组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:63 题号:14608762

The first time I used the TV to distract (使分散注意力) my daughter, I felt like a bad parent; I convinced myself I was a “bad” mom. However, these days I believe the opposite to be true. Screen time makes me a better mom.

Now I know what most of you might be thinking: That’s ridiculous. Only crappy (糟糕的) parents rely on the screen to care for their kids. Then again, experts suggest parents limit media use. And while I do not doubt experts, there are things they fail to consider.

Like most 6-year-olds, my daughter gets worked up and excited easily and watching a cartoon gives her a chance to shut off her mind. And there are other reasons— more selfish reasons. I am a work-from-work mom, and giving her screen time gives me “me”time. I’m able to write while she watches TV. And while this may sound bad, I believe I am helping my daughter realize she should rely on herself. When Mommy works, she gets her own snacks, drinks and toys.

There are other benefits, too. TV has also taught my daughter. Thanks to “super Why”,she knew her alphabet at age 2, and thanks to “Sesame Street”, she was able to count to 20 by age 3. Also I use the screen as a great incentive. My daughter earns “IPad time” when she completes tasks, e.g., making her bed earns 15minutes while doing her homework gets her 30.

Of course, I have a few rules. During meals, the TV is off; all programs must be supervised; on weekdays, she is limited to two hours maximum. So remember: It doesn’t matter what our kids watch; it matters what they do, what they say, what they feel and how they act, and only you know what is best for them.

1. What can be learned about the author’s opinion about screen time?
A.It fails to take kids into consideration.B.It is welcome by most crappy parents.
C.It challenges a popular belief.D.It corresponds with experts.
2. How can screen time be good for kids of mothers working at home?
A.It gives them topics to discuss with friends.B.It gives them some easy time.
C.It enables them to keep their spirits up.D.It helps them become independent.
3. What does the underlined word “incentive” in Paragraph 4 probably mean?
A.encouragementB.relaxation
C.idea producerD.learning tool
4. Which of the following might the author agree with ?
A.Science and technology are primary strength.
B.A man is good-for-nothing until he is educated.
C.Nothing can be acquired without rules.
D.Each coin has two sides.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐1】Moscow city authorities have begun using comics(漫画) with characters from Russian fairy tales to explain to migrants(移民) how they should behave. They say a 100-page guide is needed to "keep a positive image" of the city and could help reduce "tensions" between natives and migrants. But critics have pointed out that foreign migrants and natives may be regarded as antagonists in the manual(手册).

Russians and migrants have repeatedly flooded in Moscow recently. Many migrants from ex-Soviet republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus(高加索) and North Caucasus, arrive in Moscow every year, attracted by the capital’s job opportunities and relatively high salaries. A significant number of them work in the Russian capital illegally.

The new guide in Russian seeks to explain the "dos" and "don’ts" to migrants. They are urged not to cause trouble, by staring at women, or eating or talking loudly on the streets. They are also warned that the police may routinely(例行公事) stop them to check their documents.

In the manual, Russia’s famous "three warriors" are meant to represent the city’s law enforcement agencies(执法机关), while Prince Yuri Dolgoruky (a historical character) is used for tours around Moscow.       Meanwhile, Vasilisa the Wise and The Snow Maiden test the reader on Russia’s language and history. A special section of the book explains the importance of following Moscow’s strict residency and employment rules, stressing that migrants could otherwise be deported(驱逐出境) or banned from entry.

The manual was written primarily for illegal migrants, Alexander Kalinin, who heads the group Support for Working Migrants in Moscow, told BBC Russian.

"We want to raise their level of law awareness," he added.

Migrant characters had initially(最初) been identified as representatives of different nationalities, but the book’s authors later decided to drop this idea so as "not to offend anyone", said Mr. Kalinin.

"The old conflict between Russian heroes and non-Slavic invaders is being revived," Yevgeny Varshaver, a migration expert told BBC Russian. He also suggested that the language used in the book would be "difficult" to understand for some migrants who were not native Russian speakers.

1. The underlined word "antagonists" in Paragraph 1 can probably be replaced by "_____".
A.friendsB.acquaintances
C.cooperatorsD.opponents
2. People from other countries come to Moscow "_____".
A.to find well-paid jobsB.to have a new lifestyle
C.to enjoy the fine climateD.to experience a new culture
3. The third paragraph is mainly about"_____".
A.consequences the migrants may suffer
B.the purpose of publishing the handbook
C.the measures to attract foreign migrants
D.characters and their functions in Russian fairytales
4. Which of the following would be the best title of the text?
A.Ways to help foreign migrants to settle in Russia
B.Characters from Russian fairy tales have new jobs
C.More and more foreign migrants to work in Moscow
D.Moscow fairy tale comics to help migrants behave
2019-04-02更新 | 309次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约590词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。灵活的工作制度和技术的发展带来了便利,减少了人们的体力劳动,但体力劳动对人们也有重大意义。

【推荐2】Marilu Arce loves her job, but for a time she considered leaving. The traffic-plagued commute from her home to her office, nearly two hours each way, meant her daughters couldn’t enroll in after school activities because she couldn’t get home in time to take them.

Then her employer adopted a policy permitting her to work from home two days a week, and “I feel like it changed my life,” she said. Her stress level has dropped. Her daughters are thrilled. She likes her job more. That’s the type of reaction Arce’s boss likes to hear as the company measures the success of the work-from-home policy which was instituted three years ago in hopes of improving employee retention. So far, it seems to be working: turnover was less than five percent last year—its lowest ever.

Flexible work policies top employee wish lists when they look for a job, and employers increasingly have been offering them. Studies have shown working remotely increases employee engagement, but in moderation because there is still value in the relationships nurtured when colleagues are face to face. The key, advocates of flexible work policies say, is to match the environment with the type of work that needs to be done.

The flexibility hasn’t hurt productivity, which is up 50 percent. There is “something lost” when colleagues don’t gather at the water cooler, but it’s outweighed by the retention and happiness gains, he said. As jobs that require physical work decline, thanks to technological advances, life superficially appears to get better. Consumers benefit in the form of cheaper prices. Labor-saving appliances all make things easier and suggest that even more and better benefits are on the horizon. But is something lost?

Talk long enough to the most accomplished academics, they will brag about a long-ago college summer job waiting tables or repairing hiking trails. They might praise the installer who redid their kitchen. There seems to be a human instinct to want to do physical work. The proliferation of hard-work reality-television programming reflects this apparent need. Indeed, the more we have become immobile and urbanized, the more we tune in to watch reality television’s truckers, loggers, farmers, drillers and rail engineers. In a society that supposedly despises menial jobs, the television ratings for such programmes suggest that lots of Americans enjoy watching people of action, who work with their hands.

Physical work, in its eleventh hour within a rapidly changing Western culture, still intrigues us in part because it remains the foundation for 21st century complexity. Before any of us can teach, write or speculate, we must first have food, shelter and safety. And for a bit longer, that will require some people to cut grapes and nail two-by-sixes. No apps or 3D printers exist to produce brown rice. Physical labour also promotes human versatility: Those who do not do it, or who do not know how to do it, become divorced from—and, at the same time, dependent on—labourers. Lawyers, accountants and journalists living in houses with yards and driving cars to work thus count on a supporting infrastructure of electricians, landscapers and mechanics. In that context, physical labour can provide independence, at least in a limited sense of not being entirely reliant on a host of hired workers.

1. The author mentions the example of Arce to show that________.
A.she dislikes the present job for the long commuting time
B.she is having trouble balancing work and school life
C.people usually don’t work hard outside office
D.employers are facing the problem of staff drain
2. The practice of flexible working time is based on the belief that________.
A.it helps to increase job satisfaction for the employees
B.it improves harmonious relationship among colleagues
C.the decline in physical work gives employees more mobility
D.employees are entitled to request it according to their work
3. What is the possible reason for the popularity of hard-work reality-television programmes?
A.They entertain those employees burned out with overwork.
B.People can learn some basic labour skills from these programmes.
C.There’s an ongoing need for physical labour skills that technology doesn’t possess.
D.They offer instructive information for both employers and employees.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the passage?
A.The Emergence of Alternative Work Arrangements
B.The Rise of Automation, the Decline in Need for Labour
C.Time to Rethink in the Face of the Evolution of Work
D.New Challenges for Today’s Employers and Academics
2023-07-19更新 | 366次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约470词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文。文章论证了我们应该把艺术家视为与作品相分离的个体,评判优秀艺术作品的标准应该是作品本身的价值,而不是艺术家的价值这一观点。

【推荐3】The question of whether it is possible to dissociate the artist from their work has been debated for a long time. Even though positive critical reviews about an artist’s behavior can improve their artistic accomplishments, people should treat artists as individuals who have lived apart from their work.

One of the reasons is that even artists have shortcomings. Like any other human being, an artist can err, and we cannot be severely judgmental of every person that falls into error. Cancel culture with endless criticism is concerned more with how we should disregard the artists when they make mistakes than with how their weaknesses can be used by the artists to create art that is unique.

Perhaps Kevin Hart’s words support this thought. He asks, “When did we get to a point where life was supposed to be perfect? Where people were supposed to operate perfectly all the time?” When people start seeing artists as human beings, they’ll see them for who they are and review their behavior not on the basis of their art but on the basis of their humanity.

It should be also noted that there are works of art that are inspired by the artist’s experience. For example, the themes in the Harry Potter books are so connected with J. K. Rowling’s wicked worldview that it is virtually impossible to distinguish the two from each other. Since canceling artists based on their worldview would mean the reception to their art will suffer, artists become tense and unwilling to express themselves, which will kill creativity, eventually leading to the death of art. Comedians, singers or painters who should be integrating contemporary issues with their works become boring, and art stops functioning as the social mirror it ought to be.

An artist who makes mistakes still has art with intrinsic (内在的) value, benefiting entire communities or cultures. For instance, when Kendrick Lamar launched his album and frequently used the F-slur in one of his songs, there was much-heated discussion. He was entirely mistaken in using the F-slur, but as an artist, he still had a wide-reaching impact on society. Similarly, one can respect the late Michael Jackson because of how he impacted pop music and the inclusion of black musicians in mainstream media despite his personal weaknesses, opinions, worldviews and associations.

While these artists may engage in their terrible behavior, the art they produce today may serve as an example for others to produce outstanding work in the future. Some would refer to this process as a cycle. Good art should, therefore, be judged due to its value and not the value of the artist.

1. Which would Kevin Hart probably agree with?
A.People should perform perfectly all the time.
B.Artists’ shortcomings might be their inspiration.
C.If artists have weaknesses, we’d better cancel them.
D.Artists should be evaluated based on their humanity.
2. Why will “cancel culture” lead to the death of art?
A.Artists will be unwilling to create any artwork.
B.Artists will stop concerning with contemporary issues.
C.Artists will lose their desire for expression and creativity.
D.Artworks are unavoidably inspired by artists’ experiences.
3. How can an artist with mistakes benefit others?
A.The artist may make some new words popular.
B.The artist’s opinions may provoke heated discussion.
C.The artist will benefit entire communities or cultures.
D.The artist’s art may give others ideas of artistic creation.
4. Which would be the best title of the passage?
A.Judge Art Due to Its Value
B.Separate the Art From the Artist
C.Regard Artists as Human Beings
D.Stop Criticizing Artists’ Behavior
2023-05-17更新 | 371次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般