组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:164 题号:15989567

Research shows people have a tendency to seek out information during uncertain times — it’s a natural coping mechanism (机制). But is continuous information-seeking on social media, sometimes called doomscrolling (末日刷刷刷), helpful during a pandemic, or any time?

Research on the effects of bad news on mood suggests exposure to negative COVID news is likely to be dangerous to our emotional well being. For instance, one study conducted in March 2020 involving more than 6,000 Americans found that the more time participants spent consuming COVID news in a day, the unhappier they felt.

These findings are striking but leave a few key questions unanswered. Does doomscrolling make people unhappy, or are unhappy people just more likely to doomscroll? How much time spent doomscrolling is a problem? And what would happen if, instead of doomscrolling, we were “ kindness scrolling ” — reading about humanity’s positive responses to a global crisis?

To find out answers to these questions, researchers conducted a study where they showed hundreds of people real-world content on either Twitter or YouTube for two to four minutes. The Twitter feeds and YouTube videos featured either general news about the COVID, or news about kindness during COVID. Researchers then measured these participants’ moods using a questionnaire, and compared their moods with participants who did not engage with any content at all.

People who were shown general COVID-related news experienced lower moods than people who were shown nothing at all. Meanwhile, people who were shown COVID news stories involving acts of kindness didn’t experience the same decline in mood, but also didn’t gain the boost in mood they’ d predicted. These findings suggest that spending as little as two to four minutes consuming negative news about COVID-19 can have a negative impact on our mood.

Researchers are still working on what people can do to look after themselves, and make time on social media more pleasurable.

1. How did the author introduce the topic of the text?
A.By asking a question.B.By telling a story.
C.By listing lots of figures.D.By answering a question.
2. Why did researchers conduct the study mentioned in paragraph 4?
A.To figure out why people like doomscrolling.
B.To find out what news has bad effects on emotion.
C.To figure out the answers to the few key questions.
D.To find out what news people like about doomscrolling.
3. What can we learn about the relation between news and emotion?
A.No news may lead people to low mood.
B.General COVID-related news may cause low spirits.
C.COVID news of kindness may boost mood.
D.2-4 minutes of COVID-19 news viewing doesn’t affect mood.
4. What is unmentioned in the text?
A.The research time.B.The results of the study.
C.The study institution.D.The number of participants.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约390词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:本文是一篇记述文。文章讲述了美国虽然是世界上最富有的国家之一,但是许多美国人甚至吃不饱。这主要是由于大量的食物浪费。于是,雪莉和朱安妮与她们的10位同学建立 了Fresh Hub。迄今为止,已经为有需要的人运送了超过15,000磅的食物。

【推荐1】The United States is one of the world’s wealthiest countries. Despite this, many Americans are not even getting enough to eat. In fact, around 37 million Americans struggle just to put healthy food, or any food at all, on the table every day.

One might think that a food shortage is happening in America, but this is not the case. There is more than sufficient food for everyone. Unfortunately, 40% of food is wasted every day. There are many different ways food is wasted: farmers only pick the best-looking crops, deliveries aren’t made on time, supermarkets throw out extra products, customers buy more than they need, and so on. The highest level of wastage tends to happen in the richest communities.

Meanwhile, people who live in poor or rural areas often have little or no access to food. These areas are called “food deserts”. They have fewer supermarkets, and the only food options that they can afford are often unhealthy ones. Healthy foods such as fresh fruits and vegetables may be impossible to find. Sadly, 12. 8% of the American population live in food deserts.

What can we do to help those who don’t have enough food? Shirley and Annie Zhu came up with a solution. In 2017, when Hurricane Harvey destroyed over 100,000 homes in their city, Houston, the sisters got involved. While helping to clear water from a flooded supermarket, they saw a huge amount of food being wasted. At the same time, thousands of people in the city didn’t have enough to eat.

The girls were only 15 when they set up Fresh Hub with 10 of their classmates. They created an app which could be used by residents to find out whether fresh food was available. Then they contacted local farmers and supermarkets to ask for their extra food.

At first, they found that people didn't take them seriously because they were so young. They decided to work with Second Servings, a local organization that had been providing food to food deserts around the city. The owner of Second Servings, Barbara Bronstein, was impressed with the twins and introduced them to several food providers. To date, Fresh Hub has delivered more than 15,000 pounds of food to people in need.

1. What does paragraph 2 mainly tell us?
A.What causes food shortage.
B.How much food is wasted every day.
C.How food is wasted in America.
D.Where the highest level of wastage happens.
2. When did the sisters realize the problem of food waste?
A.When they were assisting in flood relief.
B.After they had made a survey about it.
C.When they were visiting a food desert.
D.After they had read reports about it.
3. What can we say about “food deserts”?
A.Crops can’t grow in food deserts.
B.People in food deserts have no access to fresh water.
C.Only fruits and vegetables are available in food deserts.
D.About one in ten Americans live in food deserts.
4. What can be inferred about Fresh Hub from the last two paragraphs?
A.Its founders are mostly college students.
B.It has gained support from Second Servings.
C.It has created a most popular food app.
D.It is welcomed by local farmers and supermarkets.
2022-05-27更新 | 180次组卷
阅读理解-七选五(约230词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇夹叙夹议文。文章介绍了作者通过亲身经历和与农民交谈,逐渐理解了祖父母那一代人对食物的看法和价值观,以及可持续农业的重要性。同时,文章还介绍了再生农业的概念和实践。

【推荐2】My grandparents were always busy with food. My grandmother could pull out the feathers of a chicken in less than half an hour. They picked vegetables from their garden. Animal fat was saved.     1     Nearly a decade after my grandmother died, I found myself in a kitchen, pulling out the feathers of a chicken.

It took hours and made my fingers hurt. After an adult life spent buying rather than growing food, as a so-called new farmer, I finally began to understand my grandparents.     2    

My grandparents’ generation spent a third of their income on food.     3     Food is no longer seen as public goods, but as public given resources. The ecological cost of this progress is now clear. The health costs are starting to be noticed.

But until I began talking to the farmers around me, I had not understood the human costs faced by those asked to produce milk sold for less than bottled water.     4     Called “ regenerative farming”, it was being driven by a new generation of farmers trying to find a new kind of power in the face of loss of climate change and rising fuel and transport costs.

    5     Those plants and animals worked together to help the soil become rich again. They kept living roots in the ground all year round, building up the soil’s biology and taking in carbon.

Research has found that regenerative farming not only benefits the land, but profits can be 78% higher than conventional farms.

A.We spend less than a tenth.
B.And any leftover meat was cut up for pies.
C.Regenerative farming is welcomed by thousands of farmers now.
D.I began to understand the work that we took for granted.
E.I realized that keeping a big family was really a big burden for them.
F.New technology helped these farmers raise a diversity of crops and farm animals.
G.Then I came across a farming reform that sought to change this traditional system.
2023-10-25更新 | 460次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难 (0.4)

【推荐3】For most of us, work is the central, dominating fact of life. We spend more than half our conscious hours at work, preparing for work, traveling to and from work. What we do there largely determines our standard of living and our status to a considerable extent. It is sometimes said that because leisure has become more important, the injustices of work can be pushed into a corner, and that because most work is pretty intolerable, the people who do it should compensate for its boredom, frustrations and humiliations by concentrating their hopes on the other parts of their lives. For the foreseeable future, however, the material and psychological rewards which work can provide will continue to play a vital part in determining the satisfaction that life can offer.

Yet only a small minority can control the pace at which they work or the conditions where their work is done; only for a small minority does work offer scope for creativity, imagination or initiative.

Inequality at work is still one of the most glaring (明显的) forms of inequality in our society. We cannot hope to solve the more obvious problems of industrial life, many of which arise from the frustrations created by inequality at work, unless we handle it determinedly.

The most glaring inequality is that between managers and the rest. For most managers, work is an opportunity and a challenge. Their jobs engage their interest and allow them to develop their abilities. They are constantly learning. They are able to exercise responsibility. They have a considerable degree of control over their own and others’ working lives. Most important of all, they have opportunities to initiate. By contrast, for most manual workers, work is a boring, dull, even painful experience. They spend all their working lives in intolerable conditions. The majority have little control over their work. It provides them with no opportunity for personal development. Many jobs are so routine that workers feel themselves to be mere cogs (齿轮) in the bureaucratic machine. As a direct consequence of their work experience, many workers feel alienated (疏远) from their work and their firm.

1. In the writer’s opinion, people judge others mainly by ________.
A.the type of work they doB.the place where they work
C.the time they spend at workD.the amount of money they earn
2. According to the writer, to solve problems in an industrial society, we ________.
A.should create more working opportunities for the poor
B.have to get rid of the unequal aspects in work
C.had better cancel all managing positions in a company
D.should encourage the manual workers to promote efficiency
3. What advantage does the writer say managers have over workers?
A.They won’t be out of work.
B.They get time off to learn constantly.
C.They can work at what interests them.
D.They have complete control over themselves.
2019-12-10更新 | 117次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般