A new study led by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School has found that climate-impact labeling on a sample fast food menu significantly influenced people’s food choices in favor of more climate-friendly items, such as vegetarian diet, chicken, or fish dishes.
The researchers enrolled over 5,000 online participants and presented them a sample menu resembling a fast food menu and asked them to choose a single item for a meal. While one group of participants received a menu with non-red meat items like salads or chicken sandwiches labeled “low climate impact”, another one received a menu with red meat items, such as beef burgers, labeled “high climate impact.” Finally, a third control group received a menu with QR codes on all items but no climate labels.
The analysis revealed that both the high and low climate-impact labels significantly reduced red meat selections compared to the control group. The high climate-impact labels had a strong effect, increasing non-beef choices by 23 percent compared to just 10 percent in the case of menus including low climate-impact labels.
“These results suggest that menu labeling, particularly labels warning that an item has high climate impact, can be an effective strategy for encouraging more sustainable food choices in a fast food setting,” said the study lead author Julia Wolfson, an associate professor in the Department of International Heath at the Bloomberg School.
Besides, participants were also asked to rate how healthy they believed the item they ordered was, and those who selected a more sustainable item perceived their choice to be healthier compared to those who selected a red meat item.
Since red meat consumption has been linked to a variety of health issues, including colorectal (结肠的) cancer and type 2 diabetes (糖尿病), the type of climate-impact labeling could prove highly effective in preventing illness. However, as the researchers warn, climate-impact labels may also have the unwanted side effect of making a choice seem healthier than it actually is.
“We look for labeling strategies that create ‘win-wins’ for promoting both more sustainable and healthier choices,” Wolfson concluded.
1. What is the finding of the study?A.Red meat consumption is closely linked to climate labeling. |
B.Climate-impact labels are gaining popularity worldwide. |
C.Climate-impact labeling influences people’s food selection. |
D.Menu labeling contributes to less sustainable food choices. |
A.By citing examples. |
B.By group experimenting. |
C.By providing explanations. |
D.By analyzing cause and effect. |
A.Detected. | B.Required. | C.Urged. | D.Considered. |
A.Skeptical. | B.Objective. | C.Tolerant. | D.Conservative. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Being “a grown-up” is a pretty unclear concept, even once you’re technically “grown-up”. My career has taken its fair share of twists and turns in the past three years since I graduated, and in some ways I feel like I’m still only starting to figure out what I want to do.
In some ways, in decision about the future allows you to have a much more open mind about various career choices than those who’ve always known exactly what they want to do. If you limit yourself too much, you could miss the opportunity to join an exciting new startup, develop a great business idea, or try something unexpected that you might love.
Accept that the landscape is always changing
While it may have once made sense to dream about being a doctor, lawyer, or professional ballet dancer, many of the jobs open to you now are ones you didn’t know about as a child.
Redefine (重新定义) “grown-up”
The concept of being a “grown-up” means that there’s a finish line to a personal and professional life that is, in reality, always changing.
A.Do something |
B.Embrace uncertainty |
C.Even if the job has its disadvantages |
D.The Internet transformed the professional landscape in totally unexpected ways |
E.Truthfully, that grown-up person your childhood self once dreamed of might not exist |
F.And I’ve learned that it’s OK not to know what you want to be even at a grown-up age |
G.While you can hope that you’ll one day find a hobby or career that you’re enthusiastic about |
【推荐2】How to Break the Anxiety Cycle
People who suffer from anxiety tend to be stuck in an ongoing loop of avoidance. It’s the classic dynamic of anxiety:
Let go of perfectionism. People with social anxiety feel as if they are walking on a social tightrope.
Make small gestures. Instead of “jumping off a cliff” and walking straight into a situation that makes you anxious, start becoming more expressive in situations that you feel are less threatening.
Shift your awareness. Our attention is like a spotlight and we choose where to point it. Those with social anxiety tend to point that spotlight inward and state the commentary of our inner critic.
A.Choose your words carefully |
B.Pay attention to your health condition |
C.For example, ask a stranger for directions |
D.When we avoid the things we’re afraid of |
E.If the things reduce feelings of social anxiety |
F.It’s this idea that we need to perform perfectly |
G.Focus on what’s happening around you, not inside you |
【推荐3】When you were at school, were you ever told to stop daydreaming and concentrate? It was easy for your mind to wander if you weren’t interested in what you were learning or if you had better things to think about.
Scientists have looked at what makes us delay and found a number of ways to help us stay in the zone.
But according to Science Focus magazine, distraction isn’t all bad. “If we were always so focused that we never got distracted, we’d miss potential changes, such as threats, in our environment.
A.Distraction is vital for survival. |
B.Staying focused can avoid dangers. |
C.Performing visual tasks makes us concentrate. |
D.One of the most obvious things is removing noise. |
E.Staying focused can still be a challenge in adult life. |
F.There are more practical tips to keeping your mind focused. |
G.Another possible cure for a short attention duration is brain training. |
【推荐1】In 1957, English scientist James Lovelock invented the Electron Capture Detector, an inexpensive, sensitive device used to help measure the spread of poisonous man-made compounds (化合物) in the environment. The device provided the scientific foundations of Rachel Carson’s 1962 book, Silent Spring, a push for the environmental movement. It also helped provide the basis for regulations in the United States and in other nations that banned harmful chemicals like DDT and PCBs.
![](https://img.xkw.com/dksih/QBM/2023/6/28/3269171944259584/3271756161400832/STEM/216683e0760a4016a5c1859071728247.png?resizew=118)
Later, his discovery that chlorofluorocarbons(CFCs)—compounds that are used in refrigerators and air conditioners—were present in measurable concentrations in the atmosphere led to the discovery of a hole in the ozone layer (臭氧层). He also explained that they posed no possible danger to the planet. A year after his paper in Nature, Mario Molina of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and F. Sherwood Rowland of the University of California at Irvine published a paper in the same journal detailing how sensitive the Earth’s ozone layer is to CFCs. In 1995 they were awarded the Nobel Prize for their work in reminding the world of the thinning of the ozone layer. Lovelock later called his conclusion a mistake.
But Dr Lovelock may be most widely known for his Gaia theory that the Earth acts as a “living organism” that can “control its temperature and chemistry in a state of comfortable stability (稳定性).” As an expert on the chemical composition of the atmospheres of Earth and Mars, Dr Lovelock wondered why Earth’s atmosphere was so stable. He hypothesized (假定)that something must control heat, oxygen, nitrogen, and other ingredients. He presented his theory in 1967. That summer, the novelist William Golding, his friend, suggested the name Gaia, after the Greek goddess of the Earth.
The hypothesis may never have moved into the scientific mainstream without the contribution of Lynn Margulis, an American microbiologist. In the early 1970s and in the decades that followed, she worked with Dr Lovelock on specific studies to support this concept. Since then. Dr Lovelock’s theory of a self-controlling Earth has been considered important to understanding the causes and consequences of global warming.
1. What is Paragraph 1 mainly about?A.The functions of man-made compounds. |
B.The importance of banning harmful chemicals. |
C.The influence of the Electron Capture Detector. |
D.The working principles of the Electron Capture Detector. |
A.It was impossible to find CFCs in thin air. |
B.CFCs did little harm to the Earth. |
C.It was impossible to measure CFCs in the air. |
D.CFCs had little effect on cooling refrigerators. |
A.Earth’s atmosphere remains stable. |
B.Golding mentioned a Greek goddess. |
C.Both Earth and Mars have atmospheres. |
D.Living things can exist in the atmosphere. |
A.She became well-known because of Lovelock. |
B.She first discovered the causes of global warming. |
C.She helped Lovelock make his theory widely accepted. |
D.She proposed a new idea based on Lovelock’s Gaia theory. |
【推荐2】Humans eat an astonishing amount of meat every year-some 800 billion pounds of it, enough flesh to fill roughly 28 million dump trucks. Our desire for meat, particularly in industrialized countries like the United States, is one reason why the planet is warming as fast as it is. Raising animals consumes a lot of land that could otherwise soak up carbon. Cows, sheep, and goats give out heat-trapping methane (甲烷). And to grow the corn, soy, and other plants that those animals eat, farmers spray fertilizer that emits nitrous oxide (一氧化二氮), another planet-warming gas.
Cutting out meat sounds like an effective approach. But what would happen if everyone actually stopped eating meat tomorrow? Such a quick shift probably wouldn’t cause the sort of turmoil that would come if the planet immediately abandoned fossil fuels. But still, the consequence could be quite chaotic, causing different problems.
Researchers say the economic damage caused by the sudden disappearance of meat would fall disproportionately on low-income countries with farming economies, like Niger or Kenya, where farming and raising livestock are critical sources of income. Getting rid of livestock overnight would not only deprive many people of essential nutrients, but also threaten food security, especially in regions like South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Besides, there’s the issue of cultural damage. Taking away meat, according to Wilson Warren, a history professor at Western Michigan University, would do more than just deprive Americans of hot dogs and hamburgers and Italians of salami.
Rejecting meat entirely, let alone immediately, isn’t an ideal solution to the climate crisis. Dutkiewicz, a political economist at the Pratt Institute, suggested using guidelines established by the EAT-Lancet Commission, an international group of scientists who have designed a diet intended to give people the nutrients they need without destroying the planet.
1. What can be inferred from the first paragraph?A.Feeding animals costs more than growing plants. |
B.The USA consumes the most meat annually. |
C.Meat consumption may increase global warming. |
D.Fertilizer should be banned around the world. |
A.Prediction. | B.Disorder. | C.Pollution. | D.Shortage. |
A.the global crisis | B.improved well-being |
C.cultural diversity | D.food safety issues |
A.The declining meat industry. | B.Specific diet suggestions. |
C.Global climate crisis. | D.Farmers’ protest. |
【推荐3】For some people, walking or running outdoors is a great way to work out. What may not be so pleasant is seeing trash all over the ground. Well, some people are doing something about it. They are plogging!
“Plogging” began in Sweden. The name combines the Swedish word “plocka,” which means to pick up, and the word Jogging, which means to run slowly. A Swedish man named Erik, started the movement in 2016. On the World Environment Day website, Erik says that he moved to Stockholm from a small community in northern Sweden each day he would ride his bike to work. Concerned about the amount of trash and litter he saw each day on his way to work, he took matters into his own hands.
Plogging, by that term, may have officially begun in Sweden. But many people who exercise outdoors have been doing this for years. Take Jeff Horowitz for example. He is a personal trainer in Washington, D.C. He often picks up trash while running outside. He even has turned it into a game; he will try to pick up the trash without stopping. “I didn’t know it was a thing really. This is just my personal ethics (道德标准), where I go for a run and if I happen to see a piece of garbage lying around and it’s within reach — it is a kind of a little test for me to see if I can grab it and throw it in a near trash can without stopping. And that way, I think, it gives me a little exercise and a little focus for my run. And it helps clean up the neighborhood,” he announced.
Today, logging is an official activity, one that is becoming increasingly popular. Cities around the world now hold logging events, “I would just hope people would think twice before dropping a garbage on the ground. We have containers... seems on every block. So, it’s easy to put your garbage in the trash cans. I just think people should think about it a little bit more. I do hope one day there will not be a need for plogging.” said an interviewee.
1. Which of the following can replace the underlined phrase “took matters into his own hands”?A.called on people to join him. | B.appealed to people to go green. |
C.began to pick up the trash. | D.had the collected trash recycled. |
A.automatic | B.irresistible | C.arbitrary | D.temporary |
A.Jogging is truly beneficial. | B.Trash cans should be within reach. |
C.Littering is not acceptable. | D.Communities should be kept clean. |
A.New Exercise Enjoys unbelievable popularity |
B.New Exercise Trend Also Helps Environment |
C.Plogging — a Fashionable Way to clear waste |
D.Plogging — an Exercise Originating in Sweden |
【推荐1】Trying to figure out if your friend is angry? You may look at his or her face. However, a new study finds when people are at the peak of joy or despair, their body language is a more reliable indicator of their emotions than their face.
“You can’t tell from the face alone if something good is going on or bad going on. When people see the faces alone, they’re kind of lost,” said Julliel Hievet, a psychologist at the Hebrew University. “The body maintains a clear signal of positive and negative.”
Hievet also noted that most researches on reading emotions focused on the face. A few studies had shown people rely on body language to read emotions when it conflicts with someone’s facial expression, but those studies used trained actors in poses.
His research team wanted to see how people use body language to read intense emotions. To do so, his team gathered dozens of images of outstanding tennis players at the moment they won or lost critical points in competitions like the U.S. Open. They showed three groups of 15 participants images of just the face, just the body, or both together, and asked the viewers whether the images showed positive or negative emotions.
People who saw the body—with or without the face—accurately distinguished whether the player was happy or distraught. Those who viewed just the faces failed to do so.
The team also transformed winning faces onto losing bodies and vice versa (反之亦然), and found the body cues determined whether viewers thought the players had won.
The findings don’t rule out the face from all emotional indicators, he said. “But when things become very intense, the good and the bad combine together, and it’s hard to tell if it’s positive or negative,” he added.
Interestingly, when people saw a body and face together, they said they made judgments based on facial expression. “People use information from the body and then they read it into the face,” Hievet said.
1. What is the finding of the new study?A.You cannot tell one’s emotions from the face. |
B.Body can better indicate intense emotions than face. |
C.People thought they make judgments from the body. |
D.Facial expressions tend to be different in joy and despair. |
A.To summarize the previous studies. |
B.To prove the value of facial expression. |
C.To show the limitation of existing studies. |
D.To introduce similar findings of other studies. |
A.Research background. | B.Research method. |
C.Research results. | D.Research application. |
A.excited | B.indifferent | C.shocked | D.upset |
A.People may think it hard to read intense emotions. |
B.People read more information from facial expressions |
C.People are unaware of using body language to read emotions. |
D.People can distinguish emotions from body and facial expression. |
【推荐2】The four-day workweek’s moment has arrived. With a new proposal of legislation (立法) in America to reduce the standard workweek from 40 to 32 hours, awareness of a shorter workweek — and enthusiasm for it — is gaining. And so is the doubt around it.
Initial doubt is reasonable since American work culture has been founded on constant working and expectations for overachievement. However, if there were ever a time for transforming thinking, this is it. The challenges over the past years have strengthened our muscles of adaptation. And the new practice of working from home proved that we can adjust quickly to changing conditions.
Four-day workweek pilots (试点) are emerging across the globe, with some companies now deciding to adopt the policy permanently. Microsoft Japan and Kickstarter represent just the growing number of organizations exploring the four-day workweek.
Supporters cite many benefits, including improved physical and mental health, increased gender equity and positive environmental impacts. It is easy to imagine what we might do with an additional day-off - spend time with family and friends, pursue a hobby, sleep. Pilot findings show increased productivity as well. Many in favor of the four-day workweek anticipate a more fulfilled community.
Some leaders will see the research and believe that a pilot is worthwhile. Others will resist the idea. They were taught that face time with employees is the only way to ensure accountability (责任心) and productivity. Less face time can feel like a loss of control.
While each organization will need to find what works for them, doing so can be a productive exercise. Leaders can let employees work out the details rather than “solving” the challenge from the top down. Perpetual Guardian asked employees to propose their own productivity measures, including how to increase productivity and arrange shifts. Awin, a tech firm, saw 80 employees volunteer for task forces to ensure that their switch to a four-day workweek went smoothly.
1. Why are Americans doubtful about the new workweek practice?A.There are limited legislation proposals for it. |
B.It challenges American work value. |
C.It goes beyond their standard workweek. |
D.There are few pilots for it across the globe. |
A.American work culture. |
B.Challenges of the new practice. |
C.Details of the new workweek pilots. |
D.The possibility of adopting the new practice. |
A.A more healthy and efficient society. |
B.Diversity of organization management. |
C.Increased sense of responsibility. |
D.More choices of community services. |
A.Handle the challenges from the top down. |
B.Allow the employees to try the new practice. |
C.Work out detailed solutions for the organization. |
D.Develop more ways to measure productivity. |
【推荐3】On September 17, Nie Haisheng, Liu Boming and Tang Hongbo returned to Earth after completing China’s longest crewed space mission(任务). They had left for space on June 17.
Nie and his team spent 92 days in space. The successful mission is another symbol of China’s growing confidence and capability in the space domain.
“The universe is so vast, beautiful and fascinating. I was lucky and delighted to have the chance to fly up into the sky again and take a spacewalk on our own space station,” Liu Boming said after landing.
During their stay with Tiangong, the taikonauts(中国宇航员)carried out two extravehicular activities, or spacewalks, using a large robotic arm and other equipment to install and adjust devices outside the station. They also performed a number of scientific experiments and technological tests.
One of the main tasks for the three crew(机组)members before coming back to Earth was preparing their bodies. “We need to increase physical activities, training our muscles, bones, and heart and lung functions to prepare for the impacts when entering the atmosphere(大气层)and hitting on the ground, and to readjusting to Earth’s environment,” Nie Haisheng said.
Besides exercising, the crewmates also experienced inventory check in the space station, making it convenient for the next batch of taikonauts to know where to find what they need.
The Shenzhou—12 mission, the nation`s seventh manned space trek(徒步), is part of the Tiangong program, “I believe with the continuous development of China`s comprehensive(综合的)strength and national science and technology level, there will be more taikonauts setting new records and pushing China`s space work to a new height,” said Nie Haisheng.
1. How long did the taikonauts live in space?A.About 134 days | B.Less than 90 days | C.24 days | D.3 months |
A.Dangerous | B.Outside a spacecraft | C.Popular | D.Designed |
A.China has built more than one space station. |
B.Nie Haisheng has been to space 7 times. |
C.There is still a long way for China to explore space. |
D.It is easy for China to complete Tiangong program. |
A.Space | B.Advertisement | C.Environment | D.Science fiction |