组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:58 题号:14077561

“The grass looks greener on the other side of the fence(篱笆).”That’s an old saying in English. It means that other places often look better, more interesting than the place where you live.“Let’s go to KFC for dinner and then watch some Japanese cartoons!”We all know it: more and more Chinese kids love American and Japanese food and movies. Some people worry that young Chinese are beginning to feel that way. They see young Chinese ignoring Chinese culture and, instead, buying Japanese cartoon books, watching Korean soap operas and even celebrating western holidays.

Foreign books and soap operas are good, but Chinese writers and actors are just as good. As for holidays, Christmas is nice, but it can never have the meaning for Chinese that the Spring Festival has, and the West has nothing to compare with the Mid-Autumn Festival. China has lots of cool things in its culture: calligraphy, Beijing Opera, quick meals on the streets, and even Jay Chou! And let's not forget the part of Chinese culture I like best: its friendliness. Not all countries are as warm as China.

It’s good to enjoy other cultures and to learn from them, but they can never replace your own culture. It’s good to look on the other side of the fence, but make sure you take a good long look. You will find that the grass isn’t always greener.

Although some people become worried about that, I don’t think they should. Will we get more powerful without learning from other countries? Will Chinese people live more happily without American fast food? Besides, it's fun to learn about different cultures. Chinese kids can learn about other cultures and have fun, but they also need to learn more about their own culture. Be proud of Chinese culture and of being Chinese!

1. The author thinks young Chinese ________.
A.are ignoring our own cultureB.are foolish in learning our own culture
C.are interested in our own cultureD.are hating our own culture
2. In some young Chinese’s eyes, which of the following is not the “greener grass”?
A.Japanese cartoon books.B.Korean soap operas.
C.The Mid-Autumn Festival.D.Christmas.
3. In the author's opinion, what is the best feature of Chinese culture?
A.Hard-working.B.Friendly.C.Brave.D.Honest.
4. What is the best title for the passage?
A.Chinese culture and western cultureB.Simple young Chinese
C.Interesting western cultureD.That grass is not always greener

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐1】“Inspector Sands to the control room, please.” If you ever hear that at a British train station, don’t panic. But you might appreciate knowing that this is a codeword meant to inform staff that there is an emergency somewhere in the building. The idea is to avoid causing alarm among commuters (通勤者), but still get the message out to those trained to deal with the problem.

The subject of secret codewords like this was raised this week on Reddit, and the discussion has attracted thousands of examples. But what codewords and signs are really out there in the wild?

A good place to start is hospital emergency codes. These are often colour-coded, and one health centre in Canada has published its list online. “Code red” announces a fire, “code white” indicates a violent person while “code black” means a bomb threat is active. It’s been reported that hospital staff sometimes refer to the morgue as “Rose Cottage”, in order to avoid upsetting relatives of a patient who has recently died.

“I can see very good reasons for having these codes,” says Paul Baker, a linguist at the University of Lancaster. “It may be that people are unsure when they’re giving the code so there’s no point upsetting members of the public.”

Not all codes are alphanumeric (字母数字的). Some are visual, intended to be hidden in plain sight. As BBC Future discovered earlier this year, many banknotes feature a specific pattern of dots placed there to prevent people from photocopying money. Many copiers and scanners are programmed to spot it.

And finally, the spray-painted squiggles (波形曲线) you see on pavements in towns and cities all over the world are codes understood by construction workers and engineers. For example, in UK, different colours are related to different types of cable or pipe. Blue meant a water system while yellow indicated gas lines and green labelled CCTV or data wiring.

All of these codes have a purpose — to avoid causing panic, to transmit subtle signals in social groups, or to provide technical information quickly and easily. “People don’t like secrets, do they?” says Baker. “There is a drive to have as much information as possible — we do live in the information age,” he adds.

1. The following are purposes of the secret codes except ________.
A.to avoid causing alarm and panic among the public.
B.to send sensitive signals in social groups.
C.to provide technical information quickly and easily.
D.to make people believe you are wiser.
2. The underlined word “morgue” in paragraph 3 refers to the room in a hospital ______.
A.where patients are treated
B.where dead bodies are kept
C.where a patient has an operation
D.where a surgeon cuts open the patients’ bodies
3. How many kinds of secret codes are mentioned in the passage?
A.2.B.3.
C.4.D.5.
4. Which of the following could be the best title of the passage?
A.The secret codes you are not meant to knowB.Where to find the codes
C.The origin of different codesD.Codes in the modern society
2021-10-09更新 | 90次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约500词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了名人在一些敏感政治话题以及社会问题上的观点将产生的影响,明确了名人的社会责任。

【推荐2】The recent criticisms of Taylor Swift for her silence on the war in Gaza highlight a peculiar issue: the unrealistic expectations we place on celebrities to be know-alls. It’s a topic worth looking into.

While many are quick to urge figures like Taylor Swift to lend their voice s to critical global conversations, a concerning pattern emerges on the flip side: celebrities navigating the dark waters of complex debates with limited knowledge. Take, for instance, Billie Eilish’s fashion choice at the Oscars — a red hand pin. This wasn’t just any accessory (配饰); it’s rooted in the upset history of the 2000 cruel treatments of two Israelis. It begs the question: Was Eilish aware of the weighty story this symbol carries? This moment serves as a reminder of the nuanced (微妙的, 细节的) balance celebrities must strike between being supportive and the profound responsibility of using apublic platform.

The celebrity culture in the United States, where public figures are elevated to almost god-like status, plays a significant role in this phenomenon. They are seen as perfect, their opinions holy. This is not only unfair to the celebrities themselves, who are, after all, only human, but it also takes away from the voices of actual experts on these subjects. When we prioritize a celebrity’s opinion over those with lived experience or specialized knowledge, we do a disservice to the complexity of these issues.

As a society, we must reevaluate our obsession with celebrity culture and recognize the limitations of looking to entertainers for guidance on complex issues. This doesn’t mean celebrities can’t or shouldn’t speak out on matters that affect them personally or on which they’re well-informed. It’s entirely appropriate for Taylor Swift to publicly support political candidates in her home country. The action stems from personal values and people’s engagement, which are different from commenting on international conflicts without a deep understanding of the nuances involved.

In advocating for this nuanced approach, we’re not suggesting celebrities should remain silent on all matters of public concern. Instead, we’re calling for a shift in how we, as the public, perceive and react to their involvement in social and political issues. By adjusting our expectations, we can foster a healthier, more informed public discussion that prioritizes substance over the temptation of star power.

Ultimately, the goal should be to create a more empathetic, informed society that values expertise and genuine activism over celebrity support. By encouraging public figures to use their platforms responsibly and directing our attention to where they can make a real difference, we take a step toward a more nuanced understanding of global issues. This isn’t just about relieving celebrities of undue burdens; it’s about empowering all of us to seek out and elevate the voices that matter most.

1. Why is “a red hand pin” mentioned in Para.2?
A.To make fun of Billie’s limited knowledge on debating.
B.To show Billie’s unawareness of irresponsible advocacy.
C.To speak ill of Billie’s poor taste for fashion at the Oscars.
D.To criticize Billie for his abuse of the public platform.
2. What does “this phenomenon” in Para. 3 refer to?
A.Billie’s unreasonable selection of a red hand pin at the Oscars.
B.Celebrities’ irresponsible opinions on critical global conversations.
C.Public’s great desire for celebrities to comment on key global issues.
D.Taylor Swift’s golden silence about the crucial international concern.
3. According to the passage, it can be inferred that ______.
A.experts tend to increase the complexity of the issues
B.celebrities’ voices are as important as those of experts
C.celebrities should air views on matters at home and abroad
D.we should reassess the social and political roles of celebrities
4. Which of the following might be the best title of this passage?
A.Expect the UnexpectedB.Public Platforms, Powered Places
C.The Downside of Celebrity AdvocacyD.The Essence of Celebrity Responsibility
2024-05-05更新 | 48次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。本文讲述了未来社会的人工智能大发展,大约50%的职业将消失,但失去职业并不等于丢掉工作,只是改变了人们做的是什么,更多的新工作会被创造出来。

【推荐3】From self-driving cars to carebots (care+ robots) for elderly people, rapid development in technology has long represented a possible threat to many jobs normally performed by people. But experts now believe that almost 50 percent of occupations existing today will be completely unnecessary by 2035 as artificial intelligence (AI) continues to change businesses.

“The next fifteen years will see a revolution in how we work, and a revolution will necessarily take place in how we plan and think about workplaces,” said Peter Andrew, Director of Workplace Strategy for CBRE Asia-Pacific. A growing number of jobs in the future will require creative intelligence, social skills and the ability to use artificial intelligence.

The report is based on interviews with 200 experts, business leaders and young people from Asia-Pacific, Europe and North America. It shows that in the US technology already destroys more jobs than it creates. But the report states, “Losing occupations does not necessarily mean losing jobs—just changing what people do.” Growth in new jobs could occur as much, according to the research. “The growth of 20- to 40-person companies that have the speed and technological know-how will directly challenge big companies,” it states.

Another study by Pew Research Centre found 52 percent of experts in artificial intelligence and robotics were optimistic about the future and believed there would still be enough jobs in the next few years. The optimists pictured “a future in which robots do not take the place of more jobs than they create.”

“Technology will continue to affect jobs, but more jobs seem likely to be created. Although there have always been unemployed people, when we reached a few billion people, there were billions of jobs. There is no shortage of things that need to be done and that will not change,” Microsoft’s Jonathan Grudin told researchers.

1. Why are carebots mentioned?
A.To give a definition.B.To provide an example.
C.To make a comparison.D.To explain a theory.
2. What does the report in paragraph 3 show?
A.People will take the place of AI.
B.US technology balances job opportunities.
C.Many people have to change occupations.
D.Big companies are more innovative and flexible.
3. What is Jonathan Grudin’s attitude towards the future of human employment?
A.Hopeful.B.Doubtful.C.Unconcerned.D.Worried
4. Which section of a website is the text most probably taken from?
A.Art.B.Travel.C.Education.D.Technology.
2023-10-05更新 | 86次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般