The values of artistic works, according to cultural relativism (相对主义), are simply reflections of local and economic conditions. Such a view, however, fails to explain the ability of some works of art to excite the human mind across cultures and through centuries.
History has witnessed the endless production of Shakespearean plays in every major language of the world. It is never rare to find that Mozart packs Japanese concert hall, as Japanese painter Hiroshige does Paris galleries. Unique works of this kind are different from today’s popular art, even if they began as works of popular art. They have set themselves apart in their timeless appeal and will probably be enjoyed for centuries into the future.
In a 1757 essay, the philosopher David Hume argued that because “the general principles of tastes are uniform (不变的) in human nature,” the value of some works of art might be essentially permanent. He observed that Homer was still admired after 2000 years. Works of this type, he believed, spoke to deep and unvarying features of human nature and could continue to exist over centuries.
Now researchers are applying scientific methods to the study of the universality of art. For example, evolutionary psychology is being used by literary scholars to explain the long-lasting themes and plot devices in fiction. The structures of musical pieces are now open to experimental analysis as never before. Research findings seem to indicate that the creation by a great artist is as permanent an achievement as the discovery by a great scientist.
1. According to the passage, what do we know about cultural relativism?A.It introduces different cultural values. |
B.It relates artistic values to local conditions. |
C.It explains the history of artistic works in detail. |
D.It excites the human mind throughout the world. |
A.the charm of great arts is universal and lasting |
B.popular arts are hardly different from great arts |
C.great artists are skilled at combing various cultures |
D.great arts are works of popular arts in the beginning |
A.they are results of scientific study |
B.they establish general principles of art |
C.they are created by the world’s greatest artists |
D.they appeal to unchanging features of human nature |
A.Are Popular Arts Universal? | B.Is Human Nature Uniform? |
C.Are Great Arts Permanent? | D.Is Cultural Relativism Scientific? |
相似题推荐
【推荐1】I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development I believe there is nothing to recommend it, from the baby’s point of view.
Mothers, doctors and nurses alike have no idea of where a baby’s blood sugar level lies. All we know is that a low level is harmful to brain development and makes a baby easily annoyed. In this state, the baby is difficult to calm down and sleep is impossible. The baby asks for attention by crying and searching for food with its mouth.
It is not just unkind but also dangerous to say a four-hourly feeding schedule will make a baby satisfied. The first of the experts to advocate a strict clock-watching schedule was Dr Frederic Truby King who was against feeding in the night. I’ve never heard anything so ridiculous. Baby feeding shouldn’t follow a timetable set by the mum. What is important is feeding a baby in the best way, though it may cause some inconvenience in the first few weeks.
Well, at last we have copper-bottomed research that supports demand feeding and points out the weaknesses of strictly timed feeding. The research finds out that babies who are fed on demand do better at school at age 5, 7, 11 and 14, than babies fed according to the clock. By the age of 8, their IQ scores are four to five percent higher than babies fed by a rigid(严格的)timetable. This research comes from Oxford and Essex University using a sample of 10,419 children born in the early 1990s, taking account of parental education, family income, a child’s sex and age, the mother’s health and feeding style. These results don’t surprise me. Feeding according to schedule runs the risk of harming the rapidly growing brain by taking no account of sinking blood sugar levels.
I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeding practices.
1. What does the author think about Dr King?A.He is strict. |
B.He is unkind. |
C.He has the wrong idea. |
D.He sets a timetable for mothers |
A.basic | B.reliable |
C.surprising | D.interesting |
A.The baby will sleep well. |
B.The baby will have its brain harmed. |
C.The baby will have a low blood sugar level. |
D.The baby will grow to be wiser by the age of 8. |
A.whenever it wants food |
B.according to its blood sugar level |
C.in the night |
D.every four hours |
【推荐2】A typical lion tamer(驯兽师) in people's mind is an entertainer holding a whip(鞭) and a chair. The whip gets all of the attention, but it's mostly for show. In reality, it's the chair that does the important work. When a lion tamer holds a chair in front of the lion's face, the lion tries to focus on all four legs of the chair at the same time. With its focus divided, the lion becomes confused and is unsure about what to do next. When faced with so many options, the lion chooses to freeze and wait instead of attacking the man holding the chair.
How often do you find yourself in the same position as the lion? How often do you have something you want to achieve (e.g. lose weight, start a business, travel more)—only to end up confused by all of the options in front of you and never make progress?
This upsets me to no end because while all the experts are busy debating about which option is best, the people who want to improve their lives are left confused by all of the conflicting information. The end result is that we feel like we can't focus or that we're focused on the wrong things, and so we take less action, make less progress, and stay the same when we could be improving.
It doesn't have to be that way. Anytime you find the world waving a chair in your face, remember this: all you need to do is focus on one thing. You just need to get started. Starting before you feel ready is one of the habits of successful people. If you have somewhere you want to go, something you want to accomplish, someone you want to become…take immediate action. If you're clear about where you want to go, the rest of the world will either help you get there or get out of the way.
1. Why does the lion tamer use a chair?A.To get ready for a fight. | B.To show off his skills. |
C.To trick the lion. | D.To entertain the audience. |
A.They hold on to the wrong things. | B.They feel puzzled over choices. |
C.They find it hard to make changes. | D.They have to do something for show. |
A.Appreciative. | B.Supportive. | C.Respectful. | D.Doubtful. |
A.make a quick decision | B.break your old habits |
C.wait for a better chance | D.ask for clear guidance |
【推荐3】As a permaculture designer and consultant, I have been involved with a range of ecosystem restoration projects. These include both small-scale and landscape-scale projects to repair damage to degraded environments, boost biodiversity, and build toward a better future.
It is clear to me, as it will no doubt be clear to readers, that ecosystem restoration is crucial. As we seek to ease and adapt to climate change, and work to reverse (逆转) biodiversity losses, restoration is an important part of the global solution. But while it is widely understood that ecosystem restoration is the right thing to do, there is far less understanding about what exactly it means, and how it is to be achieved.
One of the most obvious misunderstandings about ecosystem restoration is that it is all about action, especially planting trees. It is important to understand that forest and woodland ecosystems are not the only crucial environments to restore. Ecosystem restoration consists of a huge range of different systems from farmland soils and grassland systems to our seas and oceans.
Ecosystem restoration is not always about actively intervening (干预). In many instances, passive intervention can be just as effective, if not more so, than active. This involves simply letting nature take the reins (掌管). In short, in ecosystem restoration, what we don’t do can be as important as what we do. Often nature already has the answers. But there are situations in which humans have damaged the environment to such a degree that natural restoration is impossible. This is when carefully designed action is required.
Another key thing to remember is that we cannot succeed in ecosystem restoration without local people’s involvement or, ideally, their leadership. When a community feels a sense of belonging and a deep connection with the land, this provides a firm foundation for future conservation and restoration work.
While I dislike taking an overly human-centered view, environmental issues cannot be separated in our complex modern world from socio-economic ones. We need to look at people and the planet as a whole and appreciate the complex web of human life and its interaction with the natural world in order to form practical restoration solutions. It is important to understand how nature can boom and still provide humans with the things we need. It is only when we consider the natural environment and human society as interconnected that we can really continue to make progress.
1. Which shows the proper understanding of ecosystem restoration?A.Community-led efforts should be reduced. |
B.Ecosystem restoration involves a variety of systems. |
C.Direct action on forest ecosystems should be avoided. |
D.The more trees we plant, the better the ecosystems will be. |
A.Nature fails to restore itself to health. |
B.The cost of passive intervention is high. |
C.A large population relies on natural resources. |
D.Active intervention can improve the local economy. |
A.Focusing on the interests of us humans. |
B.Making nature conservation a top priority. |
C.Conducting a survey of local natural resources. |
D.Taking both social factors and nature into account. |
A.How people can benefit from ecosystem restoration. |
B.What challenge people face in ecosystem restoration. |
C.How we can repair damaged ecosystems more effectively. |
D.Why ecosystem restoration becomes increasingly urgent. |
【推荐1】A water lily painting, Water Lily Pond, by Claude Monet, the French impressionist artist, was sold for more than S80 million on Tuesday, breaking the auction (拍卖) record for himself. Water Lily Pond was part of a four-work collection of water lily paintings that Monet put up for sale during his lifetime.
The four paintings of Monet’s water lily garden were signed and dated by the artist in 1919. One of the other paintings is at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, while another was sold at auction in 1992 for $12. 1 million and is in a private collection now. The final painting in the series was cut into two before World WarⅡ.
“After a fierce bidding battle between a number of buyers in the room and on the telephone, the painting finally was sold to a collector for $80.4 million, setting a new world record price for the artist at auction,” said Olivier Camu, a scholar of impressionist art.
The last record for a Monet work was set in May when Le Pont du Chemin de fer a Argenteuil was sold for $41.4 million. The painting sold on Tuesday was bought at a 1971 New York auction for $320,000. It has not been exhibited since then.
Monet’s later works had unique characteristics, especially Les Grandes Decorations, another good example, which was bedded in Musee de I`Orangerie in Paris five months after Monet’s death in 1926.
Monet created his water lily garden in Giverny, France. He selected different water lilies in an effort to get as many different colored flowers as possible, specially creating the garden as a base for his paintings.
1. According to the passage, Water Lily Pond broke the last record for Monet’s paintings by __________.A.$12 million | B.$39 million |
C.$41.4 million | D.$0.32 million |
A.It was once auctioned in America. |
B.It was cut into halves before World War II. |
C.It had been kept in New York for over 40 years. |
D.It was once put in Musee de I`Orangerie. |
A.Exciting. | B.Inspiring. |
C.Disappointing. | D.Frightening. |
【推荐2】Despite the fact that the Mona Lisa is one of the most well-known paintings in the world, did you know that it’s actually just 30 inches by 21 inches? The famous Leonardo da Vinci painting is housed at the Louvre and is under reliable security, but in May 2022, an angry protester was still able to lob some cake over at it.
The man disguised himself as a senior in a wheelchair, when all of a sudden, he jumped up out of the wheelchair. He tried to break through the painting’s protective glass case, and when he failed to do so, he broke some cake directly onto the glass and threw roses on the ground. He was then taken out of the building by security guards.
As he was taken out, the man was said to have shouted, “There are people who are destroying the Earth... Artists should think about the Earth! All artists should think about the Earth. That’s why I did it.”
Experts believe he was able to get so close to the painting thanks to the use of the wheelchair disguise. A museum spokesperson told BuzzFeed News that the museum had been following museum “usual procedures” for visitors with disabilities.
The painting was not damaged, but this was actually not the first time that it had faced the threat of damage. It first became well known when Vincenzo Peruggia stole the painting in 1911. It took 24 hours for people to notice that the painting was stolen at all, but then it was reported all over the front page of international newspapers. Peruggia was caught two years later and the painting became internationally known after being recovered for the intensive coverage.
In 1956, the painting was sprayed with acid, with the lower part of the painting being affected. Then Ugo Ungaza Villegas threw a rock at the painting, hitting the lower elbow of the woman in the painting. Following these events, the painting has been encased in bulletproof (防弹的) glass.
1. What does the underlined word “lob” in paragraph 1 mean?A.Take. | B.Paint. | C.Hang. | D.Throw. |
A.To gain more sympathy. | B.To destroy the painting. |
C.To visit the museum for free. | D.To watch the painting closely. |
A.He tried to force the museum to close. | B.He wanted to draw others’ attention. |
C.He was dissatisfied with artists. | D.He fought for the rights of the disabled. |
A.It became world famous. | B.It led to no more attacks. |
C.It was further damaged. | D.It was easier to protect. |
【推荐3】Shortly after the return of the NBA season in late July, the artist Victor Solomon showed an ambitious creation to mark the occasion: the “Kintsugi Court”. Using the Japanese craft of kintsugi, an ancient method of repairing pottery with gold, Solomon filled in the cracks of a run-down basketball court in South Los Angeles. In the process, he transformed the forgotten bit of concrete into something eye-catching and functional. He highlighted the court’s weak points instead of hiding them.
Basketball has been a frequent source for Solomon. But he’s far from alone. Over the past five years, basketball courts, some previously in disrepair or disuse, have been frequent canvases for public art. The work, from famous creators like Solomon as well as nonprofit organizations and art collectives, uses the courts to comment on the interconnected dynamics of race, class, and changing communities.
Artists say they’re drawn to basketball as inspiration because of the game itself—a sport described as a universally accessible, race-indifferent platform.
For other artists, that functionality—the opportunity to produce a useful public resource —is as important as the aesthetics (美感). DanPeterson is founding director of Project Backboard, an organization that changes old basketball courts into eye-catching murals (壁画) that double as durable public recreation spaces.
Since its founding in 2014, Project Backboard has made more than 20 courts active, using work by 17 artists, in locations around the US including Memphis, St. Louis, Los Angeles, and Baltimore. Repairs are done with the same material used to repair public tennis courts, ensuring they will hold up for years to come.
“The thing about the sport and the court itself is that it is indifferent to class or race or background of people it’s surrounded by,” says Vannatter. “These are meaningful contributions of public art in places that maybe would never have access to art.”
1. What inspired Solomon’s filling in the cracks of a basketball court?A.The return of the NBA season. | B.An ancient method of repairing gold. |
C.The Japanese craft of kintsugi. | D.The way to hide weak points. |
A.Repair them to be the same as before. |
B.Transform them into art works to appreciate. |
C.Pull them down to make room for museums. |
D.Rebuild them for basketball fans to play there. |
A.Because basketball was a universally accessible platform. |
B.Because basketball was more important than other sports. |
C.Because too many abandoned basketball courts need repairing. |
D.Because they liked to play basketball when they were young. |
A.Abandoned basketball courts are used to store goods. |
B.Old basketball courts are painted into murals for profits. |
C.Old basketball courts are served as public recreation spaces. |
D.More and more artists tend to get inspiration from old objects. |