组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.94 引用次数:285 题号:14693768

If you're a runner who secretly hates running, here's some good news: settling into a leisurely jog rather than an all-out run may actually be better for your health in the long term.

A team from Denmark followed over 5,000 people taking part in the Copenhagen City Heart Study, and tracked whether they were non-joggers or joggers who kept a slow, moderate, or fast pace. The participants' health was tracked over the next 12 years, and so was their mortality (死亡率): 28 of the joggers and 128 of the non-joggers died.

The connection was this: Joggers of mild and moderate intensity had a lower risk of death than the fast joggers. In fact, the lowest mortality risk was that of the mild intensity joggers. The fast-paced joggers had about the same mortality rate as sedentary (久坐的) people. This suggests that there may be an upper limit to hard exercise, after which the benefits fall off.

"The U-shaped association between jogging and mortality suggests there may be an upper limit for exercise amount that is best for health benefits," said study author Peter Schnohr. "Anything more is not just unnecessary: it may be harmful." From the current study, jogging just three times per week, for less than 2.5 hours/week was associated with the lowest overall mortality risk.

There've been a lot of mixed messages about the "right" amount of exercise and what intensity is best. The World Health Organization has suggested that the current 150 minutes/week recommendations are strenuous for most people to tackle, and that expectations should be lowered, since, after all, anything is better than nothing. Everyone probably has a level of activity that feels best to him or her. But at least the growing consensus seems to be that more-if you're pushing yourself very hard-is not necessarily better. And it may even be worse.

1. What was the study designed to find out?
A.The advantages of jogging over running.
B.The common causes of death from exercise.
C.The difference between non-joggers and joggers.
D.The relation between exercise amount and health.
2. Who will face the highest mortality risk according to the study?
A.Those fast-paced joggers.
B.Those slow-paced joggers.
C.Those jogging 150 minutes per week.
D.Those jogging just three times per week.
3. What might Peter Schnohr agree with?
A.The early bird catches the worm.
B.Wealth is nothing without health.
C.To go beyond is as wrong as to fall short.
D.Enough exercise brings about happiness.
4. What does the underlined word "strenuous" in the last paragraph mean?
A.Intense.B.Wide-ranging.C.Necessary.D.Far-reaching.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 容易 (0.94)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了一项研究发现,与成年人相比,年幼的孩子更容易受到机器人的影响。

【推荐1】Young children are significantly more likely than adults to have their opinions influenced by robots according to a new research. The study, conducted-at the-University of Plymouth, compared how adults and children respond to an identical (相同的) task when in the presence of both their peers (同龄人) and robots.

It showed that while adults regularly have their opinions influenced by peers, something also demonstrated in previous studies, they are largely able to resist being persuaded by robots. However, children aged between seven and nine were more likely to give the same responses as the robots, even if they were obviously incorrect.

The study asks people to look at a screen showing four lines and say which two match in length. When alone, people almost never make a mistake but when doing the experiment with others, they tend to follow what others are saying.

When children were alone in the room in this research, they scored 87%on the test, but when the robots join in their score drops to 75%. And of the wrong answers, 74% matched those of the robot.

Professor Belpaeme said, ”People often follow the opinions of others and we’ve known for a long time that it is hard to resist taking over views and opinions of people around-us. But as robots will soon be found in the home and the workplace, we were wondering if people would follow robots. What our results show is that adults do not follow what the robots are saying. But when we did the experiment with children, they did. It shows children can perhaps have more of an affinity (亲和力)with robots than adults, which does pose the question: What if robots were to suggest, for example, what products to buy or what to think?“?

1. What did the adults do when staying with robots?
A.They generally refused the robots’ effects.
B.They totally accepted the robots’ suggestions.
C.They tried to persuade robots to resist them.
D.They usually compared robots with their children.
2. Why did some children make more mistakes in the experiment?
A.Because children were not as clever as the adults.
B.Because robots reflected better than human beings.
C.Because robots in the presence made mistakes.
D.Because children wanted to affect the robots on purpose.
3. What is Professor Belpaeme’s attitude towards the result of the experiment?
A.He is optimistic about the result.B.He is worried about the future.
C.He doesn’t care about the result.D.He doubts the result of the research.
4. What should be followed after the last paragraph?
A.What is the meaning of the research?
B.What should adults do to avoid the problem?
C.Why are children more likely to be influenced?
D.What will be done to solve the problem?
2023-12-26更新 | 134次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 容易 (0.94)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章讲述了泰国东北部的一家餐厅已经成为加密货币交易人员的交流中心。加密货币是一种不受任何央行监管的数字货币形式。

【推荐2】A restaurant in northeast Thailand has become a center for traders of cryptocurrency. A cryptocurrency is a form of digital or virtual money that is not regulated by any central bank as it is based on a network and is independent of them.

HIP Coffee & Restaurant is a café that serves coffee and food. But it has set up screens showing the latest price information on cyptocurrency markets for its customers. The café also offers investment (投资) advice to go along with its coffee and cake.

Detnarong Satianphut is a 35-year-old cryptocurrency trader and a customer at the café. He said, “It’s exciting for me to be here because I get to meet people who share the same interests. We (traders) get to exchange information because in the trading world we are coming up against millions of people.”

Cryptocurrencies have started becoming more popular in Thailand. The latest official data suggests that as much as $7.62 billion in digital currency (货币) was traded in November.

In January, Thailand said it would start to watch over the use of digital currencies as payments. Officials warned of threats to the country’s economic system.

HIP café has been in business since 2013. The café began setting up its cryptocurrency information screens in 2020.

Since then, workers said the number of customers has doubled. HIP café’s boss is Okkhara Yongsakuljinda. He said the café provides a chance for people in the surrounding Nakhon Ratchssima province to invest. The café offers free investment advice and is planning on starting its own cryptocurrency coin.

Customers say trading in the café gives them the best chance of success in an uncertain market. The value of the most well-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin, recently dropped to a six-month low.

1. What does the underlined word “regulated” in paragraph 1 probably mean?
A.Replaced.B.Refused.C.Noticed.D.Controlled.
2. Why does Detnarong Satianphut go to the café?
A.He enjoys the delicious coffee there.
B.He hopes to promote digital money.
C.He wants to meet like-minded people.
D.He needs to teach investment knowledge there.
3. What is Thai officials’ attitude towards the use of digital currencies as payments?
A.Careful.B.Encouraging.C.Uncaring.D.Unclear.
4. What benefit does the café get from the digital money service?
A.It has sold its own digital currencies to a lot of customers.
B.It has got a sharp increase in the number of customers.
C.It has succeeded in investing in different cryptocurrencies.
D.It can sell its coffee and food at higher prices.
2022-07-07更新 | 86次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约180词) | 容易 (0.94)
文章大意:本文是议论文。文章主要介绍人们关于病人是否有决定什么时候死的权利的不同观点。

【推荐3】In recent years advances in medical technology have made it possible for people to live longer than in the past. New medicines and machines are developing every day to extend life.

However, some people, including some doctors, are not in favor of these life extending measures, and they say that people should have the right(权利) to die when they want. They say that the quality of life is as important as life itself, and that people should not be forced to go on living when conditions of life have become unbearable. They say that people should be allowed to die with dignity(尊严) and to decide when they want to die.

Others don’ t agree and say that life under any conditions is better than death and that the duty of doctors is always to extend life as long as possible. And so the battle goes on and on without a definite(明确的) answer.

1. People can live longer than in the past. It’ s because________.
A.medical technology developsB.we have big hospitals
C.there are many good doctorsD.we eat better than before
2. According to some people whether a dying patient has the right to die is up to ________.
A.the doctorsB.the surroundings
C.his or his familyD.the patient himself or herself
3. In the writer’ s opinion, ________.
A.death is better than lifeB.life is better than death
C.neither life nor death is goodD.none of the above
2024-02-17更新 | 50次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般