组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.65 引用次数:170 题号:8471442

Why do we like drinking water form plastic bottles? Some people think it is healthy and clean. Others drink bottled water because it’s easy — you can carry it around with you. In hot countries, like Greece, they often buy bottles of cold water in summer.

However, making lots of plastic is not a good idea for many reasons. First of all, we need a lot of oil for plastic products. We usually use oil as a source (资源) of energy. If we reduced the number of bottles we made, we wouldn’t need so much oil. Plastic bottles also pollute the environment. If we recycled all our plastic bottles, we wouldn’t need so much space for rubbish dumps. But in Greece, they don't recycle much of the plastic they use. In 2006, Greeks recycled only about 10% of plastic waste. The rest became rubbish on land and in rivers and seas.

So next time you want to throw away a plastic bottle in the litter bin, stop and think. If you recycled it, you would help the environment. But what can you do when there isn’t a recycling bin near you? Well, there are lots of useful ways that you can use your bottles again. For example, an empty bottle makes a great piggy bank for your pocket money, and if you cut a bottle in halves, you will have a plant pot. Go green! You can make a difference.

1. What is not mentioned about bottled water in this passage? It’s ______.
A.expensiveB.healthyC.cleanD.easy
2. Plastic products are made from ______.
A.energyB.oilC.soilD.plants
3. ________ of plastic waste became rubbish in Greece in 2006.
A.10%B.50%C.80%D.90%
4. Which is the best way to deal with used plastic bottles?
A.To drop them into the river.B.To make a plant pot.
C.To make a piggy bank.D.To recycle them.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约340词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校

【推荐1】How much do consumers care about the carbon footprint of the products they buy? Would they care more if the goods were labeled with emissions(排放物) data? Does it matter at which stage in the lifecycle of a product the carbon is emitted? Research published in the International Journal of Environmental Policy and Decision Making offers a way to find out.

Study participants view a carbon footprint label as similar to labels that have appeared on some existing products.The label shows the carbon dioxide emissions connected with their production, transportation, usage and disposal(清理), thus showing the buyer the likely effect on climate change of buying a particular product.

In the first group of studies, the research team proved that carbon emissions and a carbon emissions label would indeed play a role in consumer product decisions, although not as great a role as price.In a second set of studies, the team found that emissions connected with usage were most important to consumers followed by the transportation and disposal stages.The carbon footprint of the producing process was considered less important to consumers than the other stages in the product's lifecycle because it is outside the consumer's control.That is, the participants felt they were less responsible for carbon emitted during producing process.Consumers value recycling a product, but the researchers found that, overall, the consumers would prefer producers to offset(补偿) carbon emissions rather than having to address the problem directly themselves.

Consumers are increasingly concerned with climate change problems, and already carbon labeling is appearing on some products."We find that participants not only take the carbon label into account when making product decisions, but they want detailed information on the label," the researchers explain.They suggest that companies should prepare for how carbon emissions labels might affect future consumer choice.

1. Which of the following most affects consumer's choice?
A.Labels.B.Price.
C.Packaging.D.Carbon footprint.
2. About the carbon dioxide emissions in the product's lifecycle, which stage do consumers care most?
A.Usage stage.B.Transportation stage.
C.Disposal stage.D.Producing stage.
3. Which of the following can best replace the underlined word "address"?
A.Look into.B.Point out.
C.Deal with.D.Run into.
4. What can be inferred from the last paragraph?
A.Companies should take carbon emissions more seriously.
B.All products have been labeled with carbon emissions data.
C.Producers will attach less importance to carbon emissions labels.
D.Products labeled with carbon emissions data will have poor sales.
2021-01-16更新 | 110次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约320词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇新闻报道。文章主要报道了曼彻斯特城俱乐部提供可食用的咖啡和茶杯以减少土地废弃物,并介绍了这种可食用杯子的制造方法和优缺点。

【推荐2】Manchester City are the current champions of the English Premier League, and now they’re championing the cause of landfill waste by offering edible (可食用的) coffee and tea cups at their 55,000 seater Etihad Stadium. They played their first home match of the season, drumming Norwich City 5-0 while producing 0 pounds of disposable (一次性的) hot drinks cups--a disaster in a coffee loving country where a shocking 2.5 billion disposable cups are used every year.

“It is the first time that an ‘edible coffee cup’ has been introduced. This fantastic and innovative solution provides an amazing solution to waste, just eat your cup,“ reads a statement from the Etihad Stadium.

The cup is made by a Scottish startup called BioBite, and is essentially a 100-calorie biscuit in the shape of a cup.Made with wafer (薄脆饼) in much the same way as an ice cream cone,the cup will stay leak-proof for 12 hours, and even more amazingly, crunchy for one-half the duration of a “football” match. According to the company’s website, the cup is fully recyclable, but the taste of coffee-soaked cup is actually delicious.

There are several problems with making an edible coffee cup, however; and it’s why there still isn’t one today in the largest drinking chains.

Edible cups truly might be the best solution, provided firms like BioBite can bring the cost-per-unit down. 240 of their biscuit cups cost $111, about 14 cents more than what Starbucks pays for the cup, the plastic lid, and the wood stirrer.

Another limiting factor is that a wafer is not exactly the fuel of a healthy society. If there were a company that could make the wafers out of some kind of vegetable fiber, something many western diets are nutritionally short of, then you’re talking about a real revolution.

1. What is the purpose of writing the first paragraph?
A.To introduce the Manchester City.
B.To arouse the awareness of preserving the environment.
C.To put forward the subject of using edible cups.
D.To cover a football match of Manchester City.
2. Which is true about the third paragraph?
A.The popularity of the cup.B.The advantages of the cup.
C.The ways of using the cup.D.The process of making the cup.
3. What can be inferred from the last paragraph?
A.Western diets are short of nutrition.
B.Wafers are made from vegetable fibers.
C.The revolution for making cups is carried on.
D.Western eating habits need improving.
4. What is the author’s attitude to the edible coffee cup?
A.Stubborn.B.Carefree.C.Supportive.D.Objective.
2023-11-11更新 | 76次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约360词) | 适中 (0.65)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了一项研究指出,美国伊利诺伊州的漂浮花园不但起到了美观的作用,而且能够有效改善水质。

【推荐3】Now, a study proves that gardens are more than just a pretty place. The study, by researchers at Illinois State University, demonstrates that such constructed gardens can have a measurable and positive impact on water quality.

Floating gardens are essentially platforms built and wrapped in coconut husks (椰子壳), and filled in with native plantings. As plants grow, they extend their roots into the water. On the North Branch of the Chicago River, non-profit Urban Rivers and its partners are developing a mile-long floating eco-park called the Wild Mile. The re-development of this former industrial canal is Urban Rivers’ important project. As part of the park, floating gardens, attached to shore, are being fixed.

The primary aim of the floating gardens is beautification. But the Illinois State team, from the University’s Department of Geology, Geography, and the Environment, saw an ideal setup for a controlled experiment. “We joined it because it’s the perfect opportunity to see if there’s an influence on water quality,” explains lead author Abigail Heath.

The study is novel: previous studies have explored floating gardens’ influence on water quality over time, primarily in wastewater treatment ponds, but not over space, in moving water. The project also matches well with Urban Rivers’ broader goals. “The city is interested in bettering water quality,” says Phil Nicodemus, Urban Rivers’ Director of Research. “Happily, Illinois State took part in it later.”

Could this small human-made park improve water quality? An average of data collected over the course of the study shows middle but definitive improvement. For example, nitrogen (氮) dropped from 4.69 milligrams per liter in surface water to 4.43 milligrams per liter, a drop of about 1 percent.

“Despite how small this garden was, there was measurable improvement in water quality from upstream to downstream,” notes Heath. She and her colleagues see this as a model for how large floating gardens should be to help improve water in similar settings. “Even this tiny garden makes a difference,” she says.

1. What can be inferred from the second paragraph?
A.The floating gardens are environmentally friendly.
B.The floating gardens are fixed everywhere in the eco-park.
C.The floating gardens can help fix the former parks.
D.The Urban Rivers were once industrial canals.
2. What is the main reason to build the floating gardens?
A.To reduce waste water.B.To attract more visitors to the park.
C.To make the surroundings brilliant.D.To help researchers do the experiment.
3. What does the underlined word “it” refer to in Paragraph 4?
A.The floating garden.B.The project.
C.The treatment of ponds.D.The quality of water.
4. Which of the following could be the best title for the text?
A.Floating Gardens: More than Pretty
B.The Best Way to Better Water Quality
C.A Practical Method of Improving Parks
D.Floating Gardens Beautify the City
2023-04-29更新 | 109次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般