组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 语篇范围 > 体裁分类 > 说明文
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:315 题号:22093773

Saving Us: A Climate Scientist’s Case for Hope and Healing in a Divided World is one of the most important books about climate change to have been written. Hayhoe is a gifted public speaker and Saving Us is a follow-up to her awesome TED talk in 2018, “The most important thing you can do to fight climate change: talk about it.”

One of the many refreshing aspects of this book is that Hayhoe recounts both her successes and her failures to communicate, through which she has gathered evidence about what works and what does not. Much of the book’s advice is common sense, all backed up not just by Hayhoe’s experience but also with convincing research by psychologists and social scientists.

Hayhoe advises against trying to engage with a small minority, the “Dismissives”, who “angrily reject the idea that human-caused climate change is a threat; they are most receptive to misinformation and conspiracy theories (阴谋论)”. There is a warning that offering up more facts about climate change can actually increase polarisation (两极化) among them.

The book includes amusing examples of her encounters with the “Dismissives”, almost entirely older men—including an engineer who was unconvinced about the evidence but with whom she was able to establish mutual (相互的) respect through a shared passion for knitting (打毛线衣) —and is packed with inspiring accounts of how she has won over even the most suspicious of crowds. Her motto is “bond, connect and inspire”, which represents her approach of always looking for points of commonality.

She also tells of a man who approached her after an event in London in 2019. He had been so inspired by her TED talk that he had started to speak to everybody he could in his neighborhood of Wandsworth. He showed her details of 12, 000 conversations that had taken place as a result, claiming that they had helped to convince the government to declare a climate emergency and to switch investments from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

And so, while it may feel difficult to influence the outcome of the COP26, Hayhoe’s uplifting book makes a persuasive case that we can all do our bit to bring about success just by talking about the issue.

1. What does the book mainly focus on?
A.Promoting people’s insight into climate change.
B.Introducing presentation skills with TED talks.
C.Developing critical thinking through literature.
D.Sharing communication tips on climate change.
2. Which of the following best describes the advice in the book?
A.Humorous but one-sided.B.Novel and interesting.
C.Well-based and workable.D.Serious and hard to follow.
3. How did Hayhoe win over the “Dismissives”?
A.By changing their political identity.
B.By challenging their fundamental beliefs.
C.By seeking common ground built on a shared interest.
D.By providing more facts about climate change.
4. What does the author intend to say by telling the story in paragraph 5?
A.The shift to clean energy is unstoppable.
B.Conversations can influence climate decision-making.
C.Policymakers turn a blind eye to market changes.
D.We should call on people to prepare for the climate crisis.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约500词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。文章讲述了人们对于生活中自动化的评价及看法。

【推荐1】Automation (自动化) was a hot topic. Nearly everyone agreed that people would be working less once computers and other kinds of automatic machinery became widespread. For optimists, this was a promise of liberation: At last humanity would be freed from constant toil, and we could all devote our days to more refined pursuits. But others saw a threat: Millions of people would be thrown out of work, and desperate masses would roam the streets. Looking back from 50 years hence, the controversy over automation seems a quaint and curious episode. The dispute was never resolved.

A. J. Hayes, a leader (and no relation to me), wrote in 1964: Automation is not just a new kind of mechanization but a revolutionary force capable of overturning our social order. Whereas mechanization made workers more efficient — and thus more valuable — automation threatens to make them superfluous (过剩的) — and thus without value. The opinions I have cited here represent extreme positions, and there were also many milder views. But I think it’s fair to say that most early students of automation, including both critics and enthusiasts, believed the new technology would lead us into a world where people worked much less.

As for economic consequences, worries about unemployment have certainly not gone away — not with job losses in the current recession approaching 2 million workers in our country alone. But recent job losses are commonly attributed to causes other than automation, such as competition from overseas or a roller-coaster financial system. In any case, the vision of a world where machines do all the work and people stand idly by has simply not come to pass.

The spread of automation outside of the factory has altered its social and economic impact in some curious ways. In many cases, the net effect of automation is not that machines are doing work that people used to do. Instead we’ve dispensed with the people who used to be paid to run the machines, and we’ve learned to run them ourselves. These trends contradict almost all the expectations of early writers on automation, both optimists and pessimists. So far, automation has neither liberated us from the need to work nor deprived (剥夺) us of the opportunity to work. Instead, we’re working more than ever.

What about trades closer to my own vital interests? Will science be automated? Technology already has a central role in many areas of research; for example, genome sequences could not be read by traditional lab-bench methods. Replacing the scientist will presumably be a little harder than replacing the lab technician, but when a machine exhibits enough curiosity and tenacity, I think we’ll just have to welcome it as a companion in zealous research. And if the scientist is elbowed aside by an automaton, then surely the science writer can’t hold out either. I’m ready for my 15-hour workweek.

1. In Paragraph 1, the writer mainly wants to convey that ________.
A.automation results in unemployment
B.automation does more harm than good
C.the issue of automation was still in discussion
D.automation brings in much convenience in life
2. According to J. Hayes, we can infer _________
A.automation is more valuable than what we imagine
B.automation is a revolutionary force to better development
C.the disadvantages of automation far outweigh the advantages
D.the new technology would lead people into working much less
3. What’s the author’s attitude toward automation on jobs?
A.Doubtful.B.Supportive.C.Disapproving.D.Neutral.
4. What can we conclude from this passage?
A.People needn’t work so hard due to automation.
B.Traditional labor force will be replaced in the near future.
C.Automation should be accepted reasonably in development.
D.Automation results in more job losses in the writer’s country.
2022-12-30更新 | 209次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约290词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章阐述了一项新的研究发现。即在控制工作要求、从事有意义的工作以及享受同事的支持和鼓励环境中,压力会转化为积极的动力,帮助人们实现目标

【推荐2】Mariana Bechtel isn’t exactly someone who avoids stress. Throughout her, she has pursued high-pressure management jobs: “I’m hard core,” says the 44-yearold wife and mother of two. “I wanted to be on top at work, and I wanted to be a great mom” –one who could attend baseball games, drive and help with homework even after an hour-long commute (通勤)on workdays, more often than not, with a5 a.m. marathon-training run.

However, after months of losing sleep, dropping weight and feeling pushed to lose her mind, Mariana Bechtel decided she had to address her stress-and turn it to her advantage. The new job she recently switched to still has its share of pressure, but with more support from her boss and more flexibility in her schedule, she says she feels great.

Contrary to popular belief, stress doesn’t have to be a soul-sucking, health-damaging force. But few people know how to transform their stress into the positive kind that helps them reach their goals.

A recent research confirms that gaining control over job demands, doing work with meaning and purpose and enjoying support and encouragement from co-workers are all linked to beneficial stress. Simply changing attitudes and expectations about stress-through coaching, training or peer-support groups-can also develop the constructive kind of stress.

Stress is paradoxical,” says Alia Crum, a research scholar. “On one hand, it can be the thing that hurts us most. On the other, it’s fundamental to psychological and physical growth. The attitude that we view and approach stress will shift the outcome.”

1. What is Mariana Bechtel’s new job like?
A.It is health-damaging.
B.It is physically demanding.
C.It has little stress.
D.It has flexible worktime.
2. What does the author want to show by telling the story of Mariana Bechtel?
A.Stress can be turned beneficial.
B.Too much stress is harmful to health.
C.It’s hard to balance work and family.
D.Every job has its own advantage.
3. How can we make stress to our advantage according to the recent research?
A.By refusing the boss’s demands
B.By taking up a meaningful job.
C.By supporting co-workers.
D.By sticking to our attitude to stress.
4. What does the underlined sentence in paragraph 5 mean?
A.Stress has far-reaching effects.B.Stress has several disadvantages.
C.Stress has two opposite features.D.Stress is not necessary at all.
2022-07-23更新 | 171次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文,主要介绍的是金鱼操作载水缸的机器车,自主导航找到终点的实验。

【推荐3】Picture this: A goldfish swimming in a square tank on wheels as it rolls from one side of a room to the other.

It’s not a scene from a children’s book or a futuristic movie. It’s an animal behavior experiment at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, where researchers have successfully trained several goldfish to operate a robotic vehicle in an effort to explore whether their species is able to navigate (导航) on land.

It turns out that they just might be, according to one of the researchers. “Our experiment shows that goldfish have the ability to learn a complex task in an environment completely unlike the one they evolved in.”

To test the fish, researchers created the “Fish Operated Vehicle” (FOV), a special robotic car with a fish tank, which tracked where the goldfish was and what direction it was swimming, and then automatically move in the same direction.

Researchers tasked six goldfish with “driving” the vehicle toward a target — a colorful mark on the wall visible through the four clear sides of the tank. The fish were rewarded with a feed when the vehicle touched the target. Researchers conducted multiple 30-minute sessions to see how many times each fish reached the target, how long each drive took and the distance they traveled each time.

After a few days of training, the fish were able to navigate to the target even if they hit a wall along the way or started their drive from a new location. Notably, they weren’t fooled by fake targets of other colors, either. Initially, it took the fish about half an hour to drive to the target, but by the end of the experiment, they were able to complete the same challenge in less than a minute.

“The findings suggest that the way space is represented in the fish brain and the methods it uses may be as successful in a land environment as they are in an underwater one,” the study concludes. But still, scientists say more research is needed to extend these findings to more complex scenery, like open land environments.

1. What did the researchers intend to study about the goldfish?
A.Their potential to evolve in the tank.B.Their adaptability to a new environment.
C.Their ability to find their way on land.D.Their competence in doing complex tasks.
2. What does a feed serve as in the experiment?
A.A guide.B.A motivator.C.A distraction.D.A punishment.
3. What could the fish do according to Paragraph 6?
A.Reach new locations.B.Fool their companions.
C.Distinguish different colors.D.Understand simple language.
4. Which of the following can be the best title for the text?
A.FOV help fish explore the land.B.Robots conduct fish experiments.
C.Goldfish fit into new environment.D.Scientists Train Goldfish to Navigate.
2022-03-20更新 | 114次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般