组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:181 题号:16145015

During the annual political meetings, environmental protection was definitely among the biggest concerns. Actually, it was also an issue that ancient Chinese paid great attention to. In fact, the world’s earliest environmental protection concept, ministry and laws were all born in China. So, what did the ancient Chinese do to protect the environment?

In early ancient China, environmental protection was promoted to the political level. Xunzi, a famous thinker in Warring States Period, brought up the concept of managing state affairs through environmental protection. He stated in his book that vegetation (植被) should not be damaged at will. Guan Zhong, an official 400 years ahead of Xunzi, was also an environmental protection expert. During his term of office, he claimed that “a King who cannot protect his vegetation is not qualified to be a king”.

According to a record in Qing dynasty, the environmental protection ministry in early ancient China was called “Yu”, standing both for the institution and the official title. Although most functions were similar to such ministries today, the administration range of it was much larger, including the mountains, forests, rivers, lakes and so on.

The nine ministries established by Shun, an ancient Chinese king, already included “Yu”, the environmental protection ministry. The first “Yu” official was a man called Boyi, who was indeed an environmental protection expert. He was a capable assistant to Dayu, an ancient Chinese water-control expert. He invented wells, protecting people’s drinking water from pollution. He knew a lot about animals and also called for animal protection.

Environmental protection laws dated back to the ruling period of Dayu, which was more than 4,000 years ago. During his rule, he issued a ban, forbidding people to cut down wood in March or catch fish in June, the time when they were supposed to boom.

In Spring and Autumn and Warring States Period almost 3,000 years ago, “environmental protection laws” appeared in its true sense in Qin, which was recorded in Law of Fields and regarded as China’s earliest environmental protection laws.

1. Which statement would Xunzi probably agree with?
A.Vegetation shouldn’t be damaged at all.
B.Much attention should be paid to people’s drinking water.
C.The king who failed to protect the environment should be removed.
D.Running a country and environmental protection should be combined.
2. What does the underlined word “it” in Paragraph 3 refer to?
A.The Qing dynasty.B.The ministry of Yu.
C.The official title.D.The modern ministry.
3. Why couldn’t fish be caught in June during Dayu’s rule?
A.Fish didn’t taste delicious in June.
B.It was too hot to catch fish in June.
C.Fish had a period of rapid growth in June.
D.Fish-catching time had already passed in June.
4. Who was the first environmental protection minister in ancient China?
A.Shun.B.Boyi.C.Xunzi.D.Guan Zhong.
5. Which is the best title of the passage?
A.How the Ancient Chinese Protect the Environment
B.Famous Environmental Protection Experts in Ancient China
C.Dayu — a Great Environmental Protector
D.Measures of the World’s Earliest Environmental Protection

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇新闻报道。文章主要报道了因人们电动捕获,蚯蚓濒临灭绝,中国采取措施禁止电动捕获蚯蚓。

【推荐1】The earthworm is widely distributed, with 4000 species in the world and more than 300 species in China, where they are in demand as fishing bait, livestock feed, and components of traditional medicine. Known as “ecosystem engineers,” earthworms also play a vital role in the biogeochemical cycle. They can affect the biological, chemical, and physical processes of the ecosystem. In recent years, poachers in China have started using soil electrocution to capture earthworms, putting earthworm populations and ecosystems at risk. In February, China banned the practice.

In the past, earthworms in China were captured manually, which limited the number that could be caught in a short amount of time and did not threaten the earthworm population or the soil ecosystem. In contrast, applying electric current to the soil can catch about 150 kg of earthworms in a day. Removing earthworms at this scale threatens the species with local extinction and robs the targeted ecosystem of the benefits they provide.

This capture method threatens other species as well. The electric current may kill or harm soil organisms beyond earthworms. The changes could disrupt the food cycle or birds, arthropods, and mammals that depend on earthworms as a food source. The sharp decrease of earthworms in the soil may also affect soil fertility and productivity, reducing crop yields.

Electric earthworm capture has quickly become widespread, because earthworms are not included on the list of protected wild animals in China. There have been few legal punishments for using the approach, despite the damage it causes. In February, the Chinese government took a step to ban electric capture of earthworms and other activities that damage the soil ecosystem. However, the financial benefits of large-scale earthworm poaching may provide poachers with an motivation to continue using electric capture despite the ban. To carry out the ban effectively, China should pass laws that specify how poachers will be punished if they continue to use soil electrocution.

1. What does the author want to convey in the first paragraph?
A.The earthworm is found everywhere.B.The earthworm is used as fishing bait.
C.The earthworm is captured.D.The earthworm is endangered.
2. Why does the author mention “manual capture” and “electric capture”?
A.To give an exampleB.To explain a capture method
C.To clarify a conceptD.To make a comparison
3. Why do poacher keep using electric capture?
A.Because they want to get a lot of money.B.Because they like electric capture.
C.Because they ignore the ban.D.Because they hate earthworms.
4. Which of the following is a suitable title for the text?
A.China Bans Electric Capture of Earthworms
B.Electric Earthworm Capture Became Widespread
C.Earthworms Play a Vital Role in the Ecosystem
D.Earthworms Are Captured by Soil Electrocution
2023-08-09更新 | 31次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。100多头逼真的大象雕塑出现在伦敦街头,主办方称举办这一活动旨在增强人们对自然环境的保护意识,探索人类与野生动物和谐共存的方式。

【推荐2】Recently, more than 100 Asian elephants made their way across The Mall in front of London’s Buckingham Palace. They weren’t live animals, however, but life-sized elephant sculptures that were handmade by Indigenous community members from the jungles of Tamil Nadu in South India.

The environmental art exhibition is called CoExistence. It was headed by Elephant Family and The Real Elephant Collective, a British Charity and nonprofit socio-environmental enterprise aimed at raising awareness for the Indian elephant. Meant as a response to the increasing conflicts between humans and animals, the campaign’s goal is to start a movement of global empathy (共鸣) for members of the animal kingdom who, like the powerful elephant, have found themselves sharing natural habitats with fast-growing human populations.

The sculptures were made using an invasive(侵入式的) weed called lantana, whose removal coincides with benefits to wildlife in protected areas, where the elephants began their migration. Flying alongside the elephant are sculpted flocks of bird species that have been declared extinct or endangered in the UK.

The project helps demonstrate this unique time in history where the worldwide reduction in human activity from COVID-19 has had an overall positive effect on certain pockets of wildlife species around the planet.

“Today marks the first significant step on the herd’s 13,000 miles migration around the world. Over the past 18 months, many countries have gone into lockdown,” said Ruth Ganesh, Creative at The Real Elephant Collective and Elephant Family Trustee. “Brought about by sad circumstances, this great pause is providing crucial guidance on how to best share space with animals in our crowded planet. The elephants are here to tell their story about the inspiring ways we can coexist with all the other living beings that make our world magical—from tigers and monkeys, to nightingales and elephants.”

1. What’s Paragraph 1 mainly about?
A.Life-sized elephant sculptures in London.
B.The Mall before London’s Buckingham Palace.
C.An analysis of the effect of COVID-19 on wildlife.
D.Caring for London’s elephants during COVID-19.
2. What’s the real aim of CoExistence held?
A.To warn people not to kill elephants.
B.To call on humans to live peacefully with animals.
C.To solve the problem about the extinction of wildlife.
D.To raise the awareness of protecting wildlife during COVID-19.
3. In addition to elephant sculptures, what appeared with them?
A.Some birds and kites.B.Some live animals.
C.Some sculptured birds.D.Some volunteers saving endangered wildlife.
4. What can we know from Ruth Ganesh’s words?
A.COVID-19 has a negative effect on wildlife.
B.Elephants are loved more than other living beings.
C.The lockdown helps people realize how to coexist with wildlife.
D.He is confused about the worrying circumstances during the lockdown.
2023-07-10更新 | 57次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选 | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐3】Every year more people recognize that it is wrong to kill wildlife for “sport.” Progress in this direction is slow because shooting is not a sport for watching, and only those few who take part realize the cruelty and destruction.
The number of gunners, however, grows rapidly. Children too young to develop proper judgments through independent thought are led a long way away by their gunning parents. They are subjected to advertisements of gun producers who describe shooting as good for their health and guncarrying as a way of putting redder blood in the veins (血管). They are persuaded by gunner magazines with stories honoring the chase and the kill. In school they view motion pictures which are supposedly meant to teach them how to deal with arms safely but which are actually designed to stimulate (刺激) a desire to own a gun. Wildlife is disappearing because of shooting and because of the loss of wildland habitat (栖息地). Habitat loss will continue with our increasing population, but can we slow the loss of wildlife caused by shooting? There doesn’t seem to be any chance if the serious condition of our birds is not improved.
Wildlife belongs to everyone and not to the gunners alone. Although most people do not shoot, they seem to forgive shooting for sport because they know little or nothing about it. The only answer, then, is to bring the truth about sport shooting to the great majority of people.
Now, it is time to realize that animals have the same right to life as we do and that there is nothing fair or right about a person with a gun shooting the harmless and beautiful creatures. The gunners like to describe what they do as character-building, but we know that to wound an animal and watch it go through the agony of dying can make nobody happy. If, as they would have you believe, gun-carrying and killing improve human-character, then perhaps we should encourage war.
1. According to the text, most people do not seem to be against hunting because ________.
A.they have little knowledge of it
B.it helps to build human character
C.it is too costly to stop killing wildlife
D.they want to keep wildlife under control
2. The underlined word “agony” in the last paragraph probably means ________.
A.formB.conditionC.painD.sadness
3. According to the text, the films children watch at school actually ________.
A.teach them how to deal with guns safely
B.praise hunting as character-building
C.describe hunting as an exercise
D.encourage them to have guns of their own
4. It can be inferred from the text that the author seems to ________.
A.blame the majority of people
B.worry about the existence of wildlife
C.be in favour of war
D.be in support of character-building
2017-03-09更新 | 161次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般