组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 历史 > 历史事件
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:61 题号:6448757

Exploring the sands on the beach, Tonya III man came across a lidless boule. She picked it up, looked inside and noticed something. She turned it upside down. Out came a damp, neatly rolled piece of paper. Tonya took it home, dried and unrolled it.

What caught her eye was the year field, 18      . Though at first sceptical of finding something this old so easily, she continued reading. It began with some coordinates (坐标). Below was a request in German asking the bolded finder to put down the date and location of where it was found and return it to the nearer German embassy.

The Illmans took the note Rosa Anderson, a curator (馆长) at the Western Australian Museum. Soon Anderson called, saying he had been able to locate a 19th - century ship named Paula. Even more exciting was that experts in Germany were able to track down Paula’s logbooks and find a record by a “Captain O. Diekmann,” confirming that a bottle had been thrown overboard on June 12. 1886 - the date on the message. The sailor had also listed the coordinates of the ship’s location, which matched the ones on the note. Another evidence of the note’s truth was the logbook’s neat script (手稿), which paired perfectly with that of the handwritten message. The records also indicated that the bottle was one of the thousands thrown by the seamen back then as part of an experiment to track the water currents.

Anderson believes the note remained undamaged because it was put in a strong bottle with a narrow opening which allowed little water in, even after the lid came off. The expert guessed it had been probably washed ashore and remained buried in the thick sand.

The 131 - year - old note, now lying in the Western Australia Museum, was confirmed as the oldest message in a bottle ever discovered.

1. What’s the purpose of writing this text?
A.To advertise for the Western Australia Museum.
B.To praise the Illmans for their important discovery.
C.To explain how the note came to light and its value.
D.To describe the habits of the seamen in the 19th century.
2. How did Tonya Illman feel when she first saw the words on the note?
A.Astonished.B.Doubtful.
C.Optimistic.D.Overjoyed.
3. What proved the truth of the 131 - year - old note?
A.The records in Paula’s logbooks.
B.The date and words written on it.
C.The location where it was found.
D.The sailor’s experiment to follow the water currents.
4. The note remained in good condition probably because      .
A.the note was handwritten
B.the lid of its container came off
C.the bottle had been floating in the sea
D.its container had stayed buried in the sand
17-18高二下·山东烟台·期中 查看更多[2]
【知识点】 历史事件

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约450词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】“They tell me that you’d like to make a statue of me — is that correct, Miss Vinnie Ream?”

The deep, gentle voice helped calm the nervous girl. Asking a favor of the President of the United States was no casual matter, especially for a seventeen-year-old girl.

“Yes, sir,” she replied, her dark eyes meeting his. “I wouldn’t have dared to ask you, but my teacher, Mr. Mills, says I am ready. I plan to make it in an admirable manner.”

President Lincoln smiled.“Painters, sculptors — they’ve all tried to make the best of this ordinary face, but I’m afraid there’s not much hope. What did you have in mind, Miss Ream? A bust (半身像)?”

Before Vinnie could say yes, the President hurried on, a shade of apology in his voice. “Of course — I shouldn’t have asked. A full-length pose would be much too big a project for a young woman your size.”

Vinnie’s face turned red. She realized she looked like a child, with her tiny figure. “Small does not mean weak, sir,” she defended herself. “I was born in the country of Wisconsin. I’ve driven teams of horses and carried water. Making a full-length clay (黏土) figure would not exhaust my strength — and that is what I intend to do!”

The President’s eyes, brightened at her show of spirit. “Sorry, madam, I have underestimated you as I didn’t know your background.”

But his smile faded as he rubbed his beard with bony fingers, in thought. “Miss Ream,” he sighed, “I’d like to let you do it, but as you know, we are in the middle of a war. How could I possibly take the time to pose for a sculpture now? I hardly have a minute to myself.”

Vinnie glanced around and noted the size of his office. “I work quickly,” she said. Her voice was soft but confident as she pointed to the corner near the windows. “If I were to bring my clay here and work for three hours every afternoon, I could complete most of the project while you are at your desk.”

The President seemed to consider her idea seriously. He got up and shook Vinnie’s hand warmly, “I’ve heard that you are a talented young woman, and I have found you charming and intelligent as well. I cannot make my decision immediately, but you will hear from me soon.”

The very next day, Vinnie received an invitation from the President.

1. How did President Lincoln first respond to Vinnie’s request?
A.Doubtful.B.Thrilled.
C.Regretful.D.Pleased.
2. Vinnie confirmed her ability to make a full-length statue by emphasizing ______.
A.her experience from other projects
B.the heavy labor she had done before
C.her innocent childhood in the country
D.the skill she picked up in Wisconsin
3. Vinnie wanted to choose the corner near the windows to ______.
A.avoid disturbing the president’s work
B.keep all her tools within easy reach
C.observe the President at a right angle
D.achieve effects of natural lighting
4. What message does the story convey?
A.Ups and downs make one strong.
B.Experience helps to promote excellence.
C.A strong-willed soul can reach his goal.
D.Devotion requires enthusiasm.
2021-10-21更新 | 66次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约420词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】Michael Herr, who has died aged 76, was the author of Dispatches (1977), the best book about the Vietnam War. It took Herr eight years to write Dispatches, in part because he went home from Saigon with a bad case of stress disorder. He had gone to Vietnam as a journalist for Esquire magazine. An American general asked him whether he was there to write about military fashion and humor. No. He wrote little for Esquire, but took advantage of the US government’s decision to allow journalists extraordinary access to go to war with the soldiers. He shared their discomforts and their fears, witnessed their death and recorded their language.

His own language, a stream of consciousness pulsing with energy, but masterfully controlled, captured the fear and the horror, but also the excitement, of the war in the jungle and paddy fields. He recorded with a connoisseur’s expertise (行家专长) such details as the many ways in which soldiers would wish each other good luck, and the degrees of madness that were considered acceptable.

The power of the book, perhaps, comes from Herr’s insistence on describing the war, or more precisely his own responses to it, rather than protesting against it. It also comes from the ceaseless accompaniment of two elements, drugs and music — more particularly rock music, and especially the music of Jimi Hendrix. Herr himself spent drug-fuelled weekends in a flat in Saigon, staring at an ancient French map of Indochina. He met soldiers with a left pocket full of Dexedrine, the “upper” (兴奋剂) officially administered by the army to get them into battle, and a right pocket full of “downers” (镇定剂) to get them through it.

Dispatches did not come out until 1977, when the country was beginning to have its mind on other problems, but it did more, perhaps, than any other book to freeze an image of despair and a sense of waste about the war, rather as the trench poets of 1914 —1918 did in Britain.

Herr also made vital contributions to two of the most influential Vietnam films Apocalypse Now and Full Metal Jacket. His work, in the book and the two films, has been seen as part of the process whereby the US came to see itself and its history no longer merely through traditional literature, but in sounds and images.

1. Why did Michael Herr go to Vietnam during the war years?
A.To join the soldiers in military actions.
B.To report military actions and advances.
C.To give an authentic account of the war.
D.To write about military fashion and humor.
2. Which of the following about Dispatches is true?
A.It truly reflects Herr’s responses to the war.
B.Music and drugs give the author inspiration.
C.Its language is casually selected and organized.
D.It fully describes Herr’s protest against the war.
3. US soldiers brought drugs with them during the war most probably because            .
A.they suffered stress disorder
B.they were addicted to drugs
C.they used them to cure the wounds
D.they exchanged them for music records
4. What can we learn from the last paragraph?
A.Herr directed two influential Vietnam films.
B.Herr’s work played a positive role in traditional literature.
C.Herr stopped writing after the book Dispatches was published.
D.Herr’s work offered Americans more ways to know themselves.
2017-06-01更新 | 38次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐3】The native Americans, the people we call the “Indians”, had been in America for many thousands of years before Columbus arrived in 1492. Columbus thought he had arrived in India, so he called the native people “Indians”.

The Indians were kind to the early settlers. They were not afraid of them and they wanted to help them. They showed the settlers the new world around them. They taught them about the local crops like sweet potatoes, corn and peanuts. They introduced the Europeans to chocolate and to the turkey and the Europeans did business with the Indians.

But soon the settlers wanted bigger farms and more land for themselves and their families. More and more immigrants were coming from Europe and all these people needed land. So the Europeans started to take the land from the Indians. Naturally, when the whites started taking all the Indians’ land, the Indians started fighting back.

But the whites were stronger and cleverer. Slowly they pushed the Indians into those parts of the continent that the whites didn’t want- the parts where it was too cold or too dry or too mountainous to live comfortably. By 1875 the Indians were living in special places called “reservations”. But even here the whites took land from them- perhaps the whites wanted the wood, or perhaps the land had important minerals in it, or they even wanted to make national parks there. So even on their reservations the Indians were not safe from the whites.

There are many Hollywood films about the fight between the Indians and the whites. Usually in these films the Indians are bad and the whites are good and brave. But was it really like that? What do you think? Do you think the Indians were right or wrong to fight against the whites?

1. Why did Columbus call the native people “Indians”?
A.Because he thought he had arrived in India.
B.Because he liked Indian culture very much.
C.Because he knew they were from India.
D.Because he was an Indian himself.
2. Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the passage?
A.The Indians gave up their land willingly.
B.The settlers wanted to buy land from the Indians.
C.The whites even wanted more land on Indians’ reservations.
D.The Indians were stronger and cleverer than the white settlers.
3. We can learn from the last paragraph that______.
A.the Indians are usually beautified in the films
B.the author is doubtful about what the films show to us
C.films about fights are the most popular ones in the market
D.films about the fight between the Indians and the whites are very limited
4. The passage is most probably taken from the ______ column of a newspaper.
A.entertainmentB.historyC.economyD.industry
2021-05-08更新 | 94次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般