组卷网 > 高中英语综合库 > 主题 > 人与自然 > 环境 > 环境保护
题型:阅读理解-阅读单选 难度:0.4 引用次数:155 题号:8869171

For some people, running outdoors is a great way to exercise. What may not be so great is seeing trash all over the ground. Well, some people are doing something about it. They are plogging! Plogging began in Sweden in 2016. A Swedish man named Erik Ahlstrom became concerned about the amount of trash and litter he saw each day on his way to work and he began picking up the trash. That is how plogging was born!

Plogging, by that term,may have officially begun in Sweden. But many people who exercise outdoors have been doing this for years. Take Jeff Horowitz for example. He is a personal trainer in Washington,D. C. He would often pick up trash while running outside. He even turned it into a game; he would try to pick up the trash without stopping.

Today, plogging is an official activity, one that is becoming increasingly popular. Plogging can build closer social connections in a community, and it can also be fun. When Dana Allen goes plogging around D. C., she invites her friends, and they make a day of it. Although Allen enjoys plogging,she doesn’t do it all the time. When she is training for a serious marathon race,the trash has to wait.

Cities around the world now hold plogging events. The goal is to spread the idea that littering is not acceptable. Along with cleaning up the environment, there may be another reason to choose plogging. One fitness app,Lifesum,records one hour of plogging as burning 288 calories. Usual jogging burns about 235 calories.

Getting ready to plog is similar to getting ready to jog. Ploggers do some deep knee bends as well as some balancing exercises and then they put on protective gloves. There are other safety rules for plogging. The main one is to plog in areas where there are not too many people. Stopping quickly in front of someone. to pick up an empty bag of potato chips, for example, could cause a crash.

1. What do we know about Jeff Horowitz from the text?
A.He was the first person to plog.B.He has been actually plogging.
C.He is in support of eco-travelling.D.He is an expert in picking up trash.
2. What is so special about Dana Allen’s plogging?
A.She doesn’t always do it with her friends.
B.She always finds it interesting to do it.
C.She nearly does it in a park every day.
D.She doesn’t insist doing it every day.
3. What do the numbers in Paragraph 4 mainly tell us?
A.Picking up trash is important.B.Plogging events are of little use.
C.Plogging is a better workout.D.The idea of plogging is strange.
4. Why should ploggers choose to plog in less crowded areas?
A.To avoid a crash.B.To save energy.
C.To pick up more trash.D.To make it unknown.

相似题推荐

阅读理解-阅读单选(约370词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校
文章大意:本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍的是汽车制造商福特,利用咖啡残渣制作车灯及其他零部件,与麦当劳餐厅进行合作,共同追寻可持续发展目标。

【推荐1】Ford is turning McDonald’s coffee waste into headlights

Ford is recently including coffee chaff (谷壳) that comes off during the roasting process—into the plastic headlights housing (大灯外壳) used in some cars. It has asked McDonald’s, which doesn’t roast its own coffee, to connect it with suppliers.

In recent years, as consumers feel more concern for plastic pollution and carbon emissions, companies have made full commitments to reduce their influences on the environment. They’ve also been developing new, sustainable materials to build consumer products.

Traditionally, Ford uses plastic and talc(滑石粉) to make its headlights housing. The coffee version is more sustainable because it’s lighter and doesn’t use the talc which, as a mineral, isn’t renewable. Coffee chaff, on the other hand, is widely available, and much of it goes to waste. Eventually, Ford hopes to use the material for more parts.

Ford decided to work with coffee chaff a few years ago. But it’s been experimenting with organic materials for over a decade. The auto company has been using soy-based foam(泡沫) in its cushions since 2011. It also uses waste from wheat, coconut, tomato and other plants in its cars in order to help meet some of its sustainability goals, which include using more renewable materials. Once the Ford team figured out how coffee chaff could be used to build car parts, it reached out to McDonald’s because of the restaurant chain ‘s scale and its sustainability goals. Like Ford, McDonald’s also wants to bring renewable and recycled materials into its products. The partnership between Ford and McDonald’s is an example of how brands with different projects can work together.

“We’ve conventionally thought of cooperation as within the food industry,” said Lan Olson, senior director of Global Sustainability at McDonald’s. “The Ford partnership can help McDonald’s see what kind of larger impacts are possible when it works with a company in another field. This is just scratching(划开) the surface of trying to understand what’s possible,” Olson said.

1. Why is Ford applying coffee chaff to headlights housing?
A.To work with McDonald’s.B.To do experiments in the lab.
C.To save resources and money.D.To reduce environmental pollution.
2. What makes Ford choose McDonald’s as its partner?
A.Coffee of McDonald’s is so popular and has great potential.
B.Ford wants to cooperate with one in the food industry.
C.They have the same sustainability goals.
D.Different brands with different projects can work together.
3. What can we learn from Olson’s words?
A.Cooperation between the two brands just begins.
B.The cooperation is only on the surface.
C.Ford has a large influence on McDonald’s.
D.Only cooperation within the food industry is welcomed.
4. In which section of a newspaper may this text appear?
A.News.B.Business.C.Science.D.Entertainment.
2022-07-16更新 | 146次组卷
阅读理解-六选四(约200词) | 较难 (0.4)
文章大意:这是一篇说明文。介绍了一些自然的锁住二氧化碳的方法。

【推荐2】Greening the blue

Is there a “natural” way to enhance the potential of the oceans to lock away climate-warming CO2? Planting more trees on land can help draw down more CO2 from the atmosphere—the basis of many plans for carbon credits that companies buy to offset their emissions (抵消其排放).     1     Seaweed forests and saltmarshes (盐碱滩) are common examples.

Some regard the potential for this “blue carbon” as huge, although as yet there is no mechanism for integrating it into carbon offsetting plans. John Virdin of Duke University in North Carolina says, “    2    ” He adds, “You have to go out and measure all the carbon that’s there, you have to show that it’s not going to be lost, you have to keep monitoring it.” Virdin and others have proposed extending an existing land-based plan called REDD + (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) to the ocean, but that is an idea whose ship has yet to sail.

    3     In March, the UK government’s climate adviser, the Climate Change Committee, found that restoring and creating seagrass and saltmarsh ecosystems in the country would only lock away a small amount of CO2, removing “well below” 1 million tonnes a year. Nonetheless, these are efficient carbon stores according to the committee.     4    

A.Using the oceans as a solution to climate change is hardly a new idea.
B.There is still some doubt about how big the marine offsetting effect might be.
C.It’s really hard to turn blue carbon conservation and restoration into carbon credits that you can sell.
D.Something similar might work in the oceans, by stimulating the growth of marine and coastal ecosystems.
E.And conserving them is important given how much fishing and other activities have degraded them.
F.The big objection to all these plans is the possibility of negative environmental side effects.
2023-04-17更新 | 163次组卷
阅读理解-阅读单选(约400词) | 较难 (0.4)
名校

【推荐3】If two scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory are correct, people will still be driving gasoline powered cars 50 years from now, giving out heat-trapping carbon dioxide(二氧化碳) into the atmosphere—and yet that carbon dioxide will not contribute to global warming.

In a proposal by two scientists, vehicle emissions(排放) would no longer contribute to global warming. The scientists, F. Jeffrey Martin and William L. Kubic Jr., are proposing a concept, which they have named Green Freedom, for removing carbon dioxide from the air and turning it back into gasoline.

The idea is simple. Air would be blown over a liquid solution of potassium carbonate, which would absorb the carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide would then be put to chemical reactions that would turn it into fuel(燃料): gasoline or jet fuel.

This process could change carbon dioxide from an unwanted, climate-changing pollutant into a vast resource for renewable fuels. The cycle—equal amounts of carbon dioxide produced and removed—would mean that cars, trucks and airplanes using the synthetic(合成的) fuels would no longer be contributing to global warming.

Although they have not yet built a synthetic fuel factory, or even a small model, the scientists say it is all based on existing technology. “Everything in the concept has been built, is operating or has a close cousin that is operating.” Dr. Martin said.

The Los Alamos proposal does not go against any laws of physics, and other scientists who have independently suggested similar ideas. Dr. Martin said he and Dr. Kubic had worked out their concept in more detail than former proposals.

There is, however, a major fact that explains why no one has built a carbon-dioxide-to-gasoline factory: it requires a great deal of energy.

According to their analysis, their concept, which would cost about $5 billion to build, could produce gasoline at an operating cost of $1.40 a gallon and would turn economically practical when the price at the pump hits $4.60 a gallon.

Other scientists said the Los Alamos proposal perhaps looked promising but could not evaluate it fully because the details had not been published. “It’s definitely worth pursuing,” said Martin I. Hoffert, a professor of physics at New York University. “It’s not that new an idea. It has a couple of pieces to it that are interesting.”

1. What is the value of the scientists’ proposal?
A.It increases the productivity of a fuel factory
B.It decreases the cost of producing gasoline
C.It reduces the pollution caused by car driving
D.It promotes a new idea of environmental protection
2. The underlined part “has a close cousin that is operating” probably means the technology in the concept ________.
A.has been popular for so long
B.has been ignored by many people
C.is not appropriate for practice
D.will be put into practice in the near future
3. What is the biggest challenge in realizing the concept Green Freedom?
A.There is no theoretical basis.
B.It is not economically practical.
C.There is no solution to some technical problems.
D.Only a few scientists support the idea.
2017-10-08更新 | 231次组卷
共计 平均难度:一般