Early surveys of employees and employers found that remote work did not reduce productivity (生产力). But a new study of more than 10,000 employees at an Asian technology company between Apr. 2019 and Aug. 2020 paints a different picture.
The firm uses software installed on employees’ computers that tracked which applications or websites were active, and whether the employees were using keyboards or mouses. The research concluded that the employees were working hard. Total hours worked were 30% higher than before COVID-19, including an 18% increase in working hours outside normal working hours. But this extra effort did not translate into any rise in output.
The interesting thing is why this happened. The academics were able to analyze how much time the employees spent in “collaboration (合作) hours”, defined as various types of meetings, and how much time they had as “focus hours”, when they could pay attention to their tasks. Despite working longer hours, the employees had less focus time than before COVID-19. Instead, all their extra time was taken up by meetings.
One possibility is that managers are less certain of their team’s devotion and are holding more meetings to check on them. Another is that managers call so many meetings to prove their own existence when they are not in the office. However, the academics suggest the greater need for meetings is the result of the greater difficulty of coordinating(协调)employees when they are working remotely — another sign that the process is inefficient.
This seems a raw deal for the employees. They received no more money for the overtime. Although they saved time spent traveling between home and the office, this did not balance the extra hours spent in meetings.
Not all workers behaved the same way, however. Those who had worked at the company the longest tended to be more productive, suggesting that they found it easier to manage the difficulties of home-working. Employees with children worked around 20 minutes a day more than those without, showing an even greater fall in their productivity, probably because they were distracted (分心) by child-care duties.
It is hardly surprising that there would be some problems involved with remote working. The practice was, after all, carried out suddenly. The way to improve the efficiency of remote working is simple: fewer meetings, shorter meetings.
1. What does the underlined part “a different picture” refer to?A.Employees prefer working remotely to working in an office. |
B.Employees working remotely enjoy more flexible working hours. |
C.Employees working remotely work harder than those in the office. |
D.Employees working remotely work longer but have no increase in output. |
A.Endless meetings. |
B.Lack of devotion. |
C.Decreased attention to tasks. |
D.Unwillingness to collaborate. |
A.People who have no need to take care of the kids. |
B.People who are more focused when working in the office. |
C.People who can handle the negative aspects of remote working. |
D.People who can maintain a balance between their work and lives. |
A.Increased productivity of remote working. |
B.Doubt about the efficiency of remote working. |
C.Advantages and disadvantages of remote working. |
D.Ways to improve the efficiency of remote working. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Work less, do more. It's an attractive idea that's becoming reality for a growing number of people in Sweden, where some companies are shortening their workdays from eight hours to six or even fewer. But is it possible to finish the same amount of work in less time?
The answer depends on the person and the type of work, experts say. But plenty of evidence suggests that cutting back on hours can have many benefits, not just because people are usually happier when they work less. If done right, shortening the workday can also improve productivity (生产效率).
The average American works about 47 hours a week, and many people work much more than that, even though many recent studies have connected working long hours with many health problems. People who work too much are more likely to gain weight, suffer workplace injuries and develop stress-related illnesses.
Dealing with those problems can end up costing companies a large amount of money, experts say. One recent study found that stress in the workplace contributes to 120,000 deaths each year and as much as of health care costs in the US.
Productivity can also suffer as the day goes on and it takes even more effort to maintain the same pace. A number of studies have found that intense (紧张的) periods of mental effort can impair people's ability to solve puzzles, make decisions and control emotions.
1. Why does the author provide the example of some Sweden companies in the first paragraph?A.To provide support for his own ideas. |
B.To introduce the topic of the passage. |
C.To predict the change of views on workdays. |
D.To provide a successful case of shorter workdays. |
A.measure | B.improve | C.repair | D.affect |
A.Work at Your Peak Efficiency |
B.Assess Your Pace of Work |
C.Can a 6-hour Workday Work? |
D.Are You Shortening Your Workdays? |
【推荐2】Helen Keller, American blind writer, said: if I were given three days to see, I would not want to see too many wonderful things.
National Eye Caring Day in China is on June 6th, which came from 1996.
Most people are born with good eyesight. But look at the students in college, we can see over ninety percent of them are wearing glasses.
A.It can do harm to our health and bring us trouble. |
B.At that time the doctors advised the government to name a day. |
C.Because when the darkness came, I would miss them too much. |
D.So it is important to let the public know the ways to protect eyes. |
E.What's more, a balanced diet is necessary to keep our eyes healthy. |
F.Parents have the responsibility to supervise kids to protect their eyes. |
G.The young generation often watch the electronic products for a long time. |
The reason why experiences improve with time may be because it is possible to think about experiences in a more abstract manner than possessions. For example, if you think back to a fantastic summer from your youth, you might easily remember an abstract sense of warm sunshine and youthful exuberant (生气勃勃), but you’re less likely to remember exactly what you did day by day.
Material possessions are harder to think about in an abstract sense. The car you bought is still a car, that great new jacket you picked up cheap is still just a jacket. It’s more likely the experience of that summer has taken on a symbolic meaning that can live longer in your memory than a possession.
Purchasing may have a negative impact on happiness because consumers often buy “joyless” material possessions, resulting in comfort but not pleasure. In general, people adapt to experiences more slowly than to material purchase. This can be seen in both negative and positive purchases: hedonic adaptation would result in a positive experience causing more happiness but a negative experience causing less happiness than the comparable material purchase with the same initial happiness level.
Experience, however, seems to be more resistant to these sorts of unfavourable comparisons. It is because of the unique nature of experience. It’s more difficult to make an unfavourable comparison when there is nothing directly comparable. After all, each of our youthful summers is different.
It’s well established that social comparisons can have a huge effect on how we view what might seem like positive events. One striking example is the finding that people prefer to earn $50,000 a year while everyone else earns $25,000, instead of earning $100,000 themselves and having other people earn $200,000.
A similar effect is seen for possessions. When there are so many flat-screen HD TVs to choose from, it's easy to make unfavourable comparisons between our choice and the others available.
1. An abstract sense in the passage refers to awareness of something ________.
A.you cannot think about |
B.you can’t remember well |
C.you cannot understand |
D.you cannot see or touch |
A.a theatre before going to a store |
B.an exhibition before going to a park |
C.a mall before going to a grocer's |
D.a market before going to a restaurant |
A.how ridiculous people are |
B.how people feel content |
C.how nearsighted people are |
D.how people hold prejudice |
A.enjoy their ownership of what they have bought |
B.pick every fault in the products they have got |
C.regret making a wrong decision to buy the items |
D.leave what they’ve purchased untouched at home |
【推荐1】Recent studies found that smiling at London bus drivers increases happiness. However, on the Number 24 bus to Hampstead Heath, Londoners are sceptical. “Bus drivers,” says. Liz Hands. a passenger. “are generally annoying me.”
It might seem improbable that a report on London’s buses could change behaviour. But it has happened before. London’s buses have an underappreciated role in the history, of medical science. In the 1940s, a single study of London’s transport workers transformed epidemiology(流行病学), medicine and the way we live now. Every time you go on a run, check your step-count, or take the stairs instead of the lift, you are following a path pioneered by the feet of the workers on London’s buses.
In the late 1940s, doctors were worried. Britain was suffering from an “epidemic” of heart disease and no one knew why. Various hypotheses(假设), such as stress, were suggested; but one thing that was not exercising researchers was exercise. The idea that health and exercise were linked “wasn’t the accepted fact that we know today”, says Nick Wareham, a professor of epidemiology at Cambridge University. Some even felt that “too much physical activity was a bad thing for your health”. Navvies, miners and farmers who did physical exercise also suffered from various diseases and died young.
At this time a young doctor called Jerry Morris started to suspect that the excess deaths from heart disease might be linked to occupation. He began studying the medical ‘records of 31, 000 London transport workers. His findings were breathtaking: conductors, who spent their time running up and down stairs, had an approximately 30% lower possibility of disease than drivers, who sat down all day. Exercise was keeping people alive.
Morris’s research was eventually published in 1953, just three years after a study by Richard Doll proving the link between smoking and lung cancer. Morris’s work had consequences both big and small. Morris now also took up exercise, handing his jacket to his daughter and just running. “People thought I was bananas.” Slowly, the rest of the world took off its jacket and followed.
1. What can we learn from the first two paragraphs?A.The former study made much difference. |
B.Running was regarded as harmful behavior. |
C.Smiling at drivers can cure passengers’ diseases. |
D.London passengers can understand bus drivers well. |
A.Interrupting. | B.Responding. | C.Worrying. | D.Delighting. |
A.By carrying out surveys among numerous workers. |
B.By observing the routines of drivers and conductors. |
C.By analyzing the medical records of transport workers. |
D.By interviewing doctors about their theories on heart disease. |
A.Londoners’ Views on Bus Drivers’ Happiness |
B.Smiling and Its Effects on London Bus Drivers |
C.The Evolution of London’s Transportation System |
D.The Revolutionary Impact of London’s Bus Studies |
【推荐2】It is common for adults to use ''baby talk'' when interacting with babies. This way of speaking attempts to imitate the sounds babies make when they first try to talk. But is this form of communication helpful to a child’s development?
Several studies have suggested a clear link between parental language methods and a child's early language development. Studies showed that language learning in babies was improved when parents spoke more than a few simple words and used a wider vocabulary. Earlier research found that the style of speech used by parents to communicate with their baby could have an influence on language development.
One such speaking style is known as ''parentese''. Research has shown that babies react better to this kind of language in the first months of life. Generally, parentese involves adults speaking in a higher voice and at a slower speed. The language is simplified, while sentences are short and often repeated. Studies from the past 30 years have confirmed that babies spoken to in parentese developed larger vocabularies throughout the first three years of life.
A new study on the subject, a project of the University of Washington's Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, examined whether parents can be effectively taught methods to improve their parentese skills.
Naj a Ferjan Ramírez. working in the Institute for Learning&Brain Sciences, said that the parents involved in the research were first shown the importance of language input for their baby's development. Parents were then given suggestions on how to use different parentese methods, and then rated on how well they used these methods with their child. She added that the new study is important because there are still a 1ot of parents with little knowledge about how to use parentese to help their child. This was one reason the researchers included parents from different cultural and economic groupings.
1. How do parents usually talk with their babies?A.By speaking in a funny style. | B.By copying babies' sounds. |
C.By raising speaking speed. | D.By whispering in babies’ears. |
A.Babies' language skills are decided by talent. |
B.Babies' language is improved by simple words. |
C.Parental language style helps improve babies' behavior. |
D.Parental language methods affect babies' language development. |
A.In paragraph 2. | B.In paragraph 3. |
C.In paragraph 4. | D.In paragraph 5. |
A.Communicating with babies matters more |
B.Parentese is a good way to practice language |
C.The more parents help, the better babies 1earn |
D.Speaking parentese helps with babies' language learning |
【推荐3】Three years ago, Jasminka Jost was looking for a place for her young son, Vigo, to be active. She had tried playing soccer, but Vigo, who has autism (孤独症), had trouble focusing on the game. Jost needed a safe space for Vigo with coaches who specialized in meeting his needs. That’s when friends referred Jost and her family to the River City Inclusive Cym (RCIG), which offers workout classes for children, teens and adults with disabilities.
The gym has been in operation since 2016, renting space in a traditional gymnastics gym before moving to its current location on Patterson Avenue in April 2022. There’re six hour — long classes per day from Monday through Saturday, each with a maximum of seven attendees and each featuring one coach per participant.
“Our classes consist of an obstacle course,” says Mike McGrath, the founder of RCIG. “There’re four different sections of the gym, and we spend 15 minutes in each section. There’re monkey bars, swings, ropes for climbing and swinging, slides ropes for climbing and swinging, slides, and more. That can sound frightening, but we start from where they’re comfortable. If they just need to touch the rope at first, that’s OK, but our goal is to gradually build their skill level and participation.”
Vigo, now 6 years old, looks forward to classes every week. There’re classes for older kids and young adults, too. Christine Schwab has been bringing her niece. 20-year-old Brennan, for two years and says that the classes have improved her social and motor skills. “The coaches at RCIG were great at getting her to take the extra step — and to believe that she could,” Schwab says. “As a loved one, it’s amazing to see.”
Jost adds the gym is a good place to meet other people facing similar challenges. “Even beyond the classes, there’s a deep sense of community and belonging.” she says. “Vigo has made a lot of little friends, and it’s an opportunity to meet other parents. It’s a place we can all go and just be ourselves.”
1. What do we know about the RCIG from the text?A.It’s popular mostly with young people. |
B.It has been expanding around the country. |
C.It was built on Patterson Avenue in 2016. |
D.It is intended for people with special needs. |
A.The current location of the gym. |
B.The training courses and ways of the gym. |
C.The founder of the gym. |
D.The training coaches of the gym. |
A.Getting along well with the participants. |
B.Developing the participants’ confidence. |
C.Teaching the participants to set right goals. |
D.Bringing the participants closer together. |
A.He has better social life. | B.He gets physically stronger. |
C.He becomes much smarter. | D.He is able to keep focused. |