组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 社会 > 社会问题与社会现象
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:122 题号:17977769

Many employees must be tempted to inquire on a daily basis when they see their bosses headed down the wrong track. But caution, for fear of appearing insubordinate or foolish and thus possibly at risk of losing their jobs, often leads workers to keep silent.

A culture of silence can be dangerous, argues a new book, “The Fearless Organization”, by Amy Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School. Some of her examples are from the airline industry. One was its deadliest accident: a crash between Boeing 747s in the Canary Islands in 1977 when a co-pilot felt unable to doubt his captain’s decision to take off based on a misunderstanding of instructions from air-traffic control.

The risks may be lower than life or death in most organizations, but companies also suffer when people keep silent, Ms Edmondson believes. Volkswagen was caught up in a scandal over diesel(柴油) emissions from 2015. The engines of its diesel models did not meet American emissions standards and engineers devised a system to fool the regulators. Ms Edmondson says the company’s culture had been one based on threat and fear; Ferdinand Piëch, its longtime boss, boasted of telling engineers they had six weeks to improve the bodywork(车身) fitting on pain of dismissal. In the circumstances, engineers were understandably unwilling to mention the bad news on emissions standards and instead, worked around the problem. In a corporate culture based on fear and intimidation, it may appear that targets are being achieved in the short term. But in the long run, the effect is likely to be counterproductive. Studies show that fear stops learning. And when confronted with a problem, scared workers find ways of covering it up or getting around it with inefficient practices.

The answer is to create an atmosphere of “psychological safety” whereby workers can speak their minds. In a way, this is the equivalent of Toyota’s “lean manufacturing” process, which allows any worker who spots a problem to stop the production line. This does not mean that workers, or their ideas, are immune from criticism, or that they should complain continuously. The book describes, Pixar created what it called a “Braintrust” to give feedback to film directors. The rules were that feedback should be constructive and about the idea, not the person.

As ordinary tasks are automated, and workers rely on computers for data analysis, the added value of humans will stem from their creativity. But as Ms Edmondson’s book demonstrates, it is hard to be either constructive or creative if you are not confident about speaking out.

1. The underlined word “insubordinate”(para 1) means ________.
A.being inferiorB.disobeying a superior
C.getting aggressiveD.being arrogant
2. We can infer from Paragraph 3 that _______.
A.Volkswagen’s engineers designed a system to meet American emissions standards
B.when facing problems, scared workers resolve them directly
C.Volkswagen’s engineers were at risk of losing jobs
D.the culture of fear and intimidation must be counterproductive in the long term.
3. Which of the following is TRUE according to the author?
A.A culture of being silent is life-threatening.
B.Volkswagen’s culture is on the basis of fear.
C.Workers can escape being blamed in the culture of psychological safety.
D.The value of humans lies in originality in today’s highly-automated world.
4. What is the passage mainly about?
A.An introduction to Amy Edmondson’s new book.
B.The disadvantages of fear and intimidation culture.
C.People need to be confident when they are speaking out.
D.Companies will perform better if employees are not threatened into silence.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读表达(约450词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐1】阅读下面短文,根据题目要求回答问题。

Last week, the United Nations (UN) released the most complete report ever created on the global problem of food waste. It found that the world wastes about 17% of all the food produced. That's about a billion tons of food a year.

A billion tons is a lot of food — it's over 2 trillion (2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000) pounds or about 931 billion (931 ,000 ,000 ,000) kilograms. The report says that the amount wasted is roughly twice as much as earlier studies had suggested.

The report was produced by the UN's Environment Program (UNEP) and covered food waste around the world in 2019. The study showed a several different ways in which food was wasted — at home, in restaurants and in stores.

It turns out that by far, most food waste — about 61% — happens horse. On average, the amount of food thrown out at home works out to about 163 pounds (74 kilograms) for each person every year.

Restaurants were responsible for about 26% of the food wasted. The remaining 13% was thrown away by stores.

Many people thought rich countries were more likely to waste food than countries that were less rich. That turned out not to be true. One surprising discovery was that food was wasted at about the same rate in all but the poorest countries. (The UN had difficulty measuring food waste in the poorest countries.)

But people in richer countries may waste less food at home because they are eating out at restaurants more often. That certainly seems to be the case in the US, which has low waste numbers for homes, but quite high numbers for restaurants.

In some cases, labels might be causing food waste, the report said. People might be throwing away food even though it's still good to eat, simply because the container's "Best By" or "Sell By" date has passed. In poorer countries, food may be wasted because not all homes have a refrigerator.

Why is wasting food such a problem? For one thing, the report points out, hundreds of millions of people went hungry in 2019. Also, wasting food is really bad for the planet. Farming creates between 10% and 30% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions (排放) — the pollution that's making the climate crisis worse. So when food gets thrown out, the pollution is created for nothing.

The UNEP report says that it's important for countries to study food waste more carefully in order to figure out ways to solve the problem.

1. How many tons of food are wasted a year according to the UN report?
2. Why is wasting food bad for the environment?
3. Read the following statement, underline the false part of it and explain the reason.
Labels might be causing food waste, because people might be throwing away food that is bad to eat.
4. Please briefly present what you can do in daily life to save food. (about 40 words)
2021-07-04更新 | 43次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇记叙文。文章主要讲述的是作者去参加患自闭症儿子的家长会让作者意识到我们不能按照常规思维来判定他们的对错,呼吁全世界的人们放弃对自闭症患者的偏见,慷慨的接受这一群体,希望所有人一起改变这个世界。

【推荐2】Not Even Wrong

My eight-year-old son, lack, is a boy with autism (孤独症). Even though I always hear from others that he is very bright and he is making enough progress to meet goals, I am still anxious walking into their parents’ meetings.

Last fall’s parents’ meeting was even worse for me. I noticed Jack making a great effort to keep up with others. Some parents watched Jack and whispered (窃窃私语) and no children were willing to play with him. I started to see the social divide between Jack and his peers (同龄人) widening.

After the parents’ meeting, his teacher spent long time talking to me. She told me that it was getting more difficult for Jack to meet goals just because he was bright. Some teachers and students always complained (抱怨) about Jack’s actions. She also advised me to think about whether the normal class was the best setting for him. Hearing these words, I was very upset.

Then she blew my mind. She showed me one example of Jack’s works and said, “I didn’t know how to grade this. It’s not even wrong, but it’s not right.” I grasped when she said “not even wrong”, which is the name of one of my favorite books on autism, by Paul Collins. The book says a girl whose idea is so far off base but it is not even wrong. It perfectly describes autism and it perfectly describes Jack.

In his book, Paul Collins wrote, “Children with autism are like the square pegs (钉,桩). Hitting a square peg into a round hole is hard work. What’s worse, it’s destroying the square pegs.”

As a mother of a boy with autism, I want to help find more square holes. I want this world to be a world where it is okay to be a square peg without having to pretend to be round. We have been hammering (锤打) square pegs into round holes for a long time. Now we should put down the hammers. And I hope that some of those kids told their parents. And I hope that some of you read this and tell your kids. And I hope that we, all of us together, CAN change the world.

1. Last fall’s parents’ meeting______.
A.gave more joy to the authorB.left the author quite concerned
C.frightened the author greatlyD.seemed wonderful for the author
2. What does the underlined word “divide” in the second paragraph mean?
A.Impression.B.Personality.C.Difference.D.Brightness.
3. When the teacher said “not even wrong”, she meant______.
A.Jack had been entirely wrongB.she actually told a white lie
C.she just tried to please the authorD.Jack had a special thinking style
4. According to Paragraph 5, Paul Collins agrees that______.
A.a round hole fits a square peg
B.hitting can never destroy the square pegs
C.children with autism tend to be hard-working
D.people should let children with autism be themselves
5. What is the author’s purpose of writing this passage?
A.To change people’s opinion on autism.B.To give some examples of autism.
C.To advise people to buy a book on autism.D.To warn people of the risk of autism.
2023-11-13更新 | 136次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。主要讲述很多人列举打嗝作为人类最讨厌的问题之一,德克萨斯大学教授阿里·塞菲博士厌倦了传统的治疗打嗝方法,比如喝水或改变呼吸技巧。然后他想出了一个主意,一根吸管可以帮助阻止打嗝。

【推荐3】Many people list hiccups (嗝) as one of the most annoying problems which are associated with being human. For a group of people, continuous hiccups can seriously harm the quality of life. In the year 2017, the question “What causes hiccups?” was one of the most searched medical questions. That’s how much of an issue these hiccups are and it also reflects that this problem is so widespread in our daily life.

Dr. Ali Seifi, a professor of the University of Texas, was tired of the traditional methods which are used to remove hiccups, like drinking water or varying breathing techniques. He then came up with the idea that a straw (吸管) could help interrupt hiccups. The straw, which is named HiccAway, requires more suction (吸) power than regular straws in order to draw up liquid. Drinking with this straw can lower the diaphragm (隔膜) while first opening it and then closing it. Doing so stimulates the nerves at the same time, allowing the brain to reset and stop the hiccups.

Dr. James Alvarez of the University of Texas gathered 249 volunteers to use the straw and report back their results. When it comes to the effectiveness, this straw received a score of 4.58 out of 5. About 90% of the participants marked it as more effective than traditional home methods. A majority of the participants reported several occasions when they always suffer from hiccups. 53 reported that they suffered from hiccups weekly and about 11 participants reported daily hiccups issues. The frequent sufferers reported success rates were as high as people who hardly suffer from them.

Some people are convinced that how to interrupt hiccups is an issue in which placebo effect (安慰剂效应) could likely work. A lot of people swear that their own solutions do not end up working for others. It is not clear how this trial could be conducted in a more scientific way.

1. Why does the author mention the question in paragraph 1?
A.To show the possible causes of hiccups.
B.To show the terrible effects of hiccups.
C.To prove hiccuping is common in our life.
D.To prove people are concerned about health.
2. What does paragraph 2 mainly talk about HiccAway?
A.Its working principle.B.Its wide popularity.
C.Its experimental result.D.Its process of producing.
3. What was the participants’ reaction to HiccAway?
A.It led to more hiccups for one-fifth of them.
B.It was thought highly of by the majority of them.
C.It had no effect on removing hiccups for most of them.
D.It helped 11 of them completely get rid of daily hiccups.
4. What can we infer about the study from the text?
A.Less volunteers should be involved in the study.
B.The study has caught people’s attention on hiccups.
C.Many people are believing hiccups can be cured easily.
D.There has been no well-recognized cure for hiccups so far.
2022-03-23更新 | 173次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般