in warehouses and factories more often. |
A.User-friendly. | B.Heavy to carry. | C.Energy-consuming. | D.Complex to operate. |
A.Search-and-Rescue missions. | B.Commercialized robots. |
C.NVIDIA chips for AI computing. | D.A robot cat chasing a robot mouse. |
【推荐2】Every robot is trained in some way to do a task. By seeing what to do, robots can copy the way of doing the task. But they do so unthinkingly, perhaps relying on sensors to try to reduce collision (碰撞) risks, rather than having any understanding of why they are performing the task or where they are within physical space. It means they will often make mistakes—hitting the object in their way, for instance.
Hod Lipson and his colleagues are trying to face the challenge. They placed a robot arm in a laboratory where it was surrounded by four cameras at ground level and one camera above it. These fed video images back to a deep neural(神经的) network, a form of AI, connected to the robot that monitored its movement within the space. For 3 hours, the robot arm moved randomly and the neural network was fed information about the arm' s mechanical inputs and watched how it responded by seeing where it moved to in the space. This generated nearly 8,000 data points—and the team generated an additional 10,000 through a simulation (模拟) of the robot in a virtual version of its environment.
To test how well the AI had worked, a cloud-like diagram was generated to show where the neural network “thought” the arm should be found as it moved. It was accurate to within 1 percent, meaning if the workspace was 1 metre wide, the system correctly estimated its position to within 1 centimetre. If the neural network is considered to be part of the robot itself, this suggests the robot has the ability to visualise where it physically is at any given moment.
“To me, this is the first time in the history of robotics that a robot has been able to create a mental model of itself,” says Lipson. “It’s a small step, but it’s a sign of things to come.”
Learning about the research, Andrew Hundt at the Georgia Institute of Technology says, “There is potential for further research to lead to useful applications based on this method, but not self- perception. The computer simply matches shape and motion patterns that happen to be in the shape of a robot arm that moves.” David Cameron at the University of Sheffield, UK, also says that following a specified path to complete a goal is easily achieved by existing robots.
1. Hod Lipson’s work focuses on robots .A.flexibility | B.self-awareness |
C.deep-learning ability | D.error correction |
A.To process and transform neural information. |
B.To study and simulate AI’s virtual environment. |
C.To analyse and predict the arm’s position changes. |
D.To record and output the video images of the robot. |
A.sympathetic | B.content |
C.uncertain | D.disapproving |
A.To discuss a scientific concept. |
B.To assess a scientific finding. |
C.To introduce a science application. |
D.To present a science research. |
【推荐3】The effect on happiness of exposure to nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a gas mostly produced in diesel fumes(柴油机), is comparable to the effect from losing a job, ending a relationship or the death of a partner, research suggests.
The study found a “significant and negative association” between life satisfaction and levels of the pollutant, which causes lung problems. Sarah J Knight and Peter Howley of York University took life satisfaction data from the British Household Panel Survey and UK Household Longitudinal Survey and compared it with detailed air quality records from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Given that far more people are exposed to NO2 than suffer unemployment or end a relationship, Knight and Howley suggest that the benefits to society from reducing such emissions(排放) would be substantive.
The highest levels of NO2 occur in London, with the lowest levels in parts of south-west England. The capital has the honour of being home to the worst NO2 hotspot in Europe: Marylebone Road, which recorded the highest annual mean levels of the pollutant, more than double the legal EU limit.
Pollution from nitrogen oxides (NO) is responsible for tens of the thousands of premature deaths(过早死)across Europe, with the UK suffering a particularly high toll. Much of the pollution is produced by diesel cars, which emit about six times more than allowed in the official lab-based tests.
The European Environment Agency said the UK had 11, 940 premature deaths in 2013 from NO2. The number was down from 14, 100 in the previous year, but was still the second worst in Europe after Italy.
1. Which can replace the underlined word “substantive” in paragraph 3?A.Terrible. | B.Real. | C.Normal. | D.Special. |
A.Southwest England | B.Southeast England. |
C.Marylebone Road | D.The rural area near London |
A.11, 940 | B.15, 100 | C.14, 100 | D.19, 140 |
A.How to deal with air pollution efficiently. |
B.The biggest killer of man nowadays-air pollution |
C.Diesel fumes should be responsible for air pollution. |
D.Air pollution from NO2/ NO is as bad for happiness as partners’ death |