Nowadays women appear to have a positive image of themselves as safer drivers than men.
In a survey done for insurer MetLife, 51% of women said they drive more safely. The evidence is on their side: Men are 3.4 times more likely than women to get a ticket for careless driving and 3.1 times as likely to be punished for drunk driving. “Women are on average less aggressive and more law abiding (守法的) drivers, which leads to fewer accidents, ” the report says. However, not all male drivers share the same opinion. Of the men surveyed by MetLife, 39% claimed male drivers were safer. The findings did back them up on one point: automotive knowledge. The report showed that more men are familiar with current safety equipment such as electronic stability control, which helps prevent rollover accidents.
Auto safety unavoidably matters to money. Insurance companies focus on what classes of drivers have the lowest dollar amounts of claims, and for now, that mainly includes women. In general, women pay about 9% less for auto insurance than men. A study by the website Insweb also showed that auto insurance rates are lower for women in most states. Among individual states, women get the greatest advantage in Wyoming(where they pay 20% less), South Dakota and Washington, D. C. where their insurance costs are 16% lower.
“More than 11, 900 male drivers died in U.S. traffic accidents in 2009, compared with just under 4,900 women drivers,” according to the study. “Based on miles traveled, men died at a rate of 2.5 deaths per 100 million miles traveled, VS 1.7 deaths for women. ”
1. According to the study, female drivers ________.A.are more aggressive while driving |
B.are more interested in auto knowledge |
C.are more likely to stick to driving laws |
D.are more familiar with safety equipment |
A.cause more accidents on the road |
B.pay more money to the insurance companies |
C.take the most part of the insurance clients |
D.have the lowest amount of money on insurance claims |
A.men are 3.1 times more likely to get tickets than women |
B.all women in the USA pay the same for their auto insurance |
C.more female drivers die every year than male drivers |
D.women are generally safer drivers than the opposite |
A.giving examples | B.making comparisons |
C.drawing a conclusion | D.presenting an argument |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】There are few clear rules in the UK saying drivers should not park on the pavement (人行道). But Scotland, a country of Britain, is planning a complete ban on pavement paking. And, earlier this year, the UK government admitted it was considering changing the law for the other parts of Britain.
Joe Irvin of Living Streets (the UK charity for everyday walking) says there is “no excuse” for the disagreement and has called on the UK government to act the same way.
“Pavement parking is really thoughtless—and if you think about people with wheelchairs, pushchairs, or sight impairment (受损), they have to go out on to the road,” says Mr Irvin.
Steve Hynd, from Bristol, said his father, who uses a wheelchair, had recently ended up in hospital after a parked car had blocked his path.
“My dad’s experience was near his care home,” he says. “He was trying to wheel himself back inside and a car had parked up on the pavement. He tried to get around it and fell out of his wheelchair.”
“He went to hospital. He’d hurt his head and got a black eye where his glasses had gone in.”
Groups such as the AA and RAC admit “some streets” should not allow pavement parking if it causes problems to emergency vehicles (紧急车辆) — but they do not believe in a complete ban across the country.
AA president Edmund King says, “We would be concerned if there was a total ban. It is clearly possible in some areas to park on the pavement while still allowing room for pushchairs or people in wheelchairs to pass.”
Hugh Bladon of the Alliance of British Drivers argues a complete ban would cause serious problems as some streets were so narrow.
The simple way to deal with the problems, Mr Bladon believes, is that all drivers must leave at least one metre between their car and the inside of the pavement to allow people with pushchairs and so on to pass by.
1. What should the UK government do according to Joe Irvin?A.Give equal rights to drivers in the UK. |
B.Prevent Scotland from making the law. |
C.Ban pavement parking totally in the UK. |
D.Find more ways to protect walking people. |
A.A hospital. | B.A parked car. |
C.A wheelchair. | D.A care home. |
A.He is against it. |
B.He is uncertain of it. |
C.He feels hopeful about it. |
D.He pays little attention to it. |
A.Be careful with cars on the pavement. |
B.Stop parking on the pavement forever. |
C.Allow people with pushchairs to go first. |
D.Leave enough space for pavement walkers. |
【推荐2】Before going back to work one afternoon, Policeman Li took a big bite out of the red apple on his desk. He had no time to eat his lunch that day. He was busy dealing with a traffic accident report.
It seemed that a man named Wang Jie had run a red light, running into another person’s car. But he said that the light had been green when he drove across the crossing.
Li decided to question Wang Jie again. Maybe he could get some more information about the accident. This time Wang Jie still insisted that the light was green when he drove across the crossing. Li had no reason to doubt what Wang Jie said. He told Wang Jie that he was free to go.
“Thank you so much, Policeman Li. By the way, that green apple on your desk looks delicious! I hope you enjoy it!” Wang Jie said with a smile.
Li stopped for a moment. “Wait. Sit back down. I think we need to talk some more.”
When Wang Jie described Li’s red apple as being green, Li realized that Wang Jie must have run a red light.
1. What color is the apple on Policeman Li’s desk?A.Red. | B.Green. | C.Colorful. | D.Red and green. |
A.Wang Jie had run a red light |
B.Wang Jie didn’t run into another person’s car |
C.the light was green when Wang Jie drove across the crossing |
D.the green apple on the desk looked delicious |
A.He is lazy. | B.He is clever. | C.He is stupid. | D.He is handsome. |
A.Wang Jie couldn’t drive |
B.Wang Jie was a policeman |
C.Wang Jie stole something |
D.Wang Jie might be color-blind |
On a foggy Monday morning in May 2016, 14 Amsterdam officials, engineers and civil servants gathered nervously at Alexanderplein --- a busy crossroads near the city centre with three streetcar lines --- where many people were walking, driving, and, as in any Dutch city, riding bicycles. All of a sudden, the traffic controls were shut off for all transport modes, in all directions.
This live pilot project is part of a larger mobility strategy across the city to make more room for cyclists and pedestrians. That means limiting access and space for private vehicles. “Amsterdam's public space is limited,” says the vice mayor for traffic, Pieter Litjens, who finally approved the pilot. “We need to be thoughtful and strategic about who and what uses that space.”
In the weeks before the lights were shut off, 200 cyclists were interviewed in the morning and evening. A majority of them disliked the crossroads and made complaints. When asked whether the traffic lights were necessary, about a third said "absolutely yes," only 5% said absolutely not, and the majority was uncertain. It was clearly a question they had never thought about.
When the lights were turned off, about 150 cyclists were interviewed. We found that not only did fewer people dislike this crossroads, but about 60% said the traffic situation had improved.
All interviewees spoke more about human interaction. “People pay more attention,” said one man. “It’s amazing that it regulates itself,” said a young woman. "It's a bit scary, but you never have to stop and nobody is grumpy," said a teenager. But no one could really further explain why or how.
Behaviour was noticeably different. Most cyclists slowed down as they approached the crossroads, and communicated to other cyclists and motorists using eyes, gestures, expressions and voices. In one incident, a mother carrying her child on a front seat slowly entered the crossroads. When she was halfway across, a car approached from the right. Traffic signs indicate priority for the car driver, but instead, the mother made eye contact with the driver, both smiled, and the car driver yielded.
1. Why was the pilot project carried out in Amsterdam? (no more than 10 words)2. What did most cyclists who were interviewed think of the pilot project? (no more than 12 words)
3. What does the underlined word "yielded" (the last paragraph) probably mean?(no more than 2 words)
4. Why does the writer mention the mother and the driver in the last paragraph? (no more than 8 words)
5. Do you think the traffic lights can be turned off in Tianjin? Please give your reason. (no more than 20 words)
【推荐1】Some people think if you are happy, you are blind to reality. But when we research it, happiness actually raises every single business and educational outcome for the brain. How did we miss this? Why do we have these social misunderstandings about happiness? Because we assumed you were average. When we study people, scientists are often interested in what the average is.
Many people think happiness is genetic. That’s only half the story, because the average person does not fight their genes. When we stop studying the average and begin researching positive outliers -- people who are above average for a positive aspect like optimism or intelligence -- a wildly different picture appears. Our daily decisions and habits have a huge impact upon both our levels of happiness and success.
Scientifically, happiness is a choice. It is a choice about where your single processor brain will devote its limited resources as you process the world. If you scan for the negative first, your brain really has no resources left over to see the things you are grateful for or the meaning embedded(嵌入) in your work. But if you scan the world for the positive, you start to acquire an amazing advantage.
I wrote the cover story for the Harvard Business Review magazine on “Happiness Leads to Profits”. Based on my article called “Positive Intelligence” and my research in The Happiness Advantage, I summarized our researched conclusion: the single greatest advantage in the modern economy is a happy and busy workforce.
A decade of research in the business world proves that happiness raises nearly every business and educational outcome: increasing sales by 37%, productivity by 31%, and accuracy on tasks by 19%, as well as a number of health and quality-of-life improvements.
1. The underlined word “this” in the first paragraph refers to ________.A.the fact that people are happy |
B.the connection between happiness and educational outcome |
C.the fact that people often misunderstand happiness |
D.the fact that most people are average |
A.Scientists are only interested in what the average is. |
B.You can choose to be happy or not. |
C.The average are not happy at all. |
D.Our decisions and habits have nothing to do with happiness. |
A.To advertise himself. |
B.To arouse the readers’ interest. |
C.To support his point about happiness. |
D.To attract the readers to read his articles. |
A.To describe the misunderstandings about happiness. |
B.To show people the importance of happiness. |
C.To make the point of what business and educational outcome lies in. |
D.To make the point that happiness promotes business and educational outcome. |
【推荐2】More people who feel stressed about living in cities have been seeking protection in green spaces for the proven positive impacts on physical and mental health,but the benefits of “blue space”— the sea and coastline,but also rivers,lakes,canals,waterfalls,even fountains — are less well advertised, yet the science has kept in place for at least a decade: being by water is good for body and mind.
“Many of the processes are exactly the same as with green space — with some added benefits,” says Dr Mathew White,a senior lecturer at the University of Exeter.
White says there are three established pathways by which the presence of water is positively related to health and happiness.First,there are the beneficial environmental factors,such as less polluted air and more sunlight. Second, people who live by water tend to be more physically active. Third — and this is where blue space seems to have an advantage over other natural environments — water has a psychological recovery effect. When you are sailing, surfing or swimming, says White, “you’re really in step with natural forces there.”
Catherine Kelly is a wellness practitioner who teaches classes in “mindfulness by the sea”. She says the sea has a quality that can make people thoughtful.
“To go to the sea means letting go,” says Kelly. “It could be lying on a beach or somebody handing you a cocktail. For somebody else, it could be a wild, empty coast. But there is this really human sense of: ‘Oh, look, there’s the sea’— and the shoulders drop.”
1. Why are blue spaces less popular than green spaces?A.Because green spaces are good to people’s health. |
B.Because the benefits of green spaces are better advertised. |
C.Because green spaces have more benefits than blue spaces. |
D.Because little research has been done on blue spaces. |
A.Water helps people restore mental health. |
B.Where there’s water,there’s fresh air. |
C.People living near water are healthier. |
D.The sea can make people lost in deep thought. |
A.The sea will put you at ease. |
B.The sea will hurt your shoulder. |
C.The sea will bring you loneliness. |
D.The sea will make you feel down. |
A.People in cities prefer green spaces. |
B.Blue spaces benefit your body and mind. |
C.Green spaces have been out of date. |
D.Ways to keep us healthy. |
【推荐3】When you buy a cup of coffee, you have probably noticed the three different size options: small, medium and large. The medium-sized serving often costs almost as much as the large one.
If so, you have been driven by a cognitive bias(认知偏误) known as the “decoy effect(诱饵效应)”.
Imagine you are choosing flights from the following options:
■Flight A costs $400 with a stopover of 60 minutes.
■Flight B costs $330 with a stopover of 150 minutes.
■Flight C costs $435 with a stopover of 60 minutes
The researchers found that most people would choose Flight A. It is cheaper than Flight C. Compared with Flight B it has a shorter waiting time—even though it is considerably more expensive.
Now look at a different set of flights:
■Flight A costs $400 with a stopover of 60 minutes
■Flight B costs $330 with a stopover of 150 minutes
■Flight C costs $330 with a stopover of 195 minutes.
In this case, most people’s preference was Flight B.
In each case, Flight C (the decoy) was designed. to appear similar to, but slightly less attractive than, one of the other options (the target).
The decoy effect was first investigated as a potential marketing strategy to influence consumer choices. However, by learning about it, you may become less likely to be affected by this unconscious influence.
If you are discussing travel pans with friends, for instance, and have not decided yet where to go, you might present two alternative arrangements at your city of choice, but one with a slightly more expensive hotel. Even if your friends might have otherwise selected a different location, the comparison might just tempt them to opt for your preferred option.
A.Psychologists still debate the exact reasons for this particular effect. |
B.Don’t allow yourself to become yet another victim of the decoy effect. |
C.You may even discover ways to put it to your own use as a tool for persuasion. |
D.That comparison altered the way the participants perceived(感知) the other possibilities. |
E.The latest research shows that it could also have strong effects on recruitment (招聘), healthcare and even politics. |
F.You are presented with a well-designed, additional, and slightly less attractive option. |
G.Given the apparent bargain |
【推荐1】The St. Louis soldier, Todd Nicely joined the navy in 2007, and was severely injured—lost his arms and legs and his life was almost taken away while serving abroad in 2010.
“I didn’t want to put my guys through anything that I wouldn’t want to do, so a lot of the times I was in the front,” he told the news while remembering the incident that changed his life. Over the past decade, Nicely has learned to adjust to the world with amputated arms and legs, a way of life that recently became a bit easier thanks to the addition of a service dog.
CHAMP Assistance Dogs in St. Louis, Missouri, gifted Nicely with a service dog named Hugo this season. The non-profit’s task focuses on connecting service dogs to people with disabilities who need them. Hugo is trained to assist Nicely with his day-to-day tasks, small gestures that add up to significant changes for the man.
“Nearly 12 years later, Hugo is pam of the family. Having him here to pick things up that I drop is kind of a blessing. It makes my quality of life a lot better,” Nicely told KMOV News 4.
This improved quality of life is what CHAMP works hard to provide for soldiers and other individuals who benefit from the support of a service dog. “Hugo is making a difference in Todd’s life. It is a wonderful feeling for all of us, and we are on top of the world in seeing someone become more independent because a dog is there to help them,” Pam Budke, CHAMP Assistance Dogs’ director, shared with KMOV News 4.
Nicely hopes that Hugo helps other soldiers by showing them it’s important to seek assistance when you need help. “You are supposed to be this tough man. Now, all of a sudden, you’re asking for help. It’s like, ‘am I weak?’ ‘No’,” Nicely said. “It doesn’t make you weak. It actually makes you stronger to ask for help,” he added.
1. Which of the following can describe Todd Nicely best in army service?A.Lucky. | B.Clever. | C.Considerate. | D.Well-educated. |
A.To send homeless dogs to people. | B.To help people train service dogs. |
C.To make the disabled adjust to the world. | D.To create a bond between the disabled and service dogs. |
A.Ashamed. | B.Astonished. | C.Delighted. | D.Embarrassed. |
A.They seldom ask for help. | B.They like being tough to others. |
C.They love dogs more than anyone else. | D.They need to show their weakness sometimes. |
【推荐2】Our planet is rich in life.Tigers and turtles,bats and bees,gnats and gnus,crabs and crabgrass-the list seems endless.We have named more than 1.5 million species,and suspect that millions more remain undiscovered.Scientists call this mind-boggling variety of life biodiversity.With so many species,it is surprising to realise that so many are in danger of becoming extinct.
Extinct species are plants and animals that once lived on Earth,but no longer live anywhere in the world.Endangered species are those most in danger of extinction.Even large populations of animals can be at risk.Passenger pigeons once darkened the skies of the US.Over time,habitat destruction and hunting decreased the population of these birds.The last one died alone at the Cincinnati Zoo in 1914.
Dinosaurs,dodos and passenger pigeons are all extinct.Extinction used to happen naturally,but in modern times,people have pushed wildlife to the brink much more quickly than ever before.We are losing wildlife very rapidly!
After realising this severe situation,many countries and international organisations have carried out rules and principles to protect endangered animals.The US Endangered Species Act of 1973,for example,was passed to protect threatened wildlife and habitats so they don't go the way of the dodo.
So why do animals become endangered?The main reason is the loss of habitats.Habitat destruction can make it extremely hard for wildlife to survive.However,as people learn to take better care of plants and animals as well as their habitats,endangered and threatened species may begin to make a comeback.In fact,many species such as bald eagles already have.
1. Which of the following statements is NOT true according to the passage?A.Biodiversity refers to the large variety of life on Earth. |
B.Extinct animals and plants no longer live on Earth. |
C.Only animals with a small population can be extinct. |
D.Actions have been taken to protect endangered animals. |
A.Passenger pigeons used to fly in cloudy days or at night. |
B.Most of the passenger pigeons had black feathers. |
C.Passenger pigeons were so large in size that they blocked the sunlight. |
D.There used to have a large amount of passenger pigeons in the US. |
A.Unexpected accidents. | B.Natural disasters |
C.The loss of habitats. | D.Serious diseases |
A.The author believes things are getting better as people have realised its significance. |
B.The author doesn't care much about protecting endangered animals. |
C.The author doesn't think it is more important than developing the economy. |
D.The author thinks that there is lttle hope for the endangered species to make a comeback. |
【推荐3】At the time of writing this, more than 600 people have gone to space. The first person to do it was the Soviet astronaut Yuri Gagarin, in 1961. Most of the people that have achieved the dream of flying to outer space have been astronauts that form part of space agencies such as NASA although a few have gone as part of space tourism trips.
But space exploration can be a risky profession. We have all heard about unfortunate accidents like that of the Apollo 1 training crew or the Space Shuttle Challenger. To date, there have been 188 accidents related to space flights. Fortunately, the number of accidents has greatly been reduced since the 1980s as space agencies have gotten better at conducting safety protocols (协议).
With all those incidents, it is natural to wonder if at some point any astronauts have been lost in space. Are there any dead bodies in space? The short answer is no. There are no dead bodies in space. Most of the spaceflight-related accidents have happened on land or before reaching the line that we consider space. This limit is called the Kármán line and is 100 kilometres (62 miles) above sea level.
There have been a few cases of spacecraft that have been “lost in space”. For example, the Apollo 10 released the descent (下降) module while they were orbiting the Moon. The module did not have any astronauts inside and was “lost” although it was released in such a way that it would go into orbit around the Sun. The module was located in 2019 using a telescope. As for other types of accidents, there have been, cases of satellites that have collided (碰撞) or been hit by something. But those are unmanned and they usually fall into Earth and are disintegrated from the heat as they enter the atmosphere.
In short, there are no human bodies lost in space. Most spaceflight-related accidents that involved people have happened while still on Earth.
1. What can we learn from the text?A.Yuri Gagarin was a pioneer in space trips. |
B.Most people flew to space mainly for travel. |
C.Human exploration for space began in the 1980s. |
D.About 30% astronauts suffered from space accidents. |
A.More advanced technology. | B.Stronger safety measures. |
C.Stricter limits to space flights. | D.More financial support. |
A.To prove space exploration is becoming risky. | B.To add some background information for space. |
C.To further explain no astronauts died in space. | D.To introduce more space flight-related accidents. |
A.How Did Spaceflight-Related Accidents Happen in History? |
B.Why Is Space Exploration a Dangerous Mission? |
C.Are There Any Satellites Hit by Something in Space? |
D.Have Any Astronauts Been Lost in Space Forever? |