The trend towards larger cars is obvious in recent years. Electric SUVs (越野车) have also been growing in popularity, representing roughly 35 percent of electric car sales in 2022, according to the latest figures released by the International Energy Agency. But although electrification of the global vehicle brings climate benefits, there is also cause for concern.
Electric SUVs are still greener than the petrol (汽油) ones, but their size and weight removes some of the climate gains. Their larger batteries require more raw minerals (矿物), like cobalt and lithium, putting extra pressure on global supplies. “New policies to encourage people to choose smaller electric vehicles (EV) may be needed, such as increasing taxes for Electric SUVs. We could reduce hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) overtime.” says Christian Brand at the University of Oxford.
Air pollution is another worry. In poorer countries like India, electric vehicles will lead to significant improvements in urban air quality. But in richer countries, where petrol cars tend to be cleaner, the situation isn’t so clear. “The benefit of moving to an electric vehicle, from a certain point of view, is actually pretty small,” says Frank Kelly at Imperial College London. And since electric vehicles still produce pollution from their tires, brakes and road wear, air pollution won’t fully go away. “We’re still going to have a pretty big problem in our cities,” says Kelly.
As such, governments must do more to reduce car dependency, particularly in urban areas. Clean public transport is the solution to our air pollution problem in urban areas. We should be reducing the number of all private vehicles as much as possible, not celebrating the increased figures.
1. What can we learn about the Electric SUVs?A.They greatly improve air quality. |
B.They are not as green as expected. |
C.They will not become globally popular. |
D.They sold better than petrol ones in 2022. |
A.The trend towards EVs is not clear. |
B.Petrol cars produce less air pollution. |
C.EVs may not have the desired effects. |
D.Petrol cars are cheaper in rich countries. |
A.Start an argument and call on action. |
B.Express concerns and suggest solutions. |
C.Introduce products and attract attention. |
D.Compare products and offer suggestions. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】As energy costs rise across Europe, some people are taking an opportunity to head off to warmer climates in order to cut down on bills. Greece is one of a number of countries trying to draw visitors in for the winter-with a $20 million advertising campaign.
Famous for its sun, golden beaches and medieval city, the island of Rhodes in the south Aegean Sea is a magnet(磁铁)for northern Europeans. More than three million flock to the island every summer, but some also come in the winter.
In order to capitalize on the energy crisis, the Greek government launched a series of winter tourism campaigns aimed at attracting European visitors seeking an alternative to the bitter cold and high energy bills. Places like Santorini, Crete and Rhodes were high on the list, as temperatures there remain in the high teens.
However, the campaign to advertise Greece abroad hasn’t attracted as many visitors as expected. “The campaign from the ministry is in the right direction-I think they’re doing things right,”says Dionissis Tsiligiris, tourism marketing director for the Rodos Palace hotel and convention center in Rhodes. “But when it comes to winter tourism, Spain will always be the first choice,”Tsiligiris continues. Hotels and tour operators there just have more exposure. So competing for winter tourism is very difficult, as it’s a smaller market.
While it’s true that fewer people travel abroad than in the summer,entering the winter market could seem quite easy when you have the two key ingredients-almost guaranteed sun and well-established tourist facilities. But what’s making it difficult, according to Ashley Quint, senior holiday designer at a UK travel agency, is the message the government is sending. “Tourist boards and local governments can overcomplicate things sometimes and the message doesn’t necessarily come across. In this case, there needs to be a simple and clear message. In addition, broadening it out a little bit may be better, because we see very little here. ”
It seems that making Greece a winter destination for travelers to enjoy and save might need more than just the attraction of warmer weather.
1. Why do some Europeans go to warmer countries for winter?A.To avoid energy expense. |
B.To decrease the heating fee. |
C.To enjoy sunshine and beaches. |
D.To explore winter travel options. |
A.Ministry’s poor marketing. |
B.Operator’s limited exposure. |
C.Tourists’ common preference. |
D.Government’s inappropriate policies. |
A.Sending the message globally. |
B.Getting ideas easily understood. |
C.Beating the potential competitors. |
D.Advertising key tourist resources. |
A.Greece Ready to Take Winter Tourist Market |
B.Greece Confident to Win the Tourism Campaign |
C.Greece Eager to Draw Winter Tourists to the Sun |
D.Greece Determined to Be a Winter Tourist Destination |
【推荐2】How Taking Short Vacations Can Improve Your Well-Being at Work
Without doubt, the nonstop demands of work and life can be bad for your well-being, exhausting your physical resources and cognitive capacities-and possibly resulting in adverse health and performance results.
We know that being on vacation feels good and that it’s good for us.
No wonder, then, that most people don’t use all their vacation time. And over half (52 percent) of U.S. employees work while on vacation.
A.If working hard is the way to earn more bread, |
B.Even if many workers don’t use all their PTO, |
C.Taking a real break is important for so many reasons. |
D.But that doesn’t mean we always use our vacation time. |
E.So why do we neglect to take all the time we’ve earned? |
F.Do you know why people like to take vacations whenever possible? |
G.It also turns out that taking extended time away from the office causes a lot of stress. |
【推荐3】Not setting homework can be impossible in certain situations. There are many arguments in favour of homework, and most teachers would agree with many, if not all, of the following: homework is a perfect opportunity to go over calmly what was done with the teacher, and rethink and develop that initial input; homework offers a moment for students to work as individuals and develop learner self-governance outside the classroom; students and parents expect homework to be set and to be corrected. Nevertheless, the drawbacks that homework may have are often overlooked.
There are two key issues which need to be raised when dealing with the concept of homework. Firstly, there is the question of home. Often homework is not done at home at all, but at a friend’s house, on the street, on the bus, on the way to class or sitting on the step outside school before it opens. What’s more, all too often, for it to be done effectively at home. Homework requires the participation and involvement of other adults. Parents play a crucial role in a child’s education, but they can’t always be available, for a number of very valid reasons, and a tutor’s ability to aid, guide, encourage and simply organize a child’s study may be limited in many ways. The implication is upsetting: if homework is crucial to success in class, some children have an automatic disability.
Considering the second part of the compound noun opens up further questions. If the idea of home can be problematic, so too can the concept of work. Again, this will depend enormously on the context but, very often there is a lot of work put in. Demands on their time and attention span and all sorts of other impositions mean homework is usually something to get out of the way, to be ticked off as done, with the exercises completed as fast as possible. It is not always seen as useful time spent developing and strengthening what is done in class but, rather, as something quickly finished to keep the teacher at bay. It might be correct or not, copied from a friend or cut and pasted from the Internet, but the important thing is that a teacher sees the exercise completed and, as a result, the task achieved. How much effort went into that result is not always appreciated or easy to evaluate and, even when work clearly falls below standard, and the mere fact of its having been done is often good enough. The teacher and students are happy because everyone has officially fulfilled their commitment.
The ideal that students go home, think back to what they did with their teacher, use the great resources their books and the Internet provide to revise, reflect and put everything they have seen in class in place, into action, into practice, does not often happen with some students.
1. Which of the following is not among the advantages of homework according to Paragraph 1?A.Solidifying the knowledge and skills learnt in class. |
B.Developing the ability of the independent learning. |
C.Building a closer teacher-student relationship. |
D.Meeting the requirements of students and parents. |
A.imposes enormous meaningless evaluating work on teachers |
B.blocks teachers from knowing more about their students |
C.displays the great efforts students make to satisfy their teachers |
D.shows achievements teachers expect to accomplish in their work |
A.Homework is hardly functioning as is naturally expected. |
B.Parents need to stand away from their children’s homework. |
C.Students prefer doing homework elsewhere instead of at home. |
D.The quality of homework is usually teachers’ first concern. |
A.Are you ready for homework? | B.Is there a way out for homework? |
C.Home and work: it’s hard to combine. | D.Homework or no homework: it is your choice. |
【推荐1】Researches show that public schools across the country are reducing music classes to save money. Worse, some schools have never had music classes. But without them, students’ academic (学业的) growth and emotional health could suffer a variety of problems. Actually, music classes are necessary for all students in schools.
Recent researches by Brown University have shown that students who received music education classes were better in math and reading skills than those without music classes. Another research by The College Board found that students taking music and art classes got higher marks in exams. Students’ academic success seems to depend on their taking part in music education.
Music programs in public schools also help to add to a student’s sense of pride and self-confidence. Teens today have too many learning tasks. Besides, they have family problems, self-confidence problems, relationship troubles, and choices about drugs and alcohol. All of these can stop academic success, but music education can help. A study by The Texas Commission on Drug and Alcohol Abuse found that students who took part in school music programs were less likely to turn to drugs. Music programs encourage students to work together to produce an excellent performance.
Music crosses language, class, cultural and political boundaries (界限). Music allows students from different countries to communicate. For example, at a school talent show, a new Japanese student played a piano duet (二重奏) with an American classmate. Although they could not communicate verbally (口头上) because of their native languages, they were able to read the same music in order to play the duet. Two students from different cultures worked as a team with self-confidence and the same goal through music.
Music is definitely of great value in education. We need to be sure to have necessary music classes for all students. The world is losing its music, and putting music into schools is the first step to get it back.
1. What can we know about education with music classes?A.It has a bad influence on the quality of education. |
B.It easily causes a lot of emotional problems. |
C.It helps students improve their school work. |
D.It brings school lots of advantages. |
A.Students having music classes are better in all lessons. |
B.Students took music lessons to achieve great success. |
C.Not all students took part in music lessons. |
D.Music plays an important role in students’ success. |
A.different cultures have different styles of music |
B.music makes cross-country communication possible |
C.students in Japan and America are good at playing the piano duet |
D.Japan has a good international relationship with America |
A.Music education in schools | B.How to get music back |
C.Music — a bridge to understanding | D.The importance of listening to music |
【推荐2】When I stepped into the Samcheong Park Library in Seoul, I saw the future. The simple building had a nice selection of books and a cafe where readers could enjoy coffee while gazing at the leaves outside. It was specifically designed without any latest technology.
“What’s so innovative (创新的) about that?” a librarian in Toronto asked when I showed her pictures. Innovation to her meant digital technology, like 3D printers. “Why couldn’t they both be innovative?” I asked.
We are constantly told that innovation is the most important force in our economy, without which we would be left behind. But that fear of missing out has led us to fall into the false trappings of innovation over truly innovative ideas that may be simpler and more effective. This mindset implies that if you just buy the new thing, you have innovated! Each year, businesses and individuals run around like broken toy robots, trying to figure out their strategy for the latest buzzword equipment.
At best, this is a waste of resource. Devices are bought, used and abandoned, as the technology’s capabilities fall short of its promise. But at its worst, this approach can truly cause damage. Schools cut field trips to purchase tablets with few proven benefits. Companies that applied AI into hiring have actually strengthened gender and racial prejudices.
True innovation isn’t just some magic devices. It is a continuing process of reflection and reassessment, which often means adopting “old” ideas and tools in a new context, or even returning to methods that worked in the past. Adjusted properly, these rearview (后视的) innovations have proved as transformative as novel technologies.
Look no farther than the streets of New York, which have been redesigned recently to accommodate cyclists with car-free zones. The idea isn’t new. It was created half a century ago, with the aim of bringing cities back to their residents. And while e-reader sales have been exploding, Penguin just announced it would publish tiny printed books, an ideal solution for a market demanding both convenience and physicality.
1. Why is a librarian mentioned?A.To set an example. | B.To cite an authority. |
C.To make a prediction. | D.To present an argument. |
A.Fashionable. | B.Affordable. | C.Practical. | D.Imaginative. |
A.Innovation often leads to wasted resources and even damage. |
B.Innovation is supported by new technology and magic devices. |
C.Innovation reflects the progress of technology and economy. |
D.Innovation is more about the way of thinking than equipment we use. |
A.The key to success of business—innovation |
B.Future Lies in returning to the past |
C.Some best ideas are in the rearview mirror |
D.Innovation: an important force in economy |
【推荐3】Can you really lose your job for posting an opinion on Twitter, or even for clicking "like" on someone else's message?Pascal, an employment lawyer in the Netherlands, assumes that about one in ten laying-off is connected to behavior on social media.
Controversial opinions were once expressed in bars after work, and went no further. Today Twitter and other social media broadcast employees' thoughts, making it easy for anyone offended to put together a revenge(报复)against the poster and their employer.
Though it's not necessarily in companies' interests to allow the free expression of opinion, it's clearly in society's interest. Free speech is the foundation of democracy(民主). In laying down clear rules, we should remember that offending and harassing(骚扰)are different. It's not reasonable for companies to try to prevent their employees from expressing displeasure at something, no matter how strongly others disagree-at least if that's not relevant to the job they do. But an employee who repeatedly makes unfavorable comments at work has crossed the line into harassment, and this should be grounds for dismissal.
There's also a difference between what people do at work and what they do outside. Speech is like a dress code. Companies can demand that their employees look the part at work. After people go home, though, they should express their opinions freely, just as they're free to change into jeans and T-shirt. A woman fired in 2004 by a housing firm for displaying a sticker backing John Kerry on her car was poorly treated. The situation is more complicated when it comes to public figures such as sports stars, who in effect sell their image as well as their labor.
Firms will try to preserve their freedom, but laws against unfair dismissal that protect speech will help them stand up to complaints from angry people. Geographical and technological spaces are increasingly separated, which makes it important that people tolerate different views at work, especially outside it.
1. What can we infer from Pascal's assumption?A.Different opinions are tolerated on social media posts |
B.Posting an opinion on social media is strictly forbidden. |
C.Many employees are fired because of their social media posts. |
D.Contradictory opinions can easily invite revenge from others. |
A.She did something not proper at work. |
B.She made unfavorable comments at work. |
C.She shouldn't have used a sticker on her car. |
D.She was treated unfairly by her company. |
A.Going beyond speech restriction. |
B.The freedom of speech after work. |
C.Making unfavorable remarks repeatedly at work. |
D.Disagreeing with people in the workplace. |
A.Speech after Work Shouldn't Cause Unemployment |
B.Dress Code Is Different from Expressing Opinions |
C.We Should Avoid Offending People in Any Situation |
D.Our Speech Should Be Properly Relevant to Our Work |
【推荐1】Human activity emits far less methane(甲烷) than carbon dioxide, but methane has a bigger impact on the earth. Over the course of 20 years, a ton of the gas will warm the atmosphere about 86 times more than a ton of CO₂. As a result, methane has been responsible for 23% of the rise in temperatures since pre-industrial times. Carbon dioxide gets most of the attention, but unless methane emissions are limited, there is little hope of stabilizing the climate.
Unfortunately, methane emissions have been anything but stable. After briefly pausing in the early 2000s, atmospheric concentrations of the gas started rising again in 2007. A global inventory (清单) concluded last year, found that humans were largely to blame. Chief among the reasons for the rise are the gassy output of livestock farming, rice cultivation and the fossil-fuel industry. Agriculture and energy each make up roughly one-third of annual methane emissions.
By how much do methane emissions need to fall? Carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere for centuries, making it hard to reduce its atmospheric concentrations. By contrast, methane has a half-life of roughly ten years, which means that it degrades quickly. If new emissions can be cut to below the rate at which old emissions reduce, the concentration of methane lingering in the atmosphere will soon fall, slowing global warming. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that, to keep temperatures between 1.5°C and 2°C above pre-industrial levels, human methane emissions must drop to 35% below where they stood in 2010 by mid-century.
Politicians and the public tend to worry about carbon-dioxide emissions but neglect the effects of cutting methane. But dealing with the gas would have a large effect rapidly and at relatively low cost. Governments are supposed to firm up their commitments to cut emissions under the Paris agreement. It should go further and include a specific target for methane.
1. What does the text mainly argue for?A.Methane emissions should be taken seriously. |
B.Atmospheric concentrations of methane will soon fall. |
C.Methane is mainly responsible for the rise in temperature. |
D.Human activities were largely to blamed for the global warming. |
A.We’ve produced 86 times more carbon dioxide than methane. |
B.Carbon dioxide takes up 23% of the responsibility for global warming. |
C.Methane emissions have been rising dramatically since the early 2000s. |
D.Carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere for a long time while methane degrades quickly. |
A.The rising temperature. |
B.Agriculture and energy. |
C.Rapidly developing industry. |
D.Atmospheric concentrations of methane dropping slowly. |
A.Dealing with methane emissions will cost a lot. |
B.Carbon dioxide emissions is no longer a serious problem. |
C.Cutting methane emission is against the Paris agreement. |
D.Governments should do more to reduce methane emissions. |
【推荐2】A large body of evidence shows that exercise strengthens our brains. In studies, active people generally have more gray matter. Gray matter is made up of the brain’s essential, working neurons(神经元). Fit people also tend to have healthier white matter, which supports and connects neurons. Partly as a consequence of these, exercise is strongly linked with lower risks of dementia(痴呆) and other memory problems with age.
But exercise may increase exposure to air pollution and previous studies have shown the opposite effects of air pollution on the brain. So, what happens then?
Some researchers looked at thousands of middle-aged adults from the UK Bio-bank. The researchers characterized their physical activity patterns depending on the amount of physical activity collected from the devices researchers asked them to wear. They then evaluated air pollution levels where the people lived, asked the participants to complete brain scans, and finally, compared them. Researchers found that exercise was linked to excellent brain health for people in areas with little air pollution. But the beneficial associations almost disappeared for exercisers living in areas with even moderate(中度的) air pollution. They had less gray matter and more unhealthy white matter than people living and exercising away from pollution, even if their workouts were similar.
Extending these findings in a follow-up study, the same scientists found that the more people exercised, the less likely they were to develop dementia over time—provided their local air was clear. When it was moderately polluted, though, they had an increased long-term risk of dementia, whether they exercised or not.
These studies increase the urgency for developing more-effective regulations related to air quality. Public policy could be used to address people’s exposure to air pollution during exercise. For example, since a great amount of air pollution comes from traffic, promoting running or bicycling along paths far from heavy traffic may be more beneficial.
1. What does the author intend to tell us in the first paragraph?A.The reasons behind dementia. |
B.The benefits of workouts on brains. |
C.The working process of our brains. |
D.The exercise suitable for people with dementia. |
A.To record their daily routine. |
B.To monitor the local air quality. |
C.To help know their exercise patterns. |
D.To warn them of healthy problems. |
A.Memory problems should be cured. |
B.The structure of the brain is complicated. |
C.People face many risk factors for dementia. |
D.More rules against air pollution should be made quickly. |
A.Air quality has to be improved urgently. |
B.Most people do exercise in a wrong way. |
C.Air pollution may reduce benefits of exercise. |
D.People with diseases should do more exercise. |
【推荐3】By 2050, 68% of the global population will live in cities. That’s 2.5 billion more people than today. In Europe, three out of four of us already live in urban areas, and the consequences of that are becoming clear. Researchers estimate that nine million people die every year as a direct result of air pollution. As our cities grow and more people move into already crowded spaces, what do we need to do to transform our urban areas into healthy places to live? An increasing body of research tells us that we should be letting nature back in.
Green spaces in cities mitigate the effects of pollution and can reduce a phenomenon known as the urban heat island effect, which refers to heat trapped in built-up areas. The effect appears in towns and cities where the heat generated by people, transport and industry is trapped in the narrow roads and concrete structures, unable to escape to the atmosphere. This can bring the temperature in urban areas up 3 — 4°C higher than the surrounding countryside, and with that comes a severe cycle. Increased temperatures in summer lead to an increased demand for cooling. This expands our energy consumption, which in turn build up fossil fuel consumption, increasing pollutants in the air and harmful smog on our streets.
Planning cities to include green spaces wherever possible is the first step in making our urban areas healthier. For example, adding a layer of vegetation to rooftops and creating green roofs has proven to reduce the urban heat island effect. Trees in our streets also play their part, and a variety of tree species can have a profound effect. Simply having access to green spaces in cities can do wonders for our stress levels and concentration at work. “People need to interact with nature whenever the opportunity arises. Something as simple as a five-to-ten-minute break during the workday can improve well-being and boost productivity,” Cecil, an expert studying nature in cities says.
1. How does the author bring in the topic in Paragraph 1?A.By presenting facts. | B.By listing examples. |
C.By comparing numbers. | D.By questioning an estimate. |
A.Overcome. | B.Change. | C.Ease. | D.Shift. |
A.Lower temperature. | B.Energy regeneration. |
C.Fuel shortage. | D.Air pollution. |
A.How to Let Nature Back In |
B.Why We Need Green Spaces in Cities |
C.Heat Effect: An Unavoidable Urban Trouble |
D.Green Roofs: Tiny Urban Forests |