To eat only a vegan(素食的) diet might sound difficult, especially with many popular dishes containing meat or other animal products. Yet in 2017, veganism was described as “the fastest - growing lifestyle movement” in the UK, according to BBC news.
A study by a UK market research organization, suggests that over 542,000 Brits went vegan during the previous decade, an increase of 360%. And the main force behind this increase was those aged 15-34 years old — 42% of recent vegans fall under that age range.
So why exactly has veganism become so popular among young Brits?
One reason could be that many young people want to protect the environment, as less meat consumption is known to be beneficial to the environment. Global meat manufacturing is believed to cause 18% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions(排放), even more than that of all the world’s cars, trains and planes combined. Another reason is that many of today’s young people believe that it’s wrong to kill animals to be used as food.
Jess Murray, 22, a student at University College London, said that he chose to become vegan after realizing that eating animals is a choice that people make, rather than something that we need to do to survive. “Becoming vegan was an ethical (道德的) decision,” he told the Guardian.
Social media is also believed to have given rise to the increase in veganism. Platforms such as Facebook allow young vegans to connect with each other much easier, while others such as Instagram have led to the creation of “vegan celebrities (名人)”, who share lips on vegan lifestyles.
Despite the rising of veganism, Laura Wyness, an expert in diet and nutrition, said that meat is very important for people’s health. “A strict vegan diet makes it difficult to get some minerals and vitamins that your body needs,” Wyness told BBC news.
However, the popularity of veganism doesn’t seem to be fading. “It feels more like this is something that is sticking.” said an expert of the Vegan Society, a UK charity that promotes veganism.
1. What can we learn about veganism, “the fastest-growing lifestyle movement” in UK?A.It has created many popular dishes. |
B.It is backed up mainly by old people. |
C.It has led to further market research. |
D.It has grown steeply in the past 10 years. |
A.Young people prefer an environment-friendly life. |
B.Young people want to become ethical celebrities. |
C.Meal manufacturing contributes a lot to the world’s greenhouse gas. |
D.Social media allow the vegan message to spread quickly around. |
A.important | B.special |
C.lasting | D.impressive |
A.Young Brits Going Vegan | B.Veganism Comes First |
C.How to Start a Vegan Lifestyle | D.Veganism and the Environment |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】While eating is functional, and our bodies need the fuel that food provides, dining with friends or loved ones can be a wonderful experience.
We all have foods we like and dislike. Maybe it's a spicy cheese or stinky fish. We sometimes hold back on things that may offend the noses of others.
Have you ever spent too long debating with people which restaurant to eat in or when to meet? If dining solo, you can make the choice depending on your own desires at that moment and get your nourishment at exactly the time you're hungry!
So, is eating alone bad? Well, it may not be for everyone, but there certainly are some benefits to it.
A.Try it sometime—you might just like it! |
B.Our preference for certain foods may cause great trouble for others. |
C.When dining alone, we can consume whatever we like. |
D.However, some of us often find ourselves reserving a table for one in a restaurant. |
E.Finally, for some, dining alone can be a necessity. |
F.And why does it have to be a restaurant? |
G.The atmosphere of eating alone is very fantastic. |
American cuisine is shaped by the natural wealth of the country. Having never faced agricultural hardship, Americans don’t have to rely on rotating crops, such as the Japanese, whose food culture now showcases buckwheat (荞麦) alongside rice, or the Indians, or the French and Italians, who feature beans alongside wheat. “That kind of negotiation with the land forced people to incorporate(接受) those crops in to the culture,” says Barber. And so eating soba noodles becomes part of what it means to be Japanese, and eating beans becomes part of what it means to be French.
So if what we eat is what we are, what are Americans? Well, meat. “If Americans have any unifying food identity, I would say we are a mostly white meat culture,” says Barber. “The protein-centric dinner plate, whether you’re talking about a boneless chicken breast, or a 16-ounce steak, as an everyday expectation is something that America really created, and now exports to the rest of the world.”
Every single culture and religion uses food as part of their celebrations, says Ellen Gustafson, co-founder of the FEED Project and The 30 Project, which aims to deal with both hunger and overweight issues globally. “The celebratory nature of food is universal. Every season, every harvest, and every holiday has its own food, and this is true in America as well. It helps define us.”
1. According to the first paragraph, American cuisine ________.
A.consists of varieties of regional foods |
B.is becoming more and more globalized |
C.has absorbed a lot from Chinese cuisine |
D.is not as unified as its culture |
A.Relying on rotating crops |
B.The difficulty of planting crops |
C.The US’ melting pot culture |
D.The US’ agricultural wealth |
A.eating rice | B.eating beans |
C.eating white meat | D.eating soba noodles |
A.American cuisine is healthier than other cuisines. |
B.American cuisine hasn’t changed much over time. |
C.Americans use food as part of their celebrations. |
D.Americans are quite proud of their own cuisine. |
【推荐3】I told my husband the topic of this essay and asked him, “As a British person, why do the British like tea?”His answer was, “Tea fixes everything."
For the British, tea is a substitute for emotions. The money that an American would dedicate to counseling or therapy to deal with childhood trauma (创伤),the British instead spend on tea bags, tea pots, tea cups and tea towels.
Tea is the only outlet that the British have for strong emotion, outside of football teams and alcohol. If your co-workers annoy you, you can't very well get drunk to cope with it, so tea is the substitute. The ceremony of boiling water and adding sugar and milk in a specific order based on religiously-held personal preferences is calming and allows the type of repetitive action that comforts the British mind and helps them to suppress their feelings. Calmly sipping a cup of hot tea is a proper therapeutic and British way of dealing with emotion. If someone starts to get angry at you or if they express sadness or another emotion that is uncomfortable to deal with, rather than talking about it, a British person will put the kettle on. It is a convenient way of changing the subject to one that all British people can agree on: tea.
I am married to a British man, and we have never had an argument that didn't end in him offering to make a cup of tea. I've never entered a British house without receiving an offer of tea. Tea is social bonding. If you reject tea, you are rejecting Britain. For the British, the idea of not wanting tea is nearly incomprehensible. For the British, if you don't want tea, you don't want life. They really believe that tea fixes everything.
1. What will he do if a British man gets angry?A.He will drown his anger in tea. |
B.He will keep his anger in mind. |
C.He will go to the pub for a drink. |
D.He will express his anger directly. |
A.They like the taste of it. |
B.It's a way of killing time. |
C.It helps them to calm down. |
D.The tea boiling ceremony is a pleasure. |
A.Tea helps the British to socialize. |
B.Tea costs the British too much time. |
C.You can reject the offered tea in Britain. |
D.The author never argued with her husband. |
A.Her family life in Britain. |
B.Why the British like tea. |
C.How the British drink tea. |
D.Her husband's love for tea. |
【推荐1】These days, Earth Day is celebrated every year on April 22 in schools and cities across the United States. There are class projects, programs, tree plantings and many other official events. So, it may be hard to realize that when it first started, Earth Day was considered a radical (激进的) protest.
The modern environmental movement began in the 1960s. It was a time of the generation gap. Young people were acting out against their parents’ way of life. College campuses were rocked by demonstration against the war in Vietnam and other issues. In the middle of this, in 1970, a US senator (参议员) from Wisconsin named Gaylord Nelson camp up with the idea for Earth Day. As he later explained it, the idea was to channel “the student antiwar energy” into the environmental cause.
A lot of young people felt that science was the enemy. This was in spite of the fact that a lot of the people who were warning the public about air and water pollution and animals in danger were scientists. After all, wasn’t it technology- cars, housing developments and factories-that was causing the problem by spreading pollution and destroying nature? Some adults who had thought Earth Day supporters had gone too far made fun of them. They called them “tree huggers”.
Environmentalists were right that technology had to be controlled. Laws and regulations were needed to make sure that both industry and science acted responsibly. Still, science got a bad name. It was as if you had to choose either science or nature. You couldn’t have both.
Lately, though, the situation has changed. We have come to see that science and the environment do not have to be enemies. Technology can be used to protect the environment, not destroy it. Look at all the advances in clean energy that have come from science. Just as Earth Day has evolved, so has our view of science and nature. We know today that we do not have to choose between the two. Instead, we understand that science is one of the main tools we can use to protect the environment. You can be a scientist and a “tree hugger”. That’s big advancement for science and great news for trees.
1. What can people usually do on Earth Day?A.Cut down trees. |
B.Join in a protest. |
C.Launch an investigation. |
D.Complete a class project. |
A.To encourage young students to protect nature. |
B.To direct the public’s attention to environmental changes. |
C.To take students’ attention away from antiwar demonstration. |
D.To narrow the generation gap between young people and their parents. |
A.Too extreme. |
B.Quite rational. |
C.Very knowledgeable. |
D.Really considerate. |
A.People have to choose either science or nature. |
B.Nowadays science can serve to protect the environment. |
C.Science has been playing a positive part the whole time. |
D.The development of science does harm to the environment. |
【推荐2】U.S. forests could worsen global warming instead of easing it because they are being destroyed by natural disasters and are losing their ability to absorb planet-warming gases as they get older, a new Agriculture Department report says.
U.S. forests currently absorb 11 percent of U.S carbon emissions, or 150 million metric tons of carbon a year, equal to the combined emissions from 40 coal power plants, the report says. It predicts that the ability of forests to absorb carbon will start falling quickly after 2025 and that forests could emit up to 100 million metric tons of carbon a year as their emissions from rotting trees exceed their carbon absorption. Forests could become a “substantial carbon source” by 2070, the USDA report says.
The prediction suggests that the loss of forests as a natural carbon absorber will require the U.S. to cut emissions more rapidly to reach net zero, said Lynn Riley, a senior manager of climate science at the American Forest Foundation.
“Ten percent of our domestic emissions. That is a really significant portion,” Riley said. “As we work to decarbonize...forests are one of the greatest tools at our disposal. If we were to lose that, it means the U.S. will contribute that much more in emissions.”
The loss of cab on absorption is driven in part by natural disasters such as wildfires, tornadoes and hurricanes, which are increasing in frequency and strength as global temperatures rise. The disasters destroy forestland, disrupting their ecosystem and decreasing their ability to absorb carbon, Riley said.
Exploitation of forested areas, which the report projects will continue to increase, is having the same effect as people increasingly move to the so-called wild and urban interface.
The trees’ ability to absorb carbon weakens overtime. Older, mature trees absorb less carbon than younger trees of the same species, and the U.S. forests are rapidly aging, the report found.
More aggressive forest management can help by cutting down a small portion of aging forests to make ways for younger trees that absorb more carbon, Riley said. A thorough study of each forest should be done before removing older trees, Riley said, comparing forest management to prescribing the proper dugs to a patient.
1. Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?A.Coal power plants emit 150 million metric tons of carbon every year |
B.Cutting down all older trees is an effective way to solve the problem. |
C.A new study of forest should be conducted after removing older trees. |
D.Forests are likely to shift from a carbon absorber to an emission source. |
A.Forests play a crucial role in holding carbon. |
B.Forests are no longer a natural carbon absorber. |
C.The U.S makes contributions to decarbonization. |
D.Achieving net zero emissions is within easy reach. |
A.aging forests | B.natural disasters |
C.global warming | D.development of forests |
A.Cutting Carbon Helps Slow Global Warming. |
B.Global Warming Is Becoming Worse Gradually. |
C.Forests Are Losing Their Ability to Hold Carbon. |
D.Planting More Trees Is at The Top of The Agenda. |
【推荐3】Attention to the fight against climate change tends to be focused on trees, but 75% of the planet's surface is covered by the ocean, and a natural process taking place underwater has excited scores of investors at the recent World Economic Forum (论坛) who may want to help.
During the recent wildfires in the Amazon rainforest, journalists often described trees as the “lungs of the world”, but that title most certainly belongs to phytoplankton, which alone refreshes nearly 50% of the atmospheric oxygen on planet earth, the value of four Amazons.
And, in the effort to stop the warming of the planet, our greatest assistants could belong to whales, because of the great amount of their excrement left in the sea.
A new paper published by economist Dr. Ralph Chianti underlines the influence that whales, especially blue whales, and their excrement have on climate change. It is all due to whales’ excrement in the diets of phytoplankton.
The tiny marine algae (海洋藻类) floats at the center of several marine food webs, and they provide food for many sea creatures including whales, while also requiring whales’ excrement to feed on. They also require CO2 to survive, just like trees.
Whales, after deep-sea dives for krill (磷虾), return to the surface and release excrement, which is rich in nitrogen (氮) and iron, into the top ocean layer, which provides a key food source for phytoplankton.
In his paper, Dr. Chiami suggests that since phytoplankton populations can expand wherever whales are, a significant effort should be made to fight against climate change by encouraging the growth and protection of whale populations. “At a minimum, even a 1% increase in phytoplankton productivity thanks to whale activity would take in hundreds of millions of tons of additional CO2 a year, which is equal to the sudden appearance of 2 billion mature trees,”says Chiami.
1. What makes the investors excited?A.Trees’ function as “lungs of the world”. |
B.Phytoplankton’s ability to create oxygen. |
C.The success of the World Economic Forum. |
D.People's continuous fight against climate change. |
A.They refresh much oxygen. | B.They never send out CO2. |
C.They kill much phytoplankton. | D.They supply food to phytoplankton. |
A.Complex. | B.Competitive. | C.Dependent. | D.Distant. |
A.Rebuild food webs. | B.Try to protect whales. |
C.Grow more phytoplankton. | D.Limit population explosion. |