Absence of evidence is not, as the saying goes, the same thing as evidence of absence. But if you continue looking for something intensively and keep failing to find it, you can be forgiven for starting to worry. And so it is with grammar teaching in schools and its link with the improved writing ability. One study among many others, in this case, found that teaching kids how to label the hits and pieces in a sentence does not make them better writers. It was novel in that it tested six- and seven-year-olds who used a digital platform called Englicious to take grammar lessons alongside the rote classroom teaching of grammatical details and their functions. The Englicious group did no better than those receiving ordinary instruction when it came to writing narrative passages.
Bath Aarts, one of the researchers on the project and one of the scholars behind Englicious holds out hope that with longer exposure, or a study of older students, an improvement in writing skills might be detected.
Other observers may begin to wonder whether the National Curriculum in England, which since 2014 has made grammar such a central part of its English program might have gone down a blind alley.
In retrospect, the grammatical knowledge of modal verbs such as “can”, “should” and “may” does little to help students use them effectively in their own writing. These words are anyway grasped by tiny children without the need to know what they are called. This may tempt the conclusion that the teaching of grammar should be shelved altogether. But there are reasons to reform it rather than scrap it.
One of practical reasons to ask children to work on grammar is that explicit knowledge of it will make learning a foreign language easier. Even if you did intuit how to make noun clauses in your native languages as a very young kid just without instruction, grasping them in German or Russian in later years is simpler if you know how to define and spot them. In fact, many English speakers come to understand grammar by studying a foreign language rather than the other way around.
1. Why does the author mention “absence of evidence is not the same thing as evidence of absence”?A.To introduce the passage with a largely unsupported assumption. |
B.To show that there is no need to worry about the failure of grammar teaching. |
C.To demonstrate that researchers should try harder to support grammar teaching. |
D.To imply the existence of connection between grammar teaching and better writing skill. |
A.Many studies have shown that grammar lessons don’t help with writing skills. |
B.Longer exposure to digital grammar lessons can effectively improve writing skills. |
C.This study stands out from previous ones because it involves an e-learning platform. |
D.The project’s researcher Bas Aarts expects the system to be useful for high school students. |
A.Suspended. | B.Placed. | C.Divided. | D.Supported. |
A.Neutral. | B.Supportive. | C.Negative. | D.Confused. |
相似题推荐
The idiom “No ‘I’ in Team” is based on a pun (双关语)-The word “team” does not contain the letter “i”, which highlights the idea that instead of focusing on themselves as individuals, team members should work together to achieve their common goals.
When it comes to achieving success, there’s no denying that teamwork plays a crucial role. We’ve all been there-group projects at school, working with colleagues at the office or playing sports with teammates. A successful team agrees and sets goals based on outcomes and results to complete its tasks. It’s important that each member knows the direction the team is working toward, their responsibilities, and how they aim to achieve the team’s collective goals. It’s essential that group members within the team share workloads and help each other to succeed.
Mostly, in typical workplace culture, being focus on individual pursuits is considered plain selfish, but is supporting individuals in their own pursuits really anti-team? Evidence suggests that putting the “I” back into team can improve workplace productivity and employee engagement. In the 1990s the Harvard Business School did research, demonstrating the benefits of giving employees paid time to follow their own individual pursuits. Since then, some notable companies have introduced unstructured time into their workplaces.
Globally, 85% of employees are disengaged in their work. In Daniel Pink’s book Drive, he argues that the best way to motivate employees is not through the carrot and stick approach but rather through allowing and enabling them to direct their own lives. When teams understand what matters to the individuals within them, they are able to better empathize with each other and have each others’ backs.
There is an “I” in team and when we start to implement programs that support individuals in their pursuits, we may just find they are more creative, more engaged and more productive.
1. What idea does the idiom “No ‘I’ in Team” highlight?2. Why is it important to put “I” back into team?
3. Please decide which part is false in the following statement, then underline it and explain why.
According to Danile Pink, the effective way to motivate the 85% employees is to set the goal the company would like their employees to achieve.
4. As an individual, how can you play your role in a team?
【推荐2】During a meeting people are communicating continuously, and not only the people who are speaking. Everybody who is present expresses non-verbally how he or she feels during the meeting. They continuously show if they think the subjects for discussion are interesting and if they agree with the speakers.
The people that are present can determine, without words, how the conversation goes and who gets the floor. It often seems that the people who talk the most have the most influence on the course of the conversation and on the eventual decision-making. However, this is not always the case. Sometimes people who do not have much to say can change or disrupt the course of the conversation just by their presence.
When the people who are participating in the meeting are discussing a subject, their involvement can be seen from their attitude. The people who are not interested sit back in their chairs, and often draw the nicest doodles (涂鸦), while giving others the idea that they are taking notes. The people who are really not interested at all stare idly into space or just keep looking around them. When everyone adopts this pose, then it’s possible that the meeting was scheduled for the wrong time of the day or there is little interest for the subject. In that case such subjects do not need to be discussed for very long.
People who are participating in the meeting and are of the opinion that the subject is important follow the speakers in a non-verbal manner. When they agree with the speaker, they nod a lot. They take on an open, attentive attitude whereby they often lean forward a little. It is also striking how often listeners adopt the same attitude as the speaker that they are in agreement with. By paying attention to the attitudes of the people present, you can get an idea about the division of opinions. Maybe half of the listeners adopt the attitude of the speaker and the other half is sitting in a defensive attitude. The people who are in disagreement with the speaker hardly move their heads. They sit backwards and adopt a closed attitude. Often they fold their arms or they cover their mouths with their hands. When they start shaking their heads, they are probably about to say something.
It is important to involve everyone in the meeting. People who are silent also have an opinion, and it is important to hear this opinion during the meeting. It often happens that people are silent during the meeting and only express their opinion afterwards in the corridors. However, the people who are silent do react, in a non-verbal manner, on what is being said during the meeting. A good way to involve them in a conversation is by reacting to their body language. You can address the non-verbal behavior and link a question to it such as: “I see you are nodding, why do you think it’s important that this meeting is carried on?” or “What a deep sign, do you have a problem with this statement?”
Communication also occurs on a relational level during a meeting, besides the discussions related to the subjects. It is not so much about what a speaker says exactly but more about what he “actually” means with what he says. An underlying message can be given for example about the relation with another person in the meeting. The meaning of a comment sometimes becomes clearer through the body language of the speaker than through the words. Especially through variation in intonation, a statement can have a completely different meaning.
1. What does the phrase gets the floor mean?A.reach the first place | B.have authority over somebody |
C.have a voice in the discussion | D.have the loudest voice |
A.People who are silent don’t have an opinion. |
B.Those talking most are always making eventual decisions. |
C.Those folding their arms are in disagreement with the speaker. |
D.Only when the people feel interested in the topic do they continuously communicate. |
A.People move their heads now and then. | B.People are sitting leaning forward a little. |
C.People who are listening give a deep sigh. | D.People who are sitting back draw the nicest doodles. |
A.From the audience’s attitude. | B.From the speaker’s body language. |
C.From the speaker’s gestures. | D.From what exactly the speaker says. |
【推荐3】What is culture? It is difficult to define.
As you can see, there are different definitions of culture as there are different societies. One useful starting point is the idea of two types of culture. They are culture with a capital C and culture with a small c. Culture with a capital C refers to music, literature and art. It also includes facts and statistics about a national group or society.
Culture with a small c refers to beliefs, values, traditions and the everyday life of a particular community.
A.How many definitions of culture exist? |
B.The USA and Britain are culturally diverse. |
C.Everybody’s definition of culture is identical. |
D.These contain many questions about the country’s culture. |
E.Everyone knows what it is but explains it in different ways. |
F.People think this kind of information is valuable and important. |
G.One thing we can all agree on is that culture is about being different. |
【推荐1】Following Cook’s death in 1779, the Endeavour journal of James Cook is thought to have been held by his wife Elizabeth. There is no record of the journal’s movements following Elizabeth Cook’s death in 1835 until its appearance in 1923 when it was offered at auction (拍卖) by its owners the Bolckow family of Yorkshire. The family were unable to explain how they came to hold the journal. It had apparently been in the family’s library ‘for over fifty years, having been purchased by the late Bolckow’s uncle, but from whom and in what circumstances is unknown’.
On 21 March 1923 the Australian government purchased the Endeavour journal for £5000 for the Commonwealth Parliamentary Library.
The Mitchell Library, Sydney, had been chasing the journal since its discovery with the Bolckow family in 1922 before the auction, and had approached the Commonwealth Government for a financial contribution towards the purchase. Though Interim (临时的) Commonwealth Parliamentary Librarian Arthur Wadsworth had guaranteed the Mitchell that there would be no competition for the item, Kenneth Binns (to be Wadsworth’s successor) felt that the Endeavour journal was more suited to remain within the nation’s library.
Binns put forward an eventually persuasive argument that the Commonwealth could not finance the Mitchell, ‘which was, after all, a private institution’. Prime Minister Bruce telegraphed the officer in London to instruct the Mitchell Library’s Chief Librarian, already in England anticipating the auction, to bid on behalf of the Commonwealth. The Mitchell Library accepted upon the understanding that it would be the keeper of the journal until such time that the Commonwealth Government had a suitable storing place, a National Library.
Upon arrival in Australia the journal was exhibited in Queens Hall, Melbourne, for a month after which it was taken to the Mitchell Library which held it for four years, before it was removed to Canberra.
1. Who owned the Endeavour journal of James Cook at last ?A.James Cook. | B.Elizabeth Cook. |
C.The Bolckow family of Yorkshire. | D.The Australian government. |
A.Melbourne . | B.The Mitchell Library. |
C.The Commonwealth Government. | D.Canberra. |
A.Cook’s wife Elizabeth passed on the Endeavour journal to the Blockow family. |
B.The Endeavour journal was on show in Melbourne before being taken to Sydney. |
C.The Mitchell Library bought the Endeavour journal at its own expense. |
D.The National Library of Australia is in Melbourne. |
A.How the Endeavour journal came to the National Library of Australia. |
B.How the Endeavour journey came to the Mitchell Library of Sydney. |
C.How the Endeavour journey came to the Bolckow family of Yorkshire. |
D.How important the Endeavour journey is to Australian. |
【推荐2】Here are the bestsellers this month.
The Story of Buildings: From the Pyramids to the Sydney Opera House and Beyond
by Patrick Dillon, author; Stephen Biesty, illustrator(插画家)
Hardcover $26.99; Paperback $14.80
We spend most of our lives in buildings. We make our homes in them. We go to school in them. But why and how did people start making buildings? How did they learn to make them stronger, bigger, and more comfortable? Patrick Dillon's stories of amazing buildings and the amazing people who made them celebrate the human creation.
What Were the Twin Towers?
by Jim O'Connor, author; Ted Hammond, illustrator
Library Binding(装帧)$20.64; Paperback $7.91
When the Twin Towers were built in 1973, they were described as an architectural(建筑学的)wonder. Offices and companies moved into the Towers—also known as the World Trade Center—and the buildings were seen as the economic center of the world. Discover the whole story of the Twin Towers—from their construction to their sad end.
Where Is Machu Picchu?
by Megan Stine, author; Who HQ, author; John O'Brien, illustrator
Library Binding $21.02; Paperback $8.91
Built in the fifteenth century and set in the mountains of Peru, Machu Picchu was deserted after the Spaniards controlled the Incan empire in the sixteenth century. It remained hidden until 1911 when Hiram Bingham uncovered the amazing buildings and shared his discovery with the world. Today, hundreds of thousands of people visit the site to climb the 3,000 stone steps and explore the towering monuments.
Castle
by David Macaulay, author
Hardcover $11.98; Paperback $15.80
What could be more perfect for an author/illustrator who has continually shown the mystique(神秘性)of architectural structures that have long attracted modern man? With typical interest and a sense of humor decorating his drawings, David Macaulay finds the step-by-step planning and construction of both castle and town.
1. Which book is written by two authors?A.The Story of Buildings: From the Pyramids to the Sydney Opera House and Beyond. |
B.What Were the Twin Towers? |
C.Where Is Machu Picchu? |
D.Castle. |
A.$53.98. | B.$29.60. | C.$42.04. | D.$31.60. |
A.Arts & Architecture. | B.Literature & Fiction. |
C.Holidays & Celebrations. | D.Computers & Technology. |
【推荐3】We continue our Foreign Student Series on higher education in the United States. Now you move on to college life once you are admitted to a school. The first thing you need to value is a place to live. Housing policies differ from school to school. Students might have to live in a dormitory, at least for the first year there.
Dorms come in all sizes. Some have suites. Six or more students may live in one suite. Other dorms have many rooms along a common hallway, usually with two students in each room . Many students say dormitories provide the best chance to get to know other students. Also, dorms generally cost less than apartments or other housing not owned by the school
Most colleges and universities offer single-sex dorms, but usually males and females live in the same building. They might live on the same floors and share the same common bathrooms. They may live in the same room only if they are married.
Edward Spencer is the associate vice president for student affairs at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg. He says it is important to understand the rules of the building in which you will live. He advises students to ask questions before they decide about their housing. For example, if a student requires a special diet, will the school provide it ? How much privacy can a student expect ? Will the school provide a single room if a student requests one ? And what about any other special needs that a student might have?
Virginia Tech, for example, had a ban against candles in dorms . But it changed that policy to let students light up candles for religious purposes. The university also has several dorms open all year so foreign students have a place to stay during vacation time.
1. Why do some students in the U.S. choose to live in dorms, according to the passage ?A.Dorms allow students in the U.S. choose to live in dorms |
B.Dorms are safer for students to live in most cases |
C.Dorms offer the chance to meet other people and are cheap as well |
D.In most schools students are required to live in the dorms |
A.what suites in American schools are like | B.what dorms in American schools are like |
C.what dorms are owned by schools | D.when people get to know each other |
A.colleges usually don’t provide a special diet | B.housing rules differ from one building to another |
C.a ban against candles in dorms is necessary | D.the U.S. college always satisfies students’ requests |
A.Places to live in U.S. colleges | B.housing polices in the U.S |
C.Advantages of dormitories | D.Rules of single-sex dorms |
【推荐1】Daniel Anderson, a famous psychologist, believes it’s important to distinguish television’s influences on children from those of the family. We tend to blame TV, he says, for problems it doesn’t really cause, overlooking our own roles in shaping children’s minds.
One traditional belief about television is that it reduces a child’s ability to think and to understand the world. While watching TV, children do not merely absorb words and images (影像). Instead, they learn both explicit and hidden meanings from what they see. Actually, children learn early the psychology of characters in TV shows. Furthermore, as many teachers agree, children understand far more when parents watch TV with them, explaining new words and ideas. Yet, most parents use an educational program as a chance to park their kids in front of the set and do something in another room.
Another argument against television is that it replaces reading as a form of entertainment. But according to Anderson, the amount of time spent watching television is not related to reading ability. TV doesn’t take the place of reading for most children; it takes the place of similar sorts of recreation, such as listening to the radio and playing sports. Things like parents’ educational background have a stronger influence on a child’s reading. “A child’s reading ability is best predicted by how much a parent reads,” Anderson says.
Traditional wisdom also has it that heavy televisionwatching lowers IQ (智商) scores and affects school performance. But here, too, Anderson notes that no studies have proved it. In fact, research suggests that it’s the other way around. “If you’re smart young, you’ll watch less TV when you’re older,” Anderson says. Yet, people of lower IQ tend to be lifelong television viewers.
For years researchers have attempted to show that television is dangerous to children. However, by showing that television promotes none of the dangerous effects as conventionally believed, Anderson suggests that television cannot be condemned without considering other influences.
1. By watching TV, children learn ________.A.images through words |
B.more than explicit meanings |
C.more about images than words |
D.little about people’s psychology |
A.on his own | B.with other kids |
C.with his parents | D.with his teachers |
A.Radiolistening. |
B.Televisionwatching. |
C.Parents’ reading list. |
D.Parents’ educational background. |
A.To advise on the educational use of TV. |
B.To describe TV’s harmful effects on children. |
C.To explain traditional views on TV influences. |
D.To present Anderson’s unconventional ideas. |
【推荐2】When parents ask “What grade did you get?”, there is a common follow-up question: “So who got the highest grade?” Many educators select and publicly announce “the best student” in a class or school. Adults praise children for outperforming others. Sports tournaments award those who surpass others. The practice of making social comparisons is so common in daily life that the negative effects caused by social comparisons are usually ignored.
One well-known strategy to get rid of social comparisons is to provide children with participation awards, which means children get the same prize despite their performance. Such awards, however, may not abolish social comparisons. High-performing children may feel unjustly treated and look down on the latter group. More generally those who receive unwarranted(无正当理由的) rewards may come to believe they deserve to receive the recognition.
How, then, can we make children feel proud of themselves and motivate them without the unwanted side effects? A better approach is to use temporal comparisons-encouraging children to compare themselves with their past self rather than with others.
Researchers recently conducted a study, where 583 children were asked to do a reading-and-writing exercise designed to influence the kind of comparisons they would make: social comparisons or temporal comparisons. Results showed children who compared themselves with others said they wanted to be superior to such people, while those who compared themselves with their past self said they wanted to improve rather than be superior. Temporal comparisons changed children’s goals away from a desire for superiority and toward self-improvement.
What, then, can parents and teachers do with this knowledge? Parents and teachers can praise children’s improvement over time to let them know they are making progress. Also, teachers can create learning contexts that track children’s own progress over time, such as report cards that display their changes in learning and performance.
Of course, temporal comparisons are not a panacea; we should never push children too much to improve themselves. The road toward self-improvement is paved with struggles and setbacks. Rather than making children feel bad for those failures, we should encourage them to learn from their imperfect past self-and thus help youngsters become better than before.
1. What can we know about the strategy mentioned in paragraph 2?A.It is in high-performing children’s favor. |
B.It stresses the importance of teamwork. |
C.It may make all the children more confident. |
D.It may discourage high-performing children. |
A.Children have a desire to feel proud of themselves. |
B.Temporal comparisons make for self-improvement. |
C.Children need to be exposed to various comparisons. |
D.Social comparisons give children a sense of superiority. |
A.Cure-all. | B.Routine. | C.Priority. | D.Benefit. |
A.Failure can be avoided by equality. | B.Comparisons will lead to failure. |
C.Failure is an opportunity to learn. | D.Comparisons are difficult to abolish. |
【推荐3】Researchers recently studied 3, 000 middle and high school students. Among them were 618 teenagers with one parent who lived away from home for long periods of time because of work. The researchers wanted to know how the work of these “fly-in, fly-out” parents might influence the health of their children.
A higher percentage of teenagers who experienced the long absence of a parent had emotional (情感的) or behavioral problems compared with those whose parents worked more traditional hours. This supports earlier research finding high percentages of emotional problems in teenagers who often returned to an empty house after school or whose parents were seldom at dinner.
Findings also suggest that parents don’t have to be home all the time to be present in their children’s lives, but it helps to be home at certain times. And the best parental presence for a teenager may sometimes be like a potted plant.
Many parents of teenagers have known this to be true and find ways to be present without trying to start a conversation. One friend of mine quietly does housework each evening in the sitting room where her teenagers watch TV. They enjoy one another’s company without the need to talk. Another friend usually accepts his daughter’s invitation to work or read nearby while she sits and does her homework. Perhaps, that, at least for some families, is the best way for teenagers and their parents to stay close.
In fact, many years of research suggest that children use their parents as a safe base from which to explore the world. Studies tell us that young children quietly follow their parents’ movements from room to room, even while carrying on with their own activities. Perhaps our teens, like babies, feel most at ease when their parents are still around. They don’t want to stay away from parents who allow them freedom. A new school year is at hand, so as parents we could offer our teenagers a “potted flower” as a gift, whose quiet and steady (稳定的) presence will give them a great day.
1. What’s the purpose of the recent research?A.To show the necessity of parents’ company all the time. |
B.To support earlier research on teenagers’ emotional problems. |
C.To find connections between parents’ long absence and children’s health. |
D.To compare “fly-in, fly-out” parents with those working traditional hours. |
A.They got more used to being alone. |
B.They were more likely to have trouble with their feelings. |
C.They showed more dislike for traditional working hours. |
D.They had dinners with their parents more often. |
A.Giving children a great day. | B.Being present in children’s life. |
C.Allowing children enough freedom. | D.Staying with children quietly and steadily. |
A.To set examples for children to follow. | B.To guide children to explore the world. |
C.To take good care of children as babies. | D.To give children a sense of safety and relaxation. |