组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:85 题号:10200572

On average, American kids ages 3 to 12 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more that they did in 1981. They also did more household work and participated in more of such organized activities as soccer and ballet (芭蕾舞). Involvement in sports, in particular, rose almost 50% from 1981 to 1997: boys now spend an average of four hours a week playing sports; girls log half that time. All in all, however, children’s leisure time dropped from 40% of the day in 1981 to 25%

“Children are affected by the same time crunch (危机) that affects their parents,” says Sandra Hofferth, who headed the recent study of children’s timetable. A chief reason, she says, is that more mothers are working outside the home. (Nevertheless, children in both double-income and “male breadwinner” households spent comparable amounts of time interacting with their parents 19 hours and 22 hours respectively. In contrast, children spent only 9 hours with their single mothers.)

All work and no play could make for some very messed-up kids. “Play is the most powerful way a child explores the world and learns about himself,” says T. Berry Brazelton, professor at Harvard Medical School Unstructured(unorganized)play encourages independent thinking and allows the young to handle their relationships with their peers, but kids ages 3 to 12 spent only 12 hours a week engaged in it.

The children sampled spent a quarter of their rapidly decreasing “free time” watching television. But that, believe it or not, was one of the findings parents might regard as good news. If they’re spending less time in front of the TV set, however, kids aren’t replacing it with reading. Despite efforts to get kids more interested in books, the children spent just over an hour a week reading. Let’s face it, who’s got the time?

1. By mentioning the same time crunch” (Line 1, Para. 2) Sandra Hofferth means ______.
A.children have little time to play with their parents
B.both parents and children suffer from lack of leisure time
C.children are not taken good care of by their working parents
D.both parents and children have trouble managing their time
2. According to the author a child develops better if _______.
A.he has plenty of time reading and studying
B.he has more time participating in school activities
C.he is left to play with his peers in his own way
D.he is free to interact with his working parents
3. We can infer from the passage that _______.
A.extracurricular activities(after-class activities) promote children’s intelligence
B.most children will turn to reading with TV sets switched off
C.efforts to get kids interested in reading have been fruitful
D.most parents believe reading to be beneficial to children

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 适中 (0.65)
真题 名校
文章大意:本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述了电影制作人David Bond为了让孩子们远离屏幕,拍摄自己的旅行,并将自然当作一个品牌,推销给年轻人。

【推荐1】We live in a town with three beaches. There are two parts less than 10 minutes’ walk from home where neighborhood children gather to play. However, what my children want to do after school is pick up a screen — any screen — and stare at it for hours. They are not alone. Today’s children spend an average of four and a half hours a day looking at screens, split between watching television and using the Internet.

In the past few years, an increasing number of people and organisations have begun coming up with plans to counter this trend. A couple of years ago film-maker David Bond realised that his children, then aged five and three, were attached to screens to the point where he was able to say “chocolate” into his three-year-old son’s ear without getting a response. He realised that something needed to change, and, being a London media type, appointed himself “marketing director from Nature”. He documented his journey as he set about treating nature as a brand to be marketed to young people. The result was Project Wild Thing, a film which charts the birth of the World Network, a group of organisations with the common goal of getting children out into nature.

“Just five more minutes outdoors can make a difference,” David Bond says. “There is a lot of really interesting evidence which seems to be suggesting that if children are inspired up to the age of seven, then being outdoors will be on habit for life.” His own children have got into the habit of playing outside now: “We just send them out into the garden and tell them not to come back in for a while.”

Summer is upon us. There is an amazing world out there, and it needs our children as much as they need it. Let us get them out and let them play.

1. What is the problem with the author’s children?
A.They often annoy their neighbours.B.They are tired of doing their homework.
C.They have no friends to play withD.They stay in front of screens for too long.
2. How did David Bond advocate his idea?
A.By making a documentary film.B.By organizing outdoor activities.
C.By advertising in London media.D.By creating a network of friends.
3. Which of the following can replace the underlined word “charts” in paragraph 2?
A.recordsB.predictsC.delaysD.confirms
4. What can be a suitable title for the text?
A.Let Children Have FunB.Young Children Need More Free Time
C.Market Nature to ChildrenD.David Bond: A Role Model for Children
2021-06-15更新 | 5575次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】Type the words“kind of”,“probably”or“perhaps”into an email in Microsoft Outlook and the program might well tell you to think again.If the artificial intelligence-powered“Microsoft Editor”decides you’re not sounding decisive enough,it will warn you:“Words expressing uncertainty lessen your impact.”

To me,this suggestion sums up something we’ve got wrong in society.It highlights a broader issue:we live   in a world that rewards those who speak with conviction—even when   that is misplaced—and gives very little airtime to those who acknowledge doubt.

Research shows that the human brain is hard-wired to hate uncertainty:a 2016 study published in Nature Communications found that when volunteers were given electric shocks,their stress levels were highest when they had no idea whether they were going to be given a shock or not—higher even than subjects who were told they definitely would get one.

While confident-sounding specialists might be giving us what our brains ache for,the relief they are providing is probably misleading.Yet overconfident“thought leaders”and other public figures are usually the ones who get the most newspaper headlines and biggest social media followings.Psychology professor Philip Tetlock ran a series of“forecasting tournaments”between 1984 and 2003,in which he found that there was a negative association between the fame of forecasters and their ability to predict the outcomes of events.   

Tetlock divided up forecasters into“foxes”and“hedgehogs”.Foxes consider all sorts of   different approaches and perspectives,and integrate those into detailed conclusions.Hedgehogs   tend to view the world through the lens(透镜)of one single defining idea.That makes the   hedgehogs worse forecasters but more likely to get attention.

Perhaps we care less about the truth and more about some sense of security,however   momentary that might be.And it makes Sense that when we’re all feeling anxious and making so many sacrifices,we would want to feel that some adults somewhere know what they’re doing.Nevertheless,is it time to give a bit more attention to the foxes?

1. What does the underlined word“conviction”in paragraph 2 mean?
A.Strong belief.B.Heavy doubt.
C.Creative thought.D.Specific knowledge.
2. What conclusion can be drawn from the“forecasting tournaments”‘?
A.Big fame most probably promotes certainty.
B.Confident public figures attract more followers.
C.Thought leaders are capable of forecasting events.
D.High reputation may relate to poor predicting ability.
3. Why do the“hedgehogs”more easily attract attention?
A.Their ideas are more optimistic.
B.Their conclusions are more decisive.
C.Their viewing angles are intergrated.
D.Their approaches to forecasting are detailed.
4. What does the author mainly want to tell us?
A.Determined attitudes enhance popularity.
B.Certainty is over-rated and over-rewarded.
C.Confidence is vital to accurate predictions.
D.Human brains desire for a sense of security.
2021-12-22更新 | 50次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是说明文。文章主要讲述2022年,英国有61家公司参加了世界上最大的一周工作四天的测试情况。

【推荐3】In 2022, 61 companies in the United Kingdom (UK) took part in the world’s largest test of a four-day work week.

The pilot program, conducted in the UK, guided over 60 companies and almost 3, 000 workers through a six-month trial of a 4 day week, with no loss of pay for workers. Overall results show that almost every organization will stick to a 4-day week post-trial, with 91% definitely continuing or planning to continue, and a further 4% leaning towards continuing.

Companies rated their overall experience of the trials an average of 8. 5/10, with business productivity and business performance each scoring 7. 5/10. Profits rose by 35% over the trial periods when compared to similar periods from the previous year and hiring increased while absenteeism decreased.

Lead researcher, Professor Juliet Schor of Boston College observed an encouraging consistency in the data. “Results are largely steady across workplaces of varying sizes, showing it works for many types of organizations. There are also some interesting differences. We found that employees in non-profits and professional services had a larger average increase in time spent exercising, while those in construction enjoyed the largest reductions in burnout and sleep problems,” she said. Getting the carbon footprint down is also encouraging, with commuting (通勤) time falling by a half bour per week.

How did workers do more in less time? Some companies cut meetings, or made sure they were shorter. Others used technology to help workers get more done quickly. Some companies created a “focus time” so workers could work on just one thing without being interrupted.

In general, workers said the four-day work week left them feeling less tired. About 71% said they felt less “burnt out” with their new work hours, and 39% said they felt less stressed. On average, 73% of the workers were more satisfied with the time they spent working.

1. Which of the following best describes the experiment?
A.Controversial.
B.Ambitious.
C.Eventful.
D.Successful.
2. What can we say about the four-day work week?
A.It’s a one-sided move.
B.It’s what technology brings.
C.I’s environmentally friendly.
D.It’s unfit for big companies.
3. What are the statistics in the last paragraph about?
A.Working habits.
B.Joy at work.
C.Health management.
D.Business performance.
4. Which can be a suitable title for the text?
A.Monday-Friday Model Is Outdated
B.Good Health Is Good Business
C.4-Day Workweek Trial Finishes
D.4-Day Workweek Could Be Coming
2023-03-29更新 | 214次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般