Despite all the efforts students make to graduate with a science major, research has shown that most college science courses provide students with only a fragmented (碎片化的) understanding of fundamental scientific concepts. The teaching method improves memorization of separate facts, proceeding from one textbook chapter to the next without necessarily making connections between them, instead of learning how to use the information and connect those facts meaningfully.
With that in mind, we developed a series of cross-disciplinary (跨学科的) activities. In our most recent study, we investigated how well college students could use their chemistry knowledge to explain real-world biological phenomena. To begin with, we interviewed 28 first-year college students majoring in sciences or engineering. All had taken both introductory chemistry and biology courses. We asked them to identify connections between the content of these courses and what they believed to be the take-home messages from each course. The students responded with extensive lists of topics, concepts, and skills that they’d learned in class.
Following that, a set of cross-disciplinary activities were designed to guide students in the use of core chemistry ideas and knowledge to help explain real-world biological phenomena. One activity explored the impacts of ocean acidification on seashells. Here, the students were asked to use basic chemistry ideas to explain how the increasing level of carbon dioxide in sea water is affecting shell-building marine animals such as corals, clams and oysters.
Overall, the students felt confident of their chemistry knowledge. However, they had a harder time applying the same chemistry knowledge to explaining the biological phenomena. These findings highlight that a big gap remains between what students learn in their science courses and how well prepared they are to apply that information.
The students in our study also reported that these activities helped them see links between the two disciplines that they wouldn’t have perceived otherwise. The ability to make these connections is important beyond the classroom as well, because it’s the basis of science literacy (科学素养). So we also came away with evidence that our chemistry students at least would like to have the ability to have a deeper understanding of science and how to apply it.
1. What does the existing science education fail to do according to the research?A.Extend students’ theoretical knowledge. |
B.Engage students in more outdoor activities. |
C.Encourage students to enjoy the learning process. |
D.Teach students to make connections among different subjects. |
A.They have rich academic knowledge. | B.They pay little attention to biology courses. |
C.They hardly identify the core ideas of science. | D.They fully understand their major’s importance. |
A.analyse the exact composition of sea water. |
B.study some unusual phenomena under the sea. |
C.come up with practical methods to protect sea life. |
D.explain the effects of carbon dioxide on sea creatures. |
A.The need to remove the unfairness in education. |
B.The difficulties of cross-disciplinary study. |
C.The potential to promote students’ science literacy. |
D.The method of increasing students’ practical skills. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】Petra may be the treasure of the world, hidden among mountains. Its most beautiful scenery makes it the greatest ancient site stillstanding nowadays. Common sense says, “Perhaps there’s nothing on the planet that resembles it.” Without doubt, there’s nothing on the world that resembles it. The rockcarved (雕刻的) rosered town of Petra is filled with mysterious charm; it had been “designed to strike wonder into all who entered it”.
Petra is the most wellknown and beautiful site in Jordan that is about 262 km south of Amman, and 133 km north of Aqaba. The Dead Sea is 80 kilometers north of it. It was the legacy from the Nabataeans, who settled in the southwest of Jordan a lot more than 2,000 years back. Because of its excellent culture, buildings and many water channels, Petra has become a UNESCO world heritage site and one of the New Seven Wonders of the World that attracts visitors all over the world.
To get there, you must pass through a kilometer long, cool, dark and narrow gorge (峡谷) whose two high sides keep the sunlight out. Suddenly the gorge opens right into a natural square covered with Petra’s most wellknown monuments (遗址), which glow in the bright sun. The old town shows the visitors its beautiful look. It leads people to think about the creativity of the Nabataeans who made Petra as their capital.
Petra flourished for more than 400 years at about the time of Rome until it had been occupied through the Roman legions in 106 AD. Petra has 800 monuments, including buildings, tombs, baths, halls, temples, and streets, which were mostly carved in the pretty sandstone.
Petra sights are in their finest at the beginning of morning and late afternoon. Once the sun warms the colorful stones, you will see the greatness of Petra since it was seen first when discovered in 1812 after being lost through the 16th century for nearly 300 years!
1. What does the underlined part “mysterious charm” in Paragraph 1 mean?A.The unbelievable power to attract people. | B.All kinds of visitors from the world. |
C.A number of usual places of interest. | D.The shops, restaurants and hotels. |
A.must be disappointed | B.must be very convenient |
C.must be very comfortable | D.may not be very easy |
A.You’d better enjoy the beautiful scenery at the beginning of morning and late afternoon. |
B.Because it had been occupied, Petra was lost through the 16th century. |
C.Petra was developing quickly and strongly for more than 800 years. |
D.Petra’s monuments were all carved in the light red stones. |
【推荐2】Peggy Whitson's job demands a daily twohour workout in a gym where weight has no meaning and the view changes at 17,000 miles an hour.
Whitson makes it look easy. At 57, she is the oldest woman to fly in space, breaking the record last November, 2016, when she began her third longterm stay at the International Space Station. After returning home in September, 2017, the NASA astronaut felt matter-of-fact about the age milestone.
“It wasn't a record I was seeking for,” Whitson said. “I was 42 and 48 for my first two space flights. I feel lucky that I was able to get to do another one in my 50s. I don't think people should let age discourage them, even on those jobs that require some amount of physical fitness. The oldest man is John Glenn (at 77), and we've had male astronauts in their 60s before, so it's just a matter of time before women start flying in space at this age”.
On the earth, she stays fit by weightlifting, biking, playing basketball and water skiing. She shared what it's like to live in microgravity: “It's like you're in a swimming pool, but you don't have to worry about breathing. If I push off from one side, I'm going to float to the other side. Every direction feels exactly the same, which is really hard for your brain to grasp, but it's amazing how fast you adapt.
It's a big shock for the body to come back to Earth—everything is so heavy. We spend a lot of time getting used to being back in gravity again. Back pain was really the most dramatic for me this time. For me, coming home is harder than going up into space.”
1. How long did Peggy Whitson spend for her third stay in the International Space Station?A.About 300 days. | B.About 708 days. | C.About 107 days. | D.About 57 days. |
A.Amazing. | B.Not surprising. | C.Enthusiastic. | D.Unbelievable. |
A.Peggy Whitson likes swimming most. |
B.Peggy Whitson is the oldest person to fly in space. |
C.Peggy Whitson had been in space in 2002 and 2008. |
D.There had been female astronauts over 60s flying in space before. |
A.You can still be successful and do physical things when old. |
B.I spent quite a lot of time getting used to the life in space. |
C.The moment we reached the earth, we felt so relaxed. |
D.I feel lucky that I am physically well after the whole journey. |
【推荐3】We all know at least one person who loves their food insanely hot. They insist that their hot wings “aren’t spicy enough unless I’m dripping with sweat.” From Latin America to Sichuan province, chili peppers and their famous burning taste have become a worldwide sensation. But how could something that burns so hot possibly be any good for people?
In a study by researchers at Marshall University in the US, scientists made the first complete description of capsaicin (辣椒素) — a chemical found in spicy chilis — and its anti-cancer properties. Although capsaicin is not normally a good medicine due to some negative properties such as its spicy flavor, the study found that there are ways to bring out its anti-cancer benefits while overcoming these negatives.
In nature, capsaicin evolved as a defense mechanism (机制) in plants to drive away unwanted animals while attracting those that could spread the seeds, such as birds which cannot taste or feel the spice. From a scientific point of view, capsaicin works by triggering (触发) a pain receptor called TRPV1, causing the body to react as if it had actually touched something hot and dangerous. Yet, this natural repellent (驱虫剂) for most animals has instead become a favorite food for many people, often called “chiliheads”.
So, what is it that attracts humans to capsaicin, chili peppers and spicy food in general? Besides its many health benefits — such as pain relief, weight loss, and body heat regulation — people love eating chili peppers precisely because it hits the pain receptors in just the right way.
As an article published by Scientific American noted: “People seem to enjoy — and actively seek out — many other sensations ... the sensation of falling provided by roller coasters or skydiving, the feelings of fear and anxiety while watching horror movies, the physical pain experienced upon jumping into icy water, or even the feelings of sadness that come while watching a tearjerker.”
So, the next time you bite into a hot chili pepper, remember: it’s not just healthy, but fun too!
1. What does the underlined word “property” mean in Paragraph 2?A.Tissue. | B.Benefit. | C.Possession. | D.Quality. |
A.The study describes capsaicin for the first time. |
B.Capsaicin contributes to the prevention of cancer. |
C.There is a chemical called capsaicin in spicy chilis. |
D.The negative features of capsaicin cannot be overcome. |
A.It prevents birds from eating plants. |
B.It causes more seeds to be produced. |
C.It attracts some animals to distribute seeds. |
D.It helps plants survive in hot or dangerous situations. |
A.By giving an example. | B.By making a comparison. |
C.By analyzing causes. | D.By conducting research. |
【推荐1】“What do you want to be when you grow up?” When I was a kid, I dreaded the question. I never had a good answer. Adults always seemed terribly disappointed that I wasn’t dreaming of becoming a scientist or an astronaut.
One of my complaints about the question is that it forces kids to define (定义) themselves in terms of work. When you’re asked what you want to be when you grow up, it’s not socially acceptable to say, “A father,” or, “A mother.” This might be one of the reasons many parents say their most important value for their children is to care about others, yet their kids believe that top value is success. When we define ourselves by our jobs, our worth depends on what we achieve.
The upside of low expectations is that they erase the gap between what we want and what we get. A lot of evidence shows that instead of painting a rosy picture of a job, you’re better off going in with a realistic preview of what it’s really like. Sure, you might be less excited to take it, but on average you end up more productive.
I’m all for encouraging youngsters to aim high and dream big. But asking kids what they want to be leads them to claim a career identity they might never want to earn. So instead, invite them to think about what kind of person they want to be — and about all the different things they might want to do.
1. What does the underlined word “dreaded” most probably mean in Paragraph 1?A.Became interested in. | B.Was satisfied with. |
C.Cared little about. | D.Felt anxious about. |
A.Leading to a limited value about self-worth. |
B.Getting them to make regular complaints. |
C.Having side effects on their future work. |
D.Preventing them from being kind and helpful. |
A.Imagine our job to be promising. |
B.Preview our job realistically as a whole. |
C.Keep a normal attitude towards our job. |
D.Take up a job in our desired career. |
A.To argue against a false belief. |
B.To suggest a way to educate kids. |
C.To present a few new points of view. |
D.To encourage kids to dream big. |
【推荐2】From encouraging schoolwork and sports to modeling values as a child grows, parents have great influences on their children’s lives. They are, however, not the only influences—especially after children enter school. While parents may want to lead their child along a certain path, a parents’ job is to prepare a child for independence and the ability to achieve what they choose.
To parent effectively, it’s not enough to simply avoid the obvious dangers like abuse, neglect. Indeed, the National Academy of Sciences delineates four major responsibilities for parents: maintaining children’s health and safety, promoting their emotional health and happiness, developing social skills, and preparing children intellectually.
Many studies suggest that the best-adjusted children are brought up by parents who find a way to combine warmth with clear behavioral expectations. Parents may find the Four C’s helpful: care (showing acceptance and affection), consistency (maintaining a stable environment), choices (allowing the child to develop independence), and consequences (using results of choices, whether positive or negative).
Not every parenting style is for the child’s benefit. There is such a thing as overparenting, which can cripple children as they move into adulthood and make them unable to deal with the difficulties. Two examples of overparenting styles include “helicopter parenting,” in which children are over-monitored and kept out of harm’s way, and “snowplow parenting,” in which potential difficulties are removed from a child’s path. Both can negatively impact a child’s later independence, mental health, and self-worth.
Of course, there is such a thing as too-little parenting, too, and research proved that lack of parenting often leads to poor behaviors in children. This may be, in part, because it encourages the young to be rely too much on peer culture.
Finally, parents should try hard to be loving but firm, while giving children enough space to develop their own interests, explore independence, and experience failure.
1. According to Paragraph 2 and Paragraph 3, good parents ______.A.take advantage of positive results to guide children |
B.simply avoid the obvious dangers like abuse and neglect |
C.care about children’s physical, emotional and social well-being |
D.bring up their children in a changeable environment |
A.Damage one’s body. | B.Weaken one’s ability. |
C.Hurt one’s feeling. | D.Shorten one’s way. |
A.By telling stories. | B.By making comparisons. |
C.By analyzing data. | D.By expressing opinions. |
A.What are unhealthy parenting styles? |
B.What are the responsibilities of parents? |
C.How do good parents treat their children? |
D.How do parenting styles affect children’s development? |
【推荐3】When your parents advise you to “get an education” in order to raise your income, they tell you only half the truth. What they really mean is to get just enough education to provide manpower(人力资源) for your society, but not so much that you prove an embarrassment to your society.
Get a high school diploma, at least. Without that, you will be occupationally dead unless your name happens to be George Bernard Shaw or Thomas Alva Edison, and you can successfully dropout in grade school.
Get a college degree, if possible. With a BA, you are on the launching pad. But now you have to start to put on the brakes. If you go for a master’s degree, make sure it is an MBA, and only from a first-rate university. Beyond this, the famous law of diminishing returns begins to take effect. Do you know, for instance, that heavy truck drivers earn more a year than full professors? Yes, the average 2017 salary for those truckers was $240,000, while the full professor managed to average just $230,930.
A Ph.D is the highest degree you can get but except in a few specialized fields such as physics or chemistry where the degree can quickly be turned to industrial or commercial purposes, you are, facing a dark future. There are more Ph.Ds unemployed or underemployed in this country than in any other part of the world by far.
If you become a doctor in geography or history or anthropology or political science or—worst of all—in philosophy, you run the risk of becoming overeducated for our national demands.
Thousands of doctors are selling shoes, driving cars, waiting on table, and endlessly filling out applications month after month. They may also take a job in some backwater(闭塞)high school or college that pays much less than the doorkeeper earns.
Income and education are closely related. Far enough, that is, to make you useful to the gross national product, but not so far that nobody can turn much of a profit on you.
1. According to the writer, what the society expects of education is to turn out people who ____A.will become loyal citizens to a nation. |
B.can always take good care of themselves. |
C.will not be a shame to society or their families. |
D.can meet the demands as a source of manpower. |
A.you can get a high school diploma without difficulty. |
B.you can be professionally successful without a diploma. |
C.the least you should do is to get a diploma. |
D.you will be successful in grade school. |
A.they are of little commercial value to the society. |
B.they prefer easy jobs with more money. |
C.there are fewer jobs in high school. |
D.they are wrongly educated. |
A.The higher your education level is, the more money you’ll earn. |
B.If you are educated, you may make things difficult for the society. |
C.One must think carefully before going for a master’s degree. |
D.Bernard Shaw finished high school, so did Edison. |