组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 语篇范围 > 体裁分类 > 议论文
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:208 题号:14496531

This month, science fiction magazine Lights peed changed its normal publishing schedule to bring readers a special issue: “Women Destroy Science Fiction! ”

It’s more than just a collection of stories entirely edited and written by women. It’s an exhibition of all the ways in which women are writing—and have written.

Many of the stories will be considered the best hard science fiction even by the pickiest critics (评论家). For example, Tananarive Due’s Like Daughter deals with what happens when humans have easy access to cloning. The Unfathomable Sisterhood of Ick by Charlie Jane Anders takes place in a future where changing brain chemistry is as common as taking vitamins now.

However, it is also true that the authors are more focused on the relations between people, or between people and society, or changing cultural and gender roles. There are stories that refuse to stay firmly within science fiction borders. For example, James Tiptree Jr. ’s Love Is the Plan and the Plan Is Death is a mixture of horror, mystery and even love, something not commonly seen in science fiction.

So are women destroying science fiction?

If your idea of science fiction is limited to the concept formed by works like Isaac Asimov’s Night Fall and Arthur Charles Clarke’s Childhood’s End, then many of the stories within these pages may well seem like devastation.

“But the stories we read and the stories we tell shape who we are, ” Pat Murphy once said in a famous speech back in 1991. “They also shape the culture they’re born into. Thus, if women keep writing such kind of science fiction, and keep calling it science fiction, the room for science fiction will expand. They will exist nicely beside other kinds of science fiction. ”

I cannot agree more. Women have the right to create a space for themselves within science fiction. one filled with their dreams, experiences and realities.

1. What is special about the latest edition of Lights peed?
A.All the stories are written by female novelists.
B.It is a collection of the published love stories.
C.It has been well received by most of the critics.
D.Every story in it belongs to hard science fiction.
2. Which of the following can be considered non-science-fiction in a strict sense?
A.Like Daughter.B.The Unfathomable Sisterhood of Ick.
C.Childhood’s End.D.Love Is the Plan and the Plan Is Death.
3. What does the underlined word “devastation” in paragraph 6 mean?
A.Destruction.B.Progress.
C.Contribution.D.Reward.
4. What did Pat Murphy mean in his speech?
A.Science fiction is an important part of our life.
B.Women are unsuitable to write science fiction.
C.The definition of science fiction should be expanded.
D.Science fiction should focus mainly on future technologies.
21-22高三上·湖北·阶段练习 查看更多[5]
【知识点】 议论文 小说

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐1】Throughout history, music spread among people of different cultures. In today’s technological advanced society, however, people spread music online, sometimes without an artist’s permission. This can lead to many problems, and music companies are now cracking down on this practice. Sharing music online without permission is theft.

Sharing music online prevents recording companies from making money from their efforts. They say that sharing music online has resulted in a huge drop in profits and sales over the past 10 years. People who find music for free online are not paying for CDs or every MP3 downloaded. To truly understand the influence of music piracy (盗版行为) on creators, one must understand how many people are involved in the recording process. For the sale of each album, profits must be shared between musicians, sound engineers, music producers, managers, advertisers,and the company selling the product. Many people believe sharing music only affects the recording artist, but the reality is that sharing hurts business for all companies involved.

There are many people who don’t see the harm in sharing music online and even think they have the right to do it.One online blogger states that he originally paid for an entire CD and that he should be able to do with the material whatever he wants. While he may have legally paid for the music, he does not have the right to provide permission,which means people like the blogger are thieves.

Although we don’t spread today’s music the same way we did before, there’s no doubt that people around the world love to share music. However, internet piracy would prevent musicians from continuing producing albums for fear of theft. Therefore, if people want to continue listening to their favorite artists, they need to buy their music so that artists will make enough profit to continue their music careers.

1. The underlined phrase “cracking down on” in paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to ___________.
A.bringing up carefullyB.speaking highly of
C.dealing seriously withD.destroying completely
2. What can we infer from the text?
A.Artists are taking action to protect their right.
B.Sharing music files online affects a lot of people.
C.Online music sharing increases sales of music CD.
D.A person who bought a CD has the right to share it online.
3. How is the text organized?
A.Topic-Argument-Explanation.
B.Opinion-Discussion-Description.
C.Main idea-Comparison-Supporting statements.
D.Introduction-Supporting statements-Conclusion.
2020-10-20更新 | 124次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约350词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇议论文。文章讲述了不同语言转换的障碍与翻译之间的壁垒问题。

【推荐2】Wouldn’t it be wonderful to travel to a foreign country without having to worry about the headache of communicating in a different language?

In a recent Wall Street journal article, technology policy expert A lec Ross argued that, within a decade or so. We’ll be able to communicate with one another via small earpieces with built-in microphones. That’s because technological progress is extremely rapid. It’s only a matter of time. Indeed, some parents are so convinced that this technology is imminent that they’re wondering if their kids should even learn a second language.

It’s true that an increase in the quantity and accuracy of the data loaded into computers make them cleverer at translating “No es bueno dormir mucho” as “It’s not good to sleep too much.” Replacing a word with its equivalent (同义词) in the target language is actually the “easy part of a translator’s job”. But even this seems to be a discouraging task for computers.

It’s so difficult for computers because translation doesn’t—or shouldn’t—involve simply translating words, sentences or paragraphs. Rather, it’s about translating meaning. And in order to infer meaning from a specific expression, humans have to interpret a mass of information at the same time. Think about all the related clues that go into understanding an expression: volume, gesture, situation, and even your culture. All are likely to convey as much meaning as the words you use.

Therefore, we should doubt whether a machine is able to translate the world around us. If people from different cultures can offend each other without realizing it, how can we expect a machine to do better? Unless engineers actually find a way to breathe a soul into a computer, undoubtedly when it comes to conveying and translation meaning using a natural language, a machine will never fully take our place.

1. What does the underlined word “imminent” in Paragraph 2 probably mean?
A.Confusing.B.Approaching.C.Helpful.D.Advanced.
2. Why is it hard for computers to replace a word with its equivalent (同义词)?
A.The real meaning of words can vary.
B.Their data is not adequate (充足的) enough.
C.Their accuracy needs big improvement.
D.A soul hasn’t been breathed into them.
3. What view does the author hold about translation?
A.Some machines will translate our world properly.
B.Slight difference mean little in translation.
C.Proper translation can be tough for humans.
D.Cultures deserve more attention than words used.
4. What is the best title for the text?
A.A new language translating machine
B.Will Language Barrier (障碍) Actually Fall?
C.Who Will Be a Better Translator?
D.Translation will become easier
2024-01-04更新 | 79次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约430词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇议论文,文章主要围绕“动物是否也像人类一样是有文化的生物”而展开论述。

【推荐3】Many people would answer the question of what makes us human by insisting that we are cultural beings. There is no doubt that we are. But one definition of culture is the totality of traditions acquired in a community by social learning from other individuals, and many animal species have traditions. Can we then say that some animals are cultural beings too?

One approach to study culture in animals is the so-called Method of Exclusion (排除), in which scientists investigate behavioral variations across populations of one species. In a famous study, scientists learned that chimpanzee (黑猩猩) behaviors were socially passed on as they were present at some sites but not at others, despite having same ecological settings. For example, chimpanzees in Tai National Park in Ivory Coast are well-known for their nut-cracking skills. Chimpanzees in Gombe national part in Tanzania, on the other hand, do not crack nuts, although nuts exist in their environment too.

However, when applying the Method of Exclusion, one has to be very careful. There are other factors that could also explain the pattern of behavioral evaluation. For example, some of the chimpanzee techniques scientists evaluated occur in only one of the three subspecies. So it’s quite possible that these behaviors also have an innate component. This would mean that one chimpanzee subspecies uses a new technique not out of cultural tradition, but because the behavior is fixed to specific genes. Another factor that has to be excluded is of course the environment Chimpanzees in Mahale do not fish algae (水藻), simply because algae does not exist there.

But when we exclude all the variations that can be explained by genes or environment, we still find that animals do show cultural variations. Does that mean there is no real difference between them and us after all? Not exactly: There is a fundamental difference between human and animal culture. Only humans can build culturally on what generations before us have learned. This is called “cumulative culture”. We don’t have to keep reinventing the wheel. This is called the “ratchet (棘轮) effect”. Like a ratchet that can be turned forward but not back, people’s cultural techniques evolve.

It is likely that behaviors we see today in chimpanzee cultures could be invented over and over again by individual animals themselves. In contrast, a child born today would not be able to invent a computer without the knowledge of many past generations.

1. Why does the author mention the example of the chimpanzees in two parks in Paragraph 2?
A.To prove that culture does exist in animals.
B.To justify the uniqueness of the research method.
C.To compare how chimpanzees behave in different parks.
D.To stress the importance of environment in studying culture.
2. What does the underlined word “innate” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Advanced.B.Inborn.C.Adaptive.D.Intelligent.
3. What can we learn from the passage?
A.Cumulative culture is what sets humans apart from animals.
B.Culure in animals is as worthy to be valued as human culture.
C.Animals don’t have the ability to invent behaviors in a community.
D.The “ratchet effect” decides if humans can build on past experiences.
2023-03-23更新 | 459次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般