Digital grounding(限制)is when parents or caregivers limit or completely take away access to technology from children. According to a study conducted by Pew Research, 65% of parents have digitally grounded their teen by taking away their teen’s cellphone or Internet access as punishment.
Because children are so connected with their technologies, digital grounding may seem like a logical step for parents. Take away a child’s most cherished item and they will quickly learn from their behavior. But the idea of digital grounding isn’t as clear-cut as that. Instead, it may be a lose-lose situation for parents and kids, alike.
For most parents, the goal of grounding isn’t to make their children unhappy or sad. It is to teach a lesson in the hope that they won’t engage in whatever behavior got them in trouble in the first place. Unfortunately, though, digital grounding is often just punishment, not discipline. If a child stays out past curfew(约定的最晚回家时间), a punishment would be hitting or yelling at them. Discipline would be not letting them go out the next weekend because they failed to follow rules.
We’ve all been there—we’ve caught our child doing something wrong and in the heat of the moment laid out a strict punishment. We may have been feeling hot-headed, embarrassed, or upset. Often, though, these punishments don’t align(结盟)with the bad behavior.
While digital grounding may solve the problem temporarily, it won’t provide children with the guidance they need to act appropriately in the future. Instead of grounding, show your child what they did wrong and give them the chance to act differently. This way, they will learn from their mistakes in a practical manner and figure out ways to be safe and smart with technology.
There’s no denying it: technology is here for the long-haul. This is why some parenting experts don’t recommend digitally grounding your children. It doesn’t focus on the end goal of safe behavior. They recommend teaching them good habits as soon as possible, rather than taking away their technology. By digitally grounding them, you are putting a bandage over the wound, rather than treating it.
Now, when we say that digital grounding is a lose-lose situation, we’re not saying that disciplining your children in general is a lose-lose situation. Discipline is a great way to teach children lessons, when used appropriately.
1. Which of the following is a proper form of discipline according to the author?A.Hitting or yelling at children. |
B.Laying out a strict punishment in the heat of the moment. |
C.Taking away access to cellphones from children completely. |
D.Forbidding kids to go out the next weekend if they stay out past curfew. |
A.It benefits children a great deal. |
B.It is no better than disciplining. |
C.Parents can use it to correct kids’ behavior. |
D.Neither parents nor children gain benefits from it. |
A.Give kids more free time. | B.Help kids form good habits. |
C.Act appropriately in public. | D.Put a bandage over the wound. |
A.To inform us of ways of punishing kids. |
B.To explain what digital grounding means. |
C.To show how to parent children in digital times. |
D.To prove digital grounding is not a good parenting way. |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】“Heaven is where the police are English,the cooks are French the mechanics are German,the lovers are Italian and everything is organized by the Swiss.Hell is where the.police are German,the cooks are English,the mechanics are French,the lovers are Swiss,and everything is organized by the Italians.”
Obviously the national stereotypes(模式化的思想)in this,old joke are generalizations,but such stereotypes are often said to "exist for a reason".Is there actually a sliver of truth in them?Not likely,an international research team now says.
"National and cultural stereotypes do play an important role in how people see themselves and others,and being aware that these are not dependable is a useful thing,"said study author Robert McCrae of the National Institute on Aging."These are in fact unfounded stereotypes.They don't come from looking around you,"McCrae said.
If national stereotypes aren't rooted in real experiences,then where do they come from?One possibility is that they reflect national values,which may become known from historical events.For example,many historians have argued that the spirit of American individualism has its origins in the experiences of the pioneers on the Old West.
Social scientists such as psychologist Richard Robins have given several other possible explanations for stereotypes and why they may be incorrect.Robins notes that some stereotypes may have been correct at one point in history and then remained unchanged while the culture changed.
We may be "hard-wired",to some degree,to keep incorrect stereotypes,since we are less likely to notice and remember information that is different from our stereotypes.Generally,according to Robins,when we meet people who are different from our stereotypes,we see them as unique individuals rather than typical national or cultural groups.
1. What is the function of the first paragraph?A.To introduce the topic of national stereotypes. |
B.To make a comparison between the characters of different countries. |
C.To exemplify the argument against stereotyping. |
D.To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of people in different countries. |
A.Supportive. | B.Indifferent. |
C.Critical. | D.Uncertain. |
A.Because they are formed by individual historians. |
B.Because people tend to have false idea about other cultures. |
C.Because generalizations are made through personal experience. |
D.Because what was true in the past may not be true at present. |
A.Forgetful. | B.Fixed. |
C.Anxious. | D.Helpless. |
【推荐2】We live in a world of countless reminders, and constant push notifications (通知). Every service seems to be competing for our attention all the time. As it turns out, all this distraction may come at a massive cost, but you don’t even realize it.
The findings from new research at Ohio State University were published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Dozens of participants were given a simple-sounding task. Look at a screen of four colored squares. One will be outlined in white-pay attention to that one. After these squares flash on the screen for a mere tenth of a second, pick the color that you remember from a color wheel.
Despite the rapid speed of such work, the human brain excels (擅长) at this task. “People are quite good at this, surprisingly good!” says Julie Golumb, associate professor of psychology at Ohio State University.
They got quite good at it, to a point. Researchers threw a wrench by introducing an intentional distractor. Of the four squares, one would be outlined in white, but then another — the distractor — would be surrounded in white dots. Despite being instructed to ignore the distractor, subjects just couldn’t help it. Most of the time, they still recalled the color. But about20% to 30% of the time, they actually reported the distractor color as the correct one, unaware of the error.
As Golumb emphasizes, findings like these are a big deal. We’ve long known balancing too many tasks can slow down our thinking. But the fact that it can literally recolor our memories should give us pause, because there’s not a fundamental difference between colored squares and real versus fake news headlines on social media.
“If you’re trying to pay attention to multiple things, you’re not going to be as good at if it were one at a time,” she says. “We’ve known for a long-time multitasking might slow you down, but our research shows, it’s not just you might be slowed down; it might affect what you’re perceiving in the moment.”
1. What task were the participants given?A.Distinguish different colors of squares. |
B.Put the squares of a color into groups. |
C.Pick out the square color outlined in white. |
D.Figure out what you remember from a color wheel. |
A.Assessed the experiment. |
B.Added the difficulty. |
C.Overturned the result. |
D.Discovered the truth. |
A.Making a comparison. |
B.Giving examples. |
C.Following time order. |
D.Making classifications. |
A.Suspicious. | B.Unconcerned. | C.Optimisti | D.Negative. |
【推荐3】Rather than building new homes to help satisfy housing markets, a new study says that taxing empty homes in big cities could increase housing affordability for local residents while generating income for the governments.
During the past 20 years, housing affordability has decreased significantly in the UK due to a rapid increase in prices relative to earnings. This may be due to foreign investors buying out properties in cities such as London, or from British citizens in the countryside buying out second homes in the city, which reduces the availability of affordable housing for local residents.
This means that local citizens who actually live in the city are forced to pay more money for housing in neighborhoods that are filled with homes that are unoccupied for more than half of the year.
In a study that was published recently,researcher Jonathan Bourne at University College London studied the relationship between the amount of properties which do not have permanent residents, and housing affordability in different parts of England and Wales. Upon researching the data, which represents about 40% of the population.the researcher was stunned to find that there were over 340,000 empty apartments across the places.
Though some cities are trying to meet housing demands by building more housing. Bourne suggests that local governments put an empty homes tax of 1% instead. “The data shows that empty homes are very concentrated in small numbers of desirable areas. In such cases simply building more homes is not going to solve the problem.as the issue is severe competition for property, not a lack of places to live." says Bourne.
Vancouver introduced a similar empty homes tax in 2017,which was the first oi its kind in North America. One year after it went into effect. the city reported a 15% decrease in unoccupied homes,which amounted to 163 properties being rented out to local people. Furthermore, the tax raised more than $ 38 million in city revenue(税收),all of which was spent on affordable housing programs.
1. Who might be blamed for low housing affordability?A.Local residents. |
B.Foreign tourists. |
C.The local governments: |
D.The owners of empty homes. |
A.Excited. |
B.Surprised. |
C.Proud. |
D.Curious. |
A.Taxing empty properties works well. |
B.Taxes on housing need to be cut down. |
C.Providing more housing is a wise choice. |
D.Housing demands have fallen in North America. |
A.To encourage people to rent a house. |
B.To suggest building more new homes. |
C.To explain why housing prices have risen. |
D.To discuss solutions to affordable housing. |
【推荐1】Preparing to apply for the Ivy League
Many students dream of being admitted to famous schools, especially the Ivy League. For most of them, the chance of admission is very slim. There were 281,060 applicants for eight Ivy League schools in 2021.
●High GPA
Having a GPA in the top5—10% of your class is essential, and being ranked among the top few students dramatically betters your chances. This is a critical part of your overall application.
●Extracurricular activities
Having only a high GPA or SAT score won’t guarantee you into an Ivy League school.
Surely, Ivy Leagues want to see a well-rounded applicant who didn’t lock themselves away for four years to get good grades. Join a sports team (even if it’s just an intramural team),join a club or two and get involved with the theater department.
●Early application
A.However, it is not enough. |
B.Thus, show your passion and strong motivation. |
C.You need to show you are smart as well as special. |
D.Among them, less than 10 percent got admissions offers. |
E.Your outstanding academic performance gains popularity. |
F.Each Ivy League college offers an early admission program. |
G.Your continuous dedication will ensure your success. |
【推荐2】Suppose nearly every student passed the tests. What would the respond be from politicians, business people and the media? Would these people shake their heads in admiration and say, "Damn, those teachers must be good!"?. But in the real world, it would be mentioned as evidence that the tests were too easy. For example, when results on New York's math exam rose in 2009, the minister of the state's Board of Regents said, "What today's scores tell me is not that we should be celebrating, but that New York State needs to raise its standards."
The unavoidable and deeply disturbing effect is that "high standards"really mean "standards that all students will never be able to meet". If everyone did meet them, the standards would just be ratcheted up again---as high as necessary to ensure that some students failed.
The standards-and-responsibility movement is not about leaving no child behind. On the contrary, it is a detailed sorting device, intended to separate wheat from chaff(谷壳). The fact that students from low-income- families and students whose first language isn't English are disproportionately(不成比例地) defined as chaff makes the whole enterprise even have more gradual and accumulated effects.
But my little thought experiment uncovers a truth that extends well beyond what has been done to our schools in the name of "raising the bar", We have been taught to respond with suspicion whenever all members of any group are successful. In America, excellence is regarded as a rare product. Success doesn't count unless it is obtained by only a few. The goal, in other words, isn't to do well but to defeat other people who are also trying to do well. Grades in this view should be used to announce who's beating whom. Comparative success just gives the winner rights to talk"We're No.1!" proudly. And again, it creates the misleading impression of unavoidable, permanent failure for some.
1. Which can replace the underlined words"ratcheted up"?A.Ended up with bad result. | B.Increased by a fixed amount |
C.Obtained within a certain time. | D.Presented in an unexpected way. |
A.Critical. | B.Approval. |
C.Unconcerned | D.Neutral. |
A.What are the ideal test standards? |
B.Why do students fail in their studies? |
C.Why can't every student meet test standards? |
D.When do students' backgrounds make effect? |
A.People are encouraged to accept failure bravely. |
B.People are used to taking the failure for granted |
C.Some people lack the abilities to reach their goals. |
D.One's success completely depends on oneself. |
【推荐3】At first glance, Huaguoshan kindergarten in Zhuzhou, Hunan province, looks much like any other nursery. But on higher floors, the classrooms are more of traditional Chinese architecture with rice-paper lanterns and a row of black roof tiles. Children wear traditional jackets and large portraits of Confucius hang on the bare walls.
The kindergarten opened in September but already has a year-long waiting list. It taps into a growing nationwide demand for guoxue, or “national studies”. This usually involves learning classical Chinese thought, texts and morals, especially those associated with Confucius. They are taught how to bow, greet each other politely and sit attentively. Also they recite poems, practise calligraphy, perform tea ceremonies and play Chinese chess. But teachers say mastering skills is secondary to building character. A child learns to “respect her rival and accept defeat” in chess and to “value what is fragile” in the tea room.
Frost & Sullivan, a data firm, estimated that the market for children's guoxue education was worth 466bn yuan ($73bn) in 2018, almost double its value in 2014. At the heart of the trend is education. The ancient system of thought stresses respect for authority, ancestors and elders. Confucius taught that such values were essential to achieving individual moral excellence (个人道德). Such citizens would form the basis for social harmony and political stability.
Guoxue content has long been part of the state secondary-school curriculum. The number of classical texts to be taught in schools increased from 14 to 72. In 2017 the government put out guidelines for having a comprehensive guoxue syllabus (大纲) in primary and secondary schools by 2025. The education ministry said state-approved guoxue classes would “enhance a sense of belonging to and pride in the Chinese nation”.
1. How does the guoxue learning in Huaguoshan kindergarten differ?A.It requires children to behave like ancient Chinese. |
B.It follows the growing trend of leaning diverse cultures. |
C.It attaches more significance to teaching and training skills. |
D.It provides courses associated with classical Chinese culture. |
A.The heart of guoxue trend is to gain economic profit. |
B.Guoxue learning has been a must in secondary schools. |
C.Guoxue learning promotes social harmony and stability. |
D.The market of children's guoxue learning develops quickly. |
A.It helps to build the students' sense of gratitude. |
B.Official approval will boost its growth and influence. |
C.Classical texts are the only medium in secondary schools. |
D.Its content has been taught in primary schools since 2017. |
A.China's education reform is in progress. |
B.Guoxue learning hits Chinese primary schools. |
C.A more Confucian education is forming in China. |
D.Chinese schools explore ways to spread national culture. |