Top European hotel chains are hiring workers without experience or even a resume as executives admit years of underpaying staff have come back to bite, leaving them unable to meet post-pandemic travel demand.
Thousands of workers left the hospitality industry (酒店业) when international travel shut down during the COVID- 19 pandemic. Many chose not to return, finding better paid employment elsewhere, leaving hoteliers facing a desperate shortage.
Europe’s largest hotelier Accor ACCP. PA is running trial initiatives to recruit people who haven’t previously worked in the industry, Chief Executive Sebastien Bazin said at the Qatar Economic Forum last month.” We tried in Lyon and Bordeaux 10 days ago and this weekend we’re having people interviewed with no resume, no prior job experience and they are hired within 24 hours. The new recruits are given six hours of training and learn on the job,” he said.
In the short term, Accor is filling roles in France with young people and migrants while also limiting services. “It’s students, people coming from North Africa,” Bazin said. “And basically closing restaurants for lunch or opening them only five days a week. There’s no other solution.”
Staff shortages are particularly pressing in Spain and Portugal. Spain’s hospitality industry is 200,000 workers short and Portuguese hotels need at least 15,000 more people to meet growing demand, according to national hospitality associations.
Bazin said that while hotels are only 60 percent or 70 percent occupied they can cope with staff shortages, but the time will come when they’re fully booked.
“In the past, the industry has neither paid enough or focused on developing staff,” Bazin said, “Half of it is that we’ve been blind, we’ve been not paying attention to a lot of people and probably underpaying some people for too long as well,” he said. “So it’s a wake-up call.”
1. What problem is the European hospitality industry facing?A.Shortage of resources. | B.International travel bans. |
C.Staffing challenges. | D.Dissatisfactory service. |
A.The travel demand is increasing. | B.The job is highly demanding. |
C.The hospitality industry isn’t developed. | D.The staff hasn’t been fairly paid. |
A.Explaining previous work experience. | B.Sending the resume in advance. |
C.Receiving a six-hour training for the job. | D.Going through a competitive interview. |
A.Hoteliers have been turning a blind eye to the problem. |
B.The problem is a reminder that hotel staff deserves attention. |
C.The problem is too pressing for hoteliers to address right now. |
D.The problem can be solved with the help of students and migrants. |
相似题推荐
The scientists did a series of eight experiments. They published their findings online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS,《美国国家科学院院刊》).
They carried out the first two experiments from the sidewalk near Berkeley. They noted that drivers of newer and more expensive cars were more likely to cut off other cars and pedestrians at crosswalks. Nearly 45 percent of people driving expensive cars ignored a pedestrian compared with only 30 percent of people driving more modest (不豪华的)cars.
In another experiment,a group of college students was asked if they would do unethical things in various everyday situations. Examples included taking printer paper from work and not telling a salesperson when he or she gave back more change. Students from higher-class families were more likely to act dishonestly.
According to the scientists,rich people often think money can get them out of trouble. This makes them less afraid to take risks. It also means they care less about other people’s feelings.
Finally,it simply makes them greedier. “Higher wealth status seems to make you want even more,and that increased want leads you to bend the rules or break the rules to serve your self-interest,’’said Paul Piif, lead scientist of the study.
Piff pointed out that the findings don’t mean that all rich people are untrustworthy(不能信赖的)or all poor people honest. He said the experiments were to show how people living in different social situations express their instincts and values in different ways.
1. By saying “money is the root of all evil”,the author wants to___________.
A.draw readers’ attention to the research |
B.link wealth with bad behavior |
C.show how the saying proves the findings |
D.defend rich people who do unethical things |
A.Most wealthy people are not trustworthy. |
B.The findings were not persuasive enough and the scientists will do further experiments. |
C.Drivers of more expensive cars are more likely to break traffic rules. |
D.Students from poorer families are not as honest as students from richer families. |
A.To show how social status affects people's ethics. |
B.To show people’s instincts and values in different ways. |
C.To test whether the saying “money is the root of all evil” is true. |
D.To show the difference between higher-class people and lower-class people. |
A.Money is the root of all evil. |
B.The rich are more likely to act badly. |
C.The saying is reasonable. |
D.All rich people are untrustworthy. |
【推荐2】Early in the pandemic, refrigerators began popping up in unlikely places outdoors. Volunteers plugged them in on street corners in cities. Anyone could take food for free.
The fridges were necessary to address food insecurity, activists said. Many people lost their jobs during the pandemic and could not afford to buy food. The problem continues due to rising food prices.
Tajahnaé Stocker started the Community Fridge Project, in Wichita, Kansas. She raised $1.500 to buy, decorate, and stock a fridge with food. It was a step toward solving the hunger crisis. “Charity alone cannot solve every problem,” she says. The fridge is “just trying to fill in the gap of a grocery store.”
Volunteers have stocked hundreds of fridges around the U.S. They’re on street corners,outside cafés, and at churches and housing developments. Kristin Guerin runs a community fridge network in Miami, Florida, called Buddy System MIA. The group fills its fridges up to five times a day. Usually, the fridges are empty within an hour. “The need is still really high,” Guerin says.
Often, community fridges contain homemade meals or donations from restaurants and supermarkets. The group 901 Community Fridges operates in Memphis, Tennessee. It stocks fridges with leftover meals from other food-assistance groups, so meals don’t go to waste.
The movement has begun to expand beyond food. Donations of diapers and other baby items are accepted by 901 Community Fridges. The group plans to provide additional services, like laundry and help for recent immigrants. “Anything that might be needed in the community,” organizer L.J Abraham says. In Miami, the fridges are papered with flyers advertising summer camp and other programs. “The fridges have become small community centers”, Guerin says. “They have become a staple, and they will be for a while.”
1. Why were fridges outdoors needed during the pandemic?A.To solve the hunger problem. | B.To tackle the pandemic. |
C.To decorate the street corners. | D.To support a community project. |
A.Take advantage of a grocery store. | B.Do what a grocery store doesn’t do. |
C.Take the place of a grocery store. | D.Satisfy the needs of a grocery store. |
A.Food resources. | B.More volunteers. | C.New fridges. | D.Fridge networks. |
A.The group shifts its original plan. |
B.The organizer targets at other programs. |
C.People can turn to the service for everything. |
D.The service expands due to different needs. |
【推荐3】Twenty years ago, the idea of sharing our lives so openly with the world was unheard of. However, for young people today it is considered completely normal to share pictures of their lives and interact online every day. Fans of social media point out that the world has never been so connected as it has allowed people to make friends, learn about the world and celebrate life.
However, many people have concerns about the effects of this new way of living, particularly about the amount and type of information that is shared so openly. Now researchers have found that too much time on social media may indeed have some negative effects. They measured people’s attitudes and feelings before and after browsing(浏览)social media sites. They found that the more time people spent on social media, the unhappier they became.
There are a number of reasons for this. When browsing social media, people often see photographs and stories showing beautiful holidays, fun parties and fashionable clothes. People rarely post negative stories or bad pictures, so it can be misleading. For those looking at these pictures and comparing them with their own lives, they can end up feeling sad and depressed. They might think their lives are worse in comparison. Even for those people who post positive stories and pictures, they also can feel stressed and worried. The number of “likes” and comments on their posts can make them anxious about their popularity. Of course, there is also the problem of “cyber bullying” where people become victims of being bullied online when others make negative or cruel comments about them.
The reality is that social media is a part of modern life and it is not going to go away. This research shows us that it is important to find a balance between our online and offline lives. We don’t have to disconnect from the Internet to live a happy life, but we should realise that the pictures we see and stories we read are only a part of a bigger picture. If we can do that, we can protect ourselves and enjoy our lives.
1. What’s the genre of this passage?A.Narration(记叙文). | B.Practical writing. |
C.Argumentation(议论文). | D.Exposition(说明文). |
A.researchers found a bad phenomenon |
B.they know how to face the phenomenon |
C.they have found the secrets |
D.they have analysed correctly |
A.2 | B.3 |
C.4 | D.5 |
A.Stop surfing the Internet. |
B.Go on surfing the Internet as usual. |
C.Share more and more pictures. |
D.Find our balance between online and ofline lives. |
【推荐1】Long before the Europeans arrived on Easter Island in 1722, the native Polynesian culture known as Rapa Nui showed signs of demographic decline. However, the catalyst has long been debated in the scientific community. Was it environmental degradation or could a political revolution or an epidemic of disease be to blame?
A new study by a group of international researchers, including UC Santa Barbara s Oliver Chadwick, offers a different explanation and helps to clarify the chronological framework. The investigators expected to find that changes coincided with the arrival of the Europeans, but their work shows instead that the extinction of the Rapa Nui culture began prior to that. Their findings are published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“In the current Easter Island debate, one side says the Rapa Nui severely damaged their environment and killed themselves off,” said Chadwick, a professor in UC Santa Barbara’s Department of Geography and the Environmental Studies Program. “The other side says it had nothing to do with cultural behavior, that it was the Europeans who brought disease that killed the Rapa Nui. Our results show that there is some of both going on, but the important point is that we show evidence of some communities being abandoned prior to European contact.”
Chadwick joined archaeologists Christopher Stevenson of Virginia Commonwealth University, Cedric Puleston of UC Davis and Thegn Ladefoged of the University of Auckland in examining six agriculture sites used by the island’s statue-building inhabitants. Their research focused mainly on the three sites for which they had information on climate, soil chemistry and land use trends as determined by an analysis of obsidian spear points.
The team used flakes of obsidian, a natural glass, as a dating tool. Measuring the amount of water that had penetrated the obsidian’s surface allowed them to calculate approximately how long it had been exposed and to determine its age.
The first site the researchers analyzed was near the northwest coast. Lying in the rain shadow of a volcano, it had low rainfall and relatively high soil nutrient availability. The second study site, on the interior side of the volcanic mountain, experienced high rainfall but had a low nutrient supply; the third, another near-coastal are in the northeast, was characterized by intermediate amounts of rainfall and relatively high soil nutrients.
‘‘When we evaluate the length of time that the land was used based on the age distribution of each site’s obsidian flakes, which we used as an index of human habitation, we find that the very dry area and the very wet area were abandoned before European contact.” Chadwick said. The area that had relatively high nutrients and intermediate rainfall maintained a robust population well after European contact.”
These results suggest that the Rapa Nui reacted to regional variations and natural environmental barriers to producing sufficient crops rather than degrading the environment themselves. In the nutrient-rich center where they could produce food well, they were able to maintain a viable culture even under the threat of external factors, including European diseases such as smallpox, syphilis and tuberculosis.
“The pullback from the marginal areas suggests that the Rapa Nui couldn’t continue to maintain the food resources necessary to keep the statue builders in business,” Chadwick included. “So we see the story as one of pushing against constraints and having to pull back than one of violent collapse.”
1. Which of the following has the closest meaning to “catalyst” in paragraph one?A.Chemical substance | B.Cause | C.Consequence | D.Evidence |
A.that Polynesian culture’s impacts on the environment destroyed the culture in turn. |
B.that the Europeans brought disease on the island, thus killing is culture. |
C.that some Polynesian culture was abandoned before the Europeans came. |
D.two different views. |
A.the failure to produce food for the workers in the areas. |
B.the threat of European diseases. |
C.the heavy workload of the island’s statue-building inhabitants. |
D.a lack of sites with both high rainfall and high soil nutrients. |
A.The extinction of Rapa Nui: Two opposing views |
B.Rapa Nu: The culture worth preservation |
C.The native Polynesian culture: Researchers come to its rescue |
D.Easter Island mystery: Why did the native culture die out |
【推荐2】In today’s youth culture, it seems as if teens are permanently glued to their cellphones, constantly receiving beeping, buzzing and blinking social media notifications (通知). We often hear of the harm of social media to teens and young people, but our latest research on young girls and boys has revealed that social media is not always negative.
In some cases, we found that social media can positively influence their health and well-being, by helping them learn about healthy eating or new workouts to try. Besides, social media provides space for young people to talk to each other about issues of health.
For our study, conducted by researchers from the University of Birmingham and Orebro University, we invited over 1,300 young girls and boys, aged 13-18, from ten UK schools. We were interested in better understanding how young people use social media, and how they feel it impacts their health and well-being. To do this, we selected 84 participants from the main sample and had them take part in small group interviews.
The results showed that social media often had a positive influence on young people’s motivation for being physically active and on their ability to make conscious diet choices. Social media also allowed them to access the information they found inspirational, and learn about different apps they could use to be physically active or monitor their progress. They reported that likes, comments, and views on their social media posts also helped them stay motivated to exercise.
Encouragingly, the young people we spoke to were also highly discerning users of social media. They thought carefully about the content they were engaging with online. For instance, the teenagers reported that they would often ignore content that had the potential to lead to harm, such as images or videos that presented unrealistic workouts or expectations for their bodies.
While the risks should certainly not be overlooked, our findings show that social media can have a positive effect on young people’s health and well-being. A benefit of social media is that it provides real-time, low-cost information, and support from their peers. Making young people use social media safely, critically and responsibly may thus help them continue to lead a healthy life.
1. What is the main finding of the latest research mentioned in the text?A.Young people make better use of social media. |
B.Teenagers use social media more than expected. |
C.Social media proves to be of great benefit to young people. |
D.New evidence adds to the harm of social media |
A.They made thorough analyses at two universities. |
B.They collected data from the database of ten UK schools. |
C.They referred to the findings of several previous studies. |
D.They conducted group interviews with young girls and boys. |
A.have great freedom | B.enjoy special privileges |
C.show good judgment | D.have an influence on others |
A.Making full use of their online time |
B.Using social media in a smart way |
C.Taking full responsibility for their health. |
D.Keeping informed of low-cost information. |
【推荐3】Natural selection is the process(过程)by which one type of animal survives because of certain characters that make it more likely to live than others. The history of the peppered moth(灰蛾)is an example of the natural selection process.
In nineteenth—century England, certain types of peppered moths were able to live better in changeable environments. During that time period, great changes were happening in Great Britain. The Industrial Revolution was part of this change, and with it came air pollution. Natural selection often takes hundreds or even thousands of years to occur. For the peppered moth, this process happened comparatively quickly.
At the beginning of the Industrial Age, most peppered moths in England were light—colored and covered with black markings, although a few moths had dark—colored wings. Because the light—colored moths looked like the light—colored bark(树皮)on the trees, they could not be easily seen by birds that would eat them. The light—colored moths became easy for birds to see against the dark tree. Since the dark—colored moths now had the advantage, their numbers grew. Within 50 years, the peppered moth went from being mostly light—colored to being mostly dark—colored.
In the twentieth century, the air cleared up, and the peppered moth population changed again. As tree bark lightened due to less soot(煤烟)in the air, light—colored moths once again had an advantage. Their numbers increased as soot levels fell. Depending on their environment, the coloration of the moths helped them to be “naturally selected” to survive.
1. What do we know about the peppered moth’s natural selection process?A.It is a general process of insect change. |
B.It has nothing to do with the soot levels. |
C.It shows bark can protect peppered moths. |
D.It takes less time to complete this process than others. |
A.The color of moths was unimportant. |
B.Most of the bark was darkened with soot. |
C.Peppered moths prefer dark—colored trees. |
D.Birds are less able to recognize dark moths. |
A.Their natural color. | B.Their large population. |
C.Their wide range of food. | D.Their dark wings. |
A.Technology. | B.Air pollution. |
C.Science fiction. | D.Biological Science. |