Jason M. Allen of Pueblo West, Colorado, began experimenting with Al-generated (人工智能创作的) art this year. This summer, he saw people testing Midjourney, which uses a process to turn text into custom images. Finally, Allen got the idea to give one of his Midjourney creations to the Colorado State Fair. Several weeks later, while walking around the fairground in Pueblo, Allen found he had won, along with a $300 prize.
After his win, Allen posted a photo of his prize work online. It made its way to Twitter, where many people expressed their disapproving (反对的) attitude. “We’re watching the death of artistry” one Twitter user wrote. Another wrote: “I can see how AI art can be beneficial, but saying you’re an artist by generating one? Of course not.” Some artists stand with Allen, saying that using AI to create a piece was no different from using Photoshop or other tools and that human creativity is still required to generate an award-winning piece.
Controversy (争论) over new artmaking technologies is nothing new. Many painters feared the invention of the camera, which they saw as a debasement (降低) of human artistry.
What makes the new kind of AI tools different some people believe, is not just that they’re able to produce beautiful works of art with little effort, but how they work. “What makes this AI different is that it’s trained on working artists,” RI Palmer, a digital artist, tweeted last month. “This thing wants our jobs; it’s actively against the artist.”
Allen said he understood artists who feared that Al tools would put them out of work. But “People should only be unsatisfied with the technology itself,” he said. “The ethics (伦理学) isn’t in the technology. It’s in the people. And he strongly suggested artists deal with their fear of AI. “This isn’t going to stop,” Allen said. “Art is dead. It’s over. AI won. Humans lost.”
1. What did Allen do this summer?A.He hosted a big fair. |
B.He started to get to know AI. |
C.He handed in an AI-generated piece and won. |
D.He invited some artists to discuss the future of art. |
A.By saying that his piece differed from ones created by other tools. |
B.By saying that his piece was partly a result of his creativity. |
C.By saying that his piece was a new form of art. |
D.By explaining that AI could be beneficial. |
A.supportive | B.disapproving | C.regretful | D.uncertain |
A.Try to accept AI tools. |
B.Join in different art competitions. |
C.Comment on artworks based on ethics. |
D.Focus on their own artistic creations. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】I think that I always knew I wanted to become an artist. I can’t remember a time when I wasn’t drawing or painting pictures. My oldest sister and my brother were artistic, and watching them draw fascinated me. They had many different art supplies around the house. Boxes of pastels, little ink bottles and pens were very appealing.
My parents and friends soon saw that I had more than a passing interest in art. It came to define much of my image. Relatives gave me art-related birthday gifts. At school I became “the kid who could draw,” a unique distinction, like “brainiest” or “best athlete”.
As I got a little older, I began copying pictures: cartoons, comic books, and magazine illustrations.
My third-grade class wrote essays on what we wanted to be when we grew up. To me it was obvious. We read them aloud, and I told about the types of paintings I would some day try. I’d have turtles with paintbrushes tied to their backs walking around on a big sheet of paper. Or I’d fill squirt guns with different colored paints and shoot at the canvas. I actually tried this with friends! Well, it sounded like a good idea.
One of the only discouraging childhood experiences about my artwork happened in the fourth grade. During study time I was drawing a picture. My teacher took it away and wrote an angry note home to my mother. “David would rather be drawing pictures than doing his work!!!” I couldn’t believe it, three exclamation points. School “art classes” were pretty uninspiring. Art never seemed to be taken as seriously as other subjects.
In the eighth grade, a big career day was held. Months before, we wrote suggestions for careers we wanted to hear about. On the big day, guest speakers from many fields came to talk, but there wasn’t one that came close to an art-related field.
In high school it actually sank in that I was going to be an artist. I already knew. I’d always known. My parents were excited about my choice, too. As I looked into art schools, I felt like doors were being thrown wide open. Until then my art was a private thing, but at art school I found a place where everyone as “the kid who could draw.”
1. The author became interested in art because of _________.A.his parents’ wish |
B.some schools’ appeal |
C.his family members’ influence |
D.some experts’ suggestion |
A.began copying pictures |
B.drew with squirt guns |
C.was discouraged by the teacher |
D.got suggestions from guest speakers |
A.thanked his parents very much |
B.went into a new world of art |
C.was still the only kid who could draw |
D.stopped learning art finally |
A.stick to their dreams |
B.treasure what they have |
C.obey the natural rules |
D.choose their career earlier |
【推荐2】When you take pictures, you tend to enjoy fun experiences less. Taking pictures hurts. “Most people don’t think it hurts. Certainly, this isn’t obvious to people,” LeBoeuf says. A group of 111 people (ages 19-70, 51 percent male) took surveys online, asking simply if photographing highly enjoyable experiences (a) increases, (b) decreases, or (c) has no effect on enjoyment. Some 51.4 percent thought it had no effect. But 27.9 percent believed it increased enjoyment, compared to 21.6 percent who said it decreased enjoyment.
When others told them about negative things, a majority (59.8 percent) of the same pool noted picture-taking had reduced their enjoyment of some experiences.
A group of 152 people (ages 17-23, 61 percent female) watched a 10-minute, immersive video clip (短片) featuring vivid footage of extremely poisonous snakes and jellyfish. Some simply watched, while others were told to watch and take pictures — “like we often do on, say, vacations,” LeBoeuf says. In this survey, they used an on-screen button to take photos they like, which they didn’t know was a trick. Asked to rate their enjoyment, participants who only watched the video enjoyed the experience significantly more, at 72.6 on a 100-point scale, than those occasionally “taking” pictures, 63.8.
When asked to take photos not just for yourself, but ultimately to share — such as on social media — people’s enjoyment was further reduced. As LeBoeuf says, “Thinking ‘Oh, I have to post these’ makes it even harder to enjoy the experience.” Some 162 people (ages 18-38, 61 percent female) broke down thusly: 83.7 enjoyment when only watching, 76.2 when taking personal pictures, 73.5 when taking photos to share.
Using 194 people (ages 18-40, 59 percent female), taking pictures scored a 27.8 on the enjoyment scale compared to 25.6 simply watching when the experience was an ordinary video of a Florida park tour. However, the experience mattered: When participants watched the much more enjoyable snakes-and-jellyfish video, they scored a 79.4 for simply watching and a 69.4 for picture-taking, again showing how the latter takes away an enjoyable experience.
1. What does the first survey indicate about taking pictures?A.Most people thought it to be positive or ineffective just on the surface alone. |
B.Most people thought it hurt when they were not reminded of negative effects. |
C.More people believed it increased their enjoyment without being told about it. |
D.More people believed it didn’t remove their enjoyment even if told everything. |
A.Younger females watching a less funny video. |
B.People watching a moderately enjoyable video. |
C.People who want to share a highly enjoyable video. |
D.Older males watching a comparatively funny video. |
A.To show different backgrounds. | B.To prove the reliability. |
C.To indicate the randomness. | D.To confirm their identity. |
A.Taking photos can dull your fun experiences. |
B.Picture-taking actually doesn’t have much effect. |
C.Effect varies a lot depending on males or females. |
D.Further more surveys are needed for the conclusion. |
【推荐3】It was a history-making moment at Miller & Miller’s Canadian & Discoveries Arts auction(拍卖)when the hammer finally came down for a rare Maud Lewis painting for $ 350,000.
Lewis was a Canadian artist who painted brightly colored scenes. She sold her paintings by the side of the road for $2 to $3. Painting wasn’t easy, since she suffered from a physical challenge that made moving painful. After reading an article about her, John Kinnear, also an artist mailed her boxes of painting supplies. At the time, Lewis lived in a one-room house with no electricity, using simple house paint to create. After receiving the supplies, Lewis wrote back insisting on repaying him with some of her paintings.
Kinnear sold some of them, sending part of the money back to Lewis and using the remainder to buy her more paint. Gradually, the two artists developed long-lasting friendship.
Kinnear was friends with Irene and Tony Demas, who owned a restaurant where he ate lunch every day. One day, Kinnear told them he had some paintings by an artist and wondered if they might consider buying one of them. “When we saw the paintings, our jaw almost dropped,” recalls Irene. “We had never seen anything like them. They were so childlike, with cats and cows.” They ended up agreeing to the trade, choosing a painting called Black Trunk.
Over 50 years later, they’re long retired and now considering travelling more. They hoped to sell the painting. In the years since Lewis died, her paintings have become famous. But it was recent scare that really urged them into action. After having non-glare glass added to the painting, the business street where the framer(装裱师)lived burned to the ground just days after they picked up their painting. “We saw that Miller &Miller’s had sold one not long ago. We trusted the Miller brothers.” says Irene.
1. Why did John Kinnear send Lewis boxes of painting supplies?A.To exchange for her paintings. | B.To offer her assistance. |
C.To teach her painting techniques. | D.To befriend with her. |
A.Confused. | B.Panicked. |
C.Shocked. | D.Embarrassed. |
A.They were eventually persuaded by the framer. |
B.They were afraid the painting would lose value. |
C.They fear something unexpected would happen. |
D.They were in desperate need of money to travel. |
A.To recommend an auction house. | B.To introduce a painting artist. |
C.To explain a trend in art collecting. | D.To tell the story of a painting. |
【推荐1】Some people like modern art, while others say that it is rubbish. But a cleaner who works in the Tate Britain Gallery in London isn’t able to tell the difference. The woman, whose name isn’t known, mistook a work of art by the German painter Gustav Metzger for a bag of rubbish, and threw it out with other bags. The plastic bag, which contained pieces of paper and cardboard, was later recovered outside the gallery, but the artist thought that it was too badly damaged to be put on show again, and so he found another bag. 78-year-old Mr. Metzger explained that the exhibit, which he said was a copy of a similar work he had created in 1960, was meant to show that all art is temporary (暂时的).
Embarrassed officials at the museum said that they had had to call a meeting with cleaners to explain which things should not be touched. They would not say whether Mr. Metzger would be paid for the incident. However, to make absolutely sure the same thing would not happen again, they decided to cover Mr. Metzger’s work every evening with a coloured cloth. In this way cleaners arriving after the gallery had closed to the general public would realize that they should not touch it.
This is not the first time that museum cleaners have had trouble distinguishing exhibits from rubbish. In 2001, in another London gallery, a cleaner threw away a work by the well-known British artist Damien Hirst. It was an arrangement of empty beer bottles, coffee cups, and ashtrays (烟灰缸), which were meant to show the disorder in the life of an artist.
However, cleaners don’t always throw things away—sometimes they clean them! This was the case with a dirty bath, which was on show in a gallery in Germany. Without asking what the bath was doing in the gallery, the cleaner simply cleaned it.
1. The woman cleaner threw away the plastic bag because__________.A.the plastic bag was badly damaged |
B.she didn’t recognize it was a work of art |
C.she hated modern art and considered it rubbish |
D.The exhibit on show was taken the place of by another bag |
A.collecting | B.replacing | C.telling | D.exchanging |
A.Mr Metzger would be paid some money for the incident. |
B.Tate British Gallery will be closed to avoid the same mistake. |
C.Artists often use rubbish to show how content they feel with life. |
D.More than one cleaner threw away works of art in galleries. |
A.Cleaner Mistakes Modern Art for Rubbish | B.Good Cleaners Make Mistakes |
C.Damaged Modern Art Works | D.Dangerous Galleries and Cleaners |
【推荐2】History has been made at the 2015 FINA World Championships in Kazan, Russia, as men competed in synchronized swimming(花样游泳) for the first time .
There was nothing in the world that could prevent July 26, 2015 from being the best day in Bill May’s life. The 36-year-old American synchronized swimmer became the first male world champion in mixed synchronized swimming.
“It’s something that I have dreamed of my entire life,” said May. His partner Christina Jones believed “this is the future of synchronized swimming”.
Synchronized swimming has been an Olympic sport since 1984, but only as an event for women. Nevertheless, men kept training in the hope that a chance might come for them to compete at the top international level, at the Olympics or the World Championships.
“Men’s choreography(舞蹈编排) is different from women’s. It is a completely different style. In a mixed duet(混双项目) the man should personify strength and power The woman, on the contrary, beauty and grace,” Russian male synchronized swimmer Alexander Maltsev said.
However, some people still believe that synchronized swimming should be a sport purely for women. Although men are stronger, they are less flexible so it is harder to get the necessary extension in: the legs. Buoyancy(浮力) is also an issue. The sport is very difficult for men in general, because men don’t actually float like women.
As times have changed, women now can compete in every category of sport at the Olympics, but there still remain two that are closed off to men-synchronized swimming and rhythmic gymnastics(艺术体操).
Some see FINA’s change as a sign that the International Olympic Committee(IOC)may also be ready to include mixed duets soon. Nevertheless, the IOC says that it will only consider adopting male synchronized swimming after a formal request from FINA and no such request has ever been made.
It may take many years for the IOC to open the door to male synchronized swimming but if and when it does, one thing is certain. “If synchronized swimming went to the Olympics, I would definitely be there to compete,” said Bill May, “even if I am 85. ”
1. According to the passage, Bill May dreamt of _______.A.being the first male champion swimmer at the Olympic Games |
B.being a professional synchronized swimmer and defeating other competitors |
C.having a partner who could help him win the championship at the top international- level |
D.competing in a world championship of synchronized swimming as a male athlete |
A.they never gave up training |
B.they kept appealing to the Olympic committee |
C.they made synchronized swimming known to more people |
D.they tried to gain support from the female swimmers |
①flexibility ②judgement ③floatability ④strength
A.①② | B.①③ |
C.②③ | D.③④ |
A.FINA hasn’t made the formal request |
B.Male synchronized swimmers are not fully prepared |
C.Female synchronized swimmers are strongly against it |
D.Rhythmic gymnastics hasn’t been adopted |
【推荐3】
A team of students from Stanford University are making efforts to launch a satellite powered exclusively by water into orbit (轨道) around the Mars.
These creative students are now attending a competition called the Future Space Challenge, which is held annually by NASA, the American space agency to find more talents in space. The Stanford team names itself the SuperLunar Explorers.
The principle behind the competition is simple: to think, design, build and launch “qualified small satellites.” NASA officials required that the satellites must be able to perform “advanced operations near and beyond the moon.”
Twenty teams are competing for the championship. But the SuperLunar Explorer satellites are totally different. They use only water to power their spacecraft, which has never been done before.
Such a novel idea for a water-powered satellite came from Peckon Lewis, who works at Stanford University now, who once worked as NASA’s chief technologist. He has always been wondering whether something other than rockets can be used to push spacecraft beyond earth. “A lot of things we send into space these days is with the help of rockets -- the only way we get anything into space,” he said, in a Stanford press release. “But if we could try something that has been already there? If we could do that, if we could re-fuel spacecraft while they’re already in space...”
The spacecraft is designed with the shape of the English letter L. It is about 30 centimeters in length, and the two pieces are interconnected. The lower part of the satellite is designed to store water, which will be separated by solar panel into two elements: hydrogen and oxygen. When one combines hydrogen and oxygen with a spark (火花), an explosion was caused. This provides a forward movement, known as thrust.
The SuperLunar Explorer team has devised a special way to guide its spacecraft. The idea is to imitate how sailors in ancient times used the moon, sun and stars to fix their position on the oceans. The satellite is equipped with cameras in all directions. The cameras will shoot pictures of the sun, the earth and the moon and compare their positions and their sizes. Based on where the sun, moon and earth are at any given time, the SuperLunar Explorers will find their position in a mathematic way.
The Future Space Challenge is divided into four rounds. The Stanford team has been among the top four competitors during rounds one and two. The winners of the fourth round will be publicized in about a month. The final three winners will be announced in early 2023. They will get to ride on NASA’s space launch system in early 2024.
1. The essential part of the competition “the Future Space Challenge” is ______.A.to think, design, build and deliver a qualified-small satellite. |
B.to launch a satellite to take a watery flight to the moon. |
C.to launch a satellite powered only by water into an orbit around the moon. |
D.to make the satellite perform advanced operations near and beyond the moon. |
A.To ban using rockets for the sake of safety. |
B.To use something already in space as power. |
C.To design a water-powered vehicle to push spacecraft. |
D.To try using water in space to push spacecraft. |
A.there is a lot of rubbish of rockets and satellites in the orbit these days. |
B.the explosion of the combination of hydrogen and oxygen provides power. |
C.a water-powered satellite will soon be sent into the orbit around the moon. |
D.the team members of the SuperLunar Explorers are the students of Peckon Lewis. |
A.A Water-Powered Flight to the Moon. |
B.A Competition for Water-Powered Satellite. |
C.A Spacecraft Powered by Water. |
D.A Design of Water-Powered Space Journey. |