组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:99 题号:8095559

People asked to imagine how flooding or droughts would affect particular people or places were more likely to engage in environmentally friendly actions.

Many people view climate change as a distant threat. But having them imagine the tangible (有形的) consequences of resulting droughts or floods may help change this idea and encourage proenvironmental behavior, a new study suggests.

Researchers asked 93 college students to read a report on temperature anomalies (异常),floods and other climate change-related events that have affected the island. The scientists then asked 62 of the participants to write down three ways in which such phenomena might impact their future lives. Half the people in that group were instructed to imagine such situations in detail. The remaining 31 students did not complete either the writing or imagining steps, acting as a control group.

All the participants then rated their ideas of climate change risks by responding to questions such as "How likely do you think it is that climate change is having serious impacts on the world?" They used a scale from 1 ("very unlikely") to 7 ("very likely"). The average score was higher among subjects who had been asked to envision detailed situations than among those who had not. The results were later confirmed in a second experiment involving 102 participants.

Participants in the first experiment who had imagined the effects of climate change were more likely to say they would use air conditioning in an energy-saving manner. In the second experiment, nearly two thirds of people in the visualizing (想象) group signed up to help clean a beach, compared with 43 percent in the nonvisualizing one. And when offered a choice of a vegetarian (素食主义的)or nonvegetarian lunch box, nearly half the visualizers selected the environmentally friendlier meatless choice-compared with about 28 percent of the nonvisualizers.

The researchers did not track people to see if they behaved differently in their day-to-day lives-something further studies should examine, says study co-author Wen-Bin Chiou. Moreover, the research ''should be done again in other places with other populations," says Robert Gifford, a professor of psychology at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, who was not involved in the work.

The findings could be applied to raise public concern about climate change, Chiou says. For example, he suggests that news reports about the phenomenon could include vivid descriptions of its effects on people,s lives and ask readers to imagine experiencing such impacts. Having virtual-reality demonstrations (展示)in local science museums of the consequences of climate change would be another way of putting the research into practice, Chiou adds.

1. Which of the following statements about the study is true? ______
A.Only one experiment was carried out for the study.
B.Professor Robert Gifford played a key role in the study.
C.The control group only completed the writing step in the experiment.
D.Participants asked to imagine detailed effects scored higher than those who weren't.
2. Future studies will probably be about whether ______ .
A.it is true of other populations in other places
B.more money will be donated to the people affected by climate change-related events
C.people choose vegetarian lunch boxes in their daily lives
D.climate change will cause people to think about joining in a control group
3. To put the research into practice, Wen-Bin Chiou suggests that ______ .
A.the government call on people to live a low-carbon life
B.people use air conditioning in an energy-saving manner
C.people experience possible effects of climate change through virtual reality facilities
D.news reports provide vivid descriptions of the effects of climate change on peoples5lives
4. The passage mainly tells us that ______ .
A.different people may have different reactions to climate change
B.different forms of climate change may affect people's ideas in different ways
C.people may change their behavior after thinking about the vivid impacts of climate change
D.college students show great concern for the people affected by climate change
【知识点】 环境保护

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约330词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。主要介绍了珊瑚礁的重要性,以及目前面临气温上升的危险处境,强调了减少温室气体的排放的必要性。

【推荐1】Coral reefs(珊瑚礁) are a unique ocean ecosystem consisting of rocky structures mainly formed by coral animals and some other ocean life. Despite only covering 0.2 percent of the ocean floor, coral reefs support at least 25 percent of marine species, as well as providing food and economic security for hundreds of millions of people.

However, coral reefs across the world are under threat. Warmer oceans can cause the coral bleaching(漂白). It happens when the corals lose colored algae(海藻) living in their bodies and turn completely white. Without the algae, the corals lose their main food source and can die. In addition, as oceans become more acidic(酸性的) from absorbing CO2, corals in acidic conditions become weak in forming reefs.

In 2021, the United Nations reported a 14 percent loss of corals across the world largely from rising sea temperatures in the previous 13 years. Australia declared mass bleaching events in 2022 across large parts of the Great Barrier Reef, four times since 2016. Data from the Philippines showed higher than usual ocean temperatures between 2015 and 2017 had caused a serious three-year bleaching events in reefs across the planet.

Scientists have been cooperating to see how coral reefs can be protected. Thankfully, they find those coral reefs in the hot parts of the globe are the worst affected. They contain corals with better heat resistance. So their research focus on finding genes(基因) for heat tolerance so that they can be passed on to future generations. Biologists also mix corals that are more resilient to higher temperatures with those that are not and the resulting generation has a better chance of survival.

Ultimately, scientists add that without a serious reduction in greenhouse gas, 99 percent of the world’s coral reefs will be gone by the end of the century. There is a limit to how quickly corals can adapt warm climate, but if temperatures rise rapidly, then extinction is certain.

1. Which is the main threat to coral reefs?
A.Declining ocean acidification.B.Loss of colored algae.
C.Increasing sea temperatures.D.Lack of food source.
2. What do we know from paragraph 3?
A.No actions are taken to protect coral reefs.B.Coral bleaching is the worst in Australia.
C.Coral reefs have grown rapidly for years.D.Coral reefs receive impacts globally.
3. What can be the basic way to protect coral reefs?
A.Lowering emission.B.Transplanting them to the hot parts.
C.Relying on genes science.D.Limiting their spread.
4. Which can be the best title for the text?
A.Where Are Coral Reefs Spread?B.How Can Coral Reefs Survive?
C.Coral Reefs, A New Threat To Ocean LifeD.Coral Reefs, A Busy Underwater Community
2023-12-11更新 | 48次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)

【推荐2】A new coffee culture is forming in and around San Francisco, California. A growing number of coffeehouses there are barring paper cups. Instead, they are using glass containers or creating “bring your own cup” policies. The movement started among neighborhood cafes in an effort to reduce waste. Now it is gaining support from large businesses in the city—and around the country.

Famous cook Dominique Crenn is opening a cafe in San Francisco next year that will not use to-gabags, throw-away coffee cups or any plastic. Diners who plan to buy a to-go drink from boutique Crenn will be asked to bring their own coffee cups, a spokeswoman said.

The Blue Bottle coffeehouse company uses about 15,000 to-go cups each month at its 70 shops across the U.S. The company recently said it wants to “show our guests and the world that we can get rid of disposable (一次性的) cups”.

Blue Bottle plans to stop using paper cups at two of its stores next year. The move is part of a promise to produce “zero waste” by the end of next year.

Larger coffee and fast-food businesses around the U. S. are feeling a sense of urgency (紧急) to be more environmentally friendly, said Bridget Croke. She is with the New York-based investment company Closed Loop Partners. It is working with Starbucks and McDonald’s to develop a substitute (替代品) for the disposable coffee cup.

Today’s to-go cups for hot drinks are not only made from paper, they also have plastic to prevent leaking. This makes them hard to recycle, Croke said. She admitted that it is not likely that large national food and drink companies will stop using disposable cups totally or ask all customers to bring their own.

So, her company is looking for other solutions. In partnership with Closed Loop, Starbucks and McDonald’s paid $10 million to develop the “single-use cup of the future”. The result is expected to be recyclable and to break down naturally.

1. What does the underlined word“barring”in the first paragraph mean?
A.Using.B.Inventing.C.Improving.D.Banning.
2. What do boutique Crenn and Blue Bottle have in common?
A.They will desert throw-away cups.
B.They’ve decided to improve service.
C.They want to attract more customers.
D.They will open some new coffee shops.
3. Why are traditional to-go cups bad for the environment?
A.They are made from wood.
B.They are needed in great quantity.
C.The hard to recycle.
D.They encourage people to drink more coffee.
4. What do Starbucks and McDonald’s aim to do in the future?
A.Refuse to offer cups to consumers.
B.Invent environmentally friendly cups.
C.Run together with another company.
D.Spend a lot on the development of new coffee.
2020-07-25更新 | 33次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约380词) | 适中 (0.65)
文章大意:本文是一篇议论文,美国国会通过一项议案,敦促各州削减温室气体的排放。

【推荐3】A measure in the House’s $ 2 trillion economic bill would require states to cut greenhouse gas emissions (排放) promising rewards for transportation departments that post reductions and “consequences” for those that don’t.

Peter A. DeFazio, chairman of the Transportation Committee, said the proposal is designed to push states to act. “We’re going to give them very large motivation to actually make those meaningful targets and deliver on those targets,” he said. According to the proposal, states that cut emissions could get a $ 1 billion pot of money and potentially receive other bonus funding from the federal government. The bill doesn’t spell out potential consequences for not reducing emissions, leaving the decision to national transportation officials. Experts say they could include barriers to accessing highly prized grant funds (拨款).

Much of the attention on cutting emissions from the transport industry-the nation’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases-has focused on the adoption of electric vehicles by putting money in charging factories and supporting battery-powered cars. The new measure sides with environmental advocates who argue the nation can’t battle a changing climate without changing how Americans move around. Environmentalists say the nation’s changing to electric vehicles probably won’t happen quickly enough to limit temperature rises unless Americans can be convinced to drive less, and that would mean building new networks focused on walking, cycling and transit (运输).

Opposition to the emission measure is deep-seated. The heads of five western state transportation departments wrote a letter to Capitol’s committee last month saying the proposal would harm rural areas because options such as heavy-traffic pricing are not well-suited to places which are populated in few people, and it doesn’t make sense to target those state agencies when there are multiple reasons that influence emissions, including fuel economy standards for cars and local decisions about where to build stores and homes.

Kevin DeGood, a transportation researcher, said basic construction shape how people can get around. “It is funny that the state transportation departments suggest in the letter that they do not deeply influence greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation industry,” he said.

1. How does the government provide motivation?
A.By praising.B.By punishing.
C.By financing.D.By restricting.
2. What is an intended result of the bill?
A.Greatly changed climate.B.More convenient stores.
C.Stable fuel economy standards.D.Eco-friendly transport system.
3. Why did some states mention heavy-traffic pricing?
A.To oppose the emission measure.B.To introduce solutions to emission.
C.To call for attention to rural areas.D.To list several reasons for emission.
4. What’s Kevin’s attitude towards the letter in paragraph 4?
A.Supportive.B.Disapproving.
C.Shocked.D.Confident.
2023-05-28更新 | 55次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般