组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:282 题号:14336794

Stefani Shamrowicz lives in Colorado. The 24-year-old woman has spent 23 days picking up126 bags of rubbish across the country

Having over a month off from her job at a campus recreation center, Stefani Shamrowicz decided to take a trip to help clean up the environment.

She's now driven over 70 hours through Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Texas, Louisiana Florida,Georgia,Tennessee,Kentucky,Ohio,Pennsylvania,and New York-cleaning up everything from pee-filled bottles to lawn ornaments. About 80 percent of the rubbish was drinking bottles. Stefani said she had found a few fast-food toys and a tire with a pair of cowboy boots in it and her aim wasn't to shame, but rather encourage people to do what they can

Collecting anywhere from one to 16 bags at a time, Stefani's been discouraged. She felt she wasn't doing enough. She said there was a place that had an ocean of rubbish and she pushed out four bags, but then she broke down because she realized how much rubbish there was and it felt like four bags didn't do anything. But she remembered to just do what she could, especially since she had gone beyond her goal. She said she dedicated that to her parents because they raised her to be an independent person and had been very supportive on the trip

People donated $10 a bag for Stefani to clean up in their name, which she uses for lodging and gas. The person's name is written on how many bags they've donated towards and Stefani posted a picture on her Instagram when they were filed, thanking them for helping clean up the cit she was in.

People online and in person have responded positively to the project. Stefani recalled people sent her pictures of bags of trash they picked up. Once, when she started doing a bag on the beach in Florida,two ladies saw her and started helping her fill the bag.

With her job resuming June 1, Stefani is now back home but she has so many good things to say about her unique U.S.road trip.There's litter everywhere, so I'm just happy to be able to make a little bit of an impact everywhere I go. Cleaning up this litter is a huge thank you for all the joy and good times national parks and nature in general has brought to my life,”she said.

1. Why did Stefani drive ower70 hours across the USA?
A.To call on people to donate money
B.To earn a living by classifying rubbish.
C.To encourage people to protect the environment.
D.To enjoy the scenery of the national parks and nature
2. What is the influence of Stefani's cleaning up rubbish?
A.People offered their help along her journey
B.Her parents make joint efforts to support her.
C.People begin to donate their money for her project.
D.Many people take action to clean up the environment
3. What's the attitude of the author towards cleaning up the litter?
A.Discouraged.B.AnxiousC.Surprised.D.Pleased.
4. What does the passage want to tell us?
A.Cleaning up rubbish is a tough task.B.A kind act can make a big difference
C.Believing in oneself is the key to success.D.One will realize his dream if he persists in it.
21-22高三上·北京房山·期中 查看更多[4]
【知识点】 环境保护 记叙文

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约510词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】In the 1990s, when an area of Brazilian rainforest the size of Belgium was cut down every year, Brazil was the world’s environmental villain (反派角色) and the Amazonian jungles the image of everything that was going wrong in green places. Now, the Amazon ought to be the image of what is going right. Government figures show that deforestation fell by 70% in the Brazilian Amazon region during the past decade. If clearances had continued at their rate in 2005, an extra 3.2 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide would have been put into the atmosphere. That is an amount equal to a year’s emissions from the European Union. Arguably, then, Brazil is now the world leader in addressing climate change.

But how did it break the vicious cycle (恶性循环)? The answer, according to a paper is that there was no silver bullet but instead a three-stage process in which bans, better governance in frontier areas and consumer pressure on companies worked.

The first stage ran from the mid-1990s to 2004. This was when the government put its efforts into bans and restrictions. The Brazilian Forest Code said that, on every farm in the Amazon, 80% of the land had to be set aside as a forest reserve. As the study observes, this share was so high that the code could not be followed --- or enforced. This was the period of the worst deforestation. Soybean prices were high and there were a vast expansion of soybean farming on the south-eastern border of the rainforest.

During the second stage, which ran from 2005 to 2009, the government tried to boost its ability to police the Amazon. Brazil’s president made stopping deforestation a priority, which resulted in better co-operation between different bits of the government. The area in which farming was banned was increased from a sixth to nearly half of the forest.

The third stage, which began in 2009, was a test of whether a system of restrictions could survive as soybean expansion continued. The government shifted its focus from farms to counties (each state has scores of these). Farmers in the 36 counties with the worst deforestation rates were banned from getting cheap credit until those rates fell.

By any standards, Brazil’s Amazon policy has been a success, made the more remarkable because it relied on restrictions rather than rewards, which might have been expected to have worked better. Over the period of the study, Brazil also turned itself into a farming superpower, so the country has shown it is possible to get a huge increase in food output without destroying the forest. Moreover, the policies so far have been successful among commercial farms who care about the law and respond to market pressures. Most remaining deforestation is by small holders who care rather less about these things, so the government faces the problem of persuading them to change their ways, too. Deforestation has been slowed, but not yet stopped.

1. Brazil is considered to play a leading role in dealing with climate change because ________.
A.it has rainforest as large as Belgium.
B.it has cut down too much rainforest.
C.it has taken action to reduce deforestation.
D.it sent 3.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the air.
2. The underlined phrase “silver bullet” in Paragraph 2 most probably refers to _______.
A.a powerful weapon.B.an effective solution.
C.an intelligent device.D.a golden opportunity.
3. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A.Brazil has successfully eliminated deforestation.
B.All the farmers care much about forest protection.
C.Small farm holders are a headache for the Brazilian government.
D.Both the food output and the forest in Brazil have greatly increased.
4. What can be the best title of the passage?
A.Cutting Down on Cutting Down.B.Brazil, the World Leader in Farming.
C.Restrictions Outperforming Rewards.D.Former Awareness Working Wonders.
2019-11-05更新 | 147次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约220词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐2】As warming continues, scientists warn the oxygen content of oceans across the planet could be more and more reduced, with serious consequences for the future of fish and other sea life.

    1    One is the simple fact that as water gets warmer, it can hold less dissolved (溶解的) oxygen. The other reason is less obvious. The entire ocean gets its oxygen from the surface — either from the atmosphere, or from photosynthesizing algae floating at the top of the sea.     2    

Global warming is expected to reduce the mixing of the ocean by making surface seawater lighter. That’s because in a warmer world we can expect more rainfall and more melting (融化) of glaciers, icebergs, and ice sheets.     3    The extra heat from the warming atmosphere will also make surface water expand and thus make it lighter still.     4    Instead, more of the oxygen will remain near the surface, where it will be used up by oxygen-breathing organisms.

A low-oxygen ocean may become an inescapable feature of our planet. A team of Danish researchers wondered how long oxygen levels would drop if we could somehow reduce our carbon dioxide emissions to zero by 2100. They determined that over the next few thousand years oxygen levels would continue to fall, until they declined by 30 percent. The oxygen would slowly return to the oceans, but even 100,000 years from now they will not have fully recovered.     5    

A.It’s not known why the oxygen level of oceans has reduced.
B.Scientists point to two reasons to expect a drop in ocean oxygen.
C.Fresh water’s inpouring will make the water at the ocean’s surface lighter.
D.The oxygen then spreads to the deep ocean as the surface water slowly sinks.
E.Global warming has caused the reduction of the oxygen content of oceans worldwide.
F.The light surface water will be less likely to sink so the deep ocean will get less oxygen.
G.If they are right, we have every reason to worry about the major effect it has on sea life.
2018-04-01更新 | 267次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约470词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要讲的是气候变化产生了一些极端天气,给世界上最脆弱的人带来很大的痛苦,因此作为补救措施就是要减少碳排放,但这些都不凑效,最近的研究证实,森林在减少气候变化方面是绝对必要的,政府和企业要制定和执行政策,防止毁林,然而他们并没有旅行承诺,导致森林遭到砍伐,作者呼吁现在是加强森林保护和恢复的时候了,这取得了一些成效。

【推荐3】Climate change disproportionately affects the world’s most vulnerable people, particularly poor rural communities that depend on the land for their livelihoods and coastal populations throughout the tropics. We have already seen a chain of tough suffering that results from extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, floods, droughts, wildfires, and more.

For remedies, advocates and politicians have tended to look toward cuts in fossil-fuel use or technologies to capture carbon before it enters the atmosphere – both of which are crucial. But this focus has overshadowed the most powerful and cost-efficient carbon capture technology in the world. Recent research confirms that forests are absolutely essential in reducing climate change, thanks to their ability to absorb and isolate carbon. In fact, natural climate solutions such as conservation and restoration of forests, along with improvements in land management, can help us achieve 37 percent of our climate target of limiting warming to a maximum of two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, even though they currently receive only 2.5 percent of public climate financing.

Forests’ power to store carbon dioxide is staggering: one tree can store an average of about 48 pounds in one year. Intact (完整的) forests could take in the CO2 emissions of some entire countries.

For this reason, policymakers and business leaders must create and enforce policies to prevent deforestation, foster reforestation of degraded land, and promote the sustainable management of standing forests in the fight against climate change. Protecting the world’s forests ensures they can keep performing essential functions such as producing oxygen, filtering water and supporting biodiversity. Not only does the world’s entire population depend on forests to provide clean air, clean water, oxygen and medicines, but l.6 billion people also rely on them directly for their livelihoods.

Unfortunately, a huge amount of forest continues to be converted into agricultural land to produce a handful of resource-intensive commodities — despite zero-deforestation commitments from companies and governments. So now is the time to increase forest protection and restoration. This action will also address a number of other pressing global issues. For example, in less developed and rural areas — especially in the tropics — community-based forest-management programs can forge pathways out of poverty. In the Petén region of Guatemala, for instance, community-managed forests boasted a near-zero deforestation rate from 2000 through 2013, as compared with 12 percent in nearby protected areas and buffer (缓冲) zones. These communities have built low-impact, sustainable forest-based businesses that have stimulated the economy of the region enough to fund the creation of local schools and health services. Their success is especially noticeable in a location where, outside these community-managed zones, deforestation rates have increased 20-fold.

1. Which of the following statements about natural climate solutions is TRUE according to the passage?
A.They are the only effective strategies available to address the climate change.
B.They are not effective compared with the reduction in fossil-fuel use or technologies.
C.They can and should play a more important role in cutting carbon emissions.
D.They manage to limit warming to two degrees Celsius above preindustrial level.
2. The word “staggering” (Paragraph 3) is closest in meaning to “________”.
A.immediateB.incredibleC.unsteadyD.modest
3. Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?
A.The policies to prevent deforestation have taken effect.
B.Developed countries are hit the hardest by climate change.
C.Economic growth contributes a lot to reducing deforestation.
D.Some governments fail to keep their promises to preserve forests.
4. What does the passage mainly talk about?
A.Keeping forests undamaged can go a long way toward saving the planet.
B.A high-tech climate fix is required to dramatically lessen global warming.
C.Governments should work together with businesses to stop deforestation.
D.Sustainable management of forests is crucial in powering economic development.
2023-05-07更新 | 120次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般