组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 交通 > 交通规则
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:275 题号:2687413

Nowadays women appear to have a positive image of themselves as safer drivers than men.

In a survey done for insurer MetLife, 51% of women said they drive more safely. The evidence is on their side: Men are 3.4 times more likely than women to get a ticket for careless driving and 3.1 times as likely to be punished for drunk driving. “Women are on average less aggressive and more law abiding (守法的) drivers, which leads to fewer accidents, ” the report says. However, not all male drivers share the same opinion. Of the men surveyed by MetLife, 39% claimed male drivers were safer. The findings did back them up on one point: automotive knowledge. The report showed that more men are familiar with current safety equipment such as electronic stability control, which helps prevent rollover accidents.

Auto safety unavoidably matters to money. Insurance companies focus on what classes of drivers have the lowest dollar amounts of claims, and for now, that mainly includes women. In general, women pay about 9% less for auto insurance than men. A study by the website Insweb also showed that auto insurance rates are lower for women in most states. Among individual states, women get the greatest advantage in Wyoming(where they pay 20% less), South Dakota and Washington, D. C. where their insurance costs are 16% lower.

“More than 11, 900 male drivers died in U.S. traffic accidents in 2009, compared with just   under 4,900 women drivers,” according to the study. “Based on miles traveled, men died at a rate of 2.5 deaths per 100 million miles traveled, VS 1.7 deaths for women. ”

1. According to the study, female drivers ________.
A.are more aggressive while driving
B.are more interested in auto knowledge
C.are more likely to stick to driving laws
D.are more familiar with safety equipment
2. Insurance companies focus on female driver clients probably because they ________.
A.cause more accidents on the road
B.pay more money to the insurance companies
C.take the most part of the insurance clients
D.have the lowest amount of money on insurance claims
3. We can infer from the passage that ________.
A.men are 3.1 times more likely to get tickets than women
B.all women in the USA pay the same for their auto insurance
C.more female drivers die every year than male drivers
D.women are generally safer drivers than the opposite
4. The writer mainly develops paragraphs by ________.
A.giving examplesB.making comparisons
C.drawing a conclusionD.presenting an argument

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文为一篇新闻报道。苏格兰地区计划全面禁止在人行道上停车,英国政府也考虑修改其他地区的法律。对于英国政府的这个行动,机构和个人表达了自己的态度或意见。

【推荐1】There are few clear rules in the UK saying drivers should not park on the pavement (人行道). But Scotland, a country of Britain, is planning a complete ban on pavement paking. And, earlier this year, the UK government admitted it was considering changing the law for the other parts of Britain.

Joe Irvin of Living Streets (the UK charity for everyday walking) says there is “no excuse” for the disagreement and has called on the UK government to act the same way.

“Pavement parking is really thoughtless—and if you think about people with wheelchairs, pushchairs, or sight impairment (受损), they have to go out on to the road,” says Mr Irvin.

Steve Hynd, from Bristol, said his father, who uses a wheelchair, had recently ended up in hospital after a parked car had blocked his path.

“My dad’s experience was near his care home,” he says. “He was trying to wheel himself back inside and a car had parked up on the pavement. He tried to get around it and fell out of his wheelchair.”

“He went to hospital. He’d hurt his head and got a black eye where his glasses had gone in.”

Groups such as the AA and RAC admit “some streets” should not allow pavement parking if it causes problems to emergency vehicles (紧急车辆) — but they do not believe in a complete ban across the country.

AA president Edmund King says, “We would be concerned if there was a total ban. It is clearly possible in some areas to park on the pavement while still allowing room for pushchairs or people in wheelchairs to pass.”

Hugh Bladon of the Alliance of British Drivers argues a complete ban would cause serious problems as some streets were so narrow.

The simple way to deal with the problems, Mr Bladon believes, is that all drivers must leave at least one metre between their car and the inside of the pavement to allow people with pushchairs and so on to pass by.

1. What should the UK government do according to Joe Irvin?
A.Give equal rights to drivers in the UK.
B.Prevent Scotland from making the law.
C.Ban pavement parking totally in the UK.
D.Find more ways to protect walking people.
2. What does the underlined word “it” in Paragraph 5 refer to?
A.A hospital.B.A parked car.
C.A wheelchair.D.A care home.
3. What is Edmund King’s attitude to a complete ban on pavement parking?
A.He is against it.
B.He is uncertain of it.
C.He feels hopeful about it.
D.He pays little attention to it.
4. What does Hugh Bladon want drivers to do when parking?
A.Be careful with cars on the pavement.
B.Stop parking on the pavement forever.
C.Allow people with pushchairs to go first.
D.Leave enough space for pavement walkers.
2023-07-28更新 | 8次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约220词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Before going back to work one afternoon, Policeman Li took a big bite out of the red apple on his desk. He had no time to eat his lunch that day. He was busy dealing with a traffic accident report.

It seemed that a man named Wang Jie had run a red light, running into another person’s car. But he said that the light had been green when he drove across the crossing.

Li decided to question Wang Jie again. Maybe he could get some more information about the accident. This time Wang Jie still insisted that the light was green when he drove across the crossing. Li had no reason to doubt what Wang Jie said. He told Wang Jie that he was free to go.

“Thank you so much, Policeman Li. By the way, that green apple on your desk looks delicious! I hope you enjoy it!” Wang Jie said with a smile.

Li stopped for a moment. “Wait. Sit back down. I think we need to talk some more.”

When Wang Jie described Li’s red apple as being green, Li realized that Wang Jie must have run a red light.

1. What color is the apple on Policeman Li’s desk?
A.Red.B.Green.C.Colorful.D.Red and green.
2. The underlined words “what Wang Jie said” mean _________.
A.Wang Jie had run a red light
B.Wang Jie didn’t run into another person’s car
C.the light was green when Wang Jie drove across the crossing
D.the green apple on the desk looked delicious
3. What do you think of Policeman Li?
A.He is lazy.B.He is clever.C.He is stupid.D.He is handsome.
4. From the passage we can infer__________.
A.Wang Jie couldn’t drive
B.Wang Jie was a policeman
C.Wang Jie stole something
D.Wang Jie might be color-blind
2021-11-30更新 | 43次组卷
阅读理解-阅读表达(约410词) | 适中 (0.65)
【推荐3】阅读短文,并按照题目要求用英语回答问题。

On a foggy Monday morning in May 2016, 14 Amsterdam officials, engineers and civil servants gathered nervously at Alexanderplein --- a busy crossroads near the city centre with three streetcar lines --- where many people were walking, driving, and, as in any Dutch city, riding bicycles. All of a sudden, the traffic controls were shut off for all transport modes, in all directions.

This live pilot project is part of a larger mobility strategy across the city to make more room for cyclists and pedestrians. That means limiting access and space for private vehicles. “Amsterdam's public space is limited,” says the vice mayor for traffic, Pieter Litjens, who finally approved the pilot. “We need to be thoughtful and strategic about who and what uses that space.”

In the weeks before the lights were shut off, 200 cyclists were interviewed in the morning and evening. A majority of them disliked the crossroads and made complaints. When asked whether the traffic lights were necessary, about a third said "absolutely yes," only 5% said absolutely not, and the majority was uncertain. It was clearly a question they had never thought about.

When the lights were turned off, about 150 cyclists were interviewed. We found that not only did fewer people dislike this crossroads, but about 60% said the traffic situation had improved.

All interviewees spoke more about human interaction. “People pay more attention,” said one man. “It’s amazing that it regulates itself,” said a young woman. "It's a bit scary, but you never have to stop and nobody is grumpy," said a teenager. But no one could really further explain why or how.

Behaviour was noticeably different. Most cyclists slowed down as they approached the crossroads, and communicated to other cyclists and motorists using eyes, gestures, expressions and voices. In one incident, a mother carrying her child on a front seat slowly entered the crossroads. When she was halfway across, a car approached from the right. Traffic signs indicate priority for the car driver, but instead, the mother made eye contact with the driver, both smiled, and the car driver yielded.

1. Why was the pilot project carried out in Amsterdam? (no more than 10 words)
2. What did most cyclists who were interviewed think of the pilot project? (no more than 12 words)
3. What does the underlined word "yielded" (the last paragraph) probably mean?(no more than 2 words)
4. Why does the writer mention the mother and the driver in the last paragraph? (no more than 8 words)
5. Do you think the traffic lights can be turned off in Tianjin? Please give your reason. (no more than 20 words)
2020-04-07更新 | 205次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般