组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:480 题号:11694520

Back in Brisbane, Australia, for the Christmas break, I found myself in a public transport dead zone. Bikeless, 7 kilometers from where I was meeting friends and unwilling to get a taxi, I decided to borrow an electric scooter. The trip took far longer than it would have by bike, mainly because of a major spill halfway there. A rock, hit at speed, is a terrible thing: weeks later, I still had the red knees of a primary schooler.

E-scooters have appeared in Brisbane like a rash. In the UK, they are legal only on private land, but the Department for Transport is discussing how to regulate them on public roads and pathways, with the potential for legalisation later this year.

Other cities that have e-scooter rental programs have had teething problems. In Paris, mayor Anne Hidalgo described the situation last year as messy. She has announced that the city is reducing its number of e-scooters to 15,000 and plans to create laws banning them from pavements (人行道). France has put into force laws limiting e-scooter speeds to 25 kilometres per hour.

Similar to dockless (无桩的) hire bicycles, e-scooters are parked on pavements and people leave them up trees or throw them into rivers. Rough handling shortens their lifetime, which is bad for both profitability and the environment. Analysis suggests that the average e-scooter’s lifetime is just three months.

I think e-scooters are an essential part of the effort to make city transport greener. They are seen as a solution to the “last mile” problem — a potential way to reduce transport jam by rapidly getting someone to their final destination. Cars can take up 28 times the space of a person riding a bicycle.

As far as the environmental effect goes, recent research suggests that e-scooters are not as green as walking or cycling, but they are still better than cars. And despite numerous reports of serious accidents, scooting is about as safe as cycling.

Stephen Gossling at Lund University in Sweden has suggested we build car-free “micromobility” streets, where cyclists, pedestrians (行人) and e-scooters could share the road. He thinks this will reduce accident risks and invite more vulnerable (易受伤害的) traffic participants, such as children, to become active transport users.

If more e-scooters mean fewer cars on roads, an improvement in local air quality is also a likely outcome. When 20 kilometers of roads in central London closed for World Car-Free Day last September, a temporary air quality monitor in Regent Street reportedly registered a 60% drop in nitrogen dioxide.

1. What does the underlined part “a major spill” in Paragraph 1 probably mean?
A.A serious fall.B.A sudden illness.
C.A legal defense.D.A terrible breakdown.
2. What do we know about e-scooters in Paris?
A.They are illegal on pavements.B.They are already out of fashion.
C.They are facing more restrictions.D.They are more common on private land.
3. What is the author’s opinion of e-scooters?
A.They are not as safe as cycling.
B.They stand up to rough handling.
C.They are as green as cycling or walking.
D.They play a big role in the “last mile” problem.
4. What is Stephen Gossling’s suggestion?
A.To set up more care-free days.
B.To invite more cyclists to use e-scooters.
C.To get vulnerable pedestrians off the road.
D.To separate cars from e-scooters on the road.
20-21高二上·河南郑州·期中 查看更多[5]

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇新闻报道。文章介绍了三星公司Rathore和他的团队致力于将废弃的渔网回收再利用,并成功将其用于制作三星Galaxy系列手机,在这个突破之后,三星的目标是在未来的产品线中使用更多的升级循环材料。

【推荐1】Plastic fishing nets, the so-called ghost nets, abandoned yearly in the sea—about 1 million tons—are more than just rubbish; they’re a killer. Fish, sea birds, and turtles get caught in the netting and die, with more species at risk.

Much shocked at this, Pranveer Singh Rathore, a materials-science engineer and materials R&D manager at Samsung, and his team set themselves the task of giving new life to the deadly nets. Last month, Samsung revealed a new line of Galaxy products made in part from recycled plastic fishing nets for the first time. The company estimates this year alone it can recycle over 50 tons of ocean-bound plastic into the key components that will go into its smartphones, tablets, and computers, thus taking a bite out of the global ghost nets problem.

It’s no small task to give waste fishing nets a second act. The nets are typically made of a substance called nylon which tends to dramatically degrade (降解) the longer it sits in the ocean and is exposed to the sun. “This makes it nearly impossible to use abandoned fishing nets directly,” Rathore explains. Besides, high-performance smartphone, tablet, or PC has to be waterproof and can survive severe weather. The nylon in the fishing nets falls far short of that level of durability (耐用).

To deal with that problem, Samsung last summer teamed up with two partners: one to collect and transform the nets into tiny nylon pellets (颗粒) while the other to strengthen their toughness and durability. The end result: The partners hit upon an eco-friendly and high-performance plastic material that’s being used to build the component parts for its latest line of products. For example, two parts of the Galaxy S22 mobile phone—the key bracket and the inner cover—are made of these fishing-net plastic materials. Samsung aims to use even more upcycled materials in future product lines.

“That’s the hope for the globe and our mission,” Rathore smiles.

1. What does the underlined word “this” in paragraph 2 refer to?
A.Rubbish in the sea.B.Recycling the deadly nets.
C.Ocean species’ extinction.D.Ghost nets’ threat to sea life.
2. What is paragraph 3 mainly about?
A.The low level of durability of nylon.B.The second act of waste fishing nets.
C.The great difficulty in reusing ghost nets.D.The positive comment on Samsung’s products.
3. What is special about Samsung’s new Galaxy products?
A.They are made from tiny nylon pellets.B.They put an end to the problem of fishing nets.
C.They can stand up to water and severe weather.D.They contain materials recycled from ghost nets.
4. What can we learn about Rathore’s work?
A.It makes plastic easier to break down.B.It marks the shift of Samsung’s mission.
C.It protects the planet from choking on plastic.D.It raises public awareness of ocean exploration.
2022-09-10更新 | 588次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。一项研究表示,一个国家的特定文化价值观可能决定人们对环境问题的关注是否会促使个人做出环保行为。

【推荐2】The specific cultural values of a country may determine whether concern about environmental issues actually leads individuals to engage in environmentally friendly behaviors, according to research published in Psychological Science.

Kimin Eom, a psychological scientist of the University of California, Santa Barbara, was inspired to investigate the links between culture, environmental concern, and environmental action after noticing that both public discussion and academic research on environmental behavior typically focus on people from Western countries. It is worth noticing because Western countries tend to have cultural values that prioritize individuals’ own attitudes and beliefs and encourage expression of them.

“The theory seemed to be that once individuals are led to believe in the urgency of environmental issues and have stronger concerns about sustainability (持续性), they will change and act to address the issues,” explains Eom. But this relationship might not hold for individuals living in more collectivistic (集体主义的) societies, which place more emphasis on social harmony and uniformity than on self-expression, Eom and his team assumed.

To examine what drives environmental action in individualistic and collectivistic cultures, the researchers conducted a study with participants from the United States (an individualistic culture) and Japan (a collectivistic culture). They found environmental concern was closely connected with environmental behavior — in this case, choosing environmentally friendly products — but only among American participants. On the other hand, believing that a large percentage of people engage in environmentally friendly behaviors was associated with making eco-friendly choices among Japanese participants, but not American participants.

The findings suggest that personal concerns are more likely to motivate people to take environmental action if they live in individualistic countries, while social norms (准则) are more likely to drive people to engage in environmentally friendly behavior if they live in collectivistic countries.

“Getting citizens actively engaged is critical to addressing urgent social challenges, such as climate change,” says Eom. “Our research suggests that scientists, policymakers, and activists need to understand how culture shapes the psychological factors of action to develop policies, campaigns, and interventions (干预) that address important social issues.”

1. What does Eom find about previous research on environmental behavior?
A.Its study participants are too limited.
B.Its results need a while to be achieved.
C.It prioritizes individuals’ attitudes and beliefs.
D.It draws much evidence from public discussion.
2. Under which condition will a Japanese man most likely take environmental action?
A.If he sees many others do so.
B.If he is affected by collectivistic values.
C.If he moves to an individualistic country.
D.If he worries about the environment personally.
3. What does Eom say about their research in the last paragraph?
A.It fails to take participants’ psychological factors into account.
B.It encourages scientists and policymakers to make joint efforts.
C.It has a further study direction towards urgent social challenges.
D.It provides insights into promoting public engagement in social issues.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.Social Norms Play a Part in Addressing Pollution
B.Environmental Issues Originate from National Cultures
C.Motivating Eco-Friendly Behaviors Depends on Cultural Values
D.More Environmental Concerns Usually Mean More Green Action
2024-03-04更新 | 199次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章介绍泰晤士河目前生态环境的状况,并揭露了其存在的问题,以及为应对这些问题而制定的解决方案。

【推荐3】Zologial Sociey of London(ZSL), which runs London Zoo, brought together 16 scientists from different organizations to make a full “heath heck” on 215 miles of the Thames. The results of the first-ever State of the Thames Report have been shown to the public and there’s both good and bad news for London’s main waterway.

First up, since the Thames was pronounced “biologically(生物学地)dead” in1957, the number of animals and plants growing in and around the river has increased greatly. Natural habitats(栖息地)are also on the increase, some of which can help in the fight against climate(气候)change.

It’s not all good news though—like everywhere else, the Thames is influenced by climate change, mainly through changes in water temperature and sea levels. The Thames is increasing in temperature at an average(平均数)of 0. 2℃ each year, changing the natural environment.

Water levels are also rising in the Thames—at Silvertown. There has been an average increase of 4. 26 mm per year since 1990, which makes London more likely to be flooded.

As with pretty much everywhere on Earth, the Thames needs climate change to be stopped in order to make itself a living river in the future.

The Environment Agency has put together the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan which sets out a long-term plan for dealing with the influence of rising sea levels for the rest of this century, in order to protect London from floods.

James Brand, Thames Estuary 2100 Advisor at the Environment Agency said, “We are glad to support the State of the Thames Report. If we are going to stop climate change, nature needs to be at the heart of our activities, both in slowing the pace of future change and dealing with the changes that we are already seeing.”

1. What did the 16 scientists do with the Thames?
A.They did an examination of it.B.They gave an introduction to it.
C.They brought new animals to it.D.They organized a clean-up of it.
2. What is Paragraph 2 mainly about?
A.The way animals are raised.B.The development of natural habitats.
C.The meaning of “biologically dead”.D.The welcome changes to the Thames.
3. What has happened to the Thames?
A.It has caused many floods.
B.Its temperature has been rising.
C.Its plants have become fewer and fewer.
D.It is home to a smaller number of animals.
4. Why was the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan made?
A.To record the rising sea levels.B.To help rebuild London.
C.To explain the importance of nature.D.To fight against climate change.
5. Where can the text be found?
A.In a storybook.B.In a health magazine.
C.In a research paper.D.In a geography textbook.
2022-09-09更新 | 219次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般