组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与社会 > 政治与经济 > 政治政策
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:253 题号:7310711

Public distrust of scientists stems in part from the blurring of boundaries between science and technology, between discovery and manufacture. Most governments, perhaps all governments, justify public expenditure on scientific research in terms of the economic benefits the scientific enterprise has brought in the past and will bring in the future. Politicians remind their voters of the splendid machines “our scientists” have invented, the new drugs to relieve old disorders, and the new surgical equipment and techniques by which previously unmanageable conditions may now be treated and lives saved. At the same time, the politicians demand of scientists that they tailor their research to “economics needs”, and that they award a higher priority to research proposals that are “near the market” and can be translated into the greatest return on investment in the shortest time. Dependent, as they are, on politicians for much of their funding, scientists have little choice but to comply. Like the rest of us, they are members of a society that rates the creation of wealth as the greatest possible good. Many have reservations, but keep them to themselves in what they perceive as a climate hostile to the pursuit of understanding for its own sake and the idea of an inquiring, creative spirit.

In such circumstances no one should be too hard on people who are suspicious of conflicts of interest. When we learn that the distinguished professor assuring us of the safety of a particular product holds a consultancy with the company making it, we cannot be blamed for wondering whether his fee might conceivably cloud his professional judgment. Even if the professor holds no consultancy with any firm, some people may still distrust him because of his association with those who do, or at least wonder about the source of some of his research funding.

This attitude can have damaging effects. It questions the integrity of individuals working in a profession that prizes intellectual honesty as the supreme virtue, and plays into the hands of those who would like to discredit scientists by representing them as corruptible. This makes it easier to dismiss all scientific pronouncements, but especially those made by the scientists who present themselves as “experts”. The scientist most likely to understand the safety of a nuclear reactor, for example, is a nuclear engineer, and a nuclear engineer is most likely to be employed by the nuclear industry. If a nuclear engineer declares that a reactor is unsafe, we believe him, because clearly it is not to his advantage to lie about it. If he tells us it is safe, on the other hand, we distrust him, because he may well be protecting the employer who pays his salary.

1. What is the chief concern of most governments when it comes to scientific research?
A.The reduction of public expenditure.B.Quick economic returns.
C.The budget for a research project.D.Support from the voters.
2. Why won’t scientists complain about the government’s policy concerning scientific research?
A.They know it takes patience to win support from the public.
B.They realize they work in an environment hostile to the free pursuit of knowledge.
C.They think compliance with government policy is in the interests of the public.
D.They are accustomed to keeping their opinions to themselves.
3. According to the author, people are suspicious of the professional judgment of scientists because ______.
A.some of them do not give priority to intellectual honesty
B.sometimes they hide the source of their research funding
C.they could be influenced by their association with the project concerned
D.their pronouncements often turn out to be wrong
4. Why does the author say that public distrust of scientists can have damaging effects?
A.Scientists themselves may doubt the value of their research findings.
B.People will not believe scientists even when they tell the truth.
C.It makes things difficult for scientists to seek research funds.
D.It may wear out the enthusiasm of scientists for independent research.
【知识点】 政治政策

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约280词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】Ping-pong, or table tennis, might seem like an ordinary game to play with friends or family. But it holds a special place in China-US relations, as it has helped both countries get along for the last 50 years. This has been called “ping-pong diplomacy (乒乓外交)”.

Judy Hoarfrost was just 15 years old when she was sent from the US to China as part of a nine-member table tennis team. The year was 1971, and for the past 20 years, relations between China and the US had been unfriendly.

But as the team toured around China, things started warming up. Hoarfrost even got to meet then-Premier Zhou Enlai. “The most unforgettable moment was Zhou shaking hands with me and looking into my eyes,” Hoarfrost told China Daily. “You have opened a new page in China-US relationships.” Zhou told the team.

In the years that followed the historic visit, ties between the two countries started to blossom.Diplomatic relations between the US and China were fully established (建立) in 1979.

Players from both countries believed strongly in the idea of “friendship first, competition second”. To this day, many of them remain friends. Hoarfrost thinks we should remember ping-pong diplomacy in order “to understand the importance of people to people exchanges in establishing bonds , human bonds between peoples.”

Seeing tension (紧张局面) between two of the world’s biggest powers in recent years, Hoarfrost said China and the US should work together. “We have so much in common, and we need to build on what we have in common,” she added.

1. What do we know about Hoarfrost?
A.She has played table tennis for 15 years
B.She doesn’t know what “ping-pong diplomacy” is
C.She formed her own table tennis team 20 years ago.
D.She was part of efforts to improve China-US relations.
2. What is Paragraph 3 about?
A.The team’s tour around China.B.People’s memories of the team.
C.Hoarfrost’s meeting with Zhou Enlai.D.The relationship between China and the US.
3. When were China-US diplomatic relations fully established?
A.In 1971.B.In 1972.C.In 1979.D.In 1991
4. What does the underlined phrase “establishing bonds” in Paragraph 5 mean?
A.Developing a relationship.B.Holding a competition.
C.Understanding different countries.D.Understanding the spirit of sportsmanship.
5. According to the passage, what might Hoarfrost agree with?
A.It’s normal for countries to face tensionB.China and the US should improve their relations.
C.Playing table tennis is interesting.D.US should learn from China.
2022-01-24更新 | 179次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐2】We all have a different approach to money — some of us like to spend it as soon as we have it, while some of us like to hold on to it and spend it carefully. But for people who are very savvy (精明的) about their cash, there are a number of interesting ways to invest it and, if things go well, make a tidy profit.

Buying stamps, wine, coins and books are all different ways of investing your money. It comes with risks but can be thrilling as, hopefully, you watch the value of your investment rise. However, you need to know what you’re doing and making your fortune is not guaranteed.

If you’re happy to take a risk, then one of the most well-known ways of investing is by buying artwork. By purchasing a painting and holding on to it, its value can increase by a handsome sum, but of course, only when you sell it do you feel the financial benefit. Some people get quite lucky, particularly when they don’t expect to make any money. There are stories of people buying a painting in an antique shop for peanuts only to find out it’s actually worth thousands of pounds.

Of course investing in artwork is not a guarantee to make you a millionaire. Patrick Connolly, a financial adviser, says investing in art is too risky and he recommends their clients not to invest in it because the downsides outweigh the upsides.

But if you’re still keen, there are art fairs, such as The Affordable Art Fair, and websites aimed at buyers with a modest budget. Patrick Connolly says the best approach here is to buy something you like and can afford and “if it goes up in value, that should be just an added bonus.”

If this has spoilt your plans for your investment, maybe there’s more chance of winning big money by buying a lottery ticket (彩票)!

1. What does the underlined words in paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Going to antique shops to buy peanuts.
B.Purchasing a painting for its financial benefit.
C.Spending a small amount of money on artwork.
D.Exchanging artwork for peanuts in an antique shop.
2. Which of the following view may Patrick Connolly agree with?
A.Artistic investments don’t necessarily result in the rise in value.
B.Generally, people can earn more money by buying a lottery ticket.
C.Buying stamps and coins is much safer than buying a painting.
D.People will definitely gain financial benefits if they invest wisely.
3. What’s mainly discussed in the text?
A.What investments guarantee a big fortune.
B.Whether it’s profitable to invest in artwork.
C.Where valuable works of art are available.
D.How investments influence people’s daily life.
2020-10-13更新 | 63次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐3】One feature of a successful business is its ability to employ creativity to push into new territory (领域). Those with staying power, however, have mastered an often-ignored factor that allows them to focus on the future: empathy(共情). While that may surprise many, I am certain that the ability to connect with and relate to others is the force that moves business forward.

Though the concept of empathy might go against the modern concept a traditional workplace—competitive, the reality is that for business leaders to experience success, they need to not just see or hear the activity around them, but also relate to the people around.

Some may think they can achieve their goals without much thought for other people. This attitude works for some, but at some point-often sooner rather than later—everyone needs to depend on their relationships and build personal and professional connections. Successful people do not operate alone; each of us needs the support of others to achieve positive results that push us forward our goals.

Effectively understanding empathy involves regarding it as each person’s connection to the people and marketplace. A biological principle(原理) known as co-evolution (共同进化)explains that the adaptation of an organism (有机体)is caused by the change of a related object. Similarly, business and their leaders participate in co-evolution-type relationships. Business success depends on empathetic leaders who are able to adapt, build on the strengths around them, and relate to their environment. When businesses fail, it is often because leaders have stopped focusing on understanding their environment and instead stay separated in their own operations.

To develop an effective workforce, we must be willing to give in and meet people where they are. This can be uncomfortable, particularly when you feel like your position makes more sense or offers a better solution. A significant part of developing empathy, however, is learning to understand, respect and adopt another person’s point of view rather forcing your own.

1. The author thinks that to achieve success, a company must ________.
A.frequently develop in new areas
B.always stay powerful enough
C.focus on its future development
D.have thought for its employees
2. What can be inferred from the passage?
A.Never giving up is the key to success
B.Few business leaders experience success
C.Support from others helps people achieve goals
D.Competitive seldom exists in traditional workplaces.
3. Which of the following is the best example of co-evolution principle?
A.The principal is good at judging teachers’ points of view.
B.The CEO allows the engineers full freedom to choose their working hours.
C.The boss ignores the fact that his employees’ salary is below the average.
D.The manager refuses to reduce production despite the falling market demand.
2020-04-01更新 | 44次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般