The problem of robocalls has gotten so bad that many people now refuse to pick up calls from numbers they don’t know. By next year, half of the calls we receive will be scams (欺诈). We are finally waking up to the severity (严重性) of the problem by supporting and developing a group of tools, apps and approaches intended to prevent scammers from getting through. Unfortunately, it’s too little, too late. By the time these “solutions” become widely available (有效的), scammers will have moved onto cleverer means. In the near future, it’s not just going to be the number you see on your screen that will be in doubt. Soon you will also question whether the voice you’re hearing is actually real.
That’s because there are a number of powerful voice manipulation (处理) and automation technologies that are about to become widely available for anyone to use. At this year’s I/O Conference, a company showed a new voice technology able to produce such a convincing human—sounding voice that it was able to speak to a receptionist (接待员) and book a reservation without detection.
These developments are likely to make our current problems with robocalls much worse. The reason that robocalls are a headache has less to do with amount than precision. A decade of data breaches (数据侵入) of personal information has led to a situation where scammers can easily learn your mother’s name, and far more. Armed with this knowledge, they’re able to carry out individually targeted campaigns (活动) to cheat people. This means. for example, that a scammer could call you from what looks to be a familiar number and talk to you using a voice that sounds exactly like your bank teller’s, ricking you into “confirming” your address, mother’s name, and card number. Scammers follow money, so companies will be the worst hit. A lot of business is still done over the phone, and much of it is based on trust and existing relationships. Voice manipulation technologies may weaken that gradually.
We need to deal with the insecure nature of our telecom networks. Phone carriers and consumers need to work together to find ways of determining and communicating what is real. That might mean either developing a uniform way to mark videos and images, showing when and who they were made by or abandoning phone calls altogether and moving towards data-based communications—using apps like Face Time or WhatsApp, which can be tied to your identity.
Credibility is hard to earn but easy to lose, and the problem is only going to harder from here on out.
1. How does the author feel about the solutions to problem of robocalls?A.Terrified | B.Confused. |
C.Embarrassed. | D.Disappointed. |
A.aim at victims precisely | B.damage databases easily |
C.start campaigns rapidly | D.spread information widely |
A.Honest y is the best policy. |
B.Technologies can be double-edited. |
C.There are more solutions than problems. |
D.Credibility holds the key to development. |
A.Where the Problem of Robocalls Is Rooted |
B.Who Is to Blame for the Problem of Roboealls |
C.Why Robocalls Are About to Get More Dangerous |
D.How Robocalls Are Affecting the World of Technology |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Every day, millions of shoppers hit the stores in full force, searching wildly for the perfect gift. Aside from purchasing holiday gifts, most people regularly buy presents for other occasions throughout the year, including weddings, birthdays, anniversaries, and graduations. This frequent experience of gift-giving can cause uncertain feelings in gift-givers. Many enjoy the opportunity to buy presents because gift-giving offers a powerful means to build stronger bonds, while many worry that their purchases will disappoint rather than delight the intended recipients (接受者).
Anthropologists describe gift-giving as a positive social process, serving various political, religious, and psychological functions. Economists, however, offer a less favorable view. According to Waldfogel, gift-giving represents an objective waste of resources. People buy gifts that recipients would not choose to buy on their own, or at least not spend as much money to purchase (a phenomenon referred to as ‘‘the deadweight loss of Christmas”).
What is surprising is that gift-givers have much experience acting as both gift-givers and gift-recipients, but nevertheless tend to overspend each time they set out to purchase a meaningful gift. In the present research, we propose a unique psychological explanation for this overspending problem — gift-givers link how much they spend with how much recipients will appreciate the gift. Though it seems natural to gift-givers, such an assumption may be unfounded. Indeed, we propose that gift-recipients will be less likely to base their feelings of appreciation on the value of a gift than givers assume.
Why do gift-givers assume that gift price is closely linked to gift-recipients’ feelings of appreciation? Perhaps givers believe that more expensive gifts communicate a stronger sense of thoughtfulness and consideration. According to Camerer and others, gift-giving represents a symbolic ritual (习俗), by which gift-givers attempt to signal their positive attitudes towards the recipient and their willingness to invest resources in a future relationship. In this sense, gift-givers may be motivated to spend more money on a gift in order to send a “stronger signal”. As for gift-recipients, they may not interpret smaller and larger gifts as representing smaller and larger signals of thoughtfulness and consideration.
The idea of gift-givers and gift-recipients being unable to account for the other party’s viewpoint seems confusing because people slip in and out of these roles every day. Yet, despite the experience as both givers and receivers, people often struggle to apply information gained from one role in another. In theoretical terms, people fail to use information about their own preferences and experiences to produce more efficient outcomes in their exchange relations. In practical terms, people spend hundreds of dollars each year on gifts, but somehow never learn to estimate their gift expense according to personal insight.
1. The author uses “the deadweight loss of Christmas” in Paragraph 2 to express ________.A.gift-givers don’t spend much money during holidays |
B.gift-givers don’t ask recipients what gifts they prefer |
C.gift-givers buy improper and expensive gifts |
D.gift-givers have difficulty in choosing gifts |
A.receive gifts in return |
B.enjoy the feeling of shopping |
C.help recipients to save money |
D.better relationships with recipients |
A.People’s high living standards require expensive gifts. |
B.Gift-givers buy gifts based on their experiences as recipients. |
C.Anthropologists think gift-giving meets different human needs. |
D.Recipients judge the depth of friendship according to the gift price. |
A.To criticize people’s gift-buying habits. |
B.To analyze people’s gift-giving behaviors. |
C.To offer advice on how to improve relationships. |
D.To remind people not to overlook others’ preferences. |
【推荐2】Does the happiness of parents play a role in shaping the overall happiness of their children? Scientific studies have shed light on the far-reaching connection between parental happiness and the positive development of kids. It seems that parental happiness has an important influence on the emotional, social, and cognitive (认知的) development of children.
Another great idea is sharing experiences and creating many memories together. The idea is twofold.
One of the main aspects of being happy parents is feeling comfortable, confident and able to be themselves, despite their new status and huge responsibility. Honestly, when parents prioritize their own happiness, it has positive effects on the overall happiness of the family.
When parents put their own happiness first, they become role models for their kids. They see the importance of self-care, pursuing passions and maintaining healthy relationships.
A.However, part of being responsible is being honest. |
B.They are passing on some major life skills and attitudes. |
C.They may lose a bit of their sense of self when caring for children. |
D.Parents can adopt practical ways to enhance their own happiness. |
E.A joyful and harmonious family environment benefits everyone involved. |
F.This can happen when parents prioritize their own happiness according to Inc. |
G.Firstly, the parents continue to be themselves and do something they love. |
【推荐3】Few people knew about online food delivery apps ten years ago, but today, many would find it hard to live without them. In China alone, over 400 million people use such apps. For better or for worse, online food delivery services have changed the way we eat, and they are also having a huge impact on our society.
These services have no doubt brought us many benefits. They provide jobs for millions of people and help restaurants find more customers. Since the apps are very convenient, they also benefit consumers: we can now have meals delivered at any time of day, despite bad weather or busy schedules. This is especially important for people who work long hours, since they might not have time to cook. Not only do these apps save time, they also provide us with a wide variety of restaurants to choose from. They have proved to be useful for retired people as well: seniors who live far away from restaurants and supermarkets can now get hold of meals and groceries more easily.
However, we must not forget the drawbacks of online food delivery services. For one thing, they make it even easier to order unhealthy food, high in sugar, fat and salt. Food safety is another problem: it can be hard to establish where the food actually comes from, and whether the owner is legally permitted to run a restaurant. As couriers need to deliver the orders as quickly as possible, some pay little regard to traffic rules. In recent years, there have been a number of terrible traffic accidents because of this. Moreover, the industry is creating unbelievable amounts of packaging waste: over a million tons of online food delivery boxes are thrown away every year. Experts assume that this number will continue to grow in the future, and this will have a negative impact on the environment.
1. What can we learn from paragraph 1?A.Many people knew about online food delivery apps ten years ago. |
B.The online food delivery apps are wildly welcomed now. |
C.Chinese people don't speak highly of the online food delivery apps. |
D.The online food delivery apps are having a positive impact on us. |
A.Three. | B.Four. | C.Five. | D.Six. |
A.Bosses. | B.Consumers. | C.Policemen. | D.Deliverymen. |
A.Objective. | B.Opposed. | C.Supportive. | D.Indifferent. |
【推荐1】Swimmers can drown in busy swimming pools when lifeguards fail to notice that they are in trouble. Now a company has developed an artificial intelligence system called Poseidon that sounds the alarm when it sees someone in danger of drowning.
When a swimmer sinks towards the bottom of the pool, the new system sends an alarm signal to a poolside monitoring station and a lifeguard’s pager. In trials at a pool in Ancenis, near Nantes, it saved a life within just a few months, says Alistair McQuade, a spokesman for its maker, Poseidon Technologies.
Poseidon keeps watch through a network of underwater and overhead video cameras. AI software analyses the images to work out swimmers’ trajectories(轨迹). To do this reliably, it has to tell the difference between a swimmer and the shadow of someone being cast onto the bottom or side of the pool.
It does the same with an image from another camera viewing the shape from a different angle. If the two projections are in the same position, the shape is identified as a shadow and is ignored. But if they are different, the shape is a swimmer and so the system follows its trajectory.
To pick out potential drowning victims, anyone in the water who starts to descend(下降)slowly is added to the software’s “pre-alert” list, says McQuade. Swimmers who then stay immobile on the pool bottom for five seconds or more are considered in danger of drowning. Poseidon double-checks that the image really is of a swimmer, not a shadow, by seeing whether it obscures(使模糊) the pool’s floor texture when viewed from overhead. If so, it alerts the lifeguard, showing the swimmer’s location on a poolside screen.
The first full-scale Poseidon system was officially opened at a pool in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. One man who is impressed with the idea is Travor Baylis, inventor of the clockwork radio. Baylis runs a company that installs swimming pools—and he was once an underwater escapologist(脱身杂技演员) with a circus. “I say full marks to them if this works and can save lives,” he says.
1. The underlined word “monitoring” in paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to “________”.A.advertising | B.training | C.maintaining | D.watching |
A.It must be able to descend in the water. |
B.It must be able to videotape every movement. |
C.It can distinguish between a swimmer and a shadow. |
D.It can save a life within a few months. |
A.It orders an underwater robot to rescue the drowning swimmer. |
B.It alerts the lifeguard. |
C.It displays the swimmer’s shadow on the screen. |
D.It watches the pool through dozens of overhead cameras. |
A.He owns a swimming pool. | B.He invented the clockwork radio. |
C.He was once an entertainer. | D.He runs a company. |
【推荐2】For years, Mark Hager worked as an at-sea fishery observer, going out on New England fishing boats for days or weeks and keeping detailed records of every fish caught or thrown back. The work could be perilous: on one trip, a boat turned sideways in 20-foot seas, and Hager and the crew put on survival suits in case they had to jump overboard. But the counting was essential to protecting the ecosystem.
In the early 2000s, the fishing industry began fixing video cameras on boats, so that humans could track the data from ashore. In 2019, Hager and the Gulf of Maine Research Institute launched a company, New England Marine Monitoring, based in Portland, Maine, to provide technology support for ships using electronic monitoring. His team has to watch hours of video footage (镜头), look for each moment when a fish is discarded (丢弃), then make a note of the species and the time it was discarded. In ten hours of video, there might be 45 minutes between each case of a discarded fish.
When Hager consulted with other scientists, they came up with a new idea. Now, Hager and his team are using their notes as training data for an artificial intelligence (AI)algorithm (算法)-programming the AI to scan (扫描) the video footage and indicate points of interest along the timeline for a human to look through. “Instead of ten hours of video, we’ll be able to look at about 100 pictures, which we can do in about 20 minutes,” Hager says.
The result could save time and money, but Hager has a bigger goal. He wants to prove that AI algorithms can be used to count every fish that’s caught and discarded. To be effective, the algorithm will need to be able to identify the total volume of a fish haul (一网的捕鱼量), count containers of fish,and potentially even count and measure individual fish. Using video monitoring to count a small amount of the total catch is one thing. Using it to count the entire haul on a ship is a huge challenge — one that has never been achieved before.
1. What does the underlined word “perilous” in paragraph 1 probably mean?A.Well-paid. | B.Time-consuming. |
C.Interesting. | D.Dangerous. |
A.The cost is usually quite high. | B.The process is slow and boring. |
C.The result is not always correct. | D.The quality of images is poor. |
A.AI algorithms can be of great help. |
B.Pictures prove to work better than videos. |
C.Humans are more dependable than cameras. |
D.Interest plays a key role in the fishing industry. |
A.To encourage readers to protect the ecosystem. |
B.To introduce New England Marine Monitoring. |
C.To report the influence of technology on fishing. |
D.To talk about the life of an at-sea fishery observer. |
【推荐3】Japan has started releasing wastewater into the ocean. But this isn’t the kind of wastewater that flows from city streets into stormwater drains. It’s treated nuclear wastewater used to cool damaged reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, stricken by an earthquake over a decade ago.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has approved the plan by Japan to release more than a million tons of treated nuclear waste water from the destroyed Fukushima power plant into the ocean, believing Japan’s claims that the wastewater would be safe. However, Neighboring countries and other experts say it remains environmentally harmful that will last generations and may affect ecosystems all the way to North America.
Local fishermen, who heavily depend on the ocean’s resources, fear a huge decrease in their marketability. “Japan’s self-interest should not harm the well-being of humanity in the long run.” They said.
The release of the wastewater into the sea is a threat to the ocean environment and will damage Japan’s international image. The amount of money Japan would need to spend in restoring (恢复) its international image will far exceed that required to solve the problem in an eco-friendly way.
1. What kind of water has Japan released into the ocean?A.Treated nuclear wastewater. | B.Water used to cool Fukushima. |
C.Water flowing into stormwater drains. | D.Water polluted by an early earthquake. |
A.Japanese fishermen. | B.The IAEA. |
C.North America. | D.Neighboring countries |
A.be similar to | B.be more than | C.be smaller than | D.be better than |
A.Environmental Problem in Japan | B.Fukushima’s Treated Radioactive Water |
C.Concerns on Japan’s Wastewater Release | D.Experts’ Response to Japan’s Wastewater Release |