Not sure how to treat the special person in your life who has a daily chocolate requirement? We pulled together a list of different gifts ranging from traditional hot chocolate kits to chocolate soaps that will take their favorite to a whole new level.

1. HOT CHOCOLATE ON A STICK KIT, $36

Rather than traditional powder, inside you'll find eight different chocolate sticks with flavors like peanut butter, peppermint, and salted caramel. All your giftee needs to do is steam some milk, stir in their preferred flavor, and enjoy the sweet, warm goodness.

Buy it: Amazon

2. PRECISION COOKER, $178

The secret to the right chocolate texture is finding the perfect temperature. This one promises to bring the professional temperature control technique to the home cook. And your giftee won't even have to stay in the kitchen to reap the benefits. The tool's iPhone and Android apps allow users to control the temperature and time from far away.

Buy it: UncommonGoods

3. CHOCOLATE SOAPS, $30

The magic of chocolate goes beyond the kitchen. Help your favorite chocoholics start their day off right —— with the smell of warm chocolate. Each of the soaps, which include Amber Chocolate, Chocolate Bar, and Raspberry Drizzle, are made from olive oil, coconut, refined sweet almond oil, fragrance, and cocoa butter.

Buy it: Amazon

4. CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES KIT, $35

This kit is easy to use, so even if someone has never made chocolate before, they can experiment with all sorts of flavors and combinations without any previous experience. Inside the kit is a thermometer, two bags of dark chocolate chips, organic cocoa powder, organic coconut flakes, sea salt, peppermint extract, and vanilla extract.

Buy it: UncommonGoods

1. What is special about PRECISION COOKER?

A．It can teach users temperature control technique.

B．It can be controlled from a distance by its users.

C．It can make chocolate of different flavors.

D．It can cook dishes with better smell.

2. Which one is suitable for a chocolate making beginner?

A．HOT CHOCOLATE ON A STICK KIT.

B．PRECISION COOKER.

C．CHOCOLATE SOAPS.

D．CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES KIT.

3. You can find this webpage on ______.

A．the website of UncommonGoods	B．the website of Amazon
C．a website for chocolate recipes	D．a website for gift shopping

It was Christmas Eve 1949. I was 15 and feeling sad because there was not enough money to buy the dress I wanted. After supper, I was still feeling sorry for myself. It was a cold, clear night, and Pa came in. "Come on, Elizabeth,” he said. "Get dressed. It's cold out. " Pa was dragging me out in the cold. Ma gave me a mysterious smile as I opened the door.

Outside, I asked, "Pa, what are you doing?” Have you met Mrs. Clark lately?" he asked. Mrs. Clark lived about two miles down the road from us. Her husband had died the year before, leaving her with three children to raise on her own." Yeah, " I said. "Why?” "I rode by just today, " Pa said. Little Jake was trying to find a few woodchips. They're out of wood. " That was all he said. Pa then loaded the truck with a big ham, a sack of flour and a smaller sack of something in his left hand. "What's in the smaller sack?" I asked. "Shoes. They're out of shoes. I got the children a little candy too."

We rode the two miles to the Clarks' place in silence. I tried to think through what Pa was doing. I knew we didn't have much money. The Clarks had closer neighbors than us. Why was it our concern?

When Mrs. Clark realized what was happening, she bit her lower lip to keep it from trembling as tears ran down her cheeks. She looked at Pa as if she wanted to say something, but it wouldn't come out. I wasn't the same person when I got the wood unloaded. We gave each of the kids a hug and said goodbye. Thank you, Brother Cotton,"   Mrs. Clark said.

On the way back, Pa explained that he and Ma had saved all year long to buy me a dress for Christmas. 441 spent that money on some shoes and a little candy for those children. I hope you understand, he said. I understood very well. My father had given me a gift much greater than a dress.

4. I felt sorry for myself because ______

A．I didn't get the present I desired

B．Pa forced me to go out in the cold

C．Pa didn't have money for Christmas

D．I did a lot of housework after supper

5. What can we learn about Mrs. Clark?

A．She lived on others' help.

B．She was our closest neighbor.

C．She led a hard life that winter.

D．She was a warm-hearted woman.

6. What does the underlined sentence "I wasn't the same person..." in Paragraph 4 mean?

A．I understood what Pa was doing then.

B．I helped with unloading the wood.

C．Mrs. Clark didn't recognize me.

D．Mrs. Clark noticed my change.

7. What can be a suitable title for the text?

A．Christmas Gifts from Heart	B．A Cold Christmas Eve
C．Helping Our Neighbors	D．Clark and Her Children

Let’s play a word game. What word can be put in front of the words “stick, maker and point” to make three new compound words? Ready for the answer? Match. Match will combine to make the words “match-stick, match-maker and match-point”. And the point of tasks like this is to measure creativity.
Maybe you have music playing as you think about the words. And, of course, many listen to music while they work. So Emma Threadgold, a cognitive psychologist at the University of Central Lancashire in England, and her colleagues recently used such word puzzles to investigate whether listening to music affects creativity. They asked volunteers to solve 19 puzzles, while listening to either a foreign-language tune, an instrumental version of the same song, a familiar English-language tune, or silence. In every case, volunteers listening to music solved fewer puzzles than their counterparts in total quiet, suggesting that background music does not really aid this kind of creative task. Besides, the researchers tested library noise as well, like the sounds of typing and rustling papers. None of those noises decreased volunteers’ performance at all, compared to the silent control group.
The results are in the journal Applied Cognitive Psychology. Still, if you do insist on listening to music while working, you might try something a little more low-key than Lady Gaga, says Threadgold’s colleague John Marsh. A sound with a lot of changes in state information or pitches is more disruptive (干扰的) than one with fewer of those changes. So if you compared a modern pop song with some classical music, you’d expect less disruption from that classical music, just as in actual silence.
8. What is the purpose of the word game mentioned in the passage?

A．To make fun with others.	B．To test memory.
C．To evaluate creativity.	D．To create new words.

9. Why can the volunteers in total quiet solve more puzzles?

A．Because they can concentrate on the problems.

B．Because other groups are not as clever as them.

C．Because other groups are into listening to music.

D．Because they are better at word puzzle games.

10. What can we infer from Emma Threadgold and her colleagues’ experiment?

A．Volunteers in library can do as well as the ones in quiet.

B．Library noises can affect the volunteers’ performance.

C．Sound has a negative influence on one’s creativity.

D．Those who listen to foreign songs perform worse.

11. If you do insist on listening to music while working, which one is the best?

A．Fast-paced songs.	B．High-key songs.
C．Pop music.	D．Classic music.

Put "crottin de chevre," into Google Translate, and you'll be told it means goat dung (waste). So if it appears on a menu, you may pass. Alas! You will rule out a delicious cheese made of goats5 milk that is often served as a starter in France.

Such misunderstandings are why Google Translate is not intended to replace human translators. Tourists might accept a few misunderstandings because the technology is cheap and convenient, but when in business, law or medicine, these services often fall short. " Using Google Translate can lead to some serious errors, especially when words have multiple meanings, which is often the case in fields such as law and engineering, " says Samantha Langley, a court-approved French — to — English legal translator in France.

That is not to say professional translators do not use computer assisted translation (CAT) tools. One of the most popular new tools is the translation earpiece. Usually paired with a smart-phone app, they pick up spoken foreign languages and translate them. For conferences, wearable translation tools like Waverly's are undoubtedly popular. But even this new generation tech has limitations. Users must wait at least a few seconds for a phrase to be translated, or more if the Internet connection is poor. And computers still lack the subtlety (微妙之处)of human communication.

"If you want to create a relationship with the user, you need a human translator to make sound natural and capture the sentiment, which often involves restructuring a sentence completely, says Zoey Cooper, director at Wordbank. "I believe CAT tools get in the way of creativity, " says Antonio Navarro Gosalvez, an English-to- Spanish translator in Spain.

Mr. Ochoa Spencer, chief executive of US start-up Waverly Labs, thinks this problem could be resolved within the next 10 years. "When it comes to expressing emotion and intonation, we need sentiment analysis, which may well be in ten years time, " he says. Yet, nowadays foreign language skills are still in demand in the labour market.

12. The writer uses the example of "crottin de chevre" to ______.

A．criticize Google Translate	B．regret missing the cheese
C．bring in the main topic	D．introduce a starter in France

13. How is Google Translate according to Paragraph 2?

A．Precise and cheap.	B．Cheap but inaccurate.
C．Convenient and effective.	D．Fast but incorrect.

14. Who might have a different opinion on Al translation?

A．Samantha Langley.	B．Zoey Cooper.
C．Antonio Navarro Gosalvez.	D．Ochoa Spencer.

15. What is the text mainly about?

A．The various disadvantages of Google Translate.

B．The chances of human translators being replaced by AI.

C．The difference between computer and human translation.

D．The disappearance of human translators in the near future.